The impact of feedback orientation and the effect of satisfaction with feedback on in-role job performance

Human Resource Development Quarterly

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 31-51

  Rasheed, Anwar ^a,b   Khan, Saif Ur Rehman ^c   Rasheed, Mazen F ^a   Munir, Yasin ^b  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MODERN SCIENCES   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

Feedback orientation; Human resource development; In role job performance; Nursing; Satisfaction with feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925328736     PISSN: 10448004     EISSN: 15321096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.21202     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.
2. Anseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2007). The long-term impact of the feedback environment on job satisfaction: A field study in a Belgian context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56(2), 254-266. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00253.x
3. Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 370-398.
4. Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
5. Bandura, A. (1977b). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
7. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
8. Barry, J. B., & Goran, S. (2012). Structural equation modeling in social science research: Issues of validity and reliability in the research process. European Business Review, 24(4), 320-330. doi: 10.1108/09555341211242132
9. Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, R. W. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston, MA: Kent.
10. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.
11. Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000), Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: The role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(3), 283-299. doi: 10.1002/1532-1096(200023)11:3<283::AID-HRDQ6>3.0.CO;2-3
12. Bray, S. R., & Brawley, R. (2002). Role efficacy, role clarity, and role performance effectiveness. Small Group Research, 33(2), 233-253. doi: 10.1177/104649640203300204
13. Brett, J. F., & Atwater, E. (2001). 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 930-942. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.930
14. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 389-444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
15. Brown, S. P., Ganesan, S., & Challagalla, G. (2001). Self-efficacy as a moderator of information-seeking effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 1043-1051. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.1043
16. Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 615-633. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.615
17. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83. doi: 10.1177/109442810141004
18. Dahling, J. J., Chau, S. L., & O'Malley, A. L. (2012). Correlates and consequences of feedback orientation in organizations. Journal of Management, 38, 530-545. doi: 10.1177/0149206310375467
19. Day, D. V., Shleicher, D. J., Unckless, A. L., & Hiller, N. J. (2002). Self-monitoring personality at work: A meta-analytic investigation of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2) 390-401. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.390
20. Dorfman, P. W., Stephan, W. G., & Loveland, J. (1986). Performance appraisal behavior: Supervisor perceptions and subordinate reactions. Personnel Psychology, 39(3), 579-597. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00954.x
21. Elicker, J. D., Levy, P. E., & Hall, R. J. (2006). The role of leader-member exchange in the performance appraisal process. Journal of Management, 32, 531-551.
22. Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 522-527. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1975-26584-001
23. Fletcher, C. (1999). The implication of research on gender differences in self-assessment and 360 degree appraisal. Human Resource Management Journal, 9, 39-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.1999.tb00187.x
24. Giles, W. F., & Mossholder, W. (1990). Employee reactions to contextual and session components of performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 371-377. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.371
25. Gosselin, A., Werner, J. M., & Halle, N. (1997). Ratee preferences concerning performance appraisal management and appraisal. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8(4), 315-333.
26. Gregory, J. B., & Levy, P. E. (2008). The effect of supervisor feedback orientation on subordinate perceptions of the feedback environment. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
27. Gregory, J. B., & Levy, P. E. (2012). Employee feedback orientation: implications for effective coaching relationships. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 5(2), 86-99. doi: 10.1080/17521882.2012.691888
28. Gupta, A. K., Govindarajan, V., & Malhotra, A. (1999). Feedback-seeking behavior within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal. 20(3), 205-222. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199903)20:3<205::AID-SMJ17>3.0.CO;2-H
29. Hameed, A., & Waheed, A. (2011). Employee development and its affect on employee performance a conceptual framework. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2(13), 224-229.
30. Herold, D. M., & Fedor, D. B. (1998). Individuals' interaction with their feedback environment: The role of domain specific individual differences. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 16, 215-254.
31. Ilgen, D. R., Richard, B. P., Beth A. M., & Daniel A. B. (1981). Supervisor and subordinate reactions to performance appraisal sessions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28(3), 311-330. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(81)90002-7
32. Jawahar, I. M. (2005). Influence of satisfaction with appraisal feedback on performance, attitudes and intentions. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada (pp. 13-26). Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Retrieved from http://luxor.acadiau.ca/library/ASAC/v26/09/26_09_p013.pdf
33. Jawahar, I. M. (2006a). An investigation of potential consequences of satisfaction with appraisal feedback. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(2), 14-28. doi: 10.1177/10717919070130020101
34. Jawahar, I. M. (2006b). Correlates of satisfaction with performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Labor Research, 27(2), 213-234. doi: 10.1007/s12122-006-1004-1
35. Jawahar, I. M. (2010). The mediating role of appraisal feedback reactions on the relationship between rater feedback-related behaviors and ratee performance. Group & Organization Management, 35(4), 494-526. doi: 10.1177/1059601110378294
36. Jawahar, I. M., & Williams, C. R. (1997). Where all the children are above average: The performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psychology, 50, 905-925.
37. Keeping, L. M., & Levy, E. (2000). Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 708-723. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.708
38. Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2007). Communicating positive and negative stereotypic expectancies: The interplay of stereotype threat and regulatory focus. In Y. Kashima, K. Fiedler, & P. Freytag (Eds.), Stereotype dynamics: Language-based apporaches to stereotype formation, maintenance, and transformation (pp. 373-395). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Khurshid, F., Qasmi, F., & Ashraf, N. (2012). The relationship between teachers' self-efficacy and their perceived job performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(10), 204-223.
40. Kinicki, A. J., Prussia, G. E., Wu, B., & McKee-Ryan, F. M. (2004). A covariance structure analysis of employees' response to performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1057-1069. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1057
41. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
42. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
43. Korman, A. K. (1970). Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(1), 31-41. doi: 10.1037/h0028656
44. Kuvaas, B. (2006). Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: Mediating and moderating roles of work motivation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(3), 504-522. doi: 10.1080/09585190500521581
45. Larson, J. R. (1984). The performance feedback process: A preliminary model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33(1), 42-76. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90011-4
46. Lee, T. W., & Mowday, R. T. (1987). Voluntary leaving of organization: An empirical investigation of Steers and Mowday's model of turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), 721-743. doi: 10.2307/256157
47. Levy, P. E. and Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30(6), 881-905. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.005
48. Leonard, E., & Williams, J. R. (2001). An empirical examination of accountability perceptions within a multi-source feedback system. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
49. Levy, P. E., Albright, M. D., Cawley, B. D., & Williams, J. R. (1995). Situational and individual determinants of feedback seeking: A closer look at the process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(1), 23-37. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1995.1028
50. Linderbaum, B. A., & Levy, P. E. (2010). The development and validation of the feedback orientation scale. Journal of Management, 36(6), 1372-1405. doi: 10.1177/0149206310373145
51. Locke, E. A. (1996). Motivation through conscious goal setting. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 5(2), 117-124. doi: 10.1016/S0962-1849(96)80005-9
52. London, M., & Maurer, T. J. (2004). Leadership development: A diagnostic model for continuous learning in dynamic organizations. In J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 222-246). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. London, M., & Smither, J. W. (2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12(1), 81-100. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00043-2
54. London, M., Smither, J. W., & Adsit, D. J. (1997). Accountability: The Achilles' heel of multisource feedback. Group & Organizational Management, 22(2), 162-164. doi: 10.1177/1059601197222003
55. Maurer, T. J., Lippstreu, M., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Structural model of employee involvement in skill development activity: The role of individual differences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 336-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.10.010
56. Maurer, T., Mitchell, D., & Barbeite, F. (2002). Predictors of attitudes toward a 360-degree feedback system and involvement in post-feedback management development activity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(1), 87-107. doi: 10.1348/096317902167667
57. Maurer, T. J., & Weiss, E. M. (2010). Continuous learning skill demands: Associations with managerial job content, age, and experience. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10869-009-9126-0
58. McNamara, J. M., Stephens, P. A., Dall, S. R. X., & Houston, A. I. (2009). Evolution of trust and trustworthiness: Social awareness favours personality differences. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences, 276(1657), 605-613. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1182
59. Mishra, G., & Farooqi, R. (2013). Exploring employee satisfaction with performance management and the challenges faced in context of IT industry. Compensation & Benefits Review, 45(6), 329-339. doi: 10.1177/0886368714525016
60. Morrison, E. W. (2002). Information seeking within organizations. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 229-242. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00805.x
61. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62. Nemeroff, W. F., & Wexley, K. N. (1979). An exploration of the relationships between performance feedback interview characteristics and interview outcomes as perceived by managers and subordinates. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52(1), 25-34. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1979.tb00437.x
63. Nieminen, L. R. G., Smerek, R., Kotrba, L., & Denison, D. (2013). What does an executive coaching intervention add beyond facilitated multisource feedback? Effects on leader self-ratings and perceived effectiveness. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 24, 145-176. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21152
64. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
65. Pettijohn, C. E., Pettijohn, L. S., & d'Amico, M. (2001). Charateristics of performance appraisals and their impact on sales force satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(2), 127-146. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.4
66. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
67. Rasheed, A., Jehanzeb, K., & Rasheed, M. F. (2013). An investigation of the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviour: Case of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 5(1), 128-138. doi: 10.5539/ijps.v5n1p128
68. Renn, R. W., & Fedor, B. (2001). Development and field test of a feedback seeking, self-efficacy, and goal setting model of work performance. Journal of Management, 27(5), 563-583. doi: 10.1177/014920630102700504
69. Roberson, L., Deitch, E. A., Brief, A. P., & Block, C. J. (2003). Stereotype threat and feedback seeking in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(1), 176-188. doi: 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00056-8
70. Russell, J. S., & Goode, D. L. (1988). An analysis of managers' reactions to their own performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1), 63-67. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.63
71. Ryan, A. M., Brutus, S., Greguras, G. J., & Hakel, M. D. (2000). Receptivity to assessment-based feedback for management development. Journal of Management Development, 19(4), 252-276.
72. Salas, E., & Rosen, M. A. (2010). Experts at work: Principles for developing expertise in organizations. In S. W. J. Kozlowski & E. Salas (Eds.), Learning, training, and development in organizations (pp. 99-134). New York, NY: Routledge.
73. Schwab, D. P., & Cummings, L. L. (1970). Theories of performance and satisfaction: A review. Industrial Relations, 9(4), 408-430. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-232X.1970.tb00524.x
74. Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 165-184. doi: 10.1177/0013164403258440
75. Taylor, M. S., Fisher, C., & Ilgen, D. (1984). Individuals' reactions to performance feedback in organizations: Control theory perspective. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 81-124). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
76. Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331-376). New York, NY: Academic Press.
77. Tonidandel, S., Quinones, M. A., & Adams, A. (2002). Computer-adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers' reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 320-332. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.320
78. Van der Rijt, J., van de Wiel, M. W. J., Van den Bossche, P., Segers, M. S. R., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2012). Contextual antecedents of informal feedback in the workplace. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23, 233-257. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21129
79. Van der Rijt, J., Van den Bossche, P., van de Wiel, M. W., Segers, M. S. R., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2012). The role of individual and organizational characteristics in feedback seeking behavior in the initial career stage, Human Resource Development International, 15(3), 283-301.
80. VandeWalle, D. (2003). A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 13(4), 581-604. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2003.11.004
81. Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.
82. Whitaker, B. G., Dahling, J. J., & Levy, P. (2007). The development of a feedback environment and role clarity model of job performance. Journal of Management, 33(4), 570-591. doi: 10.1177/0149206306297581
83. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700305
84. Youngcourt, S. S., Leiva, P. I., & Jones, R. G. (2007). Perceived purposes of performance appraisal: Correlates of individual-and position-focused purposes on attitudinal outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(3), 315-343.
85. Zhang, J., & Zheng, W. (2009). How does satisfaction translate into performance? An examination of commitment and cultural values. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(3), 331-351. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.20022