An integrated phylogenomic approach toward pinpointing the origin of mitochondria

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Wang, Zhang ^a   Wu, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHAPROTEOBACTERIA; GENETICS; GENOMICS; MITOCHONDRION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; RICKETTSIACEAE; SYMBIOSIS;

ALPHAPROTEOBACTERIA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOMICS; MITOCHONDRIA; PHYLOGENY; RICKETTSIACEAE; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 84939803790     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep07949     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Lang, B. F., Seif, E., Gray, M. W., O'Kelly, C. J., Burger, G. A comparative genomics approach to the evolution of eukaryotes and their mitochondria. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 46, 320-326 (1999).
2. Kurland, C. G., Andersson, S. G. Origin and evolution of the mitochondrial proteome. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64, 786-820 (2000).
3. Gabaldon, T., Huynen, M. A. Reconstruction of the proto-mitochondrial metabolism. Science 301, 609 (2003).
4. Gray, M. W., Burger, G., Lang, B. F. Mitochondrial evolution. Science 283, 1476-1481 (1999).
5. Gray, M. W., Burger, G., Lang, B. F. The origin and early evolution of mitochondria. Genome Biol. 2, REVIEWS1018 (2001).
6. Martin, W.,Muller, M. The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote. Nature 392, 37-41 (1998).
7. Felsenstein, J. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27, 401-410 (1978).
8. Hillis, D. M., Huelsenbeck, J. P., Swofford, D. L. Hobgoblin of phylogenetics Nature 369, 363-364 (1994).
9. Foster, P. G., Hickey, D. A. Compositional bias may affect both DNA-based and protein-based phylogenetic reconstructions. J. Mol. Evol. 48, 284-290 (1999).
10. Woese, C. R., Achenbach, L., Rouviere, P., Mandelco, L. Archaeal phylogeny: reexamination of the phylogenetic position of Archaeoglobus fulgidus in light of certain composition-induced artifacts. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 14, 364-371 (1991).
11. Hasegawa, M.,Hashimoto, T. Ribosomal RNA trees misleading Nature 361, 23 (1993).
12. Viale, A. M., Arakaki, A. K. The chaperone connection to the origins of the eukaryotic organelles. FEBS Lett. 341, 146-151 (1994).
13. Gupta, R. S. Evolution of the chaperonin families (Hsp60, Hsp10 and Tcp-1) of proteins and the origin of eukaryotic cells. Mol. Microbiol. 15, 1-11 (1995).
14. Karlin, S., Brocchieri, L. Heat shock protein 60 sequence comparisons: duplications, lateral transfer, and mitochondrial evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 11348-11353 (2000).
15. Emelyanov, V. V. Mitochondrial connection to the origin of the eukaryotic cell. Eur. J. Biochem. 270, 1599-1618 (2003).
16. Wu, M. et al. Phylogenomics of the Reproductive Parasite Wolbachia pipientis wMel: AStreamlined GenomeOverrun by Mobile Genetic Elements. PLoS Biol. 2, E69 (2004).
17. Esser, C. et al. A genome phylogeny for mitochondria among alphaproteobacteria and a predominantly eubacterial ancestry of yeast nuclear genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1643-1660 (2004).
18. Fitzpatrick, D. A., Creevey, C. J.,McInerney, J. O. Genome Phylogenies Indicate a Meaningful Alphaproteobacterial Phylogeny and Support a Grouping of the Mitochondria with the Rickettsiales. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 74-85 (2006).
19. Williams, K. P., Sobral, B. W., Dickerman, A. W. A robust species tree for the alphaproteobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 189, 4578-4586, doi:10.1128/JB.00269-07 (2007).
20. Georgiades, K., Madoui, M. A., Le, P., Robert, C., Raoult, D. Phylogenomic analysis of Odyssella thessalonicensis fortifies the common origin of Rickettsiales, Pelagibacter ubique and Reclimonas americana mitochondrion. PLoS ONE 6, e24857, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024857 (2011).
21. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, N., Embley, T. M. The SAR11 group of alphaproteobacteria is not related to the origin of mitochondria. PLoS ONE 7, e30520, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030520 (2012).
22. Thrash, J. C. et al. Phylogenomic evidence for a common ancestor of mitochondria and the SAR11 clade. Sci Rep 1, 13, doi:10.1038/srep00013 (2011).
23. Brindefalk, B., Ettema, T. J., Viklund, J., Thollesson, M., Andersson, S. G. A phylometagenomic exploration of oceanic alphaproteobacteria reveals mitochondrial relatives unrelated to the SAR11 clade. PLoS ONE 6, e24457, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024457 (2011).
24. Viklund, J., Ettema, T. J., Andersson, S. G. Independent genome reduction and phylogenetic reclassification of the oceanic SAR11 clade. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 599-615, doi:10.1093/molbev/msr203 (2012).
25. Jeffroy, O., Brinkmann, H., Delsuc, F., Philippe, H. Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence Trends Genet. 22, 225-231 (2006).
26. Stefanovic, S., Rice, D. W., Palmer, J. D. Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots BMC Evol. Biol. 4, 35 (2004).
27. Phillips, M. J., Delsuc, F., Penny, D. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1455-1458 (2004).
28. Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., Philippe, H. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 361-375 (2005).
29. Soltis, D. E. et al. Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and "ending incongruence": a cautionary tale in phylogenetics. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 477-483 (2004).
30. Lockhart, P. J., Penny, D. The place of Amborella within the radiation of angiosperms. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 201-202 (2005).
31. Bandelt, H. J., Dress, A. W. M. A canonical decomposition theory formetrics on a finite set. Adv. Math. 92, 47-105 (1992).
32. Lockhart, P. J., Cameron, S. A. Trees for bees. Trends Ecol Evol 16, 84-88 (2001).
33. Waddell, P. J., Cao, Y.,Hauf, J. Hasegawa, M. Using novel phylogenetic methods to evaluate mammalian mtDNA, including amino acid-invariant sites-LogDet plus site stripping, to detect internal conflicts in the data, with special reference to the positions of hedgehog, armadillo, and elephant. Syst. Biol. 48, 31-53 (1999).
34. Clements, K. D., Gray, R. D., Howard Choat, J. Rapid evolutionary divergences in reef fishes of the family Acanthuridae (Perciformes: Teleostei). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26, 190-201 (2003).
35. Hendy, M. D.,Penny, D. Spectral analysis of phylogenetic data. J Classif 10, 5-24 (1993).
36. Lento, G. M.,Hickson, R. E., Chambers, G. K., Penny, D. Use of spectral analysis to test hypotheses on the origin of pinnipeds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 28-52 (1995).
37. Kennedy, M., Holland, B. R., Gray, R. D., Spencer, H. G. Untangling long branches: identifying conflicting phylogenetic signals using spectral analysis, neighbor-net, and consensus networks. Syst. Biol. 54, 620-633 (2005).
38. Wagele, J. W., Mayer, C. Visualizing differences in phylogenetic information content of alignments and distinction of three classes of long-branch effects. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 147 (2007).
39. Kennedy, M. et al. The long and short of it: branch lengths and the problem of placing the New Zealand short-tailed bat, Mystacina. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13, 405-416 (1999).
40. Mallatt, J., Winchell, C. J. Testing the new animal phylogeny: first use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 289-301 (2002).
41. Brinkmann, H., van der Giezen, M., Zhou, Y., Poncelin de Raucourt, G., Philippe, H. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 54, 743-757 (2005).
42. Philippe,H. Rodentmonophyly: pitfalls of molecular phylogenies. J. Mol. Evol. 45, 712-715 (1997).
43. Philippe, H., Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1246-1253 (2005).
44. Leebens-Mack, J. et al. Identifying the basal angiosperm node in chloroplast genome phylogenies: sampling one's way out of the Felsenstein zone. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1948-1963 (2005).
45. Yoon, H. S. et al. Broadly sampled multigene trees of eukaryotes. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 14 (2008).
46. Pagani, I. et al. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.4: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D571-579, doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1100 (2012).
47. Wu, D. et al. Aphylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 462, 1056-1060, doi:10.1038/nature08656 (2009).
48. Cole, J. R. et al. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D141-145, doi:10.1093/nar/gkn879 (2009).
49. Steel, M. Phylogenetic diversity and the greedy algorithm. Syst. Biol. 54, 527-529 (2005).
50. Burger, G., Gray, M. W., Lang, B. F. Mitochondrial genomes: anything goes. Trends Genet 19, 709-716 (2003).
51. Anderson, S. et al. Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature 290, 457-465 (1981).
52. Karlberg, O., Canback, B., Kurland, C. G. Andersson, S.G. The dual origin of the yeast mitochondrial proteome. Yeast 17, 170-187 (2000).
53. Gabaldon, T., Huynen, M. A. From Endosymbiont to Host-Controlled Organelle: The Hijacking of Mitochondrial Protein Synthesis and Metabolism. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, e219 (2007).
54. Nugent, J. M., Palmer, J. D. RNA-mediated transfer of the gene coxII from the mitochondrion to the nucleus during flowering plant evolution. Cell 66, 473-481 (1991).
55. Adams, K. L. et al. Intracellular gene transfer in action: dual transcription and multiple silencings of nuclear and mitochondrial cox2 genes in legumes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 13863-13868 (1999).
56. Covello, P. S., Gray, M. W. Silent mitochondrial and active nuclear genes for subunit 2 of cytochrome c oxidase (cox2) in soybean: evidence for RNA-mediated gene transfer. EMBO J. 11, 3815-3820 (1992).
57. Dunning Hotopp, J. C. et al. Widespread lateral gene transfer from intracellular bacteria to multicellular eukaryotes. Science 317, 1753-1756 (2007).
58. Wang, Z.,Wu, M. A phylum-level bacterial phylogenetic marker database. Mol Biol Evol 30, 1258-1262, doi:10.1093/molbev/mst059 (2013).
59. Viklund, J., Martijn, J., Ettema, T. J., Andersson, S. G. Comparative and Phylogenomic Evidence That the Alphaproteobacterium HIMB59 Is Not a Member of the Oceanic SAR11 Clade. PLoS ONE 8, e78858, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078858 (2013).
60. Wu, M., Chatterji, S., Eisen, J. A. Accounting for alignment uncertainty in phylogenomics. PLoS One 7, e30288, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030288 (2012).
61. Nesnidal, M. P., Helmkampf, M., Bruchhaus, I., Hausdorf, B. Compositional heterogeneity and phylogenomic inference of metazoan relationships. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 2095-2104, doi:10.1093/molbev/msq097 (2010).
62. Garrity, G. M., Bell, J. A., Lilburn, T. G. Taxonomic outline of the prokaryotes. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, Second Edition., (Springer-Verlag, New York., 2004).
63. Wu, M., Eisen, J. A. A simple, fast, and accurate method of phylogenomic inference. Genome Biol. 9, R151 (2008).
64. Ferla, M. P., Thrash, J. C., Giovannoni, S. J., Patrick, W. M. New rRNA genebased phylogenies of the Alphaproteobacteria provide perspective on major groups, mitochondrial ancestry and phylogenetic instability. PLoS ONE 8, e83383, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083383 (2013).
65. Andersson, S. G., Karlberg, O., Canback, B., Kurland, C. G. On the origin of mitochondria: a genomics perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 358, 165-177; discussion 177-169 doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1193 (2003).
66. Sassera, D. et al. Phylogenomic evidence for the presence of a flagellum and cbb(3) oxidase in the free-living mitochondrial ancestor. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 3285-3296, doi:10.1093/molbev/msr159 (2011).
67. Wu, M., Scott, A. J. Phylogenomic analysis of bacterial and archaeal sequences with AMPHORA2. Bioinformatics 28, 1033-1034, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts079 (2012).
68. Huson, D. H., Bryant, D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 254-267 (2006).
69. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2-approximately maximumlikelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 (2010).
70. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa andmixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688-2690 (2006).
71. Delcher, A. L., Bratke, K. A., Powers, E. C., Salzberg, S. L. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiontDNAwith Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23, 673-679 (2007).
72. Wang, Z., Kadouri, D. E., Wu, M. Genomic Insights into An Obligate Epibiotic Bacterial Predator: Micavibrio aeruginosavorus ARL-13. BMC Genomics 12, 453, doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-453 (2011).
73. Enright, A. J., Van Dongen, S., Ouzounis, C. A. An efficient algorithm for largescale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 1575-1584 (2002).
74. Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K., Miyata, T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059-3066 (2002).
75. Lartillot, N., Philippe, H. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol 21, 1095-1109, doi:10.1093/molbev/msh112 (2004).
76. Blanquart, S., Lartillot, N. A site-and time-heterogeneous model of amino acid replacement. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 842-858 (2008).