A model biological neural network: The cephalopod vestibular system

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 362, Issue 1479, 2007, Pages 473-481

  Williamson, Roddy ^a   Chrachri, Abdul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Balance; Mollusc; Statocyst

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BRAIN; CEPHALOPOD; DATA SET; MOVEMENT; ONTOGENY; PLASTICITY;

ANIMALIA; CEPHALOPODA; MOLLUSCA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CEPHALOPOD; CYTOLOGY; HAIR CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; VESTIBULE;

ANIMALS; CEPHALOPODA; HAIR CELLS, VESTIBULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NERVE NET; VESTIBULE;

EID: 34247106325     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1975     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Arbib, M. A. 2003 Handbook of brain theory and neural networks, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Auerbach, B. & Budelmann, B. U. 1986 Evidence for acetylcholine as a neurotransmitter in the statocyst of Octopus vulgaris. Cell Tissue Res. 243, 429-436. (doi:10.1007/BF00251060)
3. Barber, V. C. 1966 The fine structure of the statocysts of Octopus vulgaris. Z. Zellforsch. Mikroskop. Anat. 70, 91-107. (doi:10.1007/BF00345067)
4. Bell, C. C. 2001 Memory-based expectations in electrosensory systems. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 481-487. (doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(00) 00238-5)
5. Brichta, A. M. & Goldberg, J. M. 2000 Responses to efferent activation and excitatory response-intensity relations of turtle posterior-crista afferents. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 1224-1242.
6. Budelmann, B. U. 1977 Structure and function of the angular acceleration receptor systems in the statocysts of cephalopods. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 38, 309-324.
7. Budelmann, B. U. & Bonn, U. 1982 Histochemical evidence for catecholamines as neurotransmitters in the statocyst of Octopus vulgaris. Cell Tissue Res. 227, 475-483. (doi:10.1007/BF00204779)
8. Budelmann, B. U., Sache, M. & Staudigl, M. 1987a The angular acceleration receptor system of the statocyst of Octopus vulgaris: morphometry, ultrastructure, and neuronal and synaptic organization. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 315, 305-343.
9. Budelmann, B. U., Williamson, R. & Auerbach, B. 1987b Structure and function of the angular acceleration receptor system of the statocyst of Octopus with special reference to its efferent innervation. In The Vestibular system: neurophysiology: and clinical research (eds M. D. Graham & J. L. Kemmink), pp. 165-168. New York, NY: Raven Press.
10. 2+. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 282-287. (doi:10.1074/jbc.274.1.282)
11. Chrachri, A. & Williamson, R. 1993 Electrical coupling between primary hair cells in the statocyst of the squid, Alloteuthis subulata. Neurosci. Lett. 161, 227-231. (doi:10.1016/0304-3940(93)90300-A)
12. Chrachri, A. & Williamson, R. 1998 Synaptic interactions between crista hair cells in the statocyst of the squid Alloteuthis subulata. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 656-666.
13. Chrachri, A. & Williamson, R. 2001 cAMP modulates electrical coupling between sensory hair cells in the squid statocyst. J. Physiol. Lond. 536S, 133-134.
14. Chrachri, A. & Williamson, R. 2004 Cholinergic modulation of L-type calcium current in isolated sensory hair cells of the statocyst of octopus, Eledone cirrhosa. Neurosci. Lett. 360, 90-94. (doi:10.1016/j. neulet.2004.01.050)
15. Colmers, W. F. 1982 The central afferent and efferent organization of the gravity receptor system of the statocyst of Octopus vulgaris. Neuroscience 7, 461-476. (doi:10.1016/0306-4522(82)90280-9)
16. Demb, J. B., Sterling, P. & Freed, M. A. 2004 How retinal ganglion cells prevent synaptic noise from reaching the spike output. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 2510-2519. (doi:10.1152/jn.00108.2004)
17. Eatock, R. A., Fay, R. & Popper, A. (eds) 2005 Vertebrate hair cells. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol. 27. New York, NY: Springer.
18. Enquist, M. & Ghirlanda, S. 2005 Neural networks and animal behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Fettiplace, R. 1999 Mechanisms of hair cell tuning. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 61, 809-834. (doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.809)
20. Goldberg, J. M. & Fernandez, C. 1980 Efferent vestibular system in the squirrel monkey: anatomical location and influence on afferent activity. J. Neurophysiol. 43, 986-1025.
21. Gurney, K. 1997 An introduction to neural networks. London, UK: UCL Press.
22. Hanlon, R. T. & Messenger, J. B. (eds) 1996 Cephalopod behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Häusser, M., Spruston, N. & Stuart, G. J. 2000 Diversity and dynamics of dendritic signaling. Science 290, 739-744. (doi:10.1126/science.290.5492.739)
24. Highstein, S. M., Fay, R. & Popper, A. N. (eds) 2004 The vestibular system. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol. 19. New York, NY: Springer.
25. Hodgkin, A. L. & Huxley, A. F. 1952 A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. Lond. 117, 500-544.
26. Hu, E. H. & Bloomfield, S. A. 2003 Gap junctional coupling underlies the short-latency spike synchrony of retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurosci. 23, 6768-6777.
27. Llinas, R. R. 1999 The squid giant synapse: a model for chemical transmission. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28. Maddock, L. & Young, J. Z. 1984 Some dimensions of the angular-acceleration receptor systems of cephalopods. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 64, 55-79.
29. McMahon, D. G. & Mattson, M. P. 1996 Horizontal cell electrical coupling in the giant danio: synaptic modulation by dopamine and synaptic maintenance by calcium. Brain Res. 718, 89-96. (doi:10.1016/0006-8993(96)00043-1)
30. Minsky, M. & Papert, S. 1969 Perceptrons: an introduction to computational geometry. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
31. O'Reilly, R. C. & Busby, R. S. 2001 Generalizable relational binding from coarse-coded distributed representations. In Advances in neural information processing systems (ed. S. Becker), pp. 75-82. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
32. Packard, A. 1972 Cephalopods and fish: the limits of convergence. Biol. Rev. 46, 241-307.
33. Plän T. 1987 Functional neuroanatomy of sensory-motor lobes of the brain of Octopus vulgaris. Ph.D. thesis, University of Regensburg.
34. Rorig, B. & Sutor, B. 1996 Regulation of gap junction coupling in the developing neocortex. Mol. Neurobiol. 12, 225-249.
35. Roy, J. E. & Cullen, K. E. 2004 Dissociating self-generated from passively applied head motion: neural mechanisms in the vestibular nuclei. J. Neurosci. 24, 2102-2111. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3988-03.2004)
36. Smith, R. G. 2002 Retina. In The handbook of brain theory and neural networks (ed. M. A. Arbib). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
37. Tu, Y. J. & Budelmann, B. U. 1994 The effect of L-glutamate on the afferent resting activity in the cephalopod statocyst. Brain Res. 642, 47-58. (doi:10.1016/0006-8993(94)90904-0)
38. Tu, Y. J. & Budelmann, B. U. 1999 Effects of L-arginine on the afferent resting activity in the cephalopod statocyst. Brain Res. 845, 35-49. (doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01929-0)
39. Tu, Y. J. & Budelmann, B. U. 2000a Inhibitory effect of cyclic guanosine 3′,5′-monophosphate (cGMP) on the afferent resting activity in the cephalopod statocyst. Brain Res. 880, 65-69. (doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02777-3)
40. Tu, Y. J. & Budelmann, B. U. 2000b Effects of nitric oxide donors on the afferent resting activity in the cephalopod statocyst. Brain Res. 865, 211-220. (doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02222-8)
41. Usrey, W. M. & Reid, R. C. 1999 Synchronous activity in the visual system. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 61, 435-456. (doi:10.1146/annurev. physiol.61.1.435)
42. Van Hemmen, L. J., Cowan, J. D. & Domany, E. (eds) 2001 Models of neural networks: early vision and attention, vol. 4. New York, NY: Springer.
43. Velte, T. J. & Masland, R. H. 1999 Action potentials in the dendrites of retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 1412-1417.
44. Vogels, T. P., Rajan, K. & Abbott, L. F. 2005 Neural network dynamics. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 357-376. (doi:10.1146/annurev. neuro.28.061604.135637)
45. Wassle, H. 2004 Parallel processing in the mammalian retina. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 747-757. (doi:10.1038/nrn1497)
46. Williamson, R. 1985 Efferent influences on the afferent activity from the Octopus angular acceleration receptor system. J. Exp. Biol. 119, 251-264.
47. Williamson, R. 1986 Efferent activity in the Octopus statocyst nerves. J. Comp. Physiol. A 158, 125-132. (doi:10.1007/BF00614526)
48. Williamson, R. 1989a Electrical coupling between secondary hair cells in the statocyst of the squid Alloteuthis subulata. Brain Res. 486, 67-72. (doi:10.1016/0006-8993(89)91278-X)
49. Williamson, R. 1989b Secondary hair cells and afferent neurones in the squid statocyst receive both inhibitory and excitatory efferent inputs. J. Comp. Physiol. A 165, 847-860. (doi:10.1007/BF00610883)
50. Williamson, R. 1989c Electrophysiological evidence for cholinergic and catecholaminergic efferent transmitters in the statocyst of Octopus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 93, 23-27. (doi:10.1016/0742-8413(89)90004- 2)
51. Williamson, R. 1990 The responses of primary and secondary sensory hair cells in the squid statocyst to mechanical stimulation. J. Comp. Physiol. A 167, 655-664.
52. Williamson, R. 1995 Ionic currents in secondary sensory hair cells isolated from the statocysts of squid and cuttlefish. J. Comp. Physiol. A 177, 261-271. (doi:10.1007/BF00192416)
53. Williamson, R. & Budelmann, B. U. 1985 The responses of the Octopus angular acceleration receptor system to sinusoidal stimulation. J. Comp. Physiol. A 156, 403-412. (doi:10.1007/BF00610733)
54. Williamson, R. & Chrachri, A. 1994 The efferent system in cephalopod statocysts. Biomed. Res. 15, 51-56.
55. Williamson, R. & Chrachri, A. 2004 Cephalopod neural networks. Neurosignals 13, 87-98. (doi:10.1159/000076160)
56. Young, J. Z. 1960 The statocyst of Octopus vulgaris. Proc. R. Soc. B 152, 3-29.
57. Young, J. Z. 1989 The angular-acceleration receptor system of diverse cephalopods. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 325, 189-238.