Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: An fMRI study

NeuroImage

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 744-750

  Grezes J ^a   Frith, C D ^a   Passingham, R E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action observation; Expectancy; False belief; fMRI; Intention; Judgement; Other; Self; Simulation theory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CEREBELLUM; CINGULATE GYRUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORBITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VIDEORECORDING; WEIGHT;

EID: 1242271371     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00665-7     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adolphs R. Social cognition and the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3:1999;469-479.
2. Adolphs R. Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nat. Rev., Neurosci. 4:2003;165-178.
3. Allison T., Puce A., McCarthy G. Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4:2000;267-278.
4. Ashburner J., Friston K. Multimodal image coregistration and partitioning - A unified framework. NeuroImage. 6:1997;209-217.
5. Barresi J., Moore C. Intentional relations and social understanding. BBS. 19:1996;107-154.
6. Bartsch K., Wellman H. Children Talk About Mind. 1995;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
7. Buccino G., Binkofski F., Fink G.R., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Seitz R.J., Zilles K., Rizzolatti G., Freund H.J. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13:2001;400-404.
8. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev., Neurosci. 3:2002;201-215.
9. Decety D., Grèzes J. Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3:1999;172-178.
10. Decety J., Grezes J., Costes N., Perani D., Jeannerod M., Procyk E., Grassi F., Fazio F. Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. Brain. 120:1997;1763-1777.
11. di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp. Brain Res. 91:1992;176-180.
12. Downar J., Crawley A.P., Mikulis D.J., Davis K.D. The effect of task relevance on the cortical response to changes in visual and auditory stimuli: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage. 14:2001;1256-1267.
13. Downar J., Crawley A.P., Mikulis D.J., Davis K.D. A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. J. Neurophysiol. 87:2002;615-620.
14. Duvernoy H.M. The Human Brain. Surface, Blood Supply and Three-dimensional Sectional Anatomy. 1999;Springer, New York.
15. Farrer C., Frith C.D. Experiencing oneself vs. another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. NeuroImage. 15:2002;596-603.
16. Fogassi L., Gallese V., Fadiga L., Rizzolatti G. Neurones responding to the sight of goal-directed hand/arm actions in the parietal area PF7b of the macaque monkey. Soc. Neurosci. Abs. 24:1998;257.5.
17. Friston K.J., Fletcher P., Josephs O., Holmes A., Rugg M.D., Turner R. Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses. NeuroImage. 7:1998;30-40.
18. Frith C.D., Frith U. Interacting minds - A biological basis. Science. 286:1999;1692-1695.
19. Gallagher H.L., Frith C.D. Functional imaging of 'theory of mind'. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7:2003;77-83.
20. Gallagher H.L., Happe F., Brunswick N., Fletcher P.C., Frith U., Frith C.D. Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of 'theory of mind' in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia. 38:2000;11-21.
21. Gallese V. The Manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B. 358:2003;517-528.
22. Gallese V., Goldman A. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2:1998;493-501.
23. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain. 119:1996;593-609.
24. Gordon R.M. Theories of Theories of Mind. Carruthers P., Smith P.K. 1995;11-21 Cambridge Univ. Press, UK.
25. Grafton S.T., Arbib M.A., Fadiga L., Rizzolatti G. Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. 2. Observation compared with imagination. Exp. Brain Res. 112:1996;103-111.
26. Grèzes J., Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 12:2001;1-19.
27. Henson R.N., Price C.J., Rugg M.D., Turner R., Friston K.J. Detecting latency differences in event-related BOLD responses: application to words versus nonwords and initial versus repeated face presentations. NeuroImage. 15:2002;83-97.
28. Hommel B., Musseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The Theory of Event Coding TEC: a framework for perception and action planning. Behav. Brain Sci. 24:2001;849-878.
29. Jeannerod M. The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. BBS. 17:1994;187-245.
30. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage. 14:2001;S103-S109.
31. Knoblich G., Prinz W. Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27:2001;456-465.
32. Knoblich G., Seigerschmidt E., Flach R., Prinz W. Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: evidence for action simulation during action perception. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., A. 55:2002;1027-1046.
33. Liberman A.M., Mattingly I.G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition. 21:1985;1-36.
34. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection Theory: A User's Guide. 1991;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
35. Orliaguet J.P., Kandel S., Böe L.J. Visual perception of motor anticipation in cursive handwriting: influence of spatial and movement information on the prediction of forthcoming letters. Perception. 26:1997;905-912.
36. Pelphrey K.A., Singerman J.D., Allison T., McCarthy G. Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: the influence of context. Neuropsychologia. 41:2003;156-170.
37. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 9:1997;129-154.
38. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Exp. Brain Res. 3:1996;131-141.
39. Rizzolatti G., Fogassi L., Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat. Rev., Neurosci. 2:2001;661-670.
40. Ruby P., Decety J. Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency. Nat. Neurosci. 4:2001;546-550.
41. Runeson S., Frykholm G. Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person- and-action perception: expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. J. Exp. Psychol: General. 112:1983;585-615.
42. Shiffrar M., Freyd J.J. Apparent motion of the human body. Psychol. Sci. 1:1993;257-264.
43. Viviani P., Stucchi N. Biological movements look uniform: evidence for motor-perceptual interactions. J. Exp. Psychol: H. Percept. Perf. 18:1992;603-623.
44. Winston J.S., Strange B.A., O'Doherty J., Dolan R.J. Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nat. Neurosci. 5:2002;277-283.
45. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Flanagan J.R. Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5:2001;487-494.
46. Wolpert D.M., Doya K., Kawato M. A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B Biol. Sci. 358:2003;593-602.