3.0 T versus 1.5 T Pediatric Brain Imaging

Neuroimaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 229-239

  Zimmerman, Robert A ^a   Bilaniuk, Larissa T ^a   Pollock, Avrum N ^a   Feygin, Tamara ^a   Zarnow, Deborah ^a   Simon Schwartz, Erin ^a   Harris, Christine ^a  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; BRAIN RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL DEVICE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; MALE;

EID: 33646853499     PISSN: 10525149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.009     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Gonen O., Gruber S., Li B.S., et al. Multi-voxel 3D proton spectroscopy in the brain at 1.5 T versus 3.0 T: signal-to-noise ratio and resolution comparison. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22 (2001) 1727-1731
2. Barker P.B., Hearshen D.O., and Boska M.D. Single-voxel proton MRS of the human brain at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Magn Reson Med 45 (2001) 765-769
3. Kruger G., Kastrup A., and Glover G.H. Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 45 (2001) 595-604
4. Thulborn K.R. Clinical rationale for very-high-field (3.0 Tesla) functional magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imag 10 (1999) 37-50
5. Hunsche S., Moseley M.E., Stoeter P., et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: initial observations. Radiol 221 (2001) 550-556
6. Bernstein M.A., Huston J., Lin C., et al. High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0 T: technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med 46 (2001) 955-962
7. Campeau N.G., Huston J., Bernstein M.A., et al. Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 T: initial clinical experience. Top Magn Reson Imaging 12 (2001) 183-204
8. Thomas S.D., Al-Kwifi O., Emery D.J., et al. Application of magnetization transfer at 3.0 T in three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 15 (2002) 479-483
9. Al-Kwifi O., Emery D.J., and Wilman A.H. Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 20 (2002) 181-187
10. Yang J.J., Hill M.D., Morrish W.F., et al. Comparison of pre-and postcontrast 3D time-of-flight MR angiography for the evaluation of distal intracranial branch occlusions in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23 (2002) 557-567
11. Zimmerman R.A., Bilaniuk L.T., Simon E.M., et al. 3T pediatric imaging. Rivista Neuroradiologica 19 1 (2006) 117-125
12. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, and Centre for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for the submission of premarket notifications for magnetic resonance diagnostic devices (1998), US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington (DC)
13. Felmlee J.P., Berstein M.A., Huston J., Analysis of RF heating at 3.0 T. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Scientific Meeting. Denver (CO): 2000. p. 8
14. Frayne R., Goodyear B.G., Dickhoff P., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol 38 (2003) 385-402
15. Wansapura J.P., Holland S.K., Dunn R.S., et al. NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 9 (1999) 531-538
16. Lin C., Berstein M.A., Huston J., et al. In vivo and in vitro measurements of T1 at 3.0 T. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Scientific Meeting. Glasgow (Scotland): 2001. p. 1685
17. Hennemeyer C.T., Wicklow K., Feinberg D.A., et al. In vitro evaluation of platinum Guglielmi detachable coils at 3.0 T with a porcine model: safety issues and artifacts. Radiol 219 (2001) 732-737
18. Shellock F.G. Biomedical implants and devices; assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 16 (2002) 721-732
19. Shellock F.G., and Crues III J.V. MR safety and the American College of Radiology white paper. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178 (2002) 1349-1352