Formative use of assessment information: It's a process, so let's say what we mean

Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1-6

  Good, Robert ^a  

^a Denver Public Schools   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054019070     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15317714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Arter, J. (2000, April). Rubrics, scoring guides, and performance criteria: Classroom tools for assessing and improving student learning. Paper presented at an annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
3. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice. 5(1), 7-74.
4. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan. 80(2), 139-144.
5. Goertz, M. Olàh, & Riggan, M. (2009, Dec.). From testing to teaching: The use of interim assessments in classroom instruction. Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE) Research Report #RR-65. Retrieved on May 15, 2010, from http://CPRE.org.
6. Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Council of Chief State School Officers: Washington, DC. Retrieved on August 20, 2010, from http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Publications/Learning_Progressions_Supporting_Instruction_and_Formative_Assessment.html.
7. Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T.P., & Herman, J.L. (2008). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? (CRESST Report 741). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
8. McManus, S. (2008). Attributes of effective formative assessment. Council of Chief State School Officers: Washington, DC. Retrieved on July 19, 2010, from http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Publications/Attributes_of_Effective_Formative_Assessment.html.
9. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan Publishing Co.
10. National Research Council (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
11. National Research Council (2001). Knowing what students know. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
12. Perie, M., Marion, S., & Gong, B. (2009). Moving toward a comprehensive assessment system: A framework for considering interim assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 5-13.
13. Popham, W.J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
14. Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
15. Shepard, L. (2005, Oct.). Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. Paper presented to an Educational Testing Service Invitational Conference, New York.
16. Stiggins, R., Arter, J., Chappuis, J. and Chappuis, S. (2006). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right - Using it well. Portland, OR: Educational Testing Service.
17. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Wiliam, D. (2000, Nov.). Integrating summative and formative functions of assessment. Keynote address to the European Association for Educational Assessment, Prague, Czech Republic. Retrieved on Jan. 17, 2011 from http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/1151/1/Wiliam2000IntergratingAEA-E_2000_keynoteaddress.pdf.
19. Vygotsky, L. S., (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.