Practices of inquiry in teaching and research

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 441-478

  Hammer, David ^a   Schifter, Deborah ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012860323     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1904_2     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-397.
2. Ball, D. L. (1995). Blurring the boundaries of research and practice. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 354-363.
3. Ball, D. L. (1997). Developing mathematics reform: What don't we know about teacher learning-but would make good working hypotheses. In S. N. Friel & G. W. Bright (Eds.), Reflecting on our work: NSF teacher enhancement in K-6 mathematics (pp. 77-112). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
4. Bastable, V., & Schifter, D. (in press). Classroom stories: Examples of elementary students engaged in early algebra. In J. Kaput (Ed.), Employing children's natural powers to build algebraic reasoning in the content of elementary mathematics.
5. Bastable, V., Schifter, D., & Russell, S. J. (in press). Developing mathematical ideas: Examining features of shape, casebook. Parsippany, NJ: Dale Seymour.
6. Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4-12.
7. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics education. Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3-20.
9. Carter, K. (1993). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 5-12, 18.
10. Clements, D.,& Battista, M. (1992). Geometry and spatial sense. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420-164). New York: Macmillan.
11. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15-25.
13. Cohen, D. K., McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (Eds.). (1993). Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Cohen, D. K., Peterson, P. L., Wilson, S., Ball, D., Putnam, R., Prawat, R., Heaton, R., Remillard, J., & Wiemers, N. (1990). Effects of state-level reform of elementary school mathematics curriculum on classroom practice (Research Rep. No. 90-14). East Lansing, MI: The National Center for Research on Teacher Education and The Center for the Learning and Teaching of Elementary Subjects, College of Education, Michigan State University.
15. Davenport, L. R., & Sassi, A. (1996). Transforming mathematics teaching in grades K-8: How narrative structures in resource materials help support teacher change. In B. S. Nelson (Ed.), Inquiry and the development of teaching (pp. 37-46). Newton, MA: Center for the Development of Teaching.
16. Eston, R., & O' Brien, D. (1999, April). Teachers as teachers and researchers as researchers: An example of intertwined learning. Presented to the Research Presession of the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Francisco.
17. Feldman, A. (1996). Enhancing the practice of physics teachers: Mechanisms for the generation and sharing of knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 513-540.
18. Floden, R. E., & Klinzing, H. G. (1990). What can research on teacher thinking contribute to teacher preparation? A second opinion. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 15-20.
19. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Goldenberg, E. P. (1996). "Habits of mind" as an organizer for the curriculum. Journal of Education, I78(1), 13-34.
21. Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or p-prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 97-127.
22. Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 485-529.
23. Hammer, D. (1999). Teacher inquiry. Newton, MA: Center for the Development of Teaching Paper Series.
24. Kessels, J. P. A. M., & Korthagen, F. A. J. (1996). The relationship between theory and practice: Back to the classics. Educational Researcher, 24(3), 17-22.
25. Konold, C., Higgins, T., & Russell, S. J. (2000). Developing statistical perspectives in the elementary grades. Paper presented at the XXII Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America (PME-NA), Tucson, AZ.
26. Lampert, M. (1989). Choosing and using mathematical tools in classroom discourse. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (pp. 223-264). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
27. Lampert, M., & Clark, C. M. (1990). Expert knowledge and expert thinking in teaching: A response to Floden and Klinzing. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 21-23.
28. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. McDonald, J. P. (1992). Teaching: Making sense of an uncertain craft. New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Minstrell, J. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 129-149). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
31. Monk, S. (in press). Representation in school mathematics: Learning to graph and graphing to learn. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), The research companion to the principles and standards of school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
32. Morse, A. (in press). Forging a partnership: Intent, decision making, and curriculum. Newton, MA: Center for the Development of Teaching Paper Series.
33. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Commission on Teaching Standards for School Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
34. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5-10.
36. Rosebery, A., & Warren, B. (Eds.). (1998). Boats, balloons and classroom video: Science teaching as inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
37. Russell, S. J., Bloomfield, K., & Horowitz, N. (1999, April). The teacher/curriculum partnership: What does it look like in practice? Presented to the Research Presession of the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Francisco.
38. Russell, S. J., Schifter, D., & Bastable, V. (in press). Working with data, casebook. Parsippany, NJ: Dale Seymour.
39. Russell, S. J., Schifter, D., Bastable, V. Yaffee, L., Lester, J., & Cohen, S. (1995). Learning mathematics while teaching. In B. S. Nelson (Ed.), Inquiry into the development of teaching: Issues in the transformation of mathematics teaching (pp. 9-16). Newton, MA: Center for the Development of Teaching, Education Development Center.
40. Schifter, D. (1994). Voicing the new pedagogy: Teachers write about learning and teaching mathematics. Newton, MA: Center for the Development of Teaching Paper Series.
41. Schifter, D. (1996a). What's happening in math class? Volume 1: Envisioning new practices through teacher narratives. New York: Teachers College Press.
42. Schifter, D. (1996b). What's happening in math class? Volume 2: Reconstructing professional identities. New York: Teachers College Press.
43. Schifter, D. (1999). Learning geometry: Some insights drawn from teacher writing. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5, 360-366.
44. Schifter, D., Bastable, V., & Russell, S. J. (1999). Developing mathematical ideas. Parsippany, NJ: Dale Seymour.
45. Schifter, D., & Fostnot, C. T. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education: Stories of teachers meeting the challenge of reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
46. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
47. Sugier, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The reaching gap. New york, Free Press.
48. Van Hiele, P. (1999). Developing geometric thinking through activities that begin with play. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5, 310-316.
49. Vinner, S., & Hershkowitz, R. (1980). Concept images and common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometrical concepts. In R. Karplus (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 177-184). Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California.
50. Wong, D. E. (1995). Challenges confronting the researcher/teacher: Conflicts of purpose and conduct. Educational Researcher, 24(3), 22-28.
51. Zeichner, K. M., & Noffke, S. E. (in press). Practitioner research. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.