Application of modeling and simulation tools for the evaluation of biocatalytic processes: A future perspective

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1529-1538

  Sin, Gürkan ^a   Woodley, John M ^a   Gernaey, Krist V ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biocatalysis; Kinetic model; Modeling; Pharmaceuticals; Process development; Uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

BIOCATALYSIS; BIOCATALYTIC PROCESS; BIOREFINERIES; CONTROL STRATEGIES; ENGINEERING DECISIONS; ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; FUTURE PERSPECTIVES; IDENTIFIABILITY ANALYSIS; KINETIC MODELING; KINETIC MODELS; LOW LEVEL; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; MODEL IDENTIFICATION; MODELING; MODELING AND SIMULATION; MODELING STUDIES; OPTIMAL PROCESS; PHARMACEUTICALS PROCESS; PROCESS FLOW-SHEET; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS UNIT; RESEARCH NEEDS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETIC THEORY; MODEL STRUCTURES; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS DESIGN; REACTION KINETICS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; BIOCATALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOREACTOR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FORECASTING; KINETICS;

BIOCATALYSIS; BIOREACTORS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FORECASTING; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

POLYGALA INCARNATA;

EID: 73249131640     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.276     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Patel RN, editor. Stereoselective Biocatalysis. NY-Basel: Marcel Dekker; 2000.
2. Pollard DJ, Woodley JM. Biocatalysis for pharmaceutical intermediates: the future is now. Trends Biotechnol. 2007;25:66-73.
3. Woodley JM. New opportunities for biocatalysis: making pharmaceutical processes greener. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:321-327.
4. FDA. Guidance for industry: PAT-A framework for innovative pharmaceutical manufacturing & quality assurance, Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/6419fnl.pdf, 2004.
5. Rohner M, Meyer HP. Applications of modelling for bioprocess design and control in industrial production. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 1995;13:69-78
6. Brass JM, Hoeks FWJMM, Rohner M. Application of modeling techniques for the improvement of industrial processes. J Biotechnol. 1997;59:63-72.
7. Smith R. Chemical Process Design and Integration. Chichester, England: Wiley; 2005.
8. Hult K, Holmquist M. Kinetics, molecular modeling, and synthetic applications with microbial lipases. Methods Enzymol. 1997;286:386-405.
9. Kazlauskas RJ. Molecular modeling and biocatalysis: explanations, predictions, limitations and opportunities. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2000;4:81-88.
10. Braiuca P, Ebert C, Basso A, Linda P, Gardossi L. Computational methods to rationalize experimental strategies in biocatalysis. Trends Biotechnol. 2006;24:419-425.
11. Turner NJ. Directed evolution of enzymes for applied biocatalysis. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21:474-478.
12. Kuchner O, Arnold FH. Directed evolution of enzyme catalyst. Trends Biotechnol. 1997;15:523-530.
13. Lye GJ, Woodley JM. Application of in situ product-removal techniques to biocatalytic processes. Trends Biotechnol. 1999; 17:395-402.
14. Woodley JM, Bisschops M, Straathof AJJ, Ottens M. Future directions for in-situ product removal (ISPR). J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2008;83:121-123.
15. Schroen CGPH, VandeWiel S, Kroon PJ, DeVroom E, Janssen AEM, Tramper J. Equilibrium position, kinetics and reactor concepts for the adipyl-7-ADCA hydrolysis process. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000A;70:654-661.
16. Schroen CGPH, Nierstrasz VA, Moody HM, Hoogschagen MJ, Kroon PJ, Bosma R, Beeftink HH, Janssen AEM, Tramper J. Modeling of the enzymatic kinetic synthesis of Cephalexin- influence of substrate concentration. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000B; 73:171-178.
17. Willeman WF, Gerrits PJ, Hanefeld U, Brussee J, Straathof AJJ, van der Gen A, Heijnen JJ. Development of a process model to describe the synthesis of (R)-mandelonitrile by Prunus amygdalus hydroxynitrile lyase in an aqueous-organic biphasic reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001;77:239-247.
18. Flores MV, Halling PJ. Full model for reversible kinetics of lipasecatalyzed sugar-ester synthesis in 2-methyl-2-butanol. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;78:794-800.
19. Buhler B, Straathof AJJ, Witholt B, Schmid A. Analysis of two-liquid-phase multistep biooxidation based on a process model: indications for biological energy shortage. Org Process Res Dev. 2006;10:628-643.
20. Swarts JW, Vossenberg P, Meerman MH, Janssen AEM, Boom RM. Comparison of two-phase lipase-catalyzed esterification on micro and bench scale. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;99:855-861.
21. Berendsen WR, Lapin A, Reuss MA. Kinetic study of lipase-catalyzed reversible kinetic resolution involving verification at miniplant-scale. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;95:883-892.
22. Schroen CGPH, Nierstrasz VA, Bosma R, Dijkstra ZJ, Vande-Sandt EJAX, Beeftink HH, Tramper J. Process design for enzymatic adipyl-7-ADCA hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog. 2002;18: 745-751.
23. Willeman WF, Straathof AJJ, Heijnen JJ. Comparison of a batch, fed-batch and continuously operated stirred-tank reactor for the enzymatic synthesis of (R)-mandelonitrile by using a process model. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2002;24:281-287.
24. Law HEM, Baldwin CVF, Chen BH, Woodley JM. Process limitations in a whole-cell catalysed oxidation: sensitivity analysis. Chem Eng Sci. 2006;61:6646-6652.
25. Berendsen WR, Lapin A, Reuss MA. Non-isothermal lipase-catalyzed kinetic resolution in a packed bed reactor: modeling, simulation and miniplant studies. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;62:2375-2385.
26. Chen BH, Baganz F, Woodley JM. Modelling and optimisation of a transketolase-mediated carbon-carbon bond formation reaction. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;62:3178-3184.
27. Illanes A, Zunaiga M, Contreras S, Guerrero A. Reactor design for the enzymatic isomerization of glucose to fructose. Bioprocess Eng. 1992;7:199-204
28. Mathys RG, Schmid A, Witholt B. Integrated two-liquid phase bioconversion and product-recovery processes for the oxidation of alkanes: process design and economic evaluation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999;64:459-477.
29. Illanes A, Wilson L, Raiman L. Design of immobilized enzyme reactors for the continuous production of fructose syrup from whey permeate. Bioprocess Eng. 1999;21:509-515.
30. Paiva AL, Balcao VM, Malcata FX. Kinetics and mechanisms of reactions catalyzed by immobilized lipases. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2000;27:187-204.
31. Woodley JM, Cunnah PJ, Lilly MD. Stirred tank two-liquid phase biocatalytic reactor studies: kinetics, evaluation and modeling of substrate mass transfer. Biocatalysis. 1991;5:1-12.
32. Gujer W. Activated sludge modelling: past, present and future. Water Sci Technol. 2006;53:111-119.
33. Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Saisana M, Tarantola S. Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. West Sussex, England: Wiley; 2008.
34. Seber G, Wild C. Nonlinear Regression. NY: Wiley; 1989.
35. Saltelli A. The critique of modeling and sensitivity analysis in the scientific discourse. An overview of good practices. EUR 22487 EN: EUR Scientific and Technical Research series: Luxembourg; 2006.
36. Helton JC, Davis FJ. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2003;81:23-69.
37. Sin G, Eliasson AL, Gernaey KV. Good modelling practice (GMoP) for PAT applications: propagation of input uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Biotechnol Prog. 2009; DOI:10.1002/ btpr.166.
38. Holmberg A. On the practical identifiability of microbial growth models incorporating Michaelis-Menten type nonlinearities. Math Biosci. 1982;62:23-43.
39. Omlin M, Reichert PA. Comparison of techniques for the estimation of model prediction uncertainty. Ecol Modell. 1999; 115:45-59.
40. Dochain D, Vanrolleghem PA. Dynamical Modelling and Estimation in Wastewater Treatment Processes. London UK: IWA Publishing; 2001.
41. Brun R, Kuhni M, Siegrist H, Gujer W, Reichert P. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters-systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water Res. 2002;36:4113-4127.
42. Sin G, Ödman P, Petersen N, Lantz AE, Gernaey KV. Matrix notation for efficient development of first-principles models within a PAT framework: integrated modeling of antibiotic production with Streptomyces coelicolor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008; 101:153-171.
43. Chen BH, Hibbert EG, Dalby PA, Woodley JM. A new approach to bioconversion of reaction kinetic parameter identification. AIChE J. 2008;54:2155-2163.
44. Hayes DJ. An examination of biorefining processes, catalysts and challenges. Catal Today 2009;145:138-151.
45. Chin JW, Khankal R, Monroe CA, Maranas CD, Cirino PC. Analysis of NADPH supply during xylitol production by engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;102:209-220.
46. Buhler B, Park JB, Blank LM, Schmid A. NADH availability limits asymmetric biocatalytic epoxidation in a growing recombinant Escherichia coli strain. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:1436-1446.
47. Blank LM, Ebert BE, Buhler B, Schmid A. Metabolic capacity estimation of Escherichia coli as a platform for redox biocatalysis: constraint-based modeling and experimental verification. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;100:1050-1065.