Differing notions of responsive teaching across mathematics and science: Does the discipline matter?

Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS

Volumn 3, Issue January, 2014, Pages 1406-1415

  Elby, Andrew ^a   Richards, Jennifer ^a   Walkoe, Janet ^a   Gupta, Ayush ^a   Russ, Rosemary ^b   Luna, Melissa ^c   Robertson, Amy ^d   Coffey, Janet E ^e   Edwards, Ann R ^f   Sherin, Miriam ^g   Van Es, Elizabeth A ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Moore Foundation   (United States)

^f Carnegie Foundation   (United States)

^g NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; STUDENTS;

KNOWLEDGE BASIS; MATHEMATICS EDUCATION; PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICES; POSTER SESSIONS; SCIENCE EDUCATION; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; TEACHER COGNITION; TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT;

TEACHING;

EID: 84937801300     PISSN: 18149316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (68)

1. Ainley, J., &Luntley, M. (2007). The role of attention in expert classroom practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 3-22
2. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373-397
3. Ball, D. L. &Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis and E. Simmt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3-14). Edmonton, AB: CMESG/GDEDM
4. Ball, D., Thames, M.H., Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special?, Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407
5. Brodie, K. (2011). Working with learners mathematical thinking: Towards a language of description for changing pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 174-186
6. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C.-P., &Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of childrens mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 499-531
7. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., &Empson, S. B. (2000). Cognitively Guided Instruction: A research-based teacher professional development program for elementary school mathematics. Madison, WI: NCISLA, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin
8. Chazan, D. (1996). Algebra for all students? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 455-477
9. Chazan, D. (2000). Beyond formulas in mathematics and teaching: Dynamics of the high school Coffey, J.E, &Edwards, A.R. (in revision): Dynamics of disciplinary understandings and practices of attending to student thinking in elementary teacher education
10. Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., &Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109-1136
11. Crespo, S. (2000). Seeing more than right and wrong answers: Prospective teachers interpretations of students mathematical work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 155-181
12. Davis, B. (1997). Listening for differences: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 355-376
13. Empson, S. B., &Jacobs, V. R. (2008). Learning to listen to childrens mathematics. In D. Tirosh &T. Wood (Eds.), Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (pp. 257-281). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers
14. Engle, R. A., &Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483
15. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., &Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use childrens thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403-434
16. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., &Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers selfsustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 67-80
17. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., &Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653-689
18. Franke, M.L. &Chan, A. (2006). High Leverage Practices. Retrieved July 2011 from http://gallery.carnegiefoundation.org/insideteaching/quest/megan-loef-franke-And-Angela-grace-chan-high.html
19. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking Their Way Into Science: Hearing Childrens Questions and Theories, Responding with Curricula. New York, NY: Teachers College Press
20. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945
21. Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or P-Prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 97-127
22. Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery Learning and Discovery Teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 485-529
23. Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., &Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51-72
24. Hamme, D., Scherr, R. E., &Robertson, A. (forthcoming). To-be-titled edited volume on responsive teaching in science
25. Hammer, D., &Schifter, D. (2001). Practices of Inquiry in Teaching and Research. Cognition and Instruction, 19(4), 441-478
26. Hammer, D., &van Zee, E. (2006). Seeing the science in childrens thinking: Case studies of student inquiry in physical science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
27. Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., &Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of childrens mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202
28. Kazemi, E., &Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203-235
29. Kazemi, E., Franke, M., &Lampert, M. (2009). Developing Pedagogies in Teacher Education to Support Novice Teachers' Ability to Enact Ambitious Instruction. In R. Hunter B. Bicknell &T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing Divides, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of The Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Vol 1 (pp. 11-29). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia
30. Kennedy, M.M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher education (Research monograph no. 1). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation
31. Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390-419). New York: Macmillan
32. Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226-243
33. Lau, M. (2010). Understanding the dynamics of teacher attention: Examples of how high school physics and physical science teachers attend to student ideas (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland at College Park
34. Levin, D. M. (2008). What secondary science teachers pay attention to in the classroom: Situating teaching in institutional and social systems (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland at College Park
35. Levin, D., Hammer, D., &Coffey, J. (2009). Novice teachers attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 142-154
36. Levin, D. M., &Richards, J. (2011). Learning to attend to the substance of students thinking in science. Science Educator, 20(2), 1-11
37. Lineback, J. E. (2012). Mrs. Millers evolution in teaching science as inquiry: A case study of a teachers change in responsiveness (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Diego/San Diego State University
38. Luna, M. J. (2013). Investigating elementary teachers thinking about and learning to notice students science ideas (Doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University
39. Maskiewicz, A. C., &Winters, V. A. (2012). Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 429-464
40. National Research Council (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
41. NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA
42. NRC (National Research Council). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press
43. NRC (National Research Council). (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
44. OConnor, M. C., &Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology &Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318-335
45. Pierson, J. L. (2008). The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning (Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin
46. Putnam, R., &Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15
47. Richards, J. (2013). Exploring what stabilizes teachers attention and responsiveness to the substance of students scientific thinking in the classroom (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland at College Park
48. Rosebery, A. S., &Puttick, G. M. (1998). Teacher professional development as situated sense-making: A case study in science education. Science Education, 82, 649-677
49. Rosebery, A. S., &Warren, B. (1998). Boats, Balloons, and Classroom Video. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
50. Russ, R. S., &Luna, M. J. (2013). Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 284-314
51. Schegloff, E. A., &Sacks, H. (1999). Opening up closings. In A. Jaworski &N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 263-274). London, England: Routledge
52. Schifter, D. (2011). Examining the Behavior of Operations: Noticing Early Algebraic Ideas. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, &R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers eyes (pp. 204-220). New York, NY: Routledge
53. Schoenfeld, A. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: Disasters of well taught mathematics classes. In T. P. Carpenter &P. L. Peterson (Eds.), Learning mathematics from instruction (Vol. 23, pp. 145
54. Schoenfeld, A. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1-94
55. Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events. Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics, 75-93
56. Sherin, B., &Star, J. R. (2011). Reflections on the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, &R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers eyes (pp. 66-78). New York, NY: Routledge
57. Sherin, M. G., &Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163-183
58. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., &Philipp, R. A. (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes. Taylor &Francis US
59. Sherin, M. G., &van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37
60. Star, J. R., &Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107-125
61. Stephens, A. (2008). What "counts" as algebra in the eyes of preservice elementary teachers? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27, 33-47
62. van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, &R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers eyes (pp. 134-151). New York, NY: Routledge
63. van Es, E. A., &Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244-276
64. van Es, E. A., &Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 155-176
65. van Zee, E. H., &Minstrell, J. (1997). Reflective discourse: developing shared understandings in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 209-228
66. Walkoe, J. (2010). Seeing algebraic thinking in the classroom: A study of teachers conceptualizations of algebra. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 1, 1055-1062
67. Walkoe, J. D. K. (2013). Investigating teacher noticing of student algebraic thinking (Doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University
68. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., &Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96, 878-903