MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain

Seminars in Perinatology

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 73-104

  Tocchio, Shannon ^a   Kline Fath, Beth ^b   Kanal, Emanuel ^c   Schmithorst, Vincent J ^a   Panigrahy, Ashok ^a  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Arterial spin label perfusion; Fetal MR; MR compatible incubator; MR spectroscopy; Neonatal MRI; NICU magnet

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EQUIPMENT; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FETUS; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INCUBATOR; MAGNETIC FIELD; NEWBORN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT TRANSPORT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCINTIGRAPHY; SEDATION; SMALL FOOTPRINT DEDICATED NICU SCANNER; SUSCEPTIBILITY WEIGHTED IMAGING; BRAIN; DEVICES; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INFANT; INFANT INCUBATOR; INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES; NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; NEUROIMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREMATURITY; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

BRAIN; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INCUBATORS, INFANT; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; NEUROIMAGING; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84925302650     PISSN: 01460005     EISSN: 1558075X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.01.002     Document Type: Review

References (372)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Criteria for significant risk investigations of magnetic resonance diagnostic devices-guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff [Internet]. Available from: 2014 Accessed 03.09.14. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm072686.htm.
2. Arthur R. Magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants. Pediatr Radiol 2006, 36(7):593-607.
3. Van Wezel-Meijler G., Steggerda S.J., Leijser L.M. Cranial ultrasonography in neonates: role and limitations. Semin Perinatol 2010, 34(1):28-38.
4. Miller S.P., Ferriero D.M., Leonard C., et al. Early brain injury in premature newborns detected with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with adverse early neurodevelopmental outcome. J Pediatr 2005, 147(5):609-616.
5. Mathur A.M., Neil J.J., Inder T.E. Understanding brain injury and neurodevelopmental disabilities in the preterm infant: the evolving role of advanced magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Perinatol 2010, 34(1):57-66.
6. Glenn O.A. MR imaging of the fetal brain. Pediatr Radiol 2010, 40(1):68-81.
7. Maalouf E.F., Duggan P.J., Counsell S.J., et al. Comparison of findings on cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2001, 107(4):719-727.
8. Roelants-van Rijn A.M., Groenendaal F., Beek F.J., Eken P., van Haastert I.C., de Vries L.S. Parenchymal brain injury in the preterm infant: comparison of cranial ultrasound, MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome. Neuropediatrics 2001, 32(2):80-89.
9. Smith F.W., Adam A.H., Phillips W.D. NMR imaging in pregnancy. Lancet 1983, 1(8314-5):61-62.
10. McCarthy S.M., Filly R.A., Stark D.D., et al. Obstetrical magnetic resonance imaging: fetal anatomy. Radiology 1985, 154(2):427-432.
11. Glenn O.A. Fetal central nervous system MR imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(1):1-17. (vii).
12. Coakley F.V., Glenn O.A., Qayyum A., Barkovich A.J., Goldstein R., Filly R.A. Fetal MRI: a developing technique for the developing patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004, 182(1):243-252.
13. Ertl-Wagner B., Lienemann A., Strauss A., Reiser M.F. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: indications, technique, anatomical considerations and a review of fetal abnormalities. Eur Radiol 2002, 12(8):1931-1940.
14. Huisman T.A.G.M., Martin E., Kubik-Huch R., Marincek B. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: technical considerations and normal brain development. Eur Radiol 2002, 12(8):1941-1951.
15. Li Y., Zhang X. Advanced MR imaging technologies in fetuses. OMICS J Radiol 2012, 1(4):e113.
16. Panigrahy A., Borzage M., Blüml S. Basic principles and concepts underlying recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging of the developing brain. Semin Perinatol 2010, 34(1):3-19.
17. Lane A., Chuk L.-M.R., Colditz P.B., Coulthard A. The MRI-compatible neonatal incubator in practice. J Paediatr Child Health 2013, 49(9):E377-E380.
18. Rona Z., Klebermass K., Cardona F., et al. Comparison of neonatal MRI examinations with and without an MR-compatible incubator: advantages in examination feasibility and clinical decision-making. Eur J Paediatr Neurol EJPN Off J Eur Paediatr Neurol Soc 2010, 14(5):410-417.
19. Dumoulin C.L., Rohling K.W., Piel J.E., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging compatible neonate incubator. Concepts Magn Reson 2002, 15(2):117-128.
20. Whitby E.H., Griffiths P.D., Lonneker-Lammers T., et al. Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of the neonate in a magnetic resonance-compatible incubator with a built-in coil. Pediatrics 2004, 113(2):e150-e152.
21. Blüml S., Friedlich P., Erberich S., Wood J.C., Seri I., Nelson M.D. MR imaging of newborns by using an MR-compatible incubator with integrated radiofrequency coils: initial experience. Radiology 2004, 231(2):594-601.
22. Tkach J.A., Hillman N.H., Jobe A.H., et al. An MRI system for imaging neonates in the NICU: initial feasibility study. Pediatr Radiol 2012, 42(11):1347-1356.
23. Tkach J.A., Merhar S.L., Kline-Fath B.M., et al. MRI in the neonatal ICU: initial experience using a small-footprint 1.5-T system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014, 202(1):W95-105.
24. Panigrahy A., Blüml S. Advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging techniques in the evaluation of neonatal encephalopathy. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 18(1):3-29.
25. Rutherford M. MRI of the Neonatal Brain 2002, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
26. Barkovich A.J. MR imaging of the neonatal brain. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(1):117-135. viii-ix.
27. Limperopoulos C. Advanced neuroimaging techniques: their role in the development of future fetal and neonatal neuroprotection. Semin Perinatol 2010, 34(1):93-101.
28. Alvarez-Linera J. 3T MRI: advances in brain imaging. Eur J Radiol 2008, 67(3):415-426.
29. Garel C. New advances in fetal MR neuroimaging. Pediatr Radiol 2006, 36(7):621-625.
30. Panigrahy A. Advanced pediatric neuroimaging techniques: clinical and research applications. Pediatr Radiol 2010, 40(1):1-2.
31. Soher B.J., Dale B.M., Merkle E.M. A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007, 15(3):277-290. v.
32. Dagia C., Ditchfield M. 3T MRI in paediatrics: challenges and clinical applications. Eur J Radiol 2008, 68(2):309-319.
33. Victoria T., Jaramillo D., Roberts T.P.L., et al. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: jumping from 1.5 to 3 Tesla (preliminary experience). Pediatr Radiol 2014, 44(4):376-386. quiz 373-5.
34. Tanenbaum L.N. Clinical 3T MR imaging: mastering the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006, 14(1):1-15.
35. Prayer D., Baert A.L. Fetal MRI 2011, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (528 pp.). 2011 ed.
36. Ting Ging Ma H. Local experience of MR imaging with 3T (TRIO) equipped with TIM. Biomed Imag Interv J 2007, 3(1):12-39.
37. DeLano M.C., Fisher C. 3T MR imaging of the brain. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006, 14(1):77-88.
38. Gonen O., Gruber S., Li B.S., Mlynárik V., Moser E. Multivoxel 3D proton spectroscopy in the brain at 1.5 versus 3.0T: signal-to-noise ratio and resolution comparison. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001, 22(9):1727-1731.
39. Krishnamurthy U., Neelavalli J., Mody S., et al. MR imaging of the fetal brain at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths: comparing specific absorption rate (SAR) and image quality. J Perinat Med 2014.
40. Willinek W.A., Kuhl C.K. 3.0T neuroimaging: technical considerations and clinical applications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(2):217-228. ix.
41. Imaging Economics. High-field MRI: is it time for 3T? [Internet]. Available from: 2014 Accessed 07.09.14. http://www.imagingeconomics.com/2004/02/high-field-mri-is-it-time-for-3t/.
42. Merkle E.M., Dale B.M. Abdominal MRI at 3.0T: the basics revisited. Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186(6):1524-1532.
43. Keil B., Alagappan V., Mareyam A., et al. Size-optimized 32-channel brain arrays for 3T pediatric imaging. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2011, 66(6):1777-1787.
44. Lattanzi R., Grant A.K., Polimeni J.R., et al. Performance evaluation of a 32-element head array with respect to the ultimate intrinsic SNR. NMR Biomed 2010, 23(2):142-151.
45. Welsh R.C., Nemec U., Thomason M.E. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2011, 22(3):119-131.
46. Glockner J.F., Hu H.H., Stanley D.W., Angelos L., King K. Parallel MR imaging: a user[U+05F3]s guide. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 2005, 25(5):1279-1297.
47. Serai S.D., Merrow A.C., Kline-Fath B.M. Fetal MRI on a multi-element digital coil platform. Pediatr Radiol 2013, 43(9):1213-1217.
48. Vernickel P., Röschmann P., Findeklee C., et al. Eight-channel transmit/receive body MRI coil at 3T. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2007, 58(2):381-389.
49. Hillenbrand C.M., Reykowski A.M.R. Imaging of the newborn: a technical perspective. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2012, 20(1):63-79.
50. Deshmane A., Gulani V., Griswold M.A., Seiberlich N. Parallel MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012, 36(1):55-72.
51. Heidemann R.M., Seiberlich N., Griswold M.A., Wohlfarth K., Krueger G., Jakob P.M. Perspectives and limitations of parallel MR imaging at high field strengths. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(2):311-320. xi.
52. Willinek W.A., Gieseke J., Kukuk G.M., et al. Dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation body MR imaging compared with standard MR imaging at 3.0T: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2010, 256(3):966-975.
53. Barth M.M., Smith M.P., Pedrosa I., Lenkinski R.E., Rofsky N.M. Body MR imaging at 3.0T: understanding the opportunities and challenges. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 2007, 27(5):1445-1462. discussion 1462-4.
54. Zimmerman R.A., Bilaniuk L.T., Pollock A.N., et al. 3.0T versus 1.5T pediatric brain imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(2):229-239. ix.
55. Stanisz G.J., Odrobina E.E., Pun J., et al. T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2005, 54(3):507-512.
56. Bernstein M.A., Huston J., Ward H.A. Imaging artifacts at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24(4):735-746.
57. De Bazelaire C.M.J., Duhamel G.D., Rofsky N.M., Alsop D.C. MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0T: preliminary results. Radiology 2004, 230(3):652-659.
58. Schick F. Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential. Eur Radiol 2005, 15(5):946-959.
59. Bernstein M.A., Huston J., Lin C., Gibbs G.F., Felmlee J.P. High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2001, 46(5):955-962.
60. Krautmacher C., Willinek W.A., Tschampa H.J., et al. Brain tumors: full- and half-dose contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0T compared with 1.5T-initial experience. Radiology 2005, 237(3):1014-1019.
61. Martirosian P., Klose U., Mader I., Schick F. FAIR true-FISP perfusion imaging of the kidneys. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2004, 51(2):353-361.
62. Moseley M.E., Liu C., Rodriguez S., Brosnan T. Advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging. Neurol Clin 2009, 27(1):1-19. xiii.
63. Huisman T.A.G.M., Sorensen A.G. Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: techniques and application in children. Eur Radiol 2004, 14(1):59-72.
64. Le Bihan D., Poupon C., Amadon A., Lethimonnier F. Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24(3):478-488.
65. Franklin K.M., Dale B.M., Merkle E.M. Improvement in B1-inhomogeneity artifacts in the abdomen at 3T MR imaging using a radiofrequency cushion. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 27(6):1443-1447.
66. Kataoka M., Isoda H., Maetani Y., et al. MR imaging of the female pelvis at 3 Tesla: evaluation of image homogeneity using different dielectric pads. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 26(6):1572-1577.
67. De Graaf R.A., Nicolay K. Adiabatic rf pulses: applications to in vivo NMR. Concepts Magn Reson 1997, 9(4):247-268.
68. Graessner J. Frequently asked questions: diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) [Internet]. Available from: 2011 Accessed 29.09.14. http://www.healthcare.siemens.com/siemens_hwem-hwem_ssxa_websites-context-root/wcm/idc/siemens_hwem-hwem_ssxa_websites-context-root/wcm/idc/groups/public/@global/@imaging/@mri/documents/download/mdaw/mdey/~edisp/frequently_asked_questions_diffusion-weighted_imaging-00012754.pdf.
69. Rutherford M., Malamateniou C., Zeka J., Counsell S. MR imaging of the neonatal brain at 3 Tesla. Eur J Paediatr Neurol EJPN Off J Eur Paediatr Neurol Soc 2004, 8(6):281-289.
70. Kwon S.H., Vasung L., Ment L.R., Huppi P.S. The role of neuroimaging in predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm neonates. Clin Perinatol 2014, 41(1):257-283.
71. Gilmore J.H., Zhai G., Wilber K., Smith J.K., Lin W., Gerig G. 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in newborns. Psychiatry Res 2004, 132(1):81-85.
72. Wimberger D.M., Roberts T.P., Barkovich A.J., Prayer L.M., Moseley M.E., Kucharczyk J. Identification of "premyelination" by diffusion-weighted MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995, 19(1):28-33.
73. Basser P.J., Jones D.K. Diffusion-tensor MRI theory, experimental design and data analysis-a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002, 15(7-8):456-467.
74. Le Bihan D., Mangin J.F., Poupon C., et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 13(4):534-546.
75. Yoshida S., Oishi K., Faria A.V., Mori S. Diffusion tensor imaging of normal brain development. Pediatr Radiol 2013, 43(1):15-27.
76. Hüppi P.S., Murphy B., Maier S.E., et al. Microstructural brain development after perinatal cerebral white matter injury assessed by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatrics 2001, 107(3):455-460.
77. Hüppi P.S., Maier S.E., Peled S., et al. Microstructural development of human newborn cerebral white matter assessed in vivo by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Res 1998, 44(4):584-590.
78. Miller S.P., McQuillen P.S., Hamrick S., et al. Abnormal brain development in newborns with congenital heart disease. N Engl J Med 2007, 357(19):1928-1938.
79. Miller J.H., McKinstry R.C., Philip J.V., Mukherjee P., Neil J.J. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of normal brain maturation: a guide to structural development and myelination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003, 180(3):851-859.
80. Bartha A.I., Yap K.R.L., Miller S.P., et al. The normal neonatal brain: MR imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and 3D MR spectroscopy in healthy term neonates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007, 28(6):1015-1021.
81. Beaulieu C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system-a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002, 15(7-8):435-455.
82. Neil J.J., Shiran S.I., McKinstry R.C., et al. Normal brain in human newborns: apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion anisotropy measured by using diffusion tensor MR imaging. Radiology 1998, 209(1):57-66.
83. Shimony J.S., McKinstry R.C., Akbudak E., et al. Quantitative diffusion-tensor anisotropy brain MR imaging: normative human data and anatomic analysis. Radiology 1999, 212(3):770-784.
84. Prayer D., Barkovich A.J., Kirschner D.A., et al. Visualization of nonstructural changes in early white matter development on diffusion-weighted MR images: evidence supporting premyelination anisotropy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001, 22(8):1572-1576.
85. Evans A.C. The NIH MRI study of normal brain development. NeuroImage 2006, 30(1):184-202. Brain Development Cooperative Group.
86. Almli C.R., Rivkin M.J., McKinstry R.C. The NIH MRI study of normal brain development (Objective-2): newborns, infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. NeuroImage 2007, 35(1):308-325. Brain Development Cooperative Group.
87. Barkovich A.J., Miller S.P., Bartha A., et al. MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and diffusion tensor imaging of sequential studies in neonates with encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006, 27(3):533-547.
88. Vasung L., Fischi-Gomez E., Hüppi P.S. Multimodality evaluation of the pediatric brain: DTI and its competitors. Pediatr Radiol 2013, 43(1):60-68.
89. Kasprian G., Brugger P.C., Weber M., et al. In utero tractography of fetal white matter development. NeuroImage 2008, 43(2):213-224.
90. Jiang S., Xue H., Counsell S., et al. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the brain in moving subjects: application to in-utero fetal and ex-utero studies. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2009, 62(3):645-655.
91. Mukherjee P., McKinstry R.C. Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of human brain development. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(1):19-43. vii.
92. Setsompop K., Cohen-Adad J., Gagoski B.A., et al. Improving diffusion MRI using simultaneous multi-slice echo planar imaging. NeuroImage 2012, 63(1):569-580.
93. Poot D.H.J., Jeurissen B., Bastiaensen Y., et al. Super-resolution for multislice diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2013, 69(1):103-113.
94. Feinberg D.A., Moeller S., Smith S.M., et al. Multiplexed echo planar imaging for sub-second whole brain FMRI and fast diffusion imaging. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(12):e15710.
95. Conturo T.E., Lori N.F., Cull T.S., et al. Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96(18):10422-10427.
96. Mori S., Crain B.J., Chacko V.P., van Zijl P.C. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1999, 45(2):265-269.
97. Basser P.J., Pajevic S., Pierpaoli C., Duda J., Aldroubi A. In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2000, 44(4):625-632.
98. Kreis R., Ernst T., Ross B.D. Absolute quantitation of water and metabolites in the human brain. II. Metabolite concentrations. J Magn Reson B 1993, 102(1):9-19.
99. Prager A., Roychowdhury S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the neonatal brain. Indian J Pediatr 2007, 74(2):173-184.
100. Brighina E., Bresolin N., Pardi G., Rango M. Human fetal brain chemistry as detected by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Pediatr Neurol 2009, 40(5):327-342.
101. Kreis R., Hofmann L., Kuhlmann B., Boesch C., Bossi E., Hüppi P.S. Brain metabolite composition during early human brain development as measured by quantitative in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2002, 48(6):949-958.
102. Leth H., Toft P.B., Peitersen B., Lou H.C., Henriksen O. Use of brain lactate levels to predict outcome after perinatal asphyxia. Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992 1996, 85(7):859-864.
103. Vigneron D.B. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of human brain development. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(1):75-85. (viii).
104. Dydak U., Schär M. MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging: comparing 3.0T versus 1.5T. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(2):269-283. (x).
105. Barker P.B., Hearshen D.O., Boska M.D. Single-voxel proton MRS of the human brain at 1.5T and 3.0T. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2001, 45(5):765-769.
106. Kim J.-H., Chang K.-H., Na D.G., et al. 3T 1H-MR spectroscopy in grading of cerebral gliomas: comparison of short and intermediate echo time sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006, 27(7):1412-1418.
107. Heerschap A., Kok R.D., van den Berg P.P. Antenatal proton MR spectroscopy of the human brain in vivo. Childs Nerv Syst ChNS Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg 2003, 19(7-8):418-421.
108. Fenton B.W., Lin C.S., Macedonia C., Schellinger D., Ascher S. The fetus at term: in utero volume-selected proton MR spectroscopy with a breath-hold technique-a feasibility study. Radiology 2001, 219(2):563-566.
109. Kok R.D., van den Bergh A.J., Heerschap A., Nijland R., van den Berg P.P. Metabolic information from the human fetal brain obtained with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 185(5):1011-1015.
110. Bogner W., Hess A.T., Gagoski B., et al. Real-time motion- and B0-correction for LASER-localized spiral-accelerated 3D-MRSI of the brain at 3T. NeuroImage 2013, 88C:22-31.
111. Hüppi P.S., Lazeyras F. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) in neonatal brain injury. Pediatr Res 2001, 49(3):317-320.
112. Bizzi A., Stefano N.D., Clinical M.R. Spectroscopy: Techniques and Applications 2009, 275. Cambridge University Press, New York.
113. Bainbridge A., Kendall G.S., Vita E.D., et al. Regional neonatal brain absolute thermometry by (1)H MRS. NMR Biomed 2013, 26(4):416-423.
114. Wu T.-W., McLean C., Friedlich P., et al. Brain temperature in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy during therapeutic hypothermia. J Pediatr 2014.
115. Ball W.S., Holland S.K. Perfusion imaging in the pediatric patient. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001, 9(1):207-230. ix.
116. Calamante F., Thomas D.L., Pell G.S., Wiersma J., Turner R. Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Off J Int Soc Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999, 19(7):701-735.
117. Tanner S.F., Cornette L., Ramenghi L.A., et al. Cerebral perfusion in infants and neonates: preliminary results obtained using dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003, 88(6):F525-F530.
118. Williams D.S., Detre J.A., Leigh J.S., Koretsky A.P. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992, 89(1):212-216.
119. Wang J., Licht D.J., Jahng G.-H., et al. Pediatric perfusion imaging using pulsed arterial spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003, 18(4):404-413.
120. Wang J., Licht D.J. Pediatric perfusion MR imaging using arterial spin labeling. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(1):149-167. ix.
121. Liu T.T., Brown G.G. Measurement of cerebral perfusion with arterial spin labeling: Part 1. Methods. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2007, 13(3):517-525.
122. Brown G.G., Clark C., Liu T.T. Measurement of cerebral perfusion with arterial spin labeling: Part 2. Applications. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2007, 13(3):526-538.
123. Miranda M.J., Olofsson K., Sidaros K. Noninvasive measurements of regional cerebral perfusion in preterm and term neonates by magnetic resonance arterial spin labeling. Pediatr Res 2006, 60(3):359-363.
124. Golay X., Petersen E.T. Arterial spin labeling: benefits and pitfalls of high magnetic field. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(2):259-268. x.
125. Ogawa S., Menon R.S., Tank D.W., et al. Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. Biophys J 1993, 64(3):803-812.
126. Seghier M.L., Hüppi P.S. The role of functional magnetic resonance imaging in the study of brain development, injury, and recovery in the newborn. Semin Perinatol 2010, 34(1):79-86.
127. Shimony J.S., Zhang D., Johnston J.M., Fox M.D., Roy A., Leuthardt E.C. Resting state spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity: a new paradigm for presurgical planning using fMRI. Acad Radiol 2009, 16(5):578.
128. Ogawa S., Lee T.M., Kay A.R., Tank D.W. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990, 87(24):9868-9872.
129. Krüger G., Kastrup A., Glover G.H. Neuroimaging at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2001, 45(4):595-604.
130. Voss H.U., Zevin J.D., McCandliss B.D. Functional MR imaging at 3.0T versus 1.5T: a practical review. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(2):285-297. x.
131. Thulborn K.R. Clinical rationale for very-high-field (3.0 Tesla) functional magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1999, 10(1):37-50.
132. Seghier M.L., Lazeyras F., Huppi P.S. Functional MRI of the newborn. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006, 11(6):479-488.
133. Fransson P., Skiöld B., Horsch S., et al. Resting-state networks in the infant brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007, 104(39):15531-15536.
134. Fransson P., Skiöld B., Engström M., et al. Spontaneous brain activity in the newborn brain during natural sleep-an fMRI study in infants born at full term. Pediatr Res 2009, 66(3):301-305.
135. Smyser C.D., Snyder A.Z., Neil J.J. Functional connectivity MRI in infants: exploration of the functional organization of the developing brain. NeuroImage 2011, 56(3):1437-1452.
136. Fransson P., Metsäranta M., Blennow M., Åden U., Lagercrantz H., Vanhatalo S. Early development of spatial patterns of power-law frequency scaling in fMRI resting-state and EEG data in the newborn brain. Cereb Cortex 2013, 23(3):638-646.
137. Fox M.D., Raichle M.E. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007, 8(9):700-711.
138. Raichle M.E., Snyder A.Z. A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea. NeuroImage 2007, 37(4):1083-1090. (discussion 1097-9.).
139. Biswal B., Yetkin F.Z., Haughton V.M., Hyde J.S. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 1995, 34(4):537-541.
140. Damoiseaux J.S., SARB Rombouts, Barkhof F., et al. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103(37):13848-13853.
141. Doria V., Beckmann C.F., Arichi T., et al. Emergence of resting state networks in the preterm human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010, 107(46):20015-20020.
142. Lin W., Zhu Q., Gao W., et al. Functional connectivity MR imaging reveals cortical functional connectivity in the developing brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008, 29(10):1883-1889.
143. Damaraju E, Phillips JR, Lowe JR, Ohls R, Calhoun VD, Caprihan A. Resting-state functional connectivity differences in premature children. Front Syst Neurosci [Internet]. Available from: 2010 Accessed 27.10.14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2923563/.
144. Smyser C.D., Inder T.E., Shimony J.S., et al. Longitudinal analysis of neural network development in preterm infants. Cereb Cortex N Y NY 2010, 20(12):2852-2862.
145. Fransson P., Åden U., Blennow M., Lagercrantz H. The functional architecture of the infant brain as revealed by resting-state fMRI. Cereb Cortex 2011, 21(1):145-154.
146. Sporns O., Tononi G., Kötter R. The human connectome: a structural description of the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol 2005, 1(4):e42.
147. Hüppi P.S., Dubois J. Diffusion tensor imaging of brain development. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006, 11(6):489-497.
148. Uğurbil K., Xu J., Auerbach E.J., et al. Pushing spatial and temporal resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage 2013, 80:80-104.
149. Seghier M.L., Lazeyras F., Zimine S., et al. Combination of event-related fMRI and diffusion tensor imaging in an infant with perinatal stroke. NeuroImage 2004, 21(1):463-472.
150. Moore R.J., Vadeyar S., Fulford J., et al. Antenatal determination of fetal brain activity in response to an acoustic stimulus using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2001, 12(2):94-99.
151. Fulford J., Vadeyar S.H., Dodampahala S.H., et al. Fetal brain activity and hemodynamic response to a vibroacoustic stimulus. Hum Brain Mapp 2004, 22(2):116-121.
152. Jardri R., Pins D., Houfflin-Debarge V., et al. Fetal cortical activation to sound at 33 weeks of gestation: a functional MRI study. NeuroImage 2008, 42(1):10-18.
153. Gowland P., Fulford J. Initial experiences of performing fetal fMRI. Exp Neurol 2004, 190(suppl 1):S22-S27.
154. Stokowski L.A. Ensuring safety for infants undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Adv Neonatal Care Off J Natl Assoc Neonatal Nurses 2005, 5(1):14-27. quiz 52-4.
155. Dearlove O., Corcoran J.P. Sedation of children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Anaesth 2007, 98(4):548-549.
156. Beauve B., Dearlove O. Sedation of children under 4 weeks of age for MRI examination. Paediatr Anaesth 2008, 18(9):892-893.
157. Wilder R.T., Flick R.P., Sprung J., et al. Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology 2009, 110(4):796-804.
158. Etzel-Hardman D., Kapsin K., Jones S., Churilla H. Sedation reduction in a pediatric radiology department. J Healthc Qual Off Publ Natl Assoc Healthc Qual 2009, 31(4):34-39.
159. Ferrazzi G., Kuklisova Murgasova M., Arichi T., et al. Resting state fMRI in the moving fetus: a robust framework for motion, bias field and spin history correction. NeuroImage 2014, 101:555-568.
160. Jiang S., Xue H., Glover A., Rutherford M., Rueckert D., Hajnal J.V. MRI of moving subjects using multislice snapshot images with volume reconstruction (SVR): application to fetal, neonatal, and adult brain studies. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007, 26(7):967-980.
161. Kim K., Habas P.A., Rousseau F., Glenn O.A., Barkovich A.J., Studholme C. Intersection based motion correction of multislice MRI for 3-D in utero fetal brain image formation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010, 29(1):146-158.
162. Rousseau F., Glenn O.A., Iordanova B., et al. Registration-based approach for reconstruction of high-resolution in utero fetal MR brain images. Acad Radiol 2006, 13(9):1072-1081.
163. Srinivasan L., Dutta R., Counsell S.J., et al. Quantification of deep gray matter in preterm infants at term-equivalent age using manual volumetry of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance images. Pediatrics 2007, 119(4):759-765.
164. Rousseau F., Glenn O., Iordanova B., et al. A novel approach to high resolution fetal brain MR imaging. Med Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv MICCAI Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv 2005, 8(Pt 1):548-555.
165. Kim K, Hansen M, Habas P, et al. Intersection based registration of slice stacks to form 3D images of the human fetal brain. In: 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2008 ISBI 2008. 1167-70.
166. Lin W., Huang F., Duensing G.R., Reykowski A. High temporal resolution retrospective motion correction with radial parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2012, 67(4):1097-1105.
167. Forbes K.P., Pipe J.G., Bird C.R., Heiserman J.E. PROPELLER MRI: clinical testing of a novel technique for quantification and compensation of head motion. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 14(3):215-222.
168. Forbes K.P., Pipe J.G., Karis J.P., Farthing V., Heiserman J.E. Brain imaging in the unsedated pediatric patient: comparison of periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction and single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003, 24(5):794-798.
169. Krämer M., Jochimsen T.H., Reichenbach J.R. Functional magnetic resonance imaging using PROPELLER-EPI. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2012, 68(1):140-151.
170. Li Z., Pipe J.G., Aboussouan E., Karis J.P., Huo D. A parallel imaging technique using mutual calibration for split-blade diffusion-weighted PROPELLER. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2011, 65(3):638-644.
171. Vertinsky A.T., Rubesova E., Krasnokutsky M.V., et al. Performance of PROPELLER relative to standard FSE T2-weighted imaging in pediatric brain MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2009, 39(10):1038-1047.
172. Nyberg E., Sandhu G.S., Jesberger J., et al. Comparison of brain MR images at 1.5T using BLADE and rectilinear techniques for patients who move during data acquisition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012, 33(1):77-82.
173. Lavdas E., Mavroidis P., Kostopoulos S., et al. Improvement of image quality using BLADE sequences in brain MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2013, 31(2):189-200.
174. Tachibana Y., Niwa T., Kwee T.C., et al. Effective performance of T(1)-weighted FLAIR Imaging with BLADE in pediatric brains. Magn Reson Med Sci MRMS Off J Jpn Soc Magn Reson Med 2012, 11(1):17-26.
175. Ohshita T. Basic examination of an imagecharacteristic in Multivane. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2011, 67(10):1298-1303.
176. American College of Radiology. American College of Radiolgy and Society for Pediatric Radiology, ACR-SPR practice parameter for the safe and optimal performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), resolution (39) [Internet]. Available from: 2014 Accessed 16.11.14. http://www.acr.org/~/media/CB384A65345F402083639E6756CE513F.pdf.
177. Kanal E., Barkovich A.J., Bell C., et al. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188(6):1447-1474.
178. Expert Panel on MR Safety, Kanal E., Barkovich A.J., Bell C., et al. ACR guidance document on MR safe practices. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013, 37(3):501-530.
179. Schenck J.F. Physical interactions of static magnetic fields with living tissues. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2005, 87(2-3):185-204.
180. Statement of Medical Magnetic Resonance Procedures: Protection of Patients. Health Phys 2004, 87(2):197-216. International Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).
181. Statement on medical magnetic resonance (MR) procedures: protection of patients. Health Phys 2009, 97(3):259-261. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Amendment to the ICNIRP.
182. Grant PE, Wald LL, Adalsteinsson E. Potential risks of fetal magnetic resonance imaging: 3 Tesla compared to 1.5 Tesla. 2015, in press.
183. De Vocht F., van Drooge H., Engels H., Kromhout H. Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing department. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 23(2):197-204.
184. De Vocht F., Stevens T., van Wendel-de-Joode B., Engels H., Kromhout H. Acute neurobehavioral effects of exposure to static magnetic fields: analyses of exposure-response relations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 23(3):291-297.
185. Toyomaki A., Yamamoto T. Observation of changes in neural activity due to the static magnetic field of an MRI scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 26(5):1216-1221.
186. Chakeres D.W., de Vocht F. Static magnetic field effects on human subjects related to magnetic resonance imaging systems. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2005, 87(2-3):255-265.
187. Vogl T.J., Paulus W., Fuchs A., Krafczyk S., Lissner J. Influence of magnetic resonance imaging on evoked potentials and nerve conduction velocities in humans. Invest Radiol 1991, 26(5):432-437.
188. Hong C.Z., Shellock F.G. Short-term exposure to a 1.5 Tesla static magnetic field does not affect somato-sensory-evoked potentials in man. Magn Reson Imaging 1990, 8(1):65-69.
189. Wiskirchen J., Grönewäller E.F., Heinzelmann F., et al. Human fetal lung fibroblasts: in vitro study of repetitive magnetic field exposure at 0.2, 1.0, and 1.5 T. Radiology 2000, 215(3):858-862.
190. Schwartz J.L., Crooks L.E. NMR imaging produces no observable mutations or cytotoxicity in mammalian cells. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982, 139(3):583-585.
191. Kay H.H., Herfkens R.J., Kay B.K. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on Xenopus laevis embryogenesis. Magn Reson Imaging 1988, 6(5):501-506.
192. Tyndall D.A., Sulik K.K. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on eye development in the C57BL/6J mouse. Teratology 1991, 43(3):263-275.
193. Saunders R. Static magnetic fields: animal studies. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2005, 87(2-3):225-239.
194. Schenck J.F. Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000, 12(1):2-19.
195. Edwards M.J., Saunders R.D., Shiota K. Effects of heat on embryos and foetuses. Int J Hyperth Off J Eur Soc Hyperthermic Oncol North Am Hyperth Group 2003, 19(3):295-324.
196. Levine D., Zuo C., Faro C.B., Chen Q. Potential heating effect in the gravid uterus during MR HASTE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 13(6):856-861.
197. Medical magnetic resonance (MR) procedures: protection of patients. Health Phys 2004, 87(2):197-216. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.
198. Bahado-Singh R.O., Goncalves L.F. Techniques, terminology, and indications for MRI in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 2013, 37(5):334-339.
199. Hennig J., Scheffler K. Hyperechoes. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2001, 46(1):6-12.
200. Hebrank FX, Gebhardt M. Siemans Medical Systems, MR Division. SAFE-Model-a new method for predicting peripheral nerve stimulations in MRI [Internet]. Available from: 2000 Accessed 19.09.14. http://cds.ismrm.org/ismrm-2000/PDF7/2007.PDF.
201. Price D.L., De Wilde J.P., Papadaki A.M., Curran J.S., Kitney R.I. Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2T to 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 13(2):288-293.
202. McJury M., Shellock F.G. Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000, 12(1):37-45.
203. CDC-NIOSH Publications and Products. Preventing occupational hearing loss-a practical guide (96-110) [Internet]. Available from: 2014 Acceessed 19.09.14. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-110/pdfs/96-110.pdf.
204. Morris B.H., Philbin M.K., Bose C. Physiological effects of sound on the newborn. J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinat Assoc 2000, 20(8 Pt 2):S55-S60.
205. Boyle Y., Bentley D.E., Watson A., Jones A.K.P. Acoustic noise in functional magnetic resonance imaging reduces pain unpleasantness ratings. NeuroImage 2006, 31(3):1278-1283.
206. Amaro E., Williams S.C.R., Shergill S.S., et al. Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: current strategies and future prospects. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002, 16(5):497-510.
207. Nordell A., Lundh M., Horsch S., et al. The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992 2009, 98(8):1278-1283.
208. Macnab A., Chen Y., Gagnon F., Bora B., Laszlo C. Vibration and noise in pediatric emergency transport vehicles: a potential cause of morbidity?. Aviat Space Environ Med 1995, 66(3):212-219.
209. Watts C., Trim E., Metherall J., Lightfoot E. Neonatal transport-the comfort zone. Infant 2008, 4(1):27-30.
210. Tkach J.A., Li Y., Pratt R.G., et al. Characterization of acoustic noise in a neonatal intensive care unit MRI system. Pediatr Radiol 2014, 44(8):1011-1019.
211. Glover P., Hykin J., Gowland P., Wright J., Johnson I., Mansfield P. An assessment of the intrauterine sound intensity level during obstetric echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 1995, 68(814):1090-1094.
212. Baker P.N., Johnson I.R., Harvey P.R., Gowland P.A., Mansfield P. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994, 170(1 Pt 1):32-33.
213. Reeves M.J., Brandreth M., Whitby E.H., et al. Neonatal cochlear function: measurement after exposure to acoustic noise during in utero MR imaging. Radiology 2010, 257(3):802-809.
214. Kok R.D., de Vries M.M., Heerschap A., van den Berg P.P. Absence of harmful effects of magnetic resonance exposure at 1.5T in utero during the third trimester of pregnancy: a follow-up study. Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 22(6):851-854.
215. Eskandar O., Eckford S., Watkinson T. Safety of diagnostic imaging in pregnancy. Part 2: magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound scanning and Doppler assessment. Obstet Gynaecol 2010, 12(3):171-177.
216. Poutamo J., Partanen K., Vanninen R., Vainio P., Kirkinen P. MRI does not change fetal cardiotocographic parameters. Prenat Diagn 1998, 18(11):1149-1154.
217. Garel C., Brisse H., Sebag G., Elmaleh M., Oury J.F., Hassan M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus. Pediatr Radiol 1998, 28(4):201-211.
218. Glenn O.A., Goldstein R.B., Li K.C., et al. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fetuses referred for sonographically suspected abnormalities of the corpus callosum. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med 2005, 24(6):791-804.
219. Benacerraf B.R., Shipp T.D., Bromley B., Levine D. What does magnetic resonance imaging add to the prenatal sonographic diagnosis of ventriculomegaly?. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med 2007, 26(11):1513-1522.
220. Levine D. Obstetric MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24(1):1-15.
221. Garel C. Fetal MRI: what is the future?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008, 31(2):123-128.
222. Righini A., Bianchini E., Parazzini C., et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient determination in normal fetal brain: a prenatal MR imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003, 24(5):799-804.
223. Prayer D., Brugger P.C., Mittermayer C., Nasel C.J.O., Hoche B., Schindler E. Diffusion-weighted imaging in intrauterine fetal brain development. Abstr Am Soc Neuroradiol Meet Wash 2003.
224. Manganaro L., Perrone A., Savelli S., et al. Evaluation of normal brain development by prenatal MR imaging. Radiol Med (Torino) 2007, 112(3):444-455.
225. Schneider J.F., Confort-Gouny S., Le Fur Y., et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in normal fetal brain maturation. Eur Radiol 2007, 17(9):2422-2429.
226. Schneider M.M., Berman J.I., Baumer F.M., et al. Normative apparent diffusion coefficient values in the developing fetal brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009, 30(9):1799-1803.
227. Clouchoux C., Limperopoulos C. Novel applications of quantitative MRI for the fetal brain. Pediatr Radiol 2012, 42(suppl 1):S24-S32.
228. Girard N., Fogliarini C., Viola A., et al. MRS of normal and impaired fetal brain development. Eur J Radiol 2006, 57(2):217-225.
229. Levine D. Timing of MRI in pregnancy, repeat exams, access, and physician qualifications. Semin Perinatol 2013, 37(5):340-344.
230. Reddy U.M., Filly R.A., Copel J.A. Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Department of Health and Human Services, NIH. Prenatal imaging: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 2008, 112(1):145-157.
231. Garel C. Imaging the fetus: when does MRI really help?. Pediatr Radiol 2008, 38(suppl 3):S467-S470.
232. Bulas D., Egloff A. Benefits and risks of MRI in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 2013, 37(5):301-304.
233. Kok R.D., van den Berg P.P., van den Bergh A.J., Nijland R., Heerschap A. Maturation of the human fetal brain as observed by 1H MR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2002, 48(4):611-616.
234. Tang P.H., Bartha A.I., Norton M.E., Barkovich A.J., Sherr E.H., Glenn O.A. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: an MR imaging analysis of associated abnormalities in the fetus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009, 30(2):257-263.
235. Switzer P.J., James C.A., M.A.Frettag Value and limitations of obstetrical ultrasound: uncovering abnormalities at earlier stages. Can Fam Physician Médecin Fam Can 1992, 38:121-128.
236. Dashe J.S., McIntire D.D., Twickler D.M. Maternal obesity limits the ultrasound evaluation of fetal anatomy. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med 2009, 28(8):1025-1030.
237. Hykin J., Moore R., Duncan K., et al. Fetal brain activity demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1999, 354(9179):645-646.
238. Fulford J., Vadeyar S.H., Dodampahala S.H., et al. Fetal brain activity in response to a visual stimulus. Hum Brain Mapp 2003, 20(4):239-245.
239. Fulford J., Gowland P.A. The emerging role of functional MRI for evaluating fetal brain activity. Semin Perinatol 2009, 33(4):281-288.
240. Thomason M., Dassanayake M., Shen S., et al. Cross-hemispheric functional connectivity in the human fetal brain. Sci Transl Med 2013, 5(173):173ra24.
241. Ullmann P., Junge S., Wick M., Seifert F., Ruhm W., Hennig J. Experimental analysis of parallel excitation using dedicated coil setups and simultaneous RF transmission on multiple channels. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2005, 54(4):994-1001.
242. Duensing R., Fitzsimmons J. 3.0T versus 1.5T: coil design similarities and differences. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(2):249-257. x.
243. Wieseler K.M., Bhargava P., Kanal K.M., Vaidya S., Stewart B.K., Dighe M.K. Imaging in pregnant patients: examination appropriateness. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 2010, 30(5):1215-1229. (discussion 1230-3).
244. Myers C., Duncan K.R., Gowland P.A., Johnson I.R., Baker P.N. Failure to detect intrauterine growth restriction following in utero exposure to MRI. Br J Radiol 1998, 71(845):549-551.
245. Clements H., Duncan K.R., Fielding K., Gowland P.A., Johnson I.R., Baker P.N. Infants exposed to MRI in utero have a normal paediatric assessment at 9 months of age. Br J Radiol 2000, 73(866):190-194.
246. Magin R.L., Lee J.K., Klintsova A., Carnes K.I., Dunn F. Biological effects of long-duration, high-field (4T) MRI on growth and development in the mouse. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000, 12(1):140-149.
247. Westbrook C., Roth C.K. MRI in Practice 2011, 497. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
248. Health C for D and R. Guidance documents (medical devices and radiation-emitting products)-guidance for industry: guidance for the submission of premarket notifications for magnetic resonance diagnostic devices [Internet]. Available from: 2014 Accessed 01.12.14. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm073817.htm.
249. Yip Y.P., Capriotti C., Talagala S.L., Yip J.W. Effects of MR exposure at 1.5T on early embryonic development of the chick. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994, 4(5):742-748.
250. Yip Y.P., Capriotti C., Yip J.W. Effects of MR exposure on axonal outgrowth in the sympathetic nervous system of the chick. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995, 5(4):457-462.
251. Mevissen M., Buntenkötter S., Löscher W. Effects of static and time-varying (50-Hz) magnetic fields on reproduction and fetal development in rats. Teratology 1994, 50(3):229-237.
252. Yip Y.P., Capriotti C., Norbash S.G., Talagala S.L., Yip J.W. Effects of MR exposure on cell proliferation and migration of chick motoneurons. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994, 4(6):799-804.
253. Heinrichs W.L., Fong P., Flannery M., et al. Midgestational exposure of pregnant BALB/c mice to magnetic resonance imaging conditions. Magn Reson Imaging 1988, 6(3):305-313.
254. Hand J.W., Li Y., Hajnal J.V. Numerical study of RF exposure and the resulting temperature rise in the foetus during a magnetic resonance procedure. Phys Med Biol 2010, 55(4):913-930.
255. Dimbylow P. Development of pregnant female, hybrid voxel-mathematical models and their application to the dosimetry of applied magnetic and electric fields at 50Hz. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51(10):2383-2394.
256. Kanal E., Gillen J., Evans J.A., Savitz D.A., Shellock F.G. Survey of reproductive health among female MR workers. Radiology 1993, 187(2):395-399.
257. Sundgren P.C., Leander P. Is administration of gadolinium-based contrast media to pregnant women and small children justified?. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011, 34(4):750-757.
258. Barkovich A. Pediatric Neuroimaging 2005, Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA. 4th ed.
259. Okuda Y., Sagami F., Tirone P., Morisetti A., Bussi S., Masters R.E. Reproductive and developmental toxicity study of gadobenate dimeglumine formulation (E7155) (3)-study of embryo-fetal toxicity in rabbits by intravenous administration. J Toxicol Sci 1999, 24(suppl 1):79-87.
260. Rofsky N.M., Pizzarello D.J., Weinreb J.C., Ambrosino M.M., Rosenberg C. Effect on fetal mouse development of exposure to MR imaging and gadopentetate dimeglumine. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994, 4(6):805-807.
261. Rofsky N.M., Pizzarello D.J., Duhaney M.O., Falick A.K., Prendergast N., Weinreb J.C. Effect of magnetic resonance exposure combined with gadopentetate dimeglumine on chromosomes in animal specimens. Acad Radiol 1995, 2(6):492-496.
262. Morisetti A., Bussi S., Tirone P., de Haën C. Toxicological safety evaluation of gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5M solution for injection (MultiHance), a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast medium. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999, 23(suppl 1):S207-S217.
263. Soltys R.A. Summary of preclinical safety evaluation of gadoteridol injection. Invest Radiol 1992, 27(suppl 1):S7-S11.
264. Mühler M.R., Clément O., Salomon L.J., et al. Maternofetal pharmacokinetics of a gadolinium chelate contrast agent in mice. Radiology 2011, 258(2):455-460.
265. McRobbie D., Foster M.A. Pulsed magnetic field exposure during pregnancy and implications for NMR foetal imaging: a study with mice. Magn Reson Imaging 1985, 3(3):231-234.
266. Von Klitzing L. Do static magnetic fields of NMR influence biological signals?. Clin Phys Physiol Meas Off J Hosp Phys Assoc Dtsch Ges Für Med Phys Eur Fed Organ Med Phys 1986, 7(2):157-160.
267. Innis N.K., Ossenkopp K.P., Prato F.S., Sestini E. Behavioral effects of exposure to nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: II. Spatial memory tests. Magn Reson Imaging 1986, 4(4):281-284.
268. Ossenkopp K.P., Innis N.K., Prato F.S., Sestini E. Behavioral effects of exposure to nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: I. Open-field behavior and passive avoidance learning in rats. Magn Reson Imaging 1986, 4(4):275-280.
269. Atkinson I.C., Renteria L., Burd H., Pliskin N.H., Thulborn K.R. Safety of human MRI at static fields above the FDA 8T guideline: sodium imaging at 9.4T does not affect vital signs or cognitive ability. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 26(5):1222-1227.
270. Prasad N., Wright D.A., Ford J.J., Thornby J.I. Safety of 4-T MR imaging: study of effects on developing frog embryos. Radiology 1990, 174(1):251-253.
271. High W.B., Sikora J., Ugurbil K., Garwood M. Subchronic in vivo effects of a high static magnetic field (9.4T) in rats. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000, 12(1):122-139.
272. Valiron O., Peris L., Rikken G., et al. Cellular disorders induced by high magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005, 22(3):334-340.
273. Denegre J.M., Valles J.M., Lin K., Jordan W.B., Mowry K.L. Cleavage planes in frog eggs are altered by strong magnetic fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95(25):14729-14732.
274. Short W.O., Goodwill L., Taylor C.W., Job C., Arthur M.E., Cress A.E. Alteration of human tumor cell adhesion by high-strength static magnetic fields. Invest Radiol 1992, 27(10):836-840.
275. Collins C.M., Li S., Smith M.B. SAR and B1 field distributions in a heterogeneous human head model within a birdcage coil. Specific energy absorption rate. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 1998, 40(6):847-856.
276. Collins C.M., Liu W., Wang J., et al. Temperature and SAR calculations for a human head within volume and surface coils at 64 and 300MHz. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 19(5):650-656.
277. Collins C.M., Smith M.B. Calculations of B(1) distribution, SNR, and SAR for a surface coil adjacent to an anatomically-accurate human body model. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2001, 45(4):692-699.
278. Turro N.J. Influence of nuclear spin on chemical reactions: magnetic isotope and magnetic field effects (A review). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983, 80(2):609-621.
279. Dimbylow P. SAR in the mother and foetus for RF plane wave irradiation. Phys Med Biol 2007, 52(13):3791-3802.
280. Hand J.W., Li Y., Thomas E.L., Rutherford M.A., Hajnal J.V. Prediction of specific absorption rate in mother and fetus associated with MRI examinations during pregnancy. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2006, 55(4):883-893.
281. Gowland P.A., De Wilde J. Temperature increase in the fetus due to radio frequency exposure during magnetic resonance scanning. Phys Med Biol 2008, 53(21):L15-L18.
282. Kikuchi S., Saito K., Takahashi M., Ito K. Temperature elevation in the fetus from electromagnetic exposure during magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 2010, 55(8):2411-2426.
283. Dagang Wu Shamsi S, Chen J., Kainz W. Evaluations of specific absorption rate and temperature increase within pregnant female models in magnetic resonance imaging birdcage coils. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 2006, 54(12):4472-4478.
284. Rodegerdts E.A., Grönewäller E.F., Kehlbach R., et al. In vitro evaluation of teratogenic effects by time-varying MR gradient fields on fetal human fibroblasts. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000, 12(1):150-156.
285. Brezinka C., Lechner T., Stephan K. The fetus and noise. Gynäkol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 1997, 37(3):119-129.
286. American Academy of Pediatrics. Noise: a hazard for the fetus and newborn. Committee on Environmental Health. Pediatrics. 1997;100(4):724-727.
287. Alibek S., Vogel M., Sun W., et al. Acoustic noise reduction in MRI using Silent Scan: an initial experience. Diagn Interv Radiol Ank Turk 2014, 20(4):360-363.
288. Katsunuma A., Takamori H., Sakakura Y., Hamamura Y., Ogo Y., Katayama R. Quiet MRI with novel acoustic noise reduction. Magma N Y N 2002, 13(3):139-144.
289. Whitby E.H., Paley M.N., Smith M.F., Sprigg A., Woodhouse N., Griffiths P.D. Low field strength magnetic resonance imaging of the neonatal brain. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003, 88(3):F203-F208.
290. Rademaker K.J., Uiterwaal C.S.P.M., Beek F.J.A., et al. Neonatal cranial ultrasound versus MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome at school age in children born preterm. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005, 90(6):F489-F493.
291. Childs A.M., Cornette L., Ramenghi L.A., et al. Magnetic resonance and cranial ultrasound characteristics of periventricular white matter abnormalities in newborn infants. Clin Radiol 2001, 56(8):647-655.
292. Leijser L.M., Liauw L., Veen S., de Boer I.P., Walther F.J., van Wezel-Meijler G. Comparing brain white matter on sequential cranial ultrasound and MRI in very preterm infants. Neuroradiology 2008, 50(9):799-811.
293. O'Shea T.M., Counsell S.J., Bartels D.B., Dammann O. Magnetic resonance and ultrasound brain imaging in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev 2005, 81(3):263-271.
294. Miller S.P., Cozzio C.C., Goldstein R.B., et al. Comparing the diagnosis of white matter injury in premature newborns with serial MR imaging and transfontanel ultrasonography findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003, 24(8):1661-1669.
295. Hintz S.R., O'Shea M. Neuroimaging and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Semin Perinatol 2008, 32(1):11-19.
296. Levene M.I., Chervenak F.A. Fetal and neonatal neurology and neurosurgery, London. Elsevier Health Sciences 2009, 940.
297. Mathur A., Inder T. Magnetic resonance imaging-insights into brain injury and outcomes in premature infants. J Commun Disord 2009, 42(4):248-255.
298. Counsell S.J., Tranter S.L., Rutherford M.A. Magnetic resonance imaging of brain injury in the high-risk term infant. Semin Perinatol 2010, 34(1):67-78.
299. Glass H.C., Bonifacio S.L., Sullivan J., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound injury in preterm infants with seizures. J Child Neurol 2009, 24(9):1105-1111.
300. Simbrunner J., Riccabona M. Imaging of the neonatal CNS. Eur J Radiol 2006, 60(2):133-151.
301. Penrice J., Cady E.B., Lorek A., et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brain in normal preterm and term infants, and early changes after perinatal hypoxia-ischemia. Pediatr Res 1996, 40(1):6-14.
302. Hanrahan J.D., Sargentoni J., Azzopardi D., et al. Cerebral metabolism within 18 hours of birth asphyxia: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Pediatr Res 1996, 39(4 Pt 1):584-590.
303. Holshouser B.A., Ashwal S., Luh G.Y., et al. Proton MR spectroscopy after acute central nervous system injury: outcome prediction in neonates, infants, and children. Radiology 1997, 202(2):487-496.
304. Groenendaal F., Veenhoven R.H., van der Grond J., Jansen G.H., Witkamp T.D., de Vries L.S. Cerebral lactate and N-acetyl-aspartate/choline ratios in asphyxiated full-term neonates demonstrated in vivo using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Pediatr Res 1994, 35(2):148-151.
305. Hüppi P.S., Posse S., Lazeyras F., Burri R., Bossi E., Herschkowitz N. Magnetic resonance in preterm and term newborns: 1H-spectroscopy in developing human brain. Pediatr Res 1991, 30(6):574-578.
306. Cheong J.L.Y., Cady E.B., Penrice J., Wyatt J.S., Cox I.J., Robertson N.J. Proton MR spectroscopy in neonates with perinatal cerebral hypoxic-ischemic injury: metabolite peak-area ratios, relaxation times, and absolute concentrations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006, 27(7):1546-1554.
307. Moorcraft J., Bolas N.M., Ives N.K., et al. Spatially localized magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brains of normal and asphyxiated newborns. Pediatrics 1991, 87(3):273-282.
308. Peden C.J., Cowan F.M., Bryant D.J., et al. Proton MR spectroscopy of the brain in infants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990, 14(6):886-894.
309. Barkovich A.J., Baranski K., Vigneron D., et al. Proton MR spectroscopy for the evaluation of brain injury in asphyxiated, term neonates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999, 20(8):1399-1405.
310. Kreis R., Ernst T., Ross B.D. Development of the human brain: in vivo quantification of metabolite and water content with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 1993, 30(4):424-437.
311. Barkovich A.J., Westmark K.D., Bedi H.S., Partridge J.C., Ferriero D.M., Vigneron D.B. Proton spectroscopy and diffusion imaging on the first day of life after perinatal asphyxia: preliminary report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001, 22(9):1786-1794.
312. Vigneron D.B., Barkovich A.J., Noworolski S.M., et al. Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging of premature and term neonates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001, 22(7):1424-1433.
313. Grant P.E., Yu D. Acute injury to the immature brain with hypoxia with or without hypoperfusion. Radiol Clin North Am 2006, 44(1):63-77. viii.
314. Counsell S.J., Allsop J.M., Harrison M.C., et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the brain in preterm infants with focal and diffuse white matter abnormality. Pediatrics 2003, 112(1 Pt 1):1-7.
315. Counsell S.J., Rutherford M.A. Magnetic resonance imaging of the newborn brain. Curr Paediatr 2002, 12(5):401-413.
316. Rutherford M., Srinivasan L., Dyet L., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in perinatal brain injury: clinical presentation, lesions and outcome. Pediatr Radiol 2006, 36(7):582-592.
317. Sagar P., Grant P.E. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pediatric clinical applications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006, 16(1):45-74. viii.
318. Volpe J.J. Neurology of the newborn 2008, 1120. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA. 5th ed.
319. Hart A., Whitby E., Wilkinson S., Alladi S., Paley M., Smith M. Neuro-developmental outcome at 18 months in premature infants with diffuse excessive high signal intensity on MR imaging of the brain. Pediatr Radiol 2011, 41(10):1284-1292.
320. Jeon T.Y., Kim J.H., Yoo S.-Y., et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants: comparison of infants with and without diffuse excessive high signal intensity on MR images at near-term-equivalent age. Radiology 2012, 263(2):518-526.
321. Erberich S.G., Friedlich P., Seri I., Nelson M.D., Blüml S. Functional MRI in neonates using neonatal head coil and MR compatible incubator. NeuroImage 2003, 20(2):683-692.
322. Shu S.K., Ashwal S., Holshouser B.A., Nystrom G., Hinshaw D.B. Prognostic value of 1H-MRS in perinatal CNS insults. Pediatr Neurol 1997, 17(4):309-318.
323. Volpe J.J. Cerebral white matter injury of the premature infant-more common than you think. Pediatrics 2003, 112(1 Pt 1):176-180.
324. Inder T., Huppi P.S., Zientara G.P., et al. Early detection of periventricular leukomalacia by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J Pediatr 1999, 134(5):631-634.
325. Inder T.E., Wells S.J., Mogridge N.B., Spencer C., Volpe J.J. Defining the nature of the cerebral abnormalities in the premature infant: a qualitative magnetic resonance imaging study. J Pediatr 2003, 143(2):171-179.
326. Maalouf E.F., Duggan P.J., Rutherford M.A., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in a cohort of extremely preterm infants. J Pediatr 1999, 135(3):351-357.
327. Plaisier A., Govaert P., Lequin M.H., Dudink J. Optimal timing of cerebral MRI in preterm infants to predict long-term neurodevelopmental outcome: a systematic review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014, 35(5):841-847.
328. Dyet L.E., Kennea N., Counsell S.J., et al. Natural history of brain lesions in extremely preterm infants studied with serial magnetic resonance imaging from birth and neurodevelopmental assessment. Pediatrics 2006, 118(2):536-548.
329. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on understanding premature birth and assuring healthy outcomes. preterm birth: causes, consequences, and prevention [Internet]. In: Behrman RE, Butler AS, eds. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US). Available from: 2007 Accessed 05.11.14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11362/.
330. Wilson-Costello D., Friedman H., Minich N., Fanaroff A.A., Hack M. Improved survival rates with increased neurodevelopmental disability for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990s. Pediatrics 2005, 115(4):997-1003.
331. Allen M.C. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants. Curr Opin Neurol 2008, 21(2):123-128.
332. Volpe J.J. Brain injury in premature infants: a complex amalgam of destructive and developmental disturbances. Lancet Neurol 2009, 8(1):110-124.
333. Wood N.S., Marlow N., Costeloe K., Gibson A.T., Wilkinson A.R. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICure Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000 10, 343(6):378-384.
334. Kinney H.C. The near-term (late preterm) human brain and risk for periventricular leukomalacia: a review. Semin Perinatol 2006, 30(2):81-88.
335. Banker B.Q., Larroche J.C. Periventricular leukomalacia of infancy. A form of neonatal anoxic encephalopathy. Arch Neurol 1962, 7:386-410.
336. Back S.A. Perinatal white matter injury: the changing spectrum of pathology and emerging insights into pathogenetic mechanisms. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2006, 12(2):129-140.
337. Hack M., Taylor H. Perinatal brain injury in preterm infants and later neurobehavioral function. J Am MedAssoc 2000, 284(15):1973-1974.
338. Hack M., Fanaroff A.A. Outcomes of children of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990s. Early Hum Dev 1999, 53(3):193-218.
339. Hack M., Fanaroff A.A. Outcomes of children of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990s. Semin Neonatol SN 2000, 5(2):89-106.
340. Uggetti C., Egitto M.G., Fazzi E., et al. Cerebral visual impairment in periventricular leukomalacia: MR correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996, 17(5):979-985.
341. Jacobson L., Ek U., Fernell E., Flodmark O., Broberger U. Visual impairment in preterm children with periventricular leukomalacia-visual, cognitive and neuropaediatric characteristics related to cerebral imaging. Dev Med Child Neurol 1996, 38(8):724-735.
342. Mirmiran M., Barnes P.D., Keller K., et al. Neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging before discharge is better than serial cranial ultrasound in predicting cerebral palsy in very low birth weight preterm infants. Pediatrics 2004, 114(4):992-998.
343. Woodward L.J., Anderson P.J., Austin N.C., Howard K., Inder T.E. Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2006, 355(7):685-694.
344. Van Wezel-Meijler G., Leijser L.M., de Bruïne F.T., Steggerda S.J., van der Grond J., Walther F.J. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in newborn infants: practical aspects. Early Hum Dev 2009, 85(2):85-92.
345. American College of Radiology. American College of Radiolgy, American Society of Neuroradiology and Society for Pediatric Radiology, ACR-ASNR-SPR practice parameter for the performance and interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, resolution (39) [Internet]. Available from: 2014 Accessed 18.09.14. http://www.acr.org/~/media/E712C7C597AE44D8B1765D5ED5086086.pdf.
346. Benavente-Fernández I., Lubián-López P.S., Zuazo-Ojeda M.A., Jiménez-Gómez G., Lechuga-Sancho A.M. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992 2010, 99(6):850-853.
347. Merchant N., Groves A., Larkman D.J., et al. A patient care system for early 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 2009, 85(12):779-783.
348. Groenendaal F., Leusink C., Nijenhuis M., Janssen M.J.H. Neonatal life support during magnetic resonance imaging. J Med Eng Technol 2002, 26(2):71-74.
349. Mathur A.M., Neil J.J., McKinstry R.C., Inder T.E. Transport, monitoring, and successful brain MR imaging in unsedated neonates. Pediatr Radiol 2008, 38(3):260-264.
350. Counsell S.J., Rutherford M.A., Cowan F.M., Edwards A.D. Magnetic resonance imaging of preterm brain injury. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003, 88(4):F269-F274.
351. Debillon T., N'Guyen S., Muet A., Quere M.P., Moussaly F., Roze J.C. Limitations of ultrasonography for diagnosing white matter damage in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003, 88(4):F275-F279.
352. Nongena P., Ederies A., Azzopardi D.V., Edwards A.D. Confidence in the prediction of neurodevelopmental outcome by cranial ultrasound and MRI in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010, 95(6):F388-F390.
353. Ferriero D.M. Neonatal brain injury. N Engl J Med 2004, 351(19):1985-1995.
354. Inder T.E., Anderson N.J., Spencer C., Wells S., Volpe J.J. White matter injury in the premature infant: a comparison between serial cranial sonographic and MR findings at term. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003, 24(5):805-809.
355. Khwaja O., Volpe J.J. Pathogenesis of cerebral white matter injury of prematurity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008, 93(2):F153-F161.
356. Battin M., Maalouf E.F., Counsell S., et al. Physiological stability of preterm infants during magnetic resonance imaging. Early Hum Dev 1998, 52(2):101-110.
357. Taber K.H., Hayman L.A., Northrup S.R., Maturi L. Vital sign changes during infant magnetic resonance examinations. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998, 8(6):1252-1256.
358. Philbin M.K., Taber K.H., Hayman L.A. Preliminary report: changes in vital signs of term newborns during MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996, 17(6):1033-1036.
359. Plaisier A., Raets M.M.A., van der Starre C., et al. Safety of routine early MRI in preterm infants. Pediatr Radiol 2012, 42(10):1205-1211.
360. Jevtovic-Todorovic V., Hartman R.E., Izumi Y., et al. Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 2003, 23(3):876-882.
361. Allegaert K., Naulaers G. Procedural sedation of neonates with chloral hydrate: a sedation procedure does not end at the end of the acquisition of the images. Paediatr Anaesth 2008, 18(12):1270-1271.
362. Coté C.J. Safety after chloral hydrate sedation of former preterm and term infants for magnetic resonance imaging: are the data clear?. Anesth Analg 2010, 110(3):671-673.
363. Litman R.S., Soin K., Salam A. Chloral hydrate sedation in term and preterm infants: an analysis of efficacy and complications. Anesth Analg 2010, 110(3):739-746.
364. Allegaert K., Daniels H., Naulaers G., Tibboel D., Devlieger H. Pharmacodynamics of chloral hydrate in former preterm infants. Eur J Pediatr 2005, 164(7):403-407.
365. Mellon R.D., Simone A.F., Rappaport B.A. Use of anesthetic agents in neonates and young children. Anesth Analg 2007, 104(3):509-520.
366. Windram J., Grosse-Wortmann L., Shariat M., Greer M.-L., Crawford M.W., Yoo S.-J. Cardiovascular MRI without sedation or general anesthesia using a feed-and-sleep technique in neonates and infants. Pediatr Radiol 2012, 42(2):183-187.
367. Haney B., Reavey D., Atchison L., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging studies without sedation in the neonatal intensive care unit: safe and efficient. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2010, 24(3):256-266.
368. Graven S.N., Browne J.V. Sensory development in the fetus, neonate, and infant: introduction and overview. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 2008, 8(4):169-172.
369. Graven S.N., Browne J.V. Auditory development in the fetus and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 2008, 8(4):187-193.
370. Berger E.H. Attenuation of earplugs worn in combination with earmuffs. Occup Health Saf Waco Tex 1984, 72-73.
371. Witt B. Bacou-Dalloz Hearing Safety Group Sound Source. Dual protection [Internet]. Available from: 2007 Accessed 20.09.14. http://www.howardleight.com/images/pdf/0000/0270/Sound_Source:11a_Dual_Protection.pdf.
372. Berger E.H. Laboratory attenuation of earmuffs and earplugs both singly and in combination. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1983, 44(5):321-329.