Consensus Paper: The Role of the Cerebellum in Perceptual Processes

Cerebellum

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 197-220

  Baumann, Oliver ^a   Borra, Ronald J ^b,c   Bower, James M ^d   Cullen, Kathleen E ^e   Habas, Christophe ^f   Ivry, Richard B ^g   Leggio, Maria ^h,i   Mattingley, Jason B ^a   Molinari, Marco ⁱ   Moulton, Eric A ^j   Paulin, Michael G ^k   Pavlova, Marina A ^l   Schmahmann, Jeremy D ^b   Sokolov, Arseny A ^m  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^d Numedon Inc   (United States)

^e MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f CENTRE HOSPITALIER NATIONAL D OPHTALMOLOGIE DES QUINZE VINGTS   (France)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

ⁱ IRCCS FONDAZIONE SANTA LUCIA   (Italy)

^j HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^l UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^m LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

more..

Author keywords

Audition; Biological motion; Cerebellum; Connectivity; Evolution; fMRI; Pain; Perception; Prediction; Self motion; Sequencing; Single unit recording; State estimation; Timing; Vision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; AUTISM; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CEREBELLUM; CEREBELLUM INJURY; CONSENSUS; EMOTION; HUMAN; MOTOR CONTROL; NEUROANATOMY; NOCICEPTION; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTING STATE NETWORK; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; NERVE TRACT; PAIN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CEREBELLUM; CONSENSUS; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PAIN; PERCEPTION;

EID: 84925503174     PISSN: 14734222     EISSN: 14734230     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-014-0627-7     Document Type: Article

References (246)

1. Schmahmann JD. From movement to thought: anatomic substrates of the cerebellar contribution to cognitive processing. Hum Brain Mapp. 1996;4:174–98.
2. Schmahmann JD. The cerebrocerebellar system: anatomic substrates of the cerebellar contribution to cognition and emotion. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2001;13:247–60.
3. Schmahmann JD. The role of the cerebellum in cognition and emotion: personal reflections since 1982 on the dysmetria of thought hypothesis, and its historical evolution from theory to therapy. Neuropsychol Rev. 2010;20:236–60.
4. Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN. The cerebrocerebellar system. In: Schmahmann JD, editor. The cerebellum and cognition. San Diego: Academic; 2007. p. 31–60.
5. Stein JR, Glickstein M. Role of the cerebellum in visual guidance of movement. Physiol Rev. 1992;72:967–1017.
6. Oscarsson O. Functional organization of the spino- and cuneocerebellar tracts. Physiol Rev. 1965;45:495–522.
7. Barmack NH. Central vestibular system: vestibular nuclei and posterior cerebellum. Brain Res Bull. 2003;60:511–41.
8. Brodal P. The corticopontine projection in the rhesus monkey. Origin and principles of organization. Brain. 1978;101:251–83.
9. Glickstein M, May JG, Mercier BE. Corticopontine projection in the macaque: the distribution of labeled cortical cells after large injections of horseradish peroxidase in the pontine nuclei. J Comp Neurol. 1985;235:343–59.
10. Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN. Anatomical investigation of projections to the basis pontis from posterior parietal association cortices in rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1989;289:53–73.
11. Schmahmann JD, Rosene DL, Pandya DN. Motor projections to the basis pontis in rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 2004;478:248–68.
12. Schmahmann JD, MacMore J, Ko R. The human basis pontis. Clinical syndromes and topographic organization. Brain. 2004;127:1269–91.
13. Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN. Anatomic organization of the basilar pontine projections from prefrontal cortices in rhesus monkey. J Neurosci. 1997;17:438–58.
14. Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN. Projections to the basis pontis from the superior temporal sulcus and superior temporal region in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1991;308:224–48.
15. Ungerleider LG, Desimone R, Galkin TW, Mishkin M. Subcortical projections of area MT in the macaque. J Comp Neurol. 1984;223:368–86.
16. Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN. Prelunate, occipitotemporal, and parahippocampal projections to the basis pontis in rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1993;337:94–112.
17. Fiez JA, Raichle ME. Linguistic processing. In: Schmahmann JD, editor. The cerebellum and cognition. International review of neurobiology, vol. 41. San Diego: Academic; 1997. p. 233–54.
18. Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage. 2009;44:489–501.
19. Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain. 1998;121:561–79.
20. Mariën P, Ackermann H, Adamaszek M, et al. Consensus paper: language and the cerebellum: an ongoing enigma. Cerebellum. 2014;13:386–410.
21. Picard N, Strick PL. Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. Cereb Cortex. 1996;6:342–53.
22. Vilensky JA, Van Hoesen GW. Corticopontine projections from the cingulate cortex in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 1981;205:391–5.
23. Aas J-E, Brodal P. Demonstration of topographically organized projections from the hypothalamus to the pontine nuclei: an experimental study in the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1988;268:313–28.
24. Haines DE, Dietrichs E. An HRP study of hypothalamo-cerebellar and cerebello-hypothalamic connections in squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). J Comp Neurol. 1984;229:559–75.
25. Ramnani N, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, et al. The evolution of prefrontal inputs to the cortico-pontine system: diffusion imaging evidence from Macaque monkeys and humans. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16:811–8.
26. Allen GI, Tsukahara N. Cerebrocerebellar communication systems. Physiol Rev. 1974;54:957–1008.
27. Brodal P. The pontocerebellar projection in the rhesus monkey: an experimental study with retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase. Neuroscience. 1979;4:193–208.
28. Kelly RM, Strick PL. Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J Neurosci. 2003;23:8432–44.
29. Middleton FA, Strick PL. Cerebellar output channels. In: Schmahmann JD, editor. The cerebellum and cognition. International review of neurobiology, vol. 41. San Diego: Academic; 1997. p. 61–82.
30. Buckner RL, Krienen FM, Castellanos A, Diaz JC, Yeo BT. The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:2322–45.
31. Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Res Med. 1995;34:537–41.
32. Beckmann CF, DeLuca M, Devlin JT, Smith SM. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005;360:1001–13.
33. Krienen FM, Buckner RL. Segregated fronto-cerebellar circuits revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:2485–97.
34. O’Reilly JX, Beckmann CF, Tomassini V, Ramnani N, Johansen-Berg H. Distinct and overlapping functional zones in the cerebellum defined by resting state functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex. 2009;20:953–65.
35. Habas C, Kamdar N, Nguyen D, Prater K, Beckmann CF, Menon V, et al. Distinct cerebellar contributions to intrinsic connectivity networks. J Neurosci. 2009;29:8586–94.
36. Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD. Evidence for topographic organization in the cerebellum of motor control versus cognitive and affective processing. Cortex. 2010;46:831–44.
37. Sokolov AA, Erb M, Grodd W, Pavlova MA. Structural loop between the cerebellum and the superior temporal sulcus: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24:626–32.
38. Habas C, Guillevin R, Abanou A. Functional connectivity of the superior human temporal sulcus in the brain resting state at 3 T. Neuroradiology. 2011;53:129–40.
39. Sang L, Qin W, Liu Y, Han W, Zhang Y, Jiang T, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity of the vermal and hemispheric subregions of cerebellum with both cerebral and cortical networks and subcortical structures. Neuroimage. 2012;61:1213–25.
40. Ding K, Liu Y, Yan X, Lin X, Jiang T. Altered functional connectivity of the primary visual cortex in subjects with amblyopia. Neural Plast. 2013;2013:612086.
41. Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF, Keller J, Glover GH, Kenna H, et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2349–56.
42. Baumann O, Mattingley JB. Functional topography of primary emotion processing in the human cerebellum. Neuroimage. 2012;61:805–11.
43. Habas C, Cabanis EA. Dissociation of the neural networks recruited during a haptic object-recognition task: complementary results with a tensorial independent component analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1715–21.
44. Holmes G. Clinical symptoms of cerebellar disease—and their interpretation. Lancet. 1922;2:59–65.
45. Schmahmann J. The cerebellum and cognition. International review of neurobiology, vol. 41. San Diego: Academic; 1997.
46. Bullock TH. Electroreception. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1982;5:121–70.
47. Llinas RR. Cortex of cerebellum. Sci Am. 1975;232:56–71.
48. Nieuwenhuys R, Pouwels E. A light and EM study of lobe C1 of the gigantocerebellum of the mormyrid fish Gnathonemus petersi. Anat Rec. 1973;175:399.
49. Paulin MG. The role of the cerebellum in motor control and perception. Brain Behav Evol. 1993;41:39–50.
50. Bower JM, Parsons LM. Rethinking the lesser brain. Sci Am. 2003;289:50–7.
51. Gao JH, Parsons LM, Bower JM, Xiong JH, Li JQ, Fox PT. Cerebellum implicated in sensory acquisition and discrimination rather than motor control. Science. 1996;272:545–7.
52. Hore J, Watts S. Skilled throwers use physics to time ball release to the nearest millisecond. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:2024–33.
53. Klier EM, Angelaki DE. Gaze Stabilization and the VOR. In: Koob GF, Le Moal M, Thompson RF, editors. Encyclopedia of behavioral neuroscience. Oxford: Academic Press; 2010. p. 569–75.
54. Kurtzer I, Trautman P, Rasquinha RJ, Bhanpuri NH, Scott SH, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar damage diminishes long-latency responses to multijoint perturbations. J Neurophysiol. 2013;109:2228–41.
55. Miall RC, King D. State estimation in the cerebellum. Cerebellum. 2008;7:572–6.
56. Molinari M, Restuccia D, Leggio MG. State estimation, response prediction, and cerebellar sensory processing for behavioral control. Cerebellum. 2009;8:399–402.
57. Parsons LM, Petacchi A, Schmahmann JD, Bower JM. Pitch discrimination in cerebellar patients: evidence for a sensory deficit. Brain Res. 2009;1303:84–96.
58. Roth MJ, Synofzik M, Lindner A. The cerebellum optimizes perceptual predictions about external sensory events. Curr Biol. 2013;23:930–5.
59. Zago M, McIntyre J, Senot P, Lacquaniti F. Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception. Exp Brain Res. 2009;192:571–604.
60. Hobbs MJ, Young JZ. Cephalopod cerebellum. Brain Res. 1973;55:424–30.
61. Williamson R, Chrachri A. A model biological neural network: the cephalopod vestibular system. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362:473–81.
62. Young JZ. Cerebellum and control of eye-movements in cephalopods. Nature. 1976;264:572–4.
63. Bell CC, Han V, Sawtell NB. Cerebellum-like structures and their implications for cerebellar function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:1–24.
64. Montgomery JC, Bodznick D, Yopak KE. The cerebellum and cerebellum-like structures of cartilaginous fishes. Brain Behav Evol. 2012;80:152–65.
65. Oertel D, Young ED. What’s a cerebellar circuit doing in the auditory system? Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:104–10.
66. Farris SM. Are mushroom bodies cerebellum-like structures? Arthropod Struct Dev. 2011;40:368–79.
67. Zeil J. Visual homing: an insect perspective. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012;22:285–93.
68. Purcell EM. Life at low Reynolds number. Am J Phys. 1977;45:3–11.
69. Gould SJ. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press; 2002.
70. Brown RG, Hwang PYC. Introduction to random signals and applied Kalman filtering. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1996.
71. Haykin S. Kalman filtering and neural networks. New York: Wiley; 2001.
72. Doucet A, De Freitas N, Gordon N. Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. New York: Springer; 2001.
73. Paulin MG. Evolution of the cerebellum as a neuronal machine for Bayesian state estimation. J Neural Eng. 2005;2:219–34.
74. Paulin MG, Hoffman LF. Bayesian head state prediction: computing the dynamic prior with spiking neurons. Shanghai: International Conference on Natural Computation ICNC; 2011.
75. Buesing L, Bill J, Nessler B, Maass W. Neural dynamics as sampling: a model for stochastic computation in recurrent networks of spiking neurons. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:11.
76. Deneve S. Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability. Front Neurosci. 2012;6:75.
77. Franklin DW, Wolpert DM. Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control. Neuron. 2011;72:425–42.
78. Knill DC, Pouget A. The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:712–9.
79. Kording KP, Wolpert DM. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature. 2004;427:244–7.
80. Laurens J, Droulez J. Bayesian processing of vestibular information. Biol Cybern. 2007;96:389–404.
81. Lochmann T, Deneve S. Neural processing as causal inference. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011;21:774–81.
82. Ma WJ, Beck JM, Latham PE, Pouget A. Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:1432–8.
83. Wolpert DM. Probabilistic models in human sensorimotor control. Hum Mov Sci. 2007;26:511–24.
84. Schmahmann JD. An emerging concept. The cerebellar contribution to higher function. Arch Neurol. 1991;48:1178–87.
85. Snider RS, Stowell A. Receiving areas of the tactile, auditory, and visual systems in the cerebellum. J Neurophysiol. 1944;7:331–57.
86. Ivry RB, Diener HC. Impaired velocity perception in patients with lesions of the cerebellum. J Cogn Neurosci. 1991;3:355–66.
87. Thier P, Haarmeier T, Treue S, Barash S. Absence of a common functional denominator of visual disturbances in cerebellar disease. Brain. 1999;122:2133–46.
88. Ivry RB, Keele SW. Timing functions of the cerebellum. J Cogn Neurosci. 1989;1:136–52.
89. Baumann O, Mattingley JB. Scaling of neural responses to visual and auditory motion in the human cerebellum. J Neurosci. 2010;30:4489–95.
90. Petacchi A, Kaernbach C, Ratnam R, Bower JM. Increased activation of the human cerebellum during pitch discrimination: a positron emission tomography (PET) study. Hear Res. 2011;282:35–48.
91. Sokolov AA, Gharabaghi A, Tatagiba MS, Pavlova M. Cerebellar engagement in an action observation network. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20:486–91.
92. Sokolov AA, Erb M, Gharabaghi A, Grodd W, Tatagiba MS, Pavlova MA. Biological motion processing: the left cerebellum communicates with the right superior temporal sulcus. Neuroimage. 2012;59:2824–30.
93. Baumann O, Greenlee MW. Neural correlates of coherent audiovisual motion perception. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:1433–43.
94. Bushara KO, Grafman J, Hallett M. Neural correlates of auditory–visual stimulus onset asynchrony detection. J Neurosci. 2001;21:300–4.
95. Calvert GA, Hansen PC, Iversen SD, Brammer MJ. Detection of audio-visual integration sites in humans by application of electrophysiological criteria to the BOLD effect. Neuroimage. 2001;14:427–38.
96. Cerminara NL, Apps R, Marple-Horvat DE. An internal model of a moving visual target in the lateral cerebellum. J Physiol. 2009;587:429–42.
97. Bower JM. Control of sensory data acquisition. In: Schmahmann JD, editor. The cerebellum and cognition. International review of neurobiology, vol. 41. San Diego: Academic; 1997. p. 489–513.
98. Keele SW, Ivry R. Does the cerebellum provide a common computation for diverse tasks? A timing hypothesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;608:179–207.
99. Pavlova MA. Biological motion processing as a hallmark of social cognition. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22:981–95.
100. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys. 1973;14:201–11.
101. Runeson S, Frykholm G. Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. J Exp Psychol. 1983;112:585–615.
102. Saygin AP. Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. Brain. 2007;130:2452–61.
103. Bonda E, Petrides M, Ostry D, Evans A. Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J Neurosci. 1996;16:3737–44.
104. Vaina LM, Solomon J, Chowdhury S, Sinha P, Belliveau JW. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:11656–61.
105. Pavlova M, Lutzenberger W, Sokolov A, Birbaumer N. Dissociable cortical processing of recognizable and non-recognizable biological movement: analysing gamma MEG activity. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:181–8.
106. Oram MW, Perrett DI. Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1996;76:109–29.
107. Pelphrey KA, Mitchell TV, McKeown MJ, Goldstein J, Allison T, McCarthy G. Brain activity evoked by the perception of human walking: controlling for meaningful coherent motion. J Neurosci. 2003;23:6819–25.
108. Pavlova MA, Sokolov AN, Bidet-Ildei C. Sex differences in the neuromagnetic cortical response to body motion. Cereb Cortex. 2014. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu175.
109. Grossman E, Donnelly M, Price R, Pickens D, Morgan V, Neighbor G, et al. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000;12:711–20.
110. Strick PL, Dum RP, Fiez JA. Cerebellum and nonmotor function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:413–34.
111. Glickstein M, Gerrits N, Kralj-Hans I, Mercier B, Stein J, Voogd J. Visual pontocerebellar projections in the macaque. J Comp Neurol. 1994;349:51–72.
112. Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN. Course of the fiber pathways to pons from parasensory association areas in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1992;326:159–79.
113. Blake R, Turner LM, Smoski MJ, Pozdol SL, Stone WL. Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychol Sci. 2003;14:151–7.
114. Kim J, Doop ML, Blake R, Park S. Impaired visual recognition of biological motion in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2005;77:299–307.
115. Barnea-Goraly N, Kwon H, Menon V, Eliez S, Lotspeich L, Reiss AL. White matter structure in autism: preliminary evidence from diffusion tensor imaging. Biol Psychiatry. 2004;55:323–6.
116. Kanaan RA, Borgwardt S, McGuire PK, Craig MC, Murphy DG, Picchioni M, et al. Microstructural organization of cerebellar tracts in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66:1067–9.
117. Kaiser MD, Hudac CM, Shultz S, Lee SM, Cheung C, Berken AM, et al. Neural signatures of autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:21223–8.
118. Catani M, Jones DK, Daly E, Embiricos N, Deeley Q, Pugliese L, et al. Altered cerebellar feedback projections in Asperger syndrome. Neuroimage. 2008;41:1184–91.
119. Nawrot M, Rizzo M. Motion perception deficits from midline cerebellar lesions in human. Vision Res. 1995;35:723–31.
120. Sokolov AA, Erb M, Grodd W, Tatagiba MS, Frackowiak RS, Pavlova MA. Recovery of biological motion perception and network plasticity after cerebellar tumor removal. Cortex. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.012.
121. Grèzes J, Frith CD, Passingham RE. Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2004;21:744–50.
122. Ohnishi T, Moriguchi Y, Matsuda H, Mori T, Hirakata M, Imabayashi E, et al. The neural network for the mirror system and mentalizing in normally developed children: an fMRI study. Neuroreport. 2004;15:1483–7.
123. Gobbini MI, Koralek AC, Bryan RE, Montgomery KJ, Haxby JV. Two takes on the social brain: a comparison of theory of mind tasks. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;19:1803–14.
124. Jack A, Pelphrey KA. Neural correlates of animacy attribution include neocerebellum in healthy adults. Cereb Cortex. 2014. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu146.
125. Jack A, Englander ZA, Morris JP. Subcortical contributions to effective connectivity in brain networks supporting imitation. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49:3689–98.
126. Cullen KE. The neural encoding of self-motion. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011;21:587–95.
127. Goldberg JM, Wilson VJ, Cullen KE, et al. The cerebellum and the vestibular system. In: Goldberg JM, Wislon VJ, Cullen KE, Angelaki DE, Broussard DM, Buttner-Ennever J, Fukushima K, Minor LB, editors. The vestibular system, a sixth sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
128. Bense S, Janusch B, Vucurevic G, Bauermann T, Schlindwein P, Brandt T, et al. Brainstem and cerebellar fMRI-activation during horizontal and vertical optokinetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 2006;174:312–23.
129. Kleinschmidt A, Thilo KV, Büchel C, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM, Frackowiak RS. Neural correlates of visual-motion perception as object- or self-motion. Neuroimage. 2002;16:873–82.
130. Bronstein AM, Grunfeld EA, Faldon M, Okada T. Reduced self-motion perception in patients with midline cerebellar lesions. Neuroreport. 2008;19:691–3.
131. Bertolini G, Ramat S, Bockisch CJ, Marti S, Straumann D, Palla A. Is vestibular self-motion perception controlled by the velocity storage? Insights from patients with chronic degeneration of the vestibulo-cerebellum. PLoS One. 2012;7:6.
132. Merfeld DM, Zupan L, Peterka RJ. Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration. Nature. 1999;398:615–618.
133. Laurens J, Meng H, Angelaki DE. Neural representation of orientation relative to gravity in the macaque cerebellum. Neuron. 2013;80:1508–18.
134. Brooks JX, Cullen KE. Multimodal integration in rostral fastigial nucleus provides an estimate of body movement. J Neurosci. 2009;29:10499–511.
135. Kleine JF, Guan Y, Kipiani E, Glonti L, Hoshi M, Buttner U. Trunk position influences vestibular responses of fastigial nucleus neurons in the alert monkey. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:2090–100.
136. Shaikh AG, Meng H, Angelaki DE. Multiple reference frames for motion in the primate cerebellum. J Neurosci. 2004;24:4491–7.
137. Brooks JX, Cullen KE. The primate cerebellum selectively encodes unexpected self-motion. Curr Biol. 2013;23:947–55.
138. Rochefort C, Arabo A, André M, Poucet B, Save E, Rondi-Reig L. Cerebellum shapes hippocampal spatial code. Science. 2011;334:385–9.
139. Batton 3rd RR, Jayaraman A, Ruggiero D, Carpenter MB. Fastigial efferent projections in the monkey: an autoradiographic study. J Comp Neurol. 1977;174:281–305.
140. Kamishina H, Conte WL, Patel SS, Tai RJ, Corwin JV, Reep RL. Cortical connections of the rat lateral posterior thalamic nucleus. Brain Res. 2009;1264:39–56.
141. Moulton EA, Schmahmann JD, Becerra L, Borsook D. The cerebellum and pain: passive integrator or active participator? Brain Res Rev. 2010;65:14–27.
142. Saab CY, Willis WD. The cerebellum: organization, functions and its role in nociception. Brain Res Rev. 2003;42:85–95.
143. Ekerot CF, Garwicz M, Schouenborg J. The postsynaptic dorsal column pathway mediates cutaneous nociceptive information to cerebellar climbing fibres in the cat. J Physiol. 1991;441:275–84.
144. Wu J, Chen PX. Discharge response of cerebellar Purkinje cells to stimulation of C-fiber in cat saphenous nerve. Brain Res. 1992;581:269–72.
145. Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede RD, Zubieta JK. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain. 2005;9:463–84.
146. Helmchen C, Mohr C, Erdmann C, Binkofski F. Cerebellar neural responses related to actively and passively applied noxious thermal stimulation in human subjects: a parametric fMRI study. Neurosci Lett. 2004;361:237–40.
147. Borsook D, Moulton EA, Tully S, Schmahmann JD, Becerra L. Human cerebellar responses to brush and heat stimuli in healthy and neuropathic pain subjects. Cerebellum. 2008;7:252–72.
148. Moulton EA, Elman I, Pendse G, Schmahmann J, Becerra L, Borsook D. Aversion-related circuitry in the cerebellum: responses to noxious heat and unpleasant images. J Neurosci. 2011;31:3795–804.
149. Moulton EA, Elman I, Becerra LR, Goldstein RZ, Borsook D. The cerebellum and addiction: insights gained from neuroimaging research. Addict Biol. 2014;19:317–31.
150. Thompson RF. Neural mechanisms of classical conditioning in mammals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990;329:161–70.
151. Koekkoek SK, Hulscher HC, Dortland BR, Hensbroek RA, Elgersma Y, Ruigrok TJ, et al. Cerebellar LTD and learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses. Science. 2003;301:1736–9.
152. Perrett SP, Ruiz BP, Mauk MD. Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses. J Neurosci. 1993;13:1708–18.
153. Bares M, Lungu O, Liu T, Waechter T, Gomez CM, Ashe J. Impaired predictive motor timing in patients with cerebellar disorders. Exp Brain Res. 2007;180:355–65.
154. Rahmati N, Owens CB, Bosman LW, Spanke JK, Lindeman S, Gong W, et al. Cerebellar potentiation and learning a whisker-based object localization task with a time response window. J Neurosci. 2014;34:1949–62.
155. Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:89–108.
156. Knolle F, Schraeger E, Baess P, Kotz SA. Cerebellar contributions to the prediction of self-initiated sounds. Cortex. 2013;49:2449–61.
157. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:127–38.
158. Blakemore SJ, Frith CD, Wolpert DM. Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999;11:551–9.
159. Kitazawa S, Kohno T, Uka T. Effects of delayed visual information on the rate and amount of prism adaptation in the human. J Neurosci. 1995;15:7644–52.
160. Tesche CD, Karhu JJ. Anticipatory cerebellar responses during somatosensory omission in man. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;9:119–42.
161. Wu X, Nestrasil I, Ashe J, Tuite P, Bushara K. Inferior olive response to passive tactile and visual stimulation with variable interstimulus intervals. Cerebellum. 2010;9:598–602.
162. Moberget T, Karns CM, Deouell LY, Lindgren M, Knight RT, Ivry RB. Detecting violations of sensory expectancies following cerebellar degeneration: a mismatch negativity study. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46:2569–79.
163. Händel B, Thier P, Haarmeier T. Visual motion perception deficits due to cerebellar lesions are paralleled by specific changes in cerebro-cortical activity. J Neurosci. 2009;29:15126–33.
164. O’Reilly JX, Mesulam MM, Nobre AC. The cerebellum predicts the timing of perceptual events. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2252–60.
165. Grube M, Cooper FE, Chinnery PF, Griffiths TD. Dissociation of duration-based and beat-based auditory timing in cerebellar degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:11597–601.
166. Koch G, Oliveri M, Caltagirone C. Neural networks engaged in milliseconds and seconds time processing: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation and patients with cortical or subcortical dysfunction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:1907–18.
167. Grube M, Lee KH, Griffiths TD, Barker AT, Woodruff PW. Transcranial magnetic theta-burst stimulation of the human cerebellum distinguishes absolute, duration-based from relative, beat-based perception of subsecond time intervals. Front Psychol. 2010;1:171.
168. Harrington DL, Lee RR, Boyd LA, Rapcsak SZ, Knight RT. Does the representation of time depend on the cerebellum? Effect of cerebellar stroke. Brain. 2004;127:561–74.
169. Gooch CM, Wiener M, Wencil EB, Coslett HB. Interval timing disruptions in subjects with cerebellar lesions. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48:1022–31.
170. Ivry RB, Spencer RM. Evaluating the role of the cerebellum in temporal processing: beware of the null hypothesis. Brain. 2004;127:E13.
171. Lewis PA, Miall RC. Brain activation patterns during measurement of sub- and supra-second intervals. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:1583–92.
172. Bueti D, Lasaponara S, Cercignani M, Macaluso E. Learning about time: plastic changes and interindividual brain differences. Neuron. 2012;75:725–37.
173. Wiener M, Lee YS, Lohoff FW, Coslett HB. Individual differences in the morphometry and activation of time perception networks are influenced by dopamine genotype. Neuroimage. 2014;89:10–22.
174. Hayashi MJ, Kantele M, Walsh V, Carlson S, Kanai R. Dissociable neuroanatomical correlates of subsecond and suprasecond time perception. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014;26:1685–93.
175. Paquette S, Mignault Goulet G, Rothermich K. Prediction, attention and unconscious processing in hierarchical auditory perception. Front Psychol. 2013;4:955–6.
176. Clark A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav Brain Sci. 2013;36:181–204.
177. Popa LS, Hewitt AL, Ebner TJ. Predictive and feedback performance errors are signaled in the simple spike discharge of individual Purkinje cells. J Neurosci. 2012;32:15345–58.
178. Molinari M, Chiricozzi F, Clausi S, Tedesco A, De Lisa M, Leggio M. Cerebellum and detection of sequences, from perception to cognition. Cerebellum. 2008;7:611–5.
179. Braitenberg V, Heck D, Sultan F. The detection and generation of sequences as a key to cerebellar function: experiments and theory. Behav Brain Sci. 1997;20:229–77.
180. Ivry R. Exploring the role of the cerebellum in sensory anticipation and timing: commentary on Tesche and Karhu. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;9:115–8.
181. Nixon PD. The role of the cerebellum in preparing responses to predictable sensory events. Cerebellum. 2003;2:114–22.
182. Restuccia D, Della MG, Valeriani M, Leggio MG, Molinari M. Cerebellar damage impairs detection of somatosensory input changes. A somatosensory mismatch-negativity study. Brain. 2007;130:276–87.
183. Ito M. Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine. Prog Neurobiol. 2006;78:272–303.
184. Molinari M, Leggio MG, Solida A, Ciorra R, Misciagna S, Silveri MC, et al. Cerebellum and procedural learning: evidence from focal cerebellar lesions. Brain. 1997;120:1753–62.
185. Leggio MG, Chiricozzi FR, Clausi S, Tedesco AM, Molinari M. The neuropsychological profile of cerebellar damage: the sequencing hypothesis. Cortex. 2011;47:137–44.
186. Dirnberger G, Novak J, Nasel C, Zehnter M. Separating coordinative and executive dysfunction in cerebellar patients during motor skill acquisition. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48:1200–8.
187. Doyon J, Gaudreau D, Laforce RJ, Castonguay M, Bedard PJ, Bedard F, et al. Role of the striatum, cerebellum, and frontal lobes in the learning of a visuomotor sequence. Brain Cogn. 1997;34:218–45.
188. Ferrucci R, Brunoni A, Parazzini M, Vergari M, Rossi E, Fumagalli M, et al. Modulating human procedural learning by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation. Cerebellum. 2013;12:485–92.
189. Gomez-Beldarrain M, Garcia-Monco JC, Rubio B, Pascual-Leone A. Effect of focal cerebellar lesions on procedural learning in the serial reaction time task. Exp Brain Res. 1998;120:25–30.
190. Nixon PD, Passingham RE. The cerebellum and cognition: cerebellar lesions impair sequence learning but not conditional visuomotor learning in monkeys. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38:1054–72.
191. Timmann D, Drepper J, Calabrese S, Burgerhoff K, Maschke M, Kolb FP, et al. Use of sequence information in associative learning in control subjects and cerebellar patients. Cerebellum. 2004;3:75–82.
192. Leggio MG, Tedesco AM, Chiricozzi FR, Clausi S, Orsini A, Molinari M. Cognitive sequencing impairment in patients with focal or atrophic cerebellar damage. Brain. 2008;13:1332–43.
193. Gomot M, Wicker B. A challenging, unpredictable world for people with autism spectrum disorder. Int J Psychophysiol. 2012;83:240–7.
194. Ford JM, Mathalon DH. Anticipating the future: automatic prediction failures in schizophrenia. Int J Psychophysiol. 2012;83:232–9.
195. Horga G, Schatz KC, Abi-Dargham A, Peterson BS. Deficits in predictive coding underlie hallucinations in schizophrenia. J Neurosci. 2014;34:8072–82.
196. Shergill SS, White TP, Joyce DW, Bays PM, Wolpert DM, Frith CD. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of impaired sensory prediction in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:28–35.
197. Jack A, Morris JP. Neocerebellar contributions to social perception in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2014;10:77–92.
198. Sachse M, Schlitt S, Hainz D, Ciaramidaro A, Walter H, Poustka F, et al. Facial emotion recognition in paranoid schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. Schizophr Res. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2014.08.030.
199. Andreasen NC, Pierson R. The role of the cerebellum in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;64:81–8.
200. Fatemi SH, Aldinger KA, Ashwood P, et al. Consensus paper: pathological role of the cerebellum in autism. Cerebellum. 2012;11:777–807.
201. Larson JCG, Mostofsky SH. Evidence that the pattern of visuomotor sequence learning is altered in children with autism. Autism Res. 2008;1:341–53.
202. Remillard G. The study of sequence learning in individuals with schizophrenia: a critical review of the literature. J Neuropsychol. 2014;8:231–45.
203. Bower JM. Is the cerebellum sensory for motor’s sake, of motor for sensory’s sake: the view from the whiskers of a rat? Prog Brain Res. 1997;114:483–516.
204. Bower JM, Kassel J. Variability in tactile projection patterns to cerebellar folia crus IIa of the Norway rat. J Comp Neurol. 1990;302:768–78.
205. Bower JM. Computational structure of the cerebellar molecular layer. In: Manto M, Gruol D, Schmahmann J, Koibuchi N, Rossi F, editors. Handbook of the cerebellum and cerebellar disorders. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 1359–80.
206. Parsons LM, Bower JM, Gao JH, Xiong J, Li J, Fox PT. Lateral cerebellar hemispheres actively support sensory acquisition and discrimination rather than motor control. Learn Mem. 1997;4:49–62.
207. Liu Y, Pu Y, Gao JH, Parsons LM, Xiong J, Liotti M, et al. The human red nucleus and lateral cerebellum in supporting roles for sensory information processing. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;10:147–59.
208. Petacchi A, Laird AR, Fox PT, Bower JM. Cerebellum and auditory function: an ALE meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25:118–228.
209. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessel TM. Principles of neural science. Norwalk: Appleton and Lange; 1991.
210. Tinazzi M, Morgante F, Peretti A, Mariotti C, Panzeri M, Fiorio M, et al. Impaired temporal processing of tactile and proprioceptive stimuli in cerebellar degeneration. PLoS One. 2013;8:e78628.
211. Bhanpuri NH, Okamura AM, Bastian AJ. Active force perception depends on cerebellar function. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107:1612–20.
212. Christensen A, Giese MA, Sultan F, Mueller OM, Goericke SL, Ilg W, et al. An intact action–perception coupling depends on the integrity of the cerebellum. J Neurosci. 2014;34:6707–16.
213. Ackermann H, Mathiak K, Riecker A. The contribution of the cerebellum to speech production and speech perception: clinical and functional imaging data. Cerebellum. 2007;6:202–13.
214. Jokisch D, Troje NF, Koch B, Schwarz M, Daum I. Differential involvement of the cerebellum in biological and coherent motion perception. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:3439–46.
215. Lee KH, Egleston PN, Brown WH, Gregory AN, Barker AT, Woodruff PW. The role of the cerebellum in subsecond time perception: evidence from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;19:147–57.
216. Bower JM. Functional implications of tactile projection patterns to the lateral hemispheres of the cerebellum of the albino rat: the legacy of Wally Welker. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1225:130–41.
217. Proville RD, Spolidoro M, Guyon N, Dugue GP, Selimi F, Isope P, et al. Cerebellum involvement in cortical sensorimotor circuits for the control of voluntary movements. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:1233–9.
218. Flourens P. Recherches Experimentales Sur Les Proprietes Et Les Fonctions Du Systeme Nerveux, Dans Les Animaux Vertebres. Crevot: Paris; 1824.
219. Holmes G. The cerebellum of man. Brain. 1939;62:1–30.
220. Manto M, Bower JM, Conforto AB, Delgado-Garcia JM, da Guarda SN, Gerwig M, et al. Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control—the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement. Cerebellum. 2012;11(2):457–87.
221. Schlerf JE, Xu J, Klemfuss NM, Griffiths TL, Ivry RB. Individuals with cerebellar degeneration show similar adaptation deficits with large and small visuomotor errors. J Neurophysiol. 2013;109:1164–73.
222. Thompson RF, Steinmetz JE. The role of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of discrete behavioral responses. Neuroscience. 2009;162:732–55.
223. Huang C, Ricklefs RE. Cerebellum and human evolution: a comparative and information theory perspective. In: Manto M, Gruol D, Schmahmann J, Koibuchi N, Rossi F, editors. Handbook of the cerebellum and cerebellar disorders. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 1337–57.
224. Kawashima R, Okuda J, Umetsu A, Sugiura M, Inoue K, Suzuki K, et al. Human cerebellum plays an important role in memory-timed finger movement: an fMRI study. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83:1079–87.
225. D’Angelo E, Casali S. Seeking a unified framework for cerebellar function and dysfunction: from circuit operations to cognition. Front Neural Circ. 2012;6:116.
226. Schlerf J, Ivry RB, Diedrichsen J. Encoding of sensory prediction errors in the human cerebellum. J Neurosci. 2012;32:4913–22.
227. Ivry RB, Spencer RMC. The neural representation of time. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14:225–32.
228. Holscher C, Munk M. Information processing by neuronal populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
229. Frings M, Boenisch R, Gerwig M, Diener HC, Timmann D. Learning of sensory sequences in cerebellar patients. Learn Mem. 2004;11:347–55.
230. Pfordresher PQ, Mantell JT, Brown S, Zivadinov R, Cox JL. Brain responses to altered auditory feedback during musical keyboard production: an fMRI study. Brain Res. 2014;1556:28–37.
231. Bell C, Bodznick D, Montgomery J, Bastian J. The generation and subtraction of sensory expectations within cerebellum-like structures. Brain Behav Evol. 1997;50:17–31.
232. Dancey E, Murphy B, Srbely J, Yielder P. The effect of experimental pain on motor training performance and sensorimotor integration. Exp Brain Res. 2014;232:2879–89.
233. Gottwald B, Mihajlovic Z, Wilde B, Mehdorn HM. Does the cerebellum contribute to specific aspects of attention? Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:1452–60.
234. Kellermann T, Regenbogen C, De Vos M, Mößnang C, Finkelmeyer A, Habel U. Effective connectivity of the human cerebellum during visual attention. J Neurosci. 2012;32:11453–60.
235. Ravizza SM, McCormick CA, Schlerf JE, Justus T, Ivry RB, Fiez JA. Cerebellar damage produces selective deficits in verbal working memory. Brain. 2006;129:306–20.
236. Robinson DA. The use of control systems analysis in the neurophysiology of eye movements. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1981;4:463–503.
237. Lisberger SG. Neural basis for motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex of primates. III. Computational and behavioral analysis of the sites of learning. J Neurophysiol. 1994;72:974–98.
238. Westheimer G, McKee SP. Visual acuity in the presence of retinal-image motion. J Opt Soc Am. 1975;65:847–50.
239. Little WJ. On the influence of abnormal parturition, difficult labours, premature birth and asphxia neonatorum on the mental and physical condition of the child, especially in relation to deformities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1966;46:7–22.
240. Spence RD, Zhen Y, White S, Schlinger BA, Day LB. Recovery of motor and cognitive function after cerebellar lesions in a songbird: role of estrogens. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;29:1225–34.
241. Williams AJ, Ling GSF, Tortella FC. Severity level and injury track determine outcome following a penetrating ballistic-like brain injury in the rat. Neurosci Lett. 2006;408:183–8.
242. Willson ML, Bower AJ, Sherrard RM. Developmental neural plasticity and its cognitive benefits: olivocerebellar reinnervation compensates for spatial function in the cerebellum. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:1475–83.
243. Konczak J, Schoch B, Dimitrova A, Gizewski E, Timmann D. Functional recovery of children and adolescents after cerebellar tumour resection. Brain. 2005;128:1428–41.
244. Fatemi SH. Cerebellum and autism. Cerebellum. 2013;12:778–9.
245. Iwanaga R, Honda S, Nakane H, Tanaka K, Toeda H, Tanaka G. Pilot study: efficacy of sensory integration therapy for Japanese children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Occup Ther Int. 2014;21:4–11.
246. Pavlova M, Krageloh-Mann I, Sokolov A, Birbaumer N. Recognition of point-light biological motion displays by young children. Perception. 2001;30:925–33.