Cellular disorders induced by high magnetic fields

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 334-340

  Valiron, Odile ^a,e   Peris, Leticia ^a   Rikken, Geert ^b,d   Schweitzer, Annie ^a   Saoudi, Yasmina ^a   Remy, Chantal ^c   Job, Didier ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b GRENOBLE HIGH MAGNETIC FIELD LABORATORY   (France)

^c Institut des Neurosciences de Grenoble   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^e CEA GRENOBLE   (France)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Cellular effects; Cytoskeleton; High magnetic field; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL TYPE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; EPITHELIUM CELL; FIBROBLAST; FOCAL ADHESION; GROWTH CONE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAMMAL CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

ANIMALS; APOPTOSIS; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL PHYSIOLOGY; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; CYTOSKELETON; HUMANS; MAGNETICS; MICE; NEURONS; RATS; TRANSFECTION;

EID: 24744442347     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20398     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aldinucci C, Blanco Garcia J, Palmi M, et al. The effect of strong static magnetic field on lymphocytes. Bioelectromagnetics 2003:24: 109-117.
2. Wiskirchen J, Groenewaeller EF, Kelhlbach R, et al. Long-term effects of repetitive exposure to a static magnetic field (1.5 T) on proliferation of human fetal lung fibroblasts. Magn Reson Med 1999:41:464-468.
3. Teodori L, Grabarek J, Smolewski P, et al. Exposure of cells to static magnetic field accelerates loss of integrity of plasma membrane during apoptosis. Cytometry 2002:49:113-118.
4. 2+ influx. FASEB J 1999:13:95-102.
5. Buemi M, Marino D, Di Pasquale G, et al. Cell proliferation/cell death balance in renal cell cultures after exposure to a static magnetic field. Nephron 2001:87:269-273.
6. Flipo D, Fournier M, Benquet C, et al. Increased apoptosis, changes in intracellular Ca 2+, and functional alterations in lymphocytes and macrophages after in vitro exposure to static magnetic field. J Toxicol Environ Health A 1998:54:63-76.
7. Chionna A, Dwikat M, Panzarini E, et al. Cell shape and plasma membrane alterations after static magnetic fields exposure. Eur J Histochem 2003;47:299-308.
8. Raylman RR, Clavo AC, Wahl RL. Exposure to strong static magnetic field slows the growth of human cancer cells in intro. Bioelectromagnetics 1996:17:358-363.
9. Nakahara T, Yaguchi H, Yoshida M, Miyakoshi J. Effects of exposure of CHO-K1 cells to a 10-T static magnetic field. Radiology 2002:224:817-822.
10. Pan H, Liu X. Apparent biological effect of strong magnetic field on mosquito egg hatching. Bioelectromagnetics 2004:25:84-91.
11. Zhang QM, Tokiwa M, Doi T, et al. Strong static magnetic field and the induction of mutations through elevated production of reactive oxygen species in Escherichia coli soxR. Int J Radiat Biol 2003:79: 281-286.
12. Kotani H, Kawaguchi H, Shimoaka T, et al. Strong static magnetic field stimulates bone formation to a definite orientation in vitro and in vivo. J Bone Miner Res 2002:17:1814-1821.
13. Hirose H, Nakahara T, Miyakoshi J. Orientation of human glioblastoma cells embedded in type I collagen, caused by exposure to a 10 T static magnetic field. Neurosci Lett 2003;338:88-90.
14. Iwasaka M, Miyakoshi J, Ueno S. Magnetic field effects of assembly patterns of smooth muscle cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2003: 39:120-123.
15. Denegre JM, Valles JM, Lin K, Jordan WB, Mowry KL. Cleavage planes in frog eggs are altered by strong magnetic fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:14729-14732.
16. Kangarlu A, Robitaille PML. Biological effects and health implications in magnetic resonance imaging. Concepts Magn Reson 2000: 12:321-359.
17. Haase A, Merken R. Verbesserung der datenlage uber bioeffekte. speziell teratogener effekte statischer magnetfelder uber 2 T. In: Strahlenschutzkommission. editor. In: Grunst M, Heller H. editors. Vermeidung Gesundheitlicher risiken bei anwendung magnetischer resonanzverfahren in der medizinischen diagnostik. Heft 28. Bonn: Strahlenschutz kommission; 2001. p 21-30.
18. Schenck JF. Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000:12:2-19.
19. Rodriguez OC, Schaefer AW, Mandato CA, Forscher P, Bement WM, Waterman-Storer CM. Conserved microtubule-actin interactions in cell movement and morphogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 2003:5:599-609.
20. Bras W, Diakun GP, Diaz JF, et al. The susceptibility of pure tubulin to high magnetic fields: a magnetic birefringence and x-ray fiber diffraction study. Biophys J 1998:74:1509-1521.
21. Torbet J, Dickens MJ. Orientation of skeletal muscle actin in strong magnetic fields. FEBS Lett 1984:173:403-406.
22. Riveline D, Zamir E, Balaban NQ, et al. J. Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDial-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. Cell Biol 2001:153:1175-1186.
23. Dotti CG, Sullivan CA, Banker GA. The establishment of polarity by hippocampal neurons in culture. J Neurosci 1988:8:1454-68.
24. Cau J, Faure S, Vigneron S, Labbe JC, Delsert C, Morin N. Regulation of Xenopus p21-activated kinase (X-PAK2) by Cdc42 and maturation-promoting factor controls Xenopus oocyte maturation. J Biol Chem 2000:275:2367-2375.
25. Forscher P, Smith SJ. Actions of cytochalasins on the organization of actin filaments and microtubules in a neuronal growth cone. J Cell Biol 1988:107:1505-1516.
26. Fukata Y, Kimura T, Kaibuchi K. Axon specification in hippocampal neurons. Neurosci Res 2002:43:305-315.
27. Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Riveline D, et al. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat Cell Biol 2001:3:466-472.
28. Krylyshkina O, Anderson KI, Kaverina I, et al. Nanometer targeting of microtubules to focal adhesions. J Cell Biol 2003:161:853-859.