Exploring the mobile structural assessment tool: Concept maps for learning website;Exploración de la herramienta de aseguramiento estructural móvil: Mapas conceptuales para websites de aprendizaje

Revista Colombiana de Estadistica

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 297-317

  Filiz, Mehmet ^a   Trumpower, David ^a   Vanapalli, Arun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Concept maps; Effective feedback; Pathfinder network; Structural assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923223063     PISSN: 01201751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15446/rce.v37n2spe.47939     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Acton, W. H., Johnson, P. J. & Goldsmith, T. E. (1994), ‘Structural knowledge assessment: Comparison of referent structures’, Journal of Educational Psychology 86(2), 303–311.
2. Ausubel, D. P. (1978), A2 edn, Holt Mc Dougal, New York.
3. Boldt, M. (2001), ‘Assessing students’ accounting knowledge: A structural approach’, Journal of Education for Business 76(5), 262–269. doi: 10.1080/08832320109599646.
4. Boring, R. L. (2005), The validity of human and computerized writing assessment, in ‘Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting’, Vol. 49, Sage Publications, pp. 759–763.
5. Casas-García, L. M. & Luengo-González, R. (2013), ‘The study of the pupil’s cognitive structure: The concept of angle’, European Journal of Psychology of Education 28(2), 373–398.
6. Chen, C. (1998), ‘Generalised similarity analysis and pathfinder network scaling’, Interacting with Computers 10(2), 107–128.
7. Chen, C. (2004), ‘Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization’, 101(14), 5303–5310.
8. Chen, L. H. (2011), ‘Enhancement of student learning performance using personalized diagnosis and remedial learning system’, Computers & Education 56(1), 289–299. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.015.
9. Clariana, R. B. (2010), Deriving individual and group knowledge structure from network diagrams and from essays, in ‘Computer-Based Diagnostics and Systematic Analysis of Knowledge’, Springer, pp. 117–130.
10. Clariana, R. B. & Koul, R. (2004), A computer-based approach for translating text into concept map-like representations, in ‘Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping’, pp. 14–17.
11. Clariana, R. B. & Wallace, P. (2007), ‘A computer-based approach for deriving and measuring individual and team knowledge structure from essay questions’, Journal of Educational Computing Research 37(3), 211–227.
12. Cooke, N. J. (1992a), ‘Eliciting semantic relations for empirically derived networks’, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 37(6), 721–750.
13. Cooke, N. J. (1992b), ‘Predicting judgment time from measures of psychological proximity’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18(3), 640–653.
14. Cooke, N. J. (1999), Knowledge elicitation, in ‘Handbook of Applied Cognition’, Wiley, New York, pp. 479–510.
15. Cooke, N. J., Neville, K. J. & Rowe, A. L. (1996), ‘Procedural network representations of sequential data’, Human Computer Interaction 11(1), 29–68.
16. Cooke, N. J. & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1988), ‘Effects of computer programming experience on network representations of abstract programming concepts’, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 29(4), 407–427.
17. Cooke, N. M., Durso, F. T. & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1986), ‘Recall and measures of memory organization’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12(4), 538–549. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.12.4.538.
18. Davis, M. A., Curtis, M. B. & Tschetter, J. D. (2003), ‘Evaluating cognitive training outcomes: Validity and utility of structural knowledge assessment’, Journal of Business and Psychology 18(2), 191–206.
19. Day, E. A., Arthur Jr, W. & Gettman, D. (2001), ‘Knowledge structures and the acquisition of a complex skill’, Journal of Applied Psychology 86(5), 1022–1033.
20. DeChurch, L. A. & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010), ‘Measuring shared team mental models: A meta-analysis’, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 14(1), 1–14.
21. Dicerbo, K. E. (2007), ‘Knowledge structures of entering computer networking students and their instructors’, Journal of Information Technology Education 6, 263–277.
22. Filiz, M., Trumpower, D. & Atas, S. (2012), Analysis of how well a concept mapping website conforms to principles of effective assessment for learning, in ‘Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Concept Mapping’, Malta, pp. 169–172.
23. Filiz, M., Trumpower, D. & Atas, S. (2013a), The contributions of digital concept maps to assessment for learning practices, in ‘Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age’, Texas, USA.
24. Filiz, M., Trumpower, D. & Atas, S. (2013b), How a computer-based concept mapping can be used in statistics education: A case of ANOVA, in ‘United States Conference on Teaching Statistics 2013’, North Carolina, USA.
25. Goldsmith, T. E., Johnson, P. J. & Acton, W. H. (1991), ‘Assessing structural knowledge’, Journal of Educational Psychology 83(1), 88–96.
26. Gomez, R. L., Hadfield, O. D. & Housner, L. D. (1996), ‘Conceptual maps and simulated teaching episodes as indicators of competence in teaching elementary mathematics’, Journal of Educational Psychology 88(3), 572–585. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.572.
27. Guerrero-Bote, V., Zapico-Alonso, F., Espinosa-Calvo, M., Gomez-Crisostomo, R. & Moya-Anegon, F. (2006), ‘Binary pathfinder: An improvement to the pathfinder algorithm’, Information Processing and Management 42(6), 1484–1490. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.015.
28. Ichino, M. & Yaguchi, H. (1994), ‘Generalized Minkowski metrics for mixed feature-type data analysis’, Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on 24(4), 698–708.
29. Kim, M. (2013), ‘Concept map engineering: Methods and tools based on the semantic relation approach’, Educational Technology Research and Development 61(6), 951–978.
30. Kim, M. K. (2012), ‘Cross-validation study of methods and technologies to assess mental models in a complex problem solving situation’, Computers in Human Behavior 28(2), 703–717.
31. Kivlighan, D. M. & Tibbits, B. M. (2012), ‘Silence is mean and other misconceptions of group counseling trainees: Identifying errors of commission and omission in trainees’ knowledge structures’, Group Dymanmics: Theory, Research and Practice 16(1), 14–34.
32. Koul, R., Clariana, R. B. & Salehi, R. (2005), ‘Comparing several human and computer-based methods for scoring concept maps and essays’, Journal of Educational Computing Research 32(3), 227–239.
33. Lau, W. W. & Yuen, A. H. (2010), ‘Promoting conceptual change of learning sorting algorithm through the diagnosis of mental models: The effects of gender and learning styles’, Computers & Education 54(1), 275–288.
34. McGaghie, W. C., Mc Crimmon, D. R., Mitchell, G., Thompson, J. A. & Ravitch, M. M. (2000), ‘Quantitative concept mapping in pulmonary physiology: Comparison of student and faculty knowledge structures’, American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education 23(1), 72–81.
35. Moni, R. W., Beswick, E. & Moni, K. B. (2005), ‘Using student feedback to construct an assessment rubric for a concept map in physiology’, American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education 29(4), 197–203. doi: 10.1152/advan.00066.2004.
36. Nash, J. G. & Nash, J. M. (2003), ‘A structural representation of migraine diagnostic criteria: The experts’ view’, Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain 43(4), 322–329.
37. Rowe, A. L., Cooke, N. J., Hall, E. P. & Halgren, T. L. (1996), ‘Toward an on-line knowledge assessment methodology: Building on the relationship between knowing and doing’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2(1), 31–47. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.2.1.31.
38. Sarwar, G. S. (2012), Comparing the Effect of Reflections, Written Exercises, and Multimedia Instruction to Address Learners’ Misconceptions Using Structural Assessment of Knowledge, PhD thesis, University of Ottawa.
39. Taricani, E. & Clariana, R. (2006), ‘A technique for automatically scoring openended concept maps’, Educational Technology Research and Development 54(1), 65–82.
40. Trumpower, D. L. & Sarwar, G. S. (2010), ‘Effectiveness of structural feedback provided by pathfinder networks’, Journal of Educational Computing Research 43(1), 7–24.
41. Trumpower, D. L., Filiz, M. & Sarwar, G. S. (2014), Assessment for learning using digital knowledge maps, in ‘Digital Knowledge Maps in Education’, Springer, pp. 221–237.
42. Von Minden, A. M., Walls, R. T. & Nardi, A. H. (1998), ‘Charting the links between mathematics content and pedagogy concepts: Cartographies of cognition’, Journal of Experimental Education 66(4), 339–358.
43. Wilson, J. M. (1998), ‘Differences in knowledge networks about acids and bases of year-12, undergraduate and postgraduate chemistry students’, Research in Science Education 28(4), 429–446.