Data-based decision making: An overview

Data-based Decision Making in Education: Challenges and Opportunities

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 9-21

  Lai, Mei Kuin ^a   Schildkamp, Kim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Photosynthesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 85042831815     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Bernhardt, V. (2003). Using data to improve student achievement. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 26-30.
2. Black, P. (2004). The nature and value of formative assessment for learning. Kings College. http://access.kcl.clientarea.net/content/1/c4/73/57/formative.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2012.
3. Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231-268.
4. Boudett, K. P., City, E. A. & Murnane, R. J. (2007). Data wise. A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge: Harvard Education.
5. Buly, M. R., & Valencia, S. W. (2002). Below the bar: Profiles of students who fail state reading assessments. Education and Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 219-239.
6. Campbell, C., & Levin, B. (2009). Using data to support educational improvement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 47-65.
7. Carlson, D., Borman, G., & Robinson, M. (2011). A multistate district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 378-398.
8. Cawelti, G., & Protheroe, N. (2001). High student achievement: How six school districts changed into high-performance systems. Arlington: Educational Research Service.
9. Cousins, B. J., &Leithwood, K. A. (1993). Enhancing knowledge utilization as a strategy for school improvement. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 14(3), 305-333.
10. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge. How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School.
11. Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2006). Leading in a data rich world. California: Thousand Oaks Corwin.
12. Ehren, M. C. M., & Swanborn, M. L. (2012). Strategic data use in accountability systems. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 257-280.
13. Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., &Yuan, K. (2009). Standards-based reform in the United States: History, research, and future directions. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP1384.
14. Herman, J., & Winter, L. (2011). The turn around toolkit: Managing rapid, sustainable school improvement. California: Thousand Oakes Corwin.
15. Ikemoto, G. S.,&Marsh, J.A. (2007). Cutting through the data-driven mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making. USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
16. Kean, M. (1996). Multiple measures: The common-sense approach to education assessment. School Administrator, 53(11), 14-16.
17. Lai, M. K. (2002). Planning an assessment cycle. Training module for the Mangere AUSAD schooling improvement initiaitve. Auckland: Mangere AUSAD Schooling Improvement Initiative.
18. Lai, M. K., McNaughton, S., Amituanai-Toloa, M., Turner, R., & Hsiao, S. (2009a). Sustained acceleration of achievement in reading comprehension: The New Zealand experience. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 30-56.
19. Lai, M. K., McNaughton, S., Timperley, H., &Hsiao, S. (2009b). Sustaining continued acceleration in reading comprehension achievement following an intervention. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 81-100.
20. Love, N. (2008). Using data to improve learning for all: A collaborative inquiry approach. California: Thousand Oakes Corwin.
21. Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey & Company.
22. Robinson, V. M. J., & Lai, M. K. (2006). Practitioner research for educators: A guide to improving classrooms and schools. California: Thousand Oaks Corwin.
23. Robinson, V. M. J., Phillips, G., & Timperley, H. (2002). Using achievement data for school-based curriculum review: A bridge too far? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(1), 3-29.
24. Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (1999). Evaluation: A systematic approach. California: Thousand Oaks Sage.
25. Rothman, R. (2010). Principles for a comprehensive assessment system. Policy brief alliance for excellent education. http://www.all4ed.org/publication_material/Accountability. Accessed 10 Feb 2011.
26. Schildkamp, K., & Handelzalts, A. (2011, April). Data teams for school improvement. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, New Orleans, USA.
27. Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A. J. (2010). The utilization of a school self-evaluation instrument. Educational Studies, 36(4), 371-389.
28. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In F. G. Madaus, M. Scriven, D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston and Hingham: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
29. Timperley, H., & Phillips, G. (2003). Changing and sustaining teachers’ expectations through professional development in literacy. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education. 19, 627-641.
30. Timperley, H., & Parr, J. (2009). Chain of influence from policy to practice in the New Zealand literacy strategy. Research Papers in Education: Policy and Practice, 24(2), 135-154.
31. Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Best evidence synthesis iterations (BES) on professional learning and development.Wellington: Ministry of Education.
32. Weiss, C. H. (1998). Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 21-33.