Assessment for learning using digital knowledge maps

Digital Knowledge Maps in Education: Technology-Enhanced Support for Teachers and Learners

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 221-237

  Trumpower, David L ^a   Filiz, Mehmet ^a   Sarwar, Gul Shahzad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computer based instruction; Feedback; Formative assessment; Structural assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927161996     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/9781461431787_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036-1060.
2. Baxter, G. R, Elder, A. D., & Glaser, R. (1996). Knowledge-based cognition and performance assessment in the science classroom. Educational Psychologist, 31, 133-140.
3. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5-25.
4. Berlanga, A. J., van Rosmalen, P., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Sloep, R B. (2012). Exploring formative feedback on textual assignments with the help of automatically created visual representations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 146-160.
5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
6. Boston, C. (2002). The concept of formative assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 8(9).
7. Chang, K.-E., Sung, Y.-T., Chang, R.-B., & Lin, S.-C. (2005). A new assessment for computer-based concept mapping. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 138-148.
8. Cizek, G. J. (2010). An introduction to formative assessment: History, characteristics, and challenges. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 3-17). New York: Taylor and Francis.
9. Clariana, R. B., Koul, R., & Salehi, R. (2006). The criterion-related validity of a computer-based approach for scoring concept maps. International Journal of Instructional Media, 33(3), 317-325.
10. Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(7), 1-11.
11. Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximise student learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
12. Filiz, M., Trumpower, D. L., & Atas, S. (2012). Analysis of how well a concept mapping website conforms to principles of effective assessment for learning. In A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak, & J. Vanhear (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on concept mapping. Veritas Press: Malta.
13. Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, Issue 1, 2004-05, 3-31.
14. Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57, 2333-2351.
15. Goldsmith, T. E., & Johnson, P. J. (1990). A structural assessment of classroom learning. In R. W. Schvaneveldt (Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization (pp. 241-253). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Good, R. (2011). Formative use of assessment information: It’s a process, so let’s say what we mean. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 16(3), 1-6.
17. Hagemans, M. G., van der Meij, H., & de Jong, T. (2012). The effects of a concept map-based support tool on simulation-based inquiry learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. Doi:10.1037/a0029433.
18. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
19. Hay, D. (2007). Using concept mapping to measure deep, surface and non-learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 39-57.
20. Heritage, M., Kim, S., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24-31.
21. Hsieh, I.-L. G., & O’Neil, H. F., Jr. (2002). Types of feedback in a computer-based collaborative problem-solving group task. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 699-715.
22. Ifenthaler, D. (2011). Bridging the gap between expert-novice differences: The model-based feedback approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 103-117.
23. Ifenthaler, D. (2012). Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem-solving scenarios. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 38-52.
24. Ifenthaler, D., Masduki, I., & Seel, N. M. (2011). The mystery of cognitive structure and how we can detect it. Tracking the development of cognitive structures over time. Instructional Science, 39(1), 41-61. Doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9097-6.
25. Keppens, J., & Hay, D. (2008). Concept map assessment for teaching computer programming. Computer Science Education, 18(1), 31-42.
26. Mackinnon, G. R. (2006). Contentious issues in science education: Building critical thinking patterns through two-dimensional concept mapping. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(4), 433-445.
27. McClure, J. R., Sonak, B., & Suen, H. K. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 475-492.
28. National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design ofedu-cational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30. Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413-448.
31. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
32. Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2006). The origins of the concept mapping tool and the continuing evolution of the tool. Information Visualization, 5, 175-184.
33. Passmore, G. J. (2004). Extending the power of the concept map. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 370-390.
34. Sarwar, G. S. (2011). Structural assessment ofknowledgefor misconceptions: Effectiveness of structural feedback provided by pathfinder networks in the domain of physics. Lambert, Saarbrucken: Germany.
35. Sarwar, G. S., & Trumpower, D. L. (2011). Comparing effects ofconceptual, procedural, and declarative reflection to address students’ misconceptions in science learning. Paper presented at the Canadian Society for the Study of Education annual conference, Fredericton, NB.
36. Schacter, J., Herl, H. E., Chung, G. K. W. K., Dennis, R. A., & O’Neil, H. F., Jr. (1999). Computer-based performance assessments: A solution to the narrow measurement and reporting of problem-solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 403-418.
37. Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
38. Shaw, R. I. (2010). A study of learning performance of e-learning materials design with knowledge maps. Computers & Education, 54(1), 253-264.
39. Shepard, L. A. (2009). Evaluating the validity of formative and interim assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 32-37.
40. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-89.
41. Smith, A. E., & Humphreys, M. S. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 262-279.
42. Trumpower, D. L., & Goldsmith, T. E. (2004). Structural enhancement of learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 426-446.
43. Trumpower, D. L., & Sarwar, G. S. (2010). Effectiveness of structural feedback provided by Pathfinder networks. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 7-24.
44. Trumpower, D. L., Sharara, H., & Goldsmith, T. E. (2010). Specificity of structural assessment of knowledge. Journal of Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, 8(5), 1-32.
45. Wu, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Milrad, M., Ke, H. R., & Huang, Y. M. (2011). An innovative concept map approach for improving students’ learning performance with an instant feedback mechanism. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1-16.
46. Yin, Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2005). Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: Implications for scoring, interpretation, and use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 166-184.