Factors influencing the functioning of data teams

Teachers College Record

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1-42

  Schildkamp, Kim ^a   Poortman, Cindy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929395523     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom living. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
2. Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36(4), 391-409.
3. Breiter, A., & Light, D. (2006). Data for school improvement: Factors for designing effective information systems to support decision-making in schools. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 206-217.
4. Campbell, C., & Levin, B. (2009). Using data to support educational improvement, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 47-65.
5. Chen, E., Heritage, M., & Lee, J. (2005). Identifying and monitoring students' learning needs with technology. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(3), 309-332.
6. Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement, 9, 173-206.
7. Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2012). The practice of data use: An introduction. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 99-111.
8. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 38-46.
9. Copland, M. A. (2003). The Bay Area school collaborative: Building the capacity to lead. In J. Murphy & A. Datnow (Eds.), Leadership lessons from comprehensive school reform (pp. 159-184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
10. Daly, A. J. (2012). Data, dyads, and dynamics: Exploring data use and social networks in educational improvement. Teachers College Record 114(11), 1-38.
11. Datnow, A., Park, V., & Kennedy-Lewis, B. (2013). Affordances and constraints in the context of teacher collaboration for the purpose of data use. Journal of Educational Administration 51(3), 341-362.
12. Datnow, A., Park, V., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007). Achieving with data: How high-performing school systems use data to improve instruction for elementary students. Los Angeles: Center on Educational Governance, Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California.
13. Desimone (2009). Improving impact studies of teacher's professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher 38(3), 181-199.
14. Earl, L. M., & Katz, S. (2006). Leading schools in a data-rich world: Harnessing data for school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
15. Henry, S. F. (2012). Instructional conversations: A qualitative exploration of differences in elementary teachers' team discussions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Education.
16. Herman, J. L., & Gribbons, B. (2001). Lessons learned in using data to support school inquiry and continuous improvement: Final report to the Stuart Foundation. Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.
17. Honig, M. I., & Venkateswaran, N. (2012). School-central office relationships in evidence use: Understanding evidence use as a systems problem. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 199-222.
18. Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers' workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181-217.
19. Huffman, D., & Kalnin, J. (2003). Collaborative inquiry to make data-based decisions in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 569-580.
20. Ingram, D., Louis, K. S., & Schroeder, R. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1258-1287.
21. Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvements: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112, 496-520.
22. King, M. B. (2002). Professional development to promote schoolwide inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(3), 243-257.
23. Knapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., & Swinnerton, J. A. (2007). Understanding the promise and dynamics of data informed leadership. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106(1), 74-104.
24. Knapp, M. S., Swinnerton, J. A., Copland, M. A., & Monpas-Huber, J. (2006). Data-informed leadership in education. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
25. Lai, M. K., McNaughton, S., Timperley, H., & Hsiao, S. (2009). Sustaining continued acceleration in reading comprehension achievement following an intervention. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 81-100.
26. Lai, M. K., & Schildkamp, K. (2013). Data-based decision making: An overview. In K. Schildkamp, M. K. Lai, & L. Earl (Eds.), Data-based decision making in education: challenges and opportunities (pp. 9-21). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
27. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & McElheron-Hopkins, C. (2006). The development and testing of a school improvement model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(4), 441-464.
29. Levin, J. A., & Datnow, A. (2012). The principal role in data-driven decision making: Using case-study data to develop multi-mediator models of educational reform. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 179-202.
30. Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 143-166.
31. Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71-85.
32. Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2013). A systemic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher 42(1), 30-37.
33. Mandinach, E., & Honey, M. (Eds.). (2008). Data-driven school improvement: Linking data and learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
34. Mandinach, E., Honey, M., Light, D., & Brunner, C. (2008). A conceptual framework for data-driven decision-making. In E. B. Mandinach & M. Honey (Eds.), Data-driven school improvement: Linking data and learning (pp. 13-31). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
35. Marsh, J. A. (2012). Interventions promoting educators' use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record 114(11), 1-48.
36. Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education: Evidence from recent RAND research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
37. Marsh, J. A., Sloan McCombs, J., & Martorell, F. (2010). How instructional coaches support data-driven decision making: Policy implementation and effects in Florida middle schools. Educational Policy, 24(6), 872-907.
38. Means, B., Chen, E., DeBarger, A., & Padilla, L. (2011). Teachers' ability to use data to inform instruction: Challenges and supports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
39. Means, B., Padilla, C., & Gallagher, L. (2010) Use of education data at the local level: From accountability to instructional improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
40. Ministry of Education, Culture & Science (Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschappen). (2000). Wet op het onderwijstoezicht [Education supervision act]. The Hague, the Netherlands: SDU.
41. Nelson, T. H., & Slavit, D. (2007). Collaborative inquiry among science and mathematics teachers in the USA: Professional learning experiences through cross-grade, crossdiscipline dialogue. Professional Development in Education, 33(1), 23-39.
42. Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2009). Co-constructing distributed leadership: District and school connections in data-driven decision making. School Leadership and Management, 29(5), 477-494.
43. Poortman, C. L., Illeris, K., & Nieuwenhuis, L. (2011). Apprenticeship: From learning theory to practice. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 63(3), 267-287.
44. Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K. (2012). Alternative quality standards in qualitative research? Quality and Quantity, 46(6), 1727-1751.
45. Ragland, M., Clubine, B., Constable, D., & Smith, P.A. (2002). Expecting success: A study of five high performing, high poverty schools. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers and the Charles A. Dana Center at the University of Texas at Austin.
46. Schaffer, E., Reynolds, D., & Stringfield, S. (2012). Sustaining turnaround at the school and district levels: The high reliability schools project at Sandfields Secondary School. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 17(1-2), 108-127.
47. Schildkamp, K., & Ehren, M. C. M. (2013). From "intuition" to data-based decision making in Dutch secondary schools? In K. Schildkamp, M. K. Lai., & L. Earl (Eds.), Data-based decision making in education: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 49-67). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
48. Schildkamp, K., Handelzalts, A., & Poortman, C. (2012, April). Data teams for school improvement. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
49. Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010). Data informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 482-496.
50. Schildkamp, K., & Lai, M. K. (2013). Conclusions and a data use framework. In K. Schildkamp, M. K. Lai., & L. Earl (Eds.), Data-based decision making in education: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 177-192). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
51. Schildkamp, K., & Rekers-Mombarg, L., & Harms, T. (2012). Student group differences in examination results and utilization for policy and school development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 229-256.
52. Schildkamp, K., & Teddlie, C. (2008). School performance feedback systems in the USA and in the Netherlands: A comparison. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(3), 255-282.
53. Sharkey, N. S., & Murnane, R. J. (2006). Tough choices in designing a formative assessment system. American Journal of Education, 112, 572-588.
54. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
55. Snipes, J., Doolittle, F., & Herlihy, C. (2002). Foundations for success: Case studies of how urban school systems improve student achievement. Washington, DC: MDCR and the Council of Great City Schools.
56. Spillane, J. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 113-141.
57. Supovitz, J. A., & Klein, A. (2003). Mapping a course for improved student learning: How innovative schools systematically use performance data to guide improvement. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education.
58. Vanhoof, J., Van Petegem, P., & De Maeyer, S. (2009). Attitudes towards school self-evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35, 21-28.
59. Wayman, J. C., Cho, V., & Johnston, M. T. (2007). The data-informed district: A district-wide evaluation of data use in the Natrona County school district. University of Texas, Austin.
60. Wayman, J. C., Jimerson, J. B., & Cho, V. (2012). Organizational considerations in establishing the data-informed district. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 159-178.
61. Wayman, J. C., Midgley, S., & Stringfield, S. (2006). Leadership for data-based decision making: Collaborative educator teams. In A. Danzig, K. Borman, B. Jones, & B. Wright (Eds.), New models of professional development for learner centered leadership (pp. 189-205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Wayman, J. C., & Stringfield, S. (2006). Data use for school improvement: School practices and research perspectives. American Journal of Education, 112, 463-468.
63. Wohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2008). Creating a system for data-driven decisionmaking: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239-259.
64. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
65. Young, V. M. (2006). Teachers' use of data: Loose coupling, agenda setting, and team norms. American Journal of Education, 112, 521-548.