Neural representation of orientation relative to gravity in the macaque cerebellum

Neuron

Volumn 80, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1508-1518

  Laurens, Jean ^a   Meng, Hui ^b   Angelaki, Dora E ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBELLUM VERMIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRAVITOINERTIAL ACCELERATION; HEAD TILTING; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NONHUMAN; ORIENTATION; ORIENTING RESPONSE; OTOLITH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURKINJE CELL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 84890525243     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.029     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Angelaki D.E. Dynamic polarization vector of spatially tuned neurons. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1991, 38:1053-1060.
2. Angelaki D.E., Bush G.A., Perachio A.A. A model for the characterization of the spatial properties in vestibular neurons. Biol. Cybern. 1992, 66:231-240.
3. Angelaki D.E., McHenry M.Q., Dickman J.D., Newlands S.D., Hess B.J. Computation of inertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information. J.Neurosci. 1999, 19:316-327.
4. Angelaki D.E., Shaikh A.G., Green A.M., Dickman J.D. Neuronscompute internal models of the physical laws of motion. Nature 2004, 430:560-564.
5. Bos J.E., Bles W. Theoretical considerations on canal-otolith interaction and an observer model. Biol. Cybern. 2002, 86:191-207.
6. Clément G., Maciel F., Deguine O. Perception of tilt and ocular torsion of normal human subjects during eccentric rotation. Otol. Neurotol. 2002, 23:958-966.
7. Cullen K.E., Brooks J.X., Jamali M., Carriot J., Massot C. Internal models of self-motion: computations that suppress vestibular reafference in early vestibular processing. Exp. Brain Res. 2011, 210:377-388.
8. Curthoys I.S. The delay of the oculogravic illusion. Brain Res. Bull. 1996, 40:407-410. discussion 410-412.
9. Denise P., Darlot C., Droulez J., Cohen B., Berthoz A. Motion perceptions induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt. Exp. Brain Res. 1988, 73:106-114.
10. Efron B., Tibshirani R. Statistical data analysis in the computer age. Science 1991, 253:390-395.
11. Einstein A. Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen. Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik 1907, 4:411-462.
12. Fushiki H., Barmack N.H. Topography and reciprocal activity of cerebellar Purkinje cells in the uvula-nodulus modulated by vestibular stimulation. J.Neurophysiol. 1997, 78:3083-3094.
13. Gaveau J., Paizis C., Berret B., Pozzo T., Papaxanthis C. Sensorimotor adaptation of point-to-point arm movements after spaceflight: the role of internal representation of gravity force in trajectory planning. J.Neurophysiol. 2011, 106:620-629.
14. Graybiel A., Clark B. Validity of the oculogravic illusion as a specific indicator of otolith function. Aerosp. Med. 1965, 36:1173-1181.
15. Green A.M., Angelaki D.E. Coordinate transformations and sensory integration in the detection of spatial orientation and self-motion: from models to experiments. Prog. Brain Res. 2007, 165:155-180.
16. Green A.M., Shaikh A.G., Angelaki D.E. Sensory vestibular contributions to constructing internal models of self-motion. J.Neural Eng. 2005, 2:S164-S179.
17. Green A.M., Meng H., Angelaki D.E. A reevaluation of the inverse dynamic model for eye movements. J.Neurosci. 2007, 27:1346-1355.
18. Indovina I., Maffei V., Bosco G., Zago M., Macaluso E., Lacquaniti F. Representation of visual gravitational motion in the human vestibular cortex. Science 2005, 308:416-419.
19. Laurens J., Angelaki D.E. The functional significance of velocity storage and its dependence on gravity. Exp. Brain Res. 2011, 210:407-422.
20. Laurens J., Droulez J. Bayesian processing of vestibular information. Biol. Cybern. 2007, 96:389-404.
21. Laurens J., Strauman D., Hess B.J. Spinning versus wobbling: how the brain solves a geometry problem. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:8093-8101.
22. Liu S., Angelaki D.E. Vestibular signals in macaque extrastriate visual cortex are functionally appropriate for heading perception. J.Neurosci. 2009, 29:8936-8945.
23. Liu S., Dickman J.D., Angelaki D.E. Response dynamics and tilt versus translation discrimination in parietoinsular vestibular cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21:563-573.
24. MacNeilage P.R., Banks M.S., Berger D.R., Bülthoff H.H. A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 179:263-290.
25. Mayne R. A systems concept of the vestibular organs. Handbook of Sensory Physiology IV/2: The Vestibular System 1974, 493-580. Springer, Berlin. H.H. Kornhuber (Ed.).
26. Meng H., Green A.M., Dickman J.D., Angelaki D.E. Pursuit-vestibular interactions in brain stem neurons during rotation and translation. J.Neurophysiol. 2005, 93:3418-3433.
27. Meng H., May P.J., Dickman J.D., Angelaki D.E. Vestibular signals in primate thalamus: properties and origins. J.Neurosci. 2007, 27:13590-13602.
28. Merfeld D.M. Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt. Exp. Brain Res. 1995, 106:123-134.
29. Merfeld D.M., Zupan L.H., Peterka R.J. Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration. Nature 1999, 398:615-618.
30. Merfeld D.M., Zupan L.H., Gifford C.A. Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation. J.Neurophysiol. 2001, 85:1648-1660.
31. Merfeld D.M., Park S., Gianna-Poulin C., Black F.O., Wood S.J. Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. Frequency response of VOR and perceptual responses during Translation and Tilt. J.Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:186-198.
32. Seidman S.H., Paige G.D. Perception and eye movement during low-frequency centripetal acceleration. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 1996, 781:693-695.
33. Senot P., Zago M., Le Séac'h A., Zaoui M., Berthoz A., Lacquaniti F., McIntyre J. When up is down in 0g: how gravity sensing affects the timing of interceptive actions. J.Neurosci. 2012, 32:1969-1973.
34. Shaikh A.G., Green A.M., Ghasia F.F., Newlands S.D., Dickman J.D., Angelaki D.E. Sensory convergence solves a motion ambiguity problem. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:1657-1662.
35. Shaikh A.G., Ghasia F.F., Dickman J.D., Angelaki D.E. Properties of cerebellar fastigial neurons during translation, rotation, and eye movements. J.Neurophysiol. 2005, 93:853-863.
36. Vercher J.L., Sarès F., Blouin J., Bourdin C., Gauthier G. Role of sensory information in updating internal models of the effector during arm tracking. Prog. Brain Res. 2003, 142:203-222.
37. Vingerhoets R.A., Medendorp W.P., Van Gisbergen J.A. Time course and magnitude of illusory translation perception during off-vertical axis rotation. J.Neurophysiol. 2006, 95:1571-1587.
38. Vingerhoets R.A., Van Gisbergen J.A., Medendorp W.P. Verticality perception during off-vertical axis rotation. J.Neurophysiol. 2007, 97:3256-3268.
39. Wolpert D.M., Miall R.C., Kawato M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1998, 2:338-347.
40. Wood S.J., Reschke M.F., Sarmiento L.A., Clément G. Tilt and translation motion perception during off-vertical axis rotation. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 182:365-377.
41. Yakhnitsa V., Barmack N.H. Antiphasic Purkinje cell responses in mouse uvula-nodulus are sensitive to static roll-tilt and topographically organized. Neuroscience 2006, 143:615-626.
42. Yakusheva T.A., Shaikh A.G., Green A.M., Blazquez P.M., Dickman J.D., Angelaki D.E. Purkinje cells in posterior cerebellar vermis encode motion in an inertial reference frame. Neuron 2007, 54:973-985.
43. Yakusheva T., Blazquez P.M., Angelaki D.E. Frequency-selective coding of translation and tilt in macaque cerebellar nodulus and uvula. J.Neurosci. 2008, 28:9997-10009.
44. Yakusheva T., Blazquez P.M., Angelaki D.E. Relationship between complex and simple spike activity in macaque caudal vermis during three-dimensional vestibular stimulation. J.Neurosci. 2010, 30:8111-8126.
45. Zago M., Lacquaniti F. Visual perception and interception of falling objects: a review of evidence for an internal model of gravity. J.Neural Eng. 2005, 2:S198-S208.
46. Zhou W., Tang B.F., Newlands S.D., King W.M. Responses ofmonkey vestibular-only neurons to translation and angular rotation. J.Neurophysiol. 2006, 96:2915-2930.
47. Zupan L.H., Merfeld D.M., Darlot C. Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements. Biol. Cybern. 2002, 86:209-230.