The neural representation of time

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 225-232

  Ivry, Richard B ^a   Spencer, Rebecca M C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditioned response; CR; fMRI; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Parkinson's disease; PD; SMA; Supplementary motor area

Indexed keywords

BASAL GANGLION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CEREBELLUM CORTEX; CEREBELLUM DISEASE; CONDITIONING; CORPUS STRIATUM; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; EXTRAPYRAMIDAL SYNDROME; EYELID REFLEX; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INHIBITORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; MODEL; MOTOR COORDINATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARKINSON DISEASE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUTAMEN; REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

BASAL GANGLIA; BRAIN; CEREBELLUM; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL PATHWAYS; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 1842785708     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.013     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Fraisse P: The Psychology of Time. New York: Harper & Row; 1963.
2. Lewis P.A., Miall R.C. Brain activation patterns during measurement of sub- and supra-second intervals. Neuropsychologia. 41:2003;1583-1592 The authors present a study in which fMRI was used to identify brain systems engaged during a duration discrimination task. The control task required judgments of stimulus length. Three aspects of this study are noteworthy. First, the psychophysical methods ensured that experimental and control tasks were of comparable difficulty and, unlike many similar studies, participants had to attend to the stimulus for its entire duration in both conditions. Second, primary analyses focus on direct comparison of the two conditions rather than a comparison of each to a resting baseline. Third, scanning parameters ensured excellent coverage of cortex and cerebellum.
3. Lewis P.A., Miall R.C. Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 13:2003;250-255.
4. Semjen A: Emergent versus programmed temporal properties of movement sequences. In Time and Mind Edited by Helfrich H. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber; 1996:25-43.
5. Turvey MT: Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. In Perceiving, Acting and Knowing. Edited by Bransford R. Hillsdale NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum; 1977:211-265.
6. McAuley J.D., Jones M.R. Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: a comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short-interval timing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 29:2003;1102-1125.
7. Gerwig M., Dimitrova A., Kolb F.P., Maschke M., Brol B., Kunnel A., Boring D., Thilmann A.F., Forsting M., Diener H.C.et al. Comparison of eyeblink conditioning in patients with superior and posterior inferior cerebellar lesions. Brain. 126:2003;71-94.
8. Bao S.W., Chen L., Kim J.J., Thompson R.F. Cerebellar cortical inhibition and classical eyeblink conditioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 99:2002;1592-1597.
9. Perrett S.P., Ruiz B.P., Mauk M.D. Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses. J Neurosci. 13:1993;1708-1718.
10. Kotani S., Kawahara S., Kirino Y. Purkinje cell activity during learning a new timing in classical eyeblink conditioning. Brain Res. 994:2003;193-202 The authors made single unit recordings in the cerebellar lobule HVI of decerebrate guinea pigs during eyeblink conditioning with the initial interval between the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli set to 250 ms, followed by transfer to an interval of 400 ms. The majority of cells showed time-dependent response to the conditioned stimulus, although the pattern could be excitatory, inhibitory, or complex. However, the profile of individual cells was uncorrelated for the two inter-response intervals (ISIs). Their results stand against the hypothesis that the new timing is learned by simple shift of output properties of learning-related cells; rather, learning of new timing required recruitment of different neural populations within the cerebellum.
11. Koekkoek S.K.E., Hulscher H.C., Dortland B.R., Hensbroek R.A., Elgersma Y., Ruigrok T.J.H., DeZeeuw C.I. Cerebellar LTD and learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses. Science. 301:2003;1736-1739 The authors conducted eyeblink conditioning in transgenic L7-PKCi mice, a knockout species in which LTD at the parallel fiber-Purkinje synapse in cerebellar cortex is impaired by inhibition of protein kinase C. These animals developed conditioned responses over a multi-day training session, although at lower levels compared to wild type littermates. The peak amplitude was much earlier in the mutants and remained maladaptively timed when the interval between the conditioned and the unconditioned stimulus was lengthened.
12. Timmann D., Watts S., Hore J. Failure of cerebellar patients to time finger opening precisely causes ball high-low inaccuracy in overarm throws. J Neurophysiol. 2:1999;103-114.
13. McNaughton S., Timmann D., Watts S., Hore J. Overarm throwing speed in cerebellar subjects: effect of timing of ball release. Exp Brain Res. 154:2004;470-478.
14. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 9:1999;718-727.
15. Ivry RB, Diedrichsen J, Spencer RMC, Hazeltine E, Semjen A: A cognitive neuroscience perspective on bimanual coordination and interference. In Interlimb Coordination. Edited by Swinnen SP, Duyens J. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic; in press.
16. Ivry R.B., Spencer R.M.C., Zelaznik H.N., Diedrichsen J. The cerebellum and event timing. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 978:2002;302-317.
17. Spencer R.M.C., Zelaznik H.N., Diedrichsen J., Ivry R.B. Disrupted timing of discontinuous movements by cerebellar lesions. Science. 300:2003;1437-1439 Previous studies (Zelaznik et al. [73]) had shown that individual differences in timing acuity were not correlated between rhythmic production tasks in which the movements involved discontinuities between successive cycles (slight pause or contact with response surface) and rhythmic production tasks in which the movements were produced in a smooth, continuous manner. As predicted, patients with cerebellar lesions were selectively impaired on the tasks involving discontinuities. The lack of impairment on the continuous tasks is especially striking given that these movements required coordination across multiple joints and involved significant interaction torques.
18. Harrington D.L., Lee R.R., Boyd L.A., Rapcsak S.Z., Knight R.T. Does the representation of time depend on the cerebellum? Effect of cerebellar stroke. Brain. 127:2004;561-574 The authors provide the most thorough attempt to date to specify subregions within the cerebellum that are essential for accurate timing on production and perception tasks. The authors focus on the lack of a consistent impairment in the group of patients, arguing that the results challenge a central role for the cerebellum in temporal processing. However, this acceptance of the null hypothesis is questionable given that patients with lesions in the superior cerebellum exhibited increased variability on a rhythmic tapping task and a marginally significant increase (p = 0.07) on a duration discrimination task. The superior cerebellum was defined as lobules superior to lobulus semilunaris inferior (above Crus II), and the lesions extended into the dentate nucleus in some of the patients.
19. Meck W.H., Benson A.M. Dissecting the brain's internal clock: how frontal-striatal circuitry keeps time and shifts attention. Brain Cogn. 48:2002;195-211 The authors present a concise review that focuses on hypothesized functions of frontal-striatal circuitry for temporal processing tasks. The article provides an overview of the component operations that constitute the scalar timing model, including timing, attention, and memory processes, and reviews how lesion and imaging studies suggest differential roles for cortical and basal ganglia regions in the instantiation of these processes.
20. Matell M.S., Meck W.H., Nicolelis M.A.L. Interval timing and the encoding of signal duration by ensembles of cortical and striatal neurons. Behav Neurosci. 117:2003;760-773.
21. Malapani C., Deweer B., Gibbon J. Separating storage from retrieval dysfunction of temporal memory in Parkinson's disease. J Cogn Neurosci. 14:2002;311-322.
22. Harrington D.L., Haaland K.Y., Hermanowicz N. Temporal processing in the basal ganglia. Neuropsychology. 12:1998;3-12.
23. Artieda J., Pastor M.A., Lacruz F., Obeso J.A. Temporal discrimination is abnormal in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 115:1992;199-210.
24. Ivry R.B., Keele S.W., Diener H.C. Dissociation of the lateral and medial cerebellum in movement timing and movement execution. Exp Brain Res. 73:1988;167-180.
25. Rammsayer T. Neuropharmacological evidence for different timing mechanisms in humans. Q J Exp Psychol. 52:1999;273-286.
26. Graeber S., Hertrich I., Daum I., Spieker S., Ackermann H. Speech perception deficits in Parkinson's disease: underestimation of time intervals compromises identification of durational phonetic contrasts. Brain Lang. 82:2002;65-74.
27. Elsinger C.L., Rao S.M., Zimbelman J.L., Reynolds N.C., Blindauer K.A., Hoffman R.G. Neural basis for impaired time reproduction in Parkinson's disease: An fMRI study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 9:2003;1088-1098.
28. Ivry R.B., Keele S.W. Timing functions of the cerebellum. J Cogn Neurosci. 1:1989;136-152.
29. O'Boyle D.J., Freeman J.S., Cody F.W.J. The accuracy and precision of timing of self-paced, repetitive movements in subjects with Parkinson's disease. Brain. 119:1996;51-70.
30. Aparicio PD, Diedrichsen J, Ivry RB: Effects of focal basal ganglia lesions on timing and force control. Brain Cogn in press.
31. Kagerer F.A., Wittmann M., Szelag E., Von Steinbuchel N. Cortical involvement in temporal reproduction: evidence for differential roles of the hemispheres. Neuropsychologia. 40:2002;357-366.
32. Fitch R.H., Miller S., Tallal P. Neurobiology of speech perception. Annu Rev Neurosci. 20:1997;331-353.
33. Robertson L.C., Ivry R. Hemispheric asymmetries: attention to visual and auditory primitives. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 9:2000;59-63.
34. Poeppel D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling time'. Speech Commun. 41:2003;245-255.
35. Harrington D.L., Haaland K.Y., Knight R.T. Cortical networks underlying mechanisms of time perception. J Neurosci. 18:1998;1085-1095.
36. Koch G., Oliveri M., Torriero S., Caltagirone C. Underestimation of time perception after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 60:2003;1844-1846.
37. Macar F., Lejeune H., Bonnet M., Ferrara A., Pouthas V., Vidal F., Maquet P. Activation of the supplementary motor area and of attentional networks during temporal processing. Exp Brain Res. 142:2002;475-485.
38. Ferrandez A.M., Hugueville L., Lehericy S., Poline J.B., Marsault C., Pouthas V. Basal ganglia and supplementary motor area subtend duration and perception: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 19:2003;1532-1544.
39. Smith A., Taylor E., Lidzba K., Rubia K. A right hemispheric frontocerebellar network for time discrimination of several hundreds of milliseconds. Neuroimage. 20:2003;344-350.
40. Nenadic I., Gaser C., Volz H.-P., Rammsayer T., Hager F., Sauer H. Processing of temporal information in the basal ganglia: new evidence from fMRI. Exp Brain Res. 148:2003;238-246.
41. Mayville J.M., Jantzen K.J., Fuchs A., Steinberg F.L., Kelso J.A.S. Cortical and subcortical networks underlying syncopated and synchronized coordination revealed using fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 17:2002;214-229.
42. Ullen F., Forssberg H., Ehrsson H.H. Neural networks for the coordination of the hands in time. J Neurophysiol. 89:2003;1126-1135.
43. Dhamala M., Pagnoni G., Wiesenfeld K., Zink C.F., Martin M., Berns G.S. Neural correlates of the complexity of rhythmic finger tapping. Neuroimage. 20:2003;918-926.
44. Sakai K., Ramnani N., Passingham R.E. Learning of sequences of finger movements and timing: frontal lobe and action-oriented representation. J Neurophysiol. 88:2002;2035-2046 The authors report an fMRI experiment of motor learning in which two variables were manipulated. First, the sequence of finger movements was either specified or random. Second, the timing of the stimuli specifying the responses was fixed or random. fMRI analyses focused on activation increases and decreases over training sessions associated with the finger sequence alone, the timing sequence alone, or both. Areas activated in the two conditions in which temporal learning was possible were limited to the contralateral inferior parietal lobe and ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere.
45. Konishi M. Coding in auditory space. Annu Rev Neurosci. 26:2003;31-55.
46. Braitenberg V. Is the cerebellar cortex a biological clock in the millisecond range? Prog Brain Res. 25:1967;334-346.
47. Buonomano D.V., Karmarkar U.R. How do we tell time? Neuroscientist. 8:2002;42-51.
48. Gibbon J. Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's Law in animal timing. Psychol Rev. 84:1977;279-325.
49. Buonomano D.V. Timing of neural responses in cortical organotypic slices. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100:2003;4897-4902 Reliably timed action potentials occurring up to 300 ms after stimulus onset are observed in an organotypic cortical slice preparation obtained from rat auditory cortex. The late responses are attributed to the intrinsic dynamics of the neural network, consistent with modeling work in which slow physiological processes are hypothesized to be capable of processing temporal information in the order of hundreds of milliseconds. The authors hypothesize that timing in this range could be a local process, reflected in the dynamics of neurons recruited in a task-specific manner.
50. Hopfield J.J., Brody C.D. What is a moment? Transient synchrony as a collective mechanism for spatiotemporal integration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 98:2001;1282-1287.
51. Leon M.I., Shadlen M.N. Representation of time by neurons in the posterior parietal cortex of the macaque. Neuron. 38:2003;317-327 Animals were trained to judge the duration of a visual stimulus and indicate their response with an eye movement after an extended delay. Neural activity was time-dependent during the stimulus period, indicating that the cells were not simply recruited at the time of the response. However, it remains plausible that the neural activity reflects the dynamics of decision processes with temporal coding originating upstream.
52. Buonomano D.V. Decoding temporal information: a model based on short-term synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci. 20:2000;1129-1141.
53. Brody C.D., Hernandez A., Antonio Z., Romo R. Timing and neural encoding of somatosensory parametric working memory in macaque prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 13:2003;1196-1207.
54. Roux S., Coulmance M., Riehle A. Context-related representation of timing processes in monkey motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 18:2003;1011-1016.
55. Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T. Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol. 86:2001;1916-1936.
56. Sawamura H., Shima K., Tanji J. Numerical representation for action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Nature. 415:2002;918-922.
57. Pfeuty M., Ragot R., Pouthas V. When time is up: CNV time course differentiates the roles of the hemispheres in the discrimination of short tone durations. Exp Brain Res. 151:2003;373-379.
58. Pfeuty M., Ragot R., Pouthas V. Processes involved in tempo perception: a CNV analysis. Psychophysiology. 40:2003;69-76.
59. Monfort V., Pouthas V. Effects of working memory demands on frontal slow waves in time-interval reproduction tasks in humans. Neurosci Lett. 343:2003;195-199.
60. Ohyama T., Nores W.L., Murphy M., Mauk M.D. What the cerebellum computes. Trends Neurosci. 26:2003;222-227 The authors present a computationally oriented review of how eyeblink conditioning provides a model system for understanding feedforward control mechanisms used to support sensorimotor learning. The review emphasizes the importance of error signals in this form of learning, how error signals are used to support associative processes that operate at various levels and how they can shape behavior that is temporally specific.
61. Fiala J.C., Grossberg S., Bullock D. Metabotropic glutamate receptor activation in cerebellar Purkinje cells as substrate for adaptive timing of the classically conditioned eye-blink response. J Neurosci. 16:1996;3760-3774.
62. Buonomano D.V., Mauk M.D. Neural network model of the cerebellum: temporal discrimination and the timing of motor responses. Neural Comput. 6:1994;38-55.
63. Mathiak K., Hertrich I., Grodd W., Ackermann H. Cerebellum and speech perception: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Cogn Neurosci. 14:2002;902-912 The authors used fMRI to study the neural correlates for processing the phonemic cue of closure duration for stop consonants. Acoustically, this cue can be signaled temporally by the duration of silence or by a combination of spectral and temporal information. Importantly, people might be unaware of this manipulation; thus, the two imaging conditions are essentially identical. Nonetheless, when the cues were purely temporal, activation was restricted to left frontal and right cerebellar foci; by contrast, the inclusion of spectral cues resulted in a shift of activation to left superior temporal lobe.
64. Dreher J.-C., Grafman J. The roles of the cerebellum and basal ganglia in timing and error prediction. Eur J Neurosci. 16:2002;1609-1619 Both the cerebellum and the basal ganglia have been implicated in similar cognitive operations including timing, error prediction, and the coordination of attentional set. In an attempt to directly evaluate these hypotheses, the authors conducted an fMRI study of task switching in which the timing and order of changes in a task set were manipulated. Cerebellar activation was sensitive to the temporal manipulation. By contrast, striatal activation was sensitive to task order predictability, interpreted as reflecting a role in error prediction. Activation in neither cerebellum nor striatum increased during attention switching compared to a control condition with similar working memory demands.
65. Price C.J., Friston K.J. Degeneracy and cognitive anatomy. Trends Cogn Sci. 6:2002;416-421.
66. Ivry R.B. The representation of temporal information in perception and motor control. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 6:1996;851-857.
67. Spencer RMC, Ivry RB: Comparison of patients with Parkinson's disease or cerebellar lesions in the production of periodic movements involving event-based or emergent timing. Brain Cogn in press.
68. Diedrichsen J, Ivry R, Pressing J: Cerebellar and basal ganglia contributions to interval timing. In Functional and Neural Mechanisms of Interval Timing. Edited by Meck WH: CRC Press; 2003:457-483.
69. Berns GS, Sejnowski TJ: How the basal ganglia make decisions. In The Neurobiology of Decision Making. Edited by Damasio A, Damasio H, Christen Y: Springer-Verlag; 1996:101-113.
70. Block R.A., Zakay D. Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: a meta-analytic review. Psychon Bull Rev. 4:1997;184-197.
71. Gazzaniga M, Ivry R, Mangun GR: Cognitive neuroscience: the biology of the mind edn 2. New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company, Inc; 2002.
72. Alexander G.E., Crutcher M.D. Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends Neurosci. 13:1990;266-271.
73. Zelaznik HN, Spencer RMC, Ivry RB: Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements, J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:575-588.