Perceived purposes of performance appraisal: Correlates of individual- And position-focused purposes on attitudinal outcomes

Human Resource Development Quarterly

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 315-343

  Youngcourt, Satoris S ^a   Leiva, Pedro I ^b   Jones, Robert G ^c  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE VALPARAÍSO   (Chile)

^c MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34748836981     PISSN: 10448004     EISSN: 15321096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.1207     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Abbasi, S. M., & Hollman, K. W. (2000). Turnover: The real bottom line. Public Personnel Management, 29, 333-343.
2. Abramis, D.J. (1994). Work role ambiguity, job satisfaction, and job performance: Meta-analyses and review. Psychological Reports, 75, 1411-1434.
3. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
4. Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414-435.
5. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-111.
6. Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001), The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27, 625-641.
7. Baruch, Y. (1999), Response rates in academic studies - a comparative analysis. Human Relations, 52, 421-434.
8. Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee "citizenship." Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.
9. Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, R. W. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent.
10. Blau, P. M. (1964), Exchange and power in social life. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.
11. Borman W. C., & Motowidlo S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Bosson, J. K., & Swann, W. B. (1999). Self-liking, self-competence, and the quest for self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1230-1241.
13. Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: The role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11, 283-299.
14. Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2002). Separating the developmental and evaluative performance appraisal uses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 391-412.
15. Burke, R. J., Weitzel, W., & Weir, T. (1978). Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews: Replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 31, 903-919.
16. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in I/O psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), The handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 704-715). San Francisco: CPI.
17. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, & Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Carroll, S. J., & Schneier, C. E. (1982). Performance appraisal and review systems: The identification, measurement and development of performance in organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
19. Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of the field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 615-633.
20. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2004). General self-efficacy and self-esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self-evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 375-395.
21. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. A., & Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of the relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835-847.
22. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Cleveland J. N., Mohammed, S., Skattebo, A. L., & Sin, H. P. (2003, April). Multiple purposes of performance appraisal: A replication and extension. Poster presented at the annual conference for the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
24. Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 130-135.
25. Day, D. V., Sin, H. P., & Chen, T. T. (2004). Assessing the burdens of leadership: Effects of formal leadership roles on individual performance over time. Personnel Psychology, 57, 573-605.
26. DeNisi, A. S. (2000). Performance appraisal and performance management. In K. J. Klein & S.W.J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 121-156). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T. P., & Meglino, B. M. (1984). A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 360-396.
28. DeNisi, A. S., & Gonzalez, J. A. (2000). Design performance appraisal systems to improve performance. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 60-72). Oxford: Blackwell.
29. Dipboye, R. L., & De Pontriand, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 248-251.
30. Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999), Effects of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83.
31. Green, S. G., Anderson, S. E., & Shivers, S. L. (1996). Demographics and organizational influences on leader-member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 203-214.
32. Greller, M. M. (1978), The nature of subordinate participation in the appraisal interview. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 646-658.
33. Griffeth, R. W, Hom, P. W, & Gaertner, S. A. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium, Journal of Management, 26, 463-488.
34. Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2000). Personnel selection: Looking toward the future -remembering the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 631-664.
35. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
36. Ilgen, D. R. (1993). Performance appraisal accuracy: An illusive or sometimes misguided goal? In H. Schuler, J. L. Farr, & M. Smith (Eds.), Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives (pp. 233-252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 16-78.
38. James, L. R., & McInytre, M. D. (1996). Perceptions of organizational climate. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 416-450). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel-8 [computer program]. Chicago: Scientific Software.
40. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1979). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley,
41. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt.
42. Korsgaard, M. A., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and noninstrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions, Journal of Management, 21, 657-669.
43. Landy, F. J., Barnes, J., & Murphy, K. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance appraisals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 751-754.
44. Lepak, D. P. & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 31-48.
45. Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (2002). Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. Journal of Management, 28, 517-543.
46. Likert, R. (1967). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Longenecker, C. O., Liverpool, P. R., & Wilson, K. Y. (1988). An assessment of manager/subordinate perceptions of performance appraisal effectiveness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 311-320.
48. MacCallum, R. C. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490-504.
49. Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
50. McConkie, M. L. (1979). A clarification of the goal-setting and appraisal process in MBO. Academy of Management Review, 4, 29-40
51. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
52. Meyer, H. H., Kay, E., & French, J.R.P. (1965). Split roles in performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 43, 123-129.
53. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.
54. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52.
55. Mount, M. K. (1983). Comparison of managerial and employee satisfaction with a performance appraisal system. Personnel Psychology, 37, 687-702.
56. Mowday, R., Steers, R., & Porter, L. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
57. Murphy, K. R., Balzer, W. K., Kellam, K., & Armstrong, J. (1984). Effect and purpose of rating on accuracy in observing teacher behavior and evaluating teaching performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 45-54.
58. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1992). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
59. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Nathan, B. R., Mohrman, A. M., & Milliman, J. (1991). Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 352-369.
61. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
62. Ostroff, C. (1993). Rater perceptions, satisfaction and performance ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 345-356.
63. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
64. Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-153.
65. Schneider, B., Brief, A. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1996). Creating a climate and culture for sustainable organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 24(4), 7-19.
66. Schneider, B., & Klein, K. J. (1994). What is enough? A systems perspective on individual-organizational performance linkages. In D. H. Harris (Ed.), Organizational linkages: Understanding the productivity paradox (pp. 81-104). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
67. Sharon, A., & Bartlett, C. J. (1969), Effect of instructional conditions in producing leniency in two types of rating scales, Personnel Psychology, 22, 251-263.
68. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
69. Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39, 1005-1016.
70. Steeh, C., (1981). Trends in nonresponse rates, 1952-1979. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 40-57.
71. Taylor, M. S., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, J. K., & Carroll, S. J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 495-523.
72. Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259-293.
73. Tremble Jr., T. R. & Alderks, C. E. (1992). Measures for research on small unit preparedness for combat effectiveness. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
74. Williams, K. J., DeNisi, A. S., Blencoe, A. G., & Cafferty, T. R. (1985). The role of appraisal purpose: Effects of purpose on information acquisition and utilization. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 314-339.
75. Zedeck, S., & Cascio, W. F. (1982). Performance appraisal decisions as a function of rater training and purpose of the appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 752-758.