Enzyme Kinetics Modeling as a Tool to Optimize Food Industry: A Pragmatic Approach Based on Amylolytic Enzymes

Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Volumn 55, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1758-1770

  Galanakis, Charis M ^a   Patsioura, Anna ^b   Gekas, Vassilis ^c  

^a Chemical Analytical Laboratories Galanakis   (Greece)

^b AGROPARISTECH   (France)

^c CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

amylases; empirical models; Michaelis Menten; Monte Carlo; Multienzyme kinetics; neural networks

Indexed keywords

AMYLASES; BYPRODUCTS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; ENZYME KINETICS; ENZYMES; KINETICS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NEURAL NETWORKS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

AMYLOLYTIC ENZYMES; EMPIRICAL MODEL; FOOD INDUSTRIES; INTERMEDIATE COMPLEXITY; KINETICS MODELING;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

AMYLASE;

ALGORITHM; FOOD HANDLING; KINETICS; METABOLISM; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; AMYLASES; FOOD HANDLING; KINETICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84929773486     PISSN: 10408398     EISSN: 15497852     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2012.725112     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. C.Åkerberg,, G.Zacchi,, N.Torto, and L.Gorton, (2000). A kinetic model for enzymatic wheat starch saccharification. J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 75:306–314.
2. J.D.Allen, and J.A.Thoma, (1976). Subsite mapping of enzymes: Depolymerase computer modeling. J. Biochem. 159:105–120.
3. J.S.Almeida, (2002). Predictive non-linear modeling of complex data by artificial neural networks. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 13:72–76.
4. P.Andrić,, A.S.Meyer,, P.A.Jensen, and K.Dam-Johansen, (2010). Reactor design for minimizing product inhibition enzymatic lignocellulose hydrolysis: I. Significance and mechanism of cellobiose and glucose inhibition on cellulotic enzymes. Biotechnol. Adv. 28:308–324.
5. T.Baks,, A.E.M.Janssen, and R.M.Boom, (2006). A kinetic model to explain the maximum in α-amylase activity measurements in the presence of small carbohydrates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 94:431–440.
6. W.Banks, and C.T.Greenwood (1975). Starch and its Components. Taylor & Francis, Edinburgh.
7. P.Bansal,, M.Hall,, M.J.Realff,, J.H.Lee, and A.S.Bommarius, (2009). Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol. Adv. 27:833–848.
8. V.Beschkov,, A.Marc, and J.M.Engasser, (1984). A kinetic model for the hydrolysis and synthesis of maltose, isomaltose and maltotriose by glucoamylase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26:22–26.
9. T.Besselink,, T.Baks,, A.E.M.Janssen, and R.M.Boom, (2008). A stochastic model for predicting dextrose equivalent and saccharide composition during hydrolysis of starch by α-amylase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 100:684–697.
10. C.Brandam,, X.M.Meyer,, J.Proth,, P.Strehaiano, and H.Pingaud, (2003). An original kinetic model for the enzymatic hydrolysis of starch during mashing. Biochem. Eng. J. 13:43–52.
11. J.Bryjak,, K.Ciesielski, and I.Zbiciński, (2004). Modelling of glucoamylase thermal inactivation in the presence of starch by artificial neural network. J. Biotechnol. 114:177–185.
12. J.Bryjak,, K.Murlikiewicz,, I.Zbicinski, and J.Stawczyk, (2000). Application of artificial neural networks to modeling of starch hydrolysis by glucoamylase. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 23:351–357.
13. R.Buckow,, U.Weiss,, V.Heinz, and D.Knorr (2006). Stability and catalytic activity of α-amylase from barley malt at different pressure-temperature conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 97:1–11.
14. J.M.S.Cabral,, J.M.Novais, and J.P.Cardoso, (1983). Modeling of immobilized glucoamylase reactors. Ann. Ny. Acad. Sci. 413:535–541.
15. J.M.S.Cabral,, J.M.Novais,, J.P.Cardoso, and J.F.Kennedy, (1986). Design of immobilized glucoamylase reactors using a simple kinetic model for the hydrolysis of starch. J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 36:247–254.
16. V.Calabrò,, S.Curcio,, M.G.De Paola, and G.Iorio, (2009). Optimization of membrane bioreactor performances during enzymatic oxidation of waste bio-phenols. Desalination 236:30–38.
17. J.V.Carbonel,, L.Izquierdo,, J.M.Sendra, and P.Manzanares, (1998). A Monte Carlo simulation of the depolymerization of linear homopolymers by endo-enzymes exhibiting random-attack probability and single-attack mechanism: Application to the (1 → 3),(→ 4)-β-D-glucan/endo-(1 → 3),(1→ 4)-β-D-glucanase system. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 60:105–113.
18. I.C.Chow, and E.O.Voit, (2009). Recent developments in parameter estimation and structure identification of biochemical and genomic systems. Mathem. Biosci. 219:57–83.
19. E.Cepeda,, M.Hermosa, and A.Ballesteros, (2001). Optimization of maltodextrin hydrolysis by glucoamylase in a batch reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 76:70–76.
20. K.Ciesielski,, J.Bryjak, and I.Zbicinski, (2004). Modeling of starch saccharification by a two-enzyme system using an artificial neural network. Inzynieria Chemiczna I Procesowa 25:801–806.
21. P.Colonna,, V.Leloup, and A.Buleon, (1992). Limiting factors of starch hydrolysis. Eur. J.Clin. Nutr. 46:S17–S32.
22. D.R.Confer, and B.E.Logan, (1997). Molecular weight distribution of hydrolysis products during biodegradation of model macromolecules in suspended and biofilm cultures I. Bovine serum albumin. Water Res. 31:2127–2136.
23. F.C.Corazza,, L.P.V.Calsavara,, F.F.Moraes,, G.M.Zanin, and I.Neitzel, (2005). Determination of inhibition in the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellobiose using hybrid neural modeling. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 22:19–29.
24. G.Del Re,, G.Di Giacomo,, L.Spera, and F.Vegliò, (2003). Integrated approach in the biotreatment of starch wastes by Rhizopus oligosporus: Kinetic analysis. Desalination 156:389–396.
25. E.Demirhan, and B.Özbek, (2009). A modeling study on hydrolysis of lactose recovered from whey and β-galactosidase stability under sonic treatment. Chem. Eng. Commun. 196:767–787.
26. C.M.Galanakis,, C.Kordulis,, M.Kanellaki,, A.A.Koutinas,, A.Bekatorou, and A.Lycourgiotis, (2012). Effect of pressure and temperature on alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized on γ-alumina pellets. Bioresource Technol. 114:492–498.
27. Q.Gan,, S.J.Allen, and G.Taylor, (2003). Kinetic dynamics in heterogeneous enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: An overview, an experimental study and mathematical modeling. Process Biochem. 38:1003--1018.
28. Q.Gaouar,, C.Aymard,, N.Zakhia, and G.M.Rios, (1997). Kinetic studies on the hydrolysis of soluble and cassava starches by maltogenase. Starch 49:231--237.
29. V.Gekas, and M.Lopez-Leiva, (1985). Hydrolysis of lactose—A literature review. Process Biochem. 20:2--12.
30. P.González-Tello,, F.Camacho,, E.Jurado, and E.M.Guadix, (1996). A simple method for obtaining kinetic equations to describe the enzymatic hydrolysis of biopolymers. J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 67:286–290.
31. G.Gyémánt,, G.Hovánszki, and L.Kandra, (2002). Subsite mapping of the binding region of α-amylases with a computer program. Eur. J. Biochem. 269:5157–5162.
32. L.He,, Y.Q.Xu, and X.H.Zhang, (2008). Medium factor optimization and fermentation kinetics for phenazine-1-carboxylic acid production by Pseudomonas sp. M18G. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 100:250–259.
33. K.Hiromi, (1970). Interpretation of dependency of rate parameters on the degree of polymerization of substrate in enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Evaluation of subsite affinities of exo-enzyme. Biochem. Bioph. Res. Co. 40:1–6.
34. K.Hiromi,, M.Ohnishi, and A.Tanaka (1983). Subsite structure and ligand binding mechanism of glucoamylase. Mol. Cell Biochem. 51:79–95.
35. F.W.J.M.M.Hoeks,, J.Mühle,, L.Böhlen, and I.Pšenička, (1996). Process integration aspects for the production of fine chemicals illustrated with the biotransformation of γ-butyrobetaine into L-carnitine. The Chem. Eng. J. Biochem. Eng. J. 61:53–61.
36. J.Huang,, H.Nanami,, A.Kanda,, H.Shimizu, and S.Shioya, (2002). Classification of fermentation performance by multivariate analysis based on mean hypothesis testing. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 94:251–257.
37. M.Izadifar, and M.Z.Jahromi,, 2007. Application of genetic algorithm for optimization of vegetable oil hydrogenation process. J. Food Eng. 78:1–8.
38. L.Kandra,, G.Gyémánt,, J.Remenyik,, G.Hovánszki, and A.Lipták, (2002). Action pattern and subsite mapping of Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase (BLA) with modified maltooligosaccharide substrates. FEBS Lett. 518:79–82.
39. M.N.Karim,, T.Yoshida,, S.L.Rivera,, V.M.Saucedo,, B.Eikens, and G.-S.Oh, (1997). Global and local neural network models in biotechnology: Application to different cultivation processes. J. Ferm. Bioeng. 83:1–11.
40. A.Kettunen,, J.J.Hämäläinen,, K.Stenholm, and K.Pietilä, (1996). A model for the prediction of β-glucanase activity and β-glucan concentration during mashing. J. Food Eng. 29:185–200.
41. T.Koljonen,, J.J.Hämäläinen,, K.Sjöholm, and K.Pietilä, (1995). A model for the prediction of fermentable sugar concentrations during mashing. J. Food Eng. 26:329--350.
42. V.Komolprasert, and R.Y.Ofoli, (1991). Starch hydrolysis kinetics of Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase.J Chem. Technol. Biot. 51:209–223.
43. T.G.Kurtz, (1972). The relationship between stochastic and deterministic models for chemical reaction. J. Chem. Phys. 57:2976–2978.
44. K.K.Kusunoki,, K.Kawakami,, F.Shiraishi,, K.Kato, and M.Kai, (1982). A kinetic expression for hydrolysis of soluble starch by glucoamylase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 24:347–354.
45. M.Ladero,, A.Santos, and F.Garćia-Ochoa, (2000). Kinetic modeling of lactose hydrolysis with an immobilized β-galactosidase from Kluyveromyces fragilis. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 27:583–592.
46. C.G.Lee,, C.H.Kim, and S.K.Rhee, (1992). A kinetic model and simulation of starch saccharification and simultaneous ethanol fermentation by amyloglucosidase and Zymomonas mobilis. Bioprocess Eng. 7:335–341.
47. L.Li,, J.Wang,, M.Zhao,, C.Cui, and Y.Jiang, (2006). Artificial neural network for production of antioxidant peptides derived from bighead carp muscles with alcalase. Food Technol. Biotech. 44:441–448.
48. W.Liao,, Y.Liu,, Z.Wen,, C.Frear, and S.Chen, (2008). Kinetic modeling of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in differently pretreated fibers from dairy manure. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 101:441–451.
49. E.A.MacGregor, and A.W.MacGregor, (1985). A model for the action of cereal alpha amylases on amylose. Carbohyd. Res. 142:223–236.
50. E.A.MacGregor,, A.W.MacGregor,, L.J.Macri, and J.E.Morgan, (1994). Models for the action of barley alpha-amylase isozymes on linear substrates. Carbohyd. Res. 257:249–268.
51. A.Marc,, J.M.Engasser,, M.Moll, and R.Flayeux, (1983). A kinetic model of starch hydrolysis by α- and β-amylase during mashing. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25:481–496.
52. L.M.Marchal,, R.V.Ulijn,, C.D.de Gooijer,, G.T.Franke, and J.Tramper, (2003). Monte Carlo simulation of the α-amylolysis of amylopectin potato starch. Part II: α-amylolysis of amylopectin. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 26:123–132.
53. L.M.Marchal,, J.Zondervan,, J.Bergsma,, H.H.Beeftink, and J.Tramper, (2001). Monte Carlo simulation of the α-amylolysis of amylopectin potato starch. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 24:163–170.
54. A.Margot,, E.Flaschel, and A.Renken, (1997). Empirical kinetic models for tryptic whey-protein hydrolysis. Process Biochem. 32:217–223.
55. G.Martínez-Araiza,, E.Castaño-Tostado,, S.L.Amaya-Llano,, C.Regalado-González,, C.Martínez-Vera,, and L.Ozimek, (2012). Modeling of enzymatic hydrolysis of whey proteins. Food & Bioprocess. Technology. 5:2596–2601.
56. M.Martίnez,, B.Gullón,, R.Yáñez,, J.L.Alonso, and J.C.Parajó, (2010). Kinetic assessment on the autohydrolysis of pectin-rich by-products. Chem. Eng. J. 162:480–486.
57. M.A.Mazutti,, M.L.Corazza,, F.M.Filho,, M.I.Rodrigues,, F.C.Corazza, and H.Treichel, (2009). Inulinase production in a batch bioreactor using agroindustrial residues as the substrate: Experimental data and modeling. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 32:85–95.
58. M.A.Mazutti,, M.L.Corazza,, F.Maugeri,, M.I.Rodrigues,, J.V.Oliveira,, H.Treichel, and F.C.Corazza, (2010). Hybrid modeling of inulinase bio-production process. J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 85:512–519.
59. J.B.McDermott, and M.T.Klein, (1986). Chemical and probabilistic modeling of complex reactions: A lignin depolymerization example. Chem. Eng. Sci. 41:1053–1060.
60. J.B.McDermott,, C.Libanati,, C.LaMarca, and M.T.Klein, (1990). Quantitative use of model compound information: Monte Carlo simulation of the reactions of complex macromolecules. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 29:22–29.
61. S.Morales,, H.Álvarez, and C.Sánchez, (2008). Dynamic models for the production of glucose syrups from cassava starch. Food Bioprod. Process. 86:25–30.
62. K.Morihara, and T.Oka, (1968). The complex active sites of bacterial neutral proteases in relation to their specificities. Biophys. Res. Commun. 30:625–630.
63. R.Muller, (2000). A mathematical model of the formation of fermentable sugars from starch hydrolysis during high-temperature mashing. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 27:337–344.
64. G.D.Najafpour, and C.P.Shan, (2003). Enzymatic hydrolysis of molasses. Bioresource Technol. 86:91–94.
65. H.Nakatani, (1996). Monte Carlo simulation of multiple attack mechanism of α-amylase. Biopolymers 39:665–669.
66. H.Nakatani (1997). Monte Carlo simulation of multiple attack mechanism of β-amylase-catalyzed reaction. Biopolymers 42:831–836.
67. R.Nassar,, S.T.Chou, and L.T.Fan, (1991). Stochastic anaysis of stepwise cellulose degradation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 46:1651–1657.
68. C.W.Ng, and M.A.Hussain, (2004). Hybrid neural network—prior knowledge model in temperature control of a semi-batch polymerization process. Chemical Engineering and Processing. 43:559–570.
69. Z.L.Nikolov,, M.M.Meagher, and P.J.Reilly, (1989). Kinetics, equilibria, and modeling of the formation of oligosaccharides from D-glucose with Aspergillus niger glucoamylases I and II. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 34:694–704.
70. S.N.Olsen,, E.Lumby,, K.McFarland,, K.Borch, and P.Westh, (2011). Kinetics of enzymatic high-solid hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass studied by calorimetry. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 163:626–635.
71. M.Ovissipour,, A.A.Kenari,, A.Motamezadegan, and R.M.Nazari, (2012). Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of visceral waste proteins of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares). Food Bioprocess Tech. 5:696–705.
72. D.Paolucci-Jeanjean,, M.P.Belleville,, G.M.Rios, and N.Zakhia, (2000a). Kinetics of continuous starch hydrolysis in a membrane reactor. Bioch. Eng. J. 6:233–238.
73. D.Paolucci-Jeanjean,, M.P.Belleville,, N.Zakhia, and G.M.Rios, (2000b). Kinetics of cassava starch hydrolysis with Termamyl(R) enzyme. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 68:71–77.
74. J.T.Park, and J.E.Rollings, (1989). Biopolymeric substrate structural effects of α-amylase-catalyzed amylose depolymerization. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 11:334–340.
75. J.T.Park, and J.E.Rollings, (1994). Effects of substrate branching characteristics on kinetics of enzymatic depolymerization of mixed linear and branched polysaccharides: I. Amylose/amylopectin α-amylolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44:792–800.
76. J.T.Park, and J.E.Rollings, (1995). Effects of substrate branching characteristics on kinetics of enzymatic depolymerization of mixed linear and branched polysaccharides: II. Amylose/glycogen α-amylolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 46:36–42.
77. P.R.Patnaik, (1996). Preliminary screening of neural network configurations for bioreactor applications. Biotechnol. Tech. 10:967–970.
78. A.Patsioura,, C.M.Galanakis, and V.Gekas, (2011). Ultrafiltration optimization for the recovery of β-glucan from oat mill waste. J. Membrane Sci. 373:53–63.
79. M.Petrova,, P.Koprinkova, and T.Patarinska, (1997). Neural network modeling of fermentation processes. Microorganisms cultivation model. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 16:145–149.
80. A.P.Pinto,, R.S.Júnior, and R.C.Giordano, (2005). Comparison of performance of different algorithms in noisy signals filtering of process in enzymatic hydrolysis of cheese whey. Braz. Arch. Biol. Techn. 48:151–159.
81. G.A.Pinto, and R.L.C.Giordano, (2007). Neural network inference of molar mass distributions of peptides during tailor-made enzymatic hydrolysis of cheese whey: Effects of pH and temperature. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 143:142–152.
82. J.H.Pinto, and S.Kaliaguine, (1991). A Monte Carlo analysis of acid hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds in polysaccharides. AIChE J. 37:905–914.
83. M.Polakovič, and J.Bryjak, (2004). Modelling of potato starch saccharification by an Aspergillus niger glucoamylase. Biochem. Eng. J. 18:57–63.
84. R.Rashid,, H.Jamaluddin, and N.A.S.Amin, (2006). Empirical and feed forward neural networks. Appl. Artif. Intell. 20:79–97.
85. J.F.Robyt, and D.French, (1967). Multiple attack hypothesis of α-amylase action: Action of porcine pancreatic, human salivary, and aspergillus oryzae α-amylases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 122:8–16.
86. J.M.Rodriguez-Nogales,, N.Ortega,, M.Perez-Mateos, and M.D.Busto, (2007). Experimental design and response surface modeling applied for the optimisation of pectin hydrolysis by enzymes from A. niger CECT 2088. Food Chemistry. 101:634–642.
87. J.E.Rollings, and R.W.Thompson, (1984). Kinetics of enzymatic starch liquefaction: Simulation of the high-molecular-weight product distribution. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26:1475–1484.
88. C.Q.Ruan,, Y.J.Chi, and R.D.Zhang, (2010). Kinetics of hydrolysis of egg white protein by pepsin. Czech J. Food Sci. 28:355–363.
89. A.Sadana, and J.M.Henley, (1987). Single step unimolecular non-first-order enzyme deactivation kinetics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 30:717–723.
90. J.M.Sendra, and J.V.Carbonell, (1998). A theoretical equation describing the time evolution of the concentration of a selected range of substrate molecular weights in depolymerization processes mediated by single-attack mechanism endo-enzymes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 57:387–393.
91. I.Schechter, and A.Berger. (1967). On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. Biochem. Bioph. Res. Co. 27:157–162.
92. G.Sin,, J.M.Woodley, and K.V.Gernaey, (2009). Application of modeling and simulation tools for the evaluation of biocatalytic processes: A future perspective. Biotechnol. Prog. 25:1529–1538.
93. B.T.Smith,, J.S.Knutsen, and R.H.Davis, (2010). Empirical evaluation of inhibitory product, substrate, and enzyme effects during the enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 161:468--482.
94. T.Suganuma,, M.Ohnishi,, K.Hiromi, and T.Nagahama, (1996). Elucidation of the subsite structure of bacterial saccharifying alpha-amylase and its mode of degradation of maltose. Carbohyd. Res. 282:171--180.
95. J.A.Thoma, (1976). Models for depolymerizing enzymes: Criteria for discrimination of models. Carbohyd. Res. 48:85–103.
96. J.A.Thoma,, C.Brothers, and J.Spradlin, (1970). Subsite mapping of enzymes. Studies on Bacillus subtilis amylase. Biochemistry-US 9:1768--1775.
97. J.A.Thoma,, G.V.K.Rao,, C.Brothers,, J.Spradlin, and L.H.Li, (1971). Subsite mapping of enzymes: Correlation of product patterns with Michaelis parameters and substrate-induced strain. J. Biol. Chem. 246:5621--5635.
98. C.L.Ting,, D.E.Makarov, and Z.G.Wang, (2009). A kinetic model for the enzymatic action of cellulase. J. Phys. Chem. B 113:4970--4977.
99. E.M.Torgerson,, L.C.Brewer, and J.A.Thoma, (1979). Subsite mapping of enzymes. Use of subsite map to simulate complete time course of hydrolysis of a polymeric substrate. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 196:13--22.
100. A.Trusek-Holownia, and A.Noworyta, (2008). Peptides removing in enzymatic membrane bioreactor. Desalination 221:543–551.
101. A.R.Tzafriri, and E.R.Edelman, (2004). The total quasi-steady-state approximation is valid for reversible enzyme kinetics. J. Theor. Biol. 226:303–313.
102. D.Vasic-Racki,, U.Kragl, and A.Liese, (2003). Benefits of enzyme kinetics modeling. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q 17:7–18.
103. J.B.C.Vidal, Jr. B. C., K.D.Rausch,, M.E.Tumbleson, and V.Singh, (2009). Kinetics of granular starch hydrolysis in corn dry-grind process. Starch 61:448–456.
104. P.M.Wojciechowski,, A.Koziol, and A.Noworyta, (2001). Iteration model of starch hydrolysis by amylolytic enzymes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 75:530–539.
105. G.Wolf,, J.S.Almeida,, C.Pinheiro,, V.Correia,, C.Rodrigues,, M.A.M.Reis, and J.G.Crespo, (2000). Two-dimensional fluorometry coupled with artificial neural networks: A novel method for on-line monitoring of complex biological processes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 72:297–306.
106. D.Yankov,, E.Dobreva,, V.Beschkov, and E.Emanuilova, (1986). Study of optimum conditions and kinetics of starch hydrolysis by means of thermostable α-amylase. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 8:665–667.
107. G.M.Zanin, and F.F.Moraes, (1996). Modeling cassava starch saccharification with amyloglucosidase. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 57–58:617–625.
108. Y.Zhang,, J.Xu,, Z.Yuan,, H.Xu, and Q.Yu, (2010). Artificial neural network-genetic algorithm based optimization for the immobilization of cellulase on the smart polymer Eudragit L-100. Bioresource Technol. 101:3153–3158.
109. J.Zhou, (2000). Kinetic model for the co-action of β-amylase and debranching enzymes in the production of maltose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 62:618–622.