Erratum: Bayesian processing of vestibular information (Biological Cybernetics (2006) DOI:10.1007/s00422-006-0133-1);Bayesian processing of vestibular information

Biological Cybernetics

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 389-404

  Laurens, Jean ^a   Droulez, Jacques ^a  

^a l'alimentation et l'Environnement   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; LINEAR ACCELERATORS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; SIGNAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

BAYESIAN PROCESSING; DISORIENTING; ILLUSORY MOTION; VESTIBULAR INFORMATION;

CYBERNETICS;

ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY POSTURE; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MATHEMATICS; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; ROTATION; VESTIBULE;

ACCELERATION; BAYES THEOREM; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; POSTURE; ROTATION; VESTIBULE;

EID: 34248381264     PISSN: 03401200     EISSN: 14320770     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00422-007-0141-9     Document Type: Erratum

References (43)

1. Angelaki DE, Shaikh AG, Green AM, Dickman JD (2004) Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion. Nature, 430(6999):560-564
2. Benson AJ, Bodin MA (1966) Interaction of linear and angular accelerations on vestibular receptors in man. Aerosp Med 37(2):144-154
3. Borah J, Young LR, Curry RE (1988) Optimal estimator model for human spatial orientation. Ann NY Acad Sci 545:51-73
4. Bos JE, Bles W (2002) Theoretical considerations on canal-otolith interaction and an observer model. Biol Cybern 86(3): 191-207
5. Bos JE, Bles W, de Graaf B (2002) Eye movements to yaw, pitch, and roll about vertical and horizontal axes: adaptation and motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 73(5):436-444
6. Correia MJ, Guedry FE (1966) Modification of vestibular responses as a function of rate of rotation about an earth-horizontal axis. Acta Otolaryngol 62(4):297-308
7. Curthoys IS, Haslwanter T, Black RA, Burgess AM, Halmagyi GM, Topple AN, Todd MJ (1998) Off-center yaw rotation: effect of naso-occipital linear acceleration on the nystagmus response of normal human subjects and patients after unilateral vestibular loss. Exp Brain Res 123(4):425-438
8. Deneve S, Latham PE, Pouget A (2001) Efficient computation and cue integration with noisy population codes. Nat Neurosci 4(8):826-831
9. Denise P, Darlot C, Droulez J, Cohen B, Berthoz A (1988) Motion perceptions induced by off-vertical axis rotation (ovar) at small angles of tilt. Exp Brain Res 73(1):106-114
10. Droulez J, Darlot C (1989) The geometric and dynamic implications of the coherence constraints in three-dimensional sensorimotor interactions. In: Jeannerod M. (ed) Attention and Performance XIII, pp 495-526. New York: Erlbaum
11. Droulez J, Cornilleau Perez V (1993) Application of the coherence scheme to the multisensory fusion problem. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Multisensory control of movement, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 485-501
12. Ernst MO and Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415(6870):429-433
13. Glasauer S, Merfeld DM (1997) Modeling three dimensional vestibular responses during complex motion stimulations. In: Three-dimensional kinematics of eye, head and limb movements, Harwood Switzerland, pp 387-389
14. Glasauer S (1992) Human spatial orientation during centrifuge experiments : non-linear interaction of semicircular canals and otoliths. In: Jerabek J Krejcova H (ed) Proceedings of the XVIIth Barany Society Meeting, pp 48-52
15. Graybiel A and Clark B (1965) Validity of the oculogravic illusion as an indicator of otolith function. Aerospace Med 36: 1173-1181
16. Guedry FE (1965) Orientation of the rotation-axis relative to gravity: its influence on nystagmus and the sensation of rotation. Acta Otolaryngol 60:30-48
17. Guedry FE (1974) Psychophysics of vestibular sensation. In: Kornhuber, H.H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, Chap. 1, pp 3-154. Springer, Berlin
18. Henn V, Cohen B, Young LR (1980) Visual-vestibular interaction in motion perception and the generation of nystagmus. Neurosci Res Program Bull 18(4):457-651
19. Hillis JM, Ernst MO, Banks MS, Landy MS (2002) Combining sensory information: Mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science 298:1627-1630
20. Hosman RJ, van der Vaart JC (1978) Vestibular models and thresehomds of motion perception. results of tests in a flight simulator. Report
21. Klam F, Graf W (2003) Vestibular response kinematics in posterior parietal cortex neurons of macaque monkeys. Eur J Neurosci 18(4):995-1010
22. Kording KP, Wolpert DM (2004) Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427(6971):244-247
23. Lackner JR, Graybiel A (1978) Postural illusions experienced during z-axis recumbent rotation and their dependence upon somatosensory stimulation of the body surface. Aviat Space Environ Med 49(3):484-488
24. Lee TS and Mumford D (2003) Hierarchical bayesian inference in the visual cortex. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 20(7):1434-1448
25. Maskell S, Gordon N (2002) A tutorial on particle filters for on-line nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans Signal Process 50(2):174-188
26. Mayne R (1974) A system concept of the vestibular organs. In: Kornhuber, H.H (ed) Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol VI. Vestibular system Part 2: psychophysics, applied aspects and general interpretations. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York pp 493-580
27. Merfeld DM, Zupan LH, Gifford CA (2001) Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans, ii. influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation. J Neurophysiol 85(4):1648-1660
28. Merfeld DM, Park S, Gianna C-Poulin, Black FO, Wood S (2005) Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. frequency response of vor and perceptual responses during translation and tilt. J Neurophysiol 94(1):186-198
29. Merfeld DM, Park S, Gianna Poulin C, Black FO, Wood S (2005) Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. ii. vor and perceptual responses during combined tilt and translation. J Neurophysiol 94(1):199-205
30. Merfeld DM (1995) Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt. Exp Brain Res 106(1):123-134
31. Mittelstaedt H, Glasauer S, Gralla G, Mittelstaedt ML (1989) How to explain a constant subjective vertical at constant high speed rotation about an earth-horizontal axis. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 468:295-299
32. Oman CM (1982) A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of sensory conflict and motion sickness. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 392:1-44
33. Rao RP (2004) Bayesian computation in recurrent neural circuits. Neural Comput 16(1):1-38
34. Raphan T, Cohen B (2002) The vestibulo-ocular reflex in three dimensions. Exp Brain Res 145(1):1-27
35. Raphan T, Cohen B, Matsuo V (1977) A velocity-storage mechanism responsible for optokinetic nystagmus (okn), optokinetic after-nystagmus (okan) and vestibular nystagmus. In: Control of gaze by brainsteam neurons, Elsevier, Amsterdam pp 37-47
36. Reymond G, Droulez J, Kemeny A (2002) Visuovestibular perception of self-motion modeled as a dynamic optimization process. Biol Cybern 87(4):301-314
37. Robinson DA (1.977) Vestibular and optokinetic symbiosis: an example of explaining by modelling. In: Control of gaze by brainsteam neurons, Elsevier, Amsterdam pp 49-58
38. van der Kooij H, Jacobs R, Koopman B, Grootenboer H (1999) A multisensory integration model of human stance control. Biol Cybern 80(5):299-308
39. van der Kooij H, Jacobs R, Koopman B, van der Helm F (2001) An adaptive model of sensory integration in a dynamic environment applied to human stance control. Biol Cybern 84(2): 103-115
40. Weiss Y, Simoncelli EP, Adelson EH (2002) Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nat Neurosci 5(6):598-604
41. Yakushin SB, Raphan T, Suzuki J, Arai Y, Cohen B (1998) Dynamics and kinematics of the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex in monkey: effects of canal plugging. J Neurophysiol 80(6): 3077-3099
42. Zemel RS, Dayan P, Pouget A (1998) Probabilistic interpretation of population codes. Neural Comput 10(2):403-430
43. Zupan LH, Merfeld DM, Darlot C (2002) Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements. Biological Cybernetics 86(3):209-230