The potential contributions of concept maps for learning website to assessment for learning practices

Knowledge Management and E-Learning

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 134-148

  Filiz, Mehmet ^a   Trumpower, David L ^a   Ghani, Shehzad ^a   Atas, Sait ^a   Vanapalli, Arun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assessment for learning; Concept mapping; Digital knowledge maps; Structural assessment of knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927155377     PISSN: 20737904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aliaga, M., Cobb, G., Cuff, C., Garfield, J., Gould, R., Lock, R., Moore, T., Rossman, A., Stephenson, R., Utts, J., Velleman, P., & Witmer, J. (2005). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE): College report. American Statistical Association. Alexandria VA. Retrieved from www.amstat.org/education/gaise
2. Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441.
3. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5-25.
4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
5. Black, P. J. (1993). Formative and summative assessment by teachers. Studies in Science Education, 21, 49-97.
6. Boring, R. L. (2005). The validity of human and computerized writing assessment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 49, pp. 759-763). SAGE Publications.
7. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. Broers, N. J. (2009). Using propositions for the assessment of structural knowledge. Journal of Statistics Education, 17 (2).
9. Browning, M. E., & Lehman, J. D. (1988). Identification of student misconceptions in genetics problem solving via computer program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(9), 747-761.
10. Casas-García, L. M., & Luengo-González, R. (2013). The study of the pupil's cognitive structure: the concept of angle. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(2), 373-398.
11. Castro Sotos, A. E., Vanhoof, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2007). Students' misconceptions of statistical inference: A review of the empirical evidence from research on statistics education. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 98-113.
12. Cizek, G. J. (2010). An introduction to formative assessment: History, characteristics, and challenges. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek, (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 3-17). New York: Taylor and Francis.
13. Clariana, R. B. (2010). Deriving individual and group knowledge structure from network diagrams and from essays. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & N. M. Seel (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge (pp. 117-130). New York, NY: Springer.
14. Cooke, N. J. (1999). Knowledge elicitation. In Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 479-510). Retrieved from http://www.cerici.org/documents/Publications/Durso%20chapter%20on%20KE.pdf
15. Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2004). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(7), 1-11.
16. Filiz, M., Trumpower, D. L., & Atas, S. (2012). Analysis of how well a concept mapping website conforms to principles of effective assessment for learning. In A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak, & J. Vanhear, (Eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Concept Mapping.
17. Filiz, M., Trumpower, D. L., & Vanapalli, A. (2014). Exploring the mobile structural assessment tool: Concept maps for learning website. Revista Colombiana de Estadística, 37(2), 297-317.
18. Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57, 2333-2351.
19. Goldsmith, T. E., Johnson, P. J., & Acton, W. H. (1991). Assessing structural knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 88-96.
20. Good, R. (2011). Formative use of assessment information: It's a process, so let's say what we mean. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 16(3), 1-6.
21. Greenstein, L. (2010). What teachers really need to know about formative assessment. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
22. Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, H.-F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031.
23. Im, S., & Yin, Y. (2009). Diagnosing skills of statistical hypothesis testing using the rule space method. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(4), 193-199.
24. Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. Taylor & Francis.
25. Kalyuga, S. (2009). Instructional design for the development of transferable knowledge and skills: A cognitive load perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 332-338.
26. Kleitman, S., & Costa, D. S. J. (2014). The role of a novel formative assessment tool (Stats-mIQ) and individual differences in real-life academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 150-161.
27. Köller, O. (2001). Mathematical world views and achievement in advanced mathematics: Findings from the TIMSS population 3. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 65-78.
28. Krause, U.-M., Stark, R., & Mandl, H. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning in statistics. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 158-170.
29. Lee, I. (2009). Ten mismatches between teachers' beliefs and written feedback practice. ELT journal, 63(1), 13-22.
30. Leppink, J., Broers, N. J., Imbos, T., van der Vleuten, C. P., & Berger, M. P. (2012). Self-explanation in the domain of statistics: an expertise reversal effect. Higher Education, 63(6), 771-785.
31. Liu, T.-C. (2010). Developing simulation-based computer assisted learning to correct students' statistical misconceptions based on cognitive conflict theory, using 'Correlation' as an example. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 180-192.
32. MacDonald, M. (2007). Toward formative assessment: The use of pedagogical documentation in early elementary classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22(2), 232-242.
33. Nyquist, J. B. (2003). The benefits of reconstruing feedback as a larger system of formative assessment: A metaanalysis. Unpublished master's thesis. Nashville, TN, Vanderbilt University
34. Rushton, A. (2005). Formative assessment: A key to deep learning? Medical Teacher, 27(6), 509-513.
35. Schacter, J., Herl, H. E., Chung, G. K. W. K., Dennis, R. A., & O'Neil, H. F. Jr. (1999). Computer-based performance assessments: A solution to the narrow measurement and reporting of problem-solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 403-418.
36. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 78(1), 153-189.
37. Stirling, D. (2010, July). Improving lectures with CAST applets. In C. Reading (ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society. - Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS8).
38. Trumpower, D. L., Filiz, M., & Sarwar, G. S. (2014). Assessment for learning using digital knowledge maps. In D. Ifenthaler & R. Hanewald (Eds.), Digital Knowledge Maps in Education (pp. 221-237). Springer New York.
39. Trumpower, D. L., & Sarwar, G. S. (2010). Effectiveness of structural feedback provided by Pathfinder networks. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 7-24.
40. Van der Merwe, L. (2012). An analysis of the field of statistics education research with special reference to computer-assisted teaching and learning. University of the Free State. Retrieved from http://etd.uovs.ac.za/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-07182013-103342/unrestricted/VanDerMerweL.pdf
41. Van der Merwe, L., & Wilkinson, A. (2011). Mapping the field of statistics education research in search of scholarship. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 29.
42. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 11(1), 49-65.
43. Wissick, C. A., & Gardner, J. E. (2008). Conducting assessment in technology needs: From assessment to implementation. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 78-93.
44. Yin, Y. (2012). Using tree diagrams as an assessment tool in statistics education. Educational Assessment, 17(1), 22-49.
45. Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477-501.