Neonatal cochlear function: Measurement after exposure to acoustic noise during in utero MR imaging

Radiology

Volumn 257, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 802-809

  Reeves, Michael J ^a   Brandreth, Marian ^b   Whitby, Elspeth H ^a   Hart, Anthony R ^a,b   Paley, Martyn N J ^a   Griffiths, Paul D ^a   Stevens, John C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY SCREENING; COCHLEA INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NOISE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; COCHLEA; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEONATAL SCREENING; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PREGNANCY; PREVALENCE; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 78649638976     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10092366     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for the submission of premarket notifications for magnetic resonance devices. US Food and Drug Administration Web site. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ ucm073817.htm. Published November 14, 1998. Accessed December 14, 2009.
2. International Electrotechnical Commission. Particular requirements for the safety of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis. Document no. 60601-2-33. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2002.
3. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Medical magnetic resonance (MR) procedures: protection of patients. Health Phys 2004;87(2):197-216.
4. UK Department of Health, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). DB 2007(03): safety guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging equipment in clinical use. UK Department of Health, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Web site. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Publications/ Safetyguidance/DeviceBulletins/CON2033018. Published December 2007. Accessed December 14, 2009.
5. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental Health. Noise: a hazard for the fetus and newborn. Pediatrics 1997;100(4):724-727.
6. Pierson LL. Hazards of noise exposure on fetal hearing. Semin Perinatol 1996;20(1):21-29.
7. Thurston FE. Is external noise a risk to fetal hearing development? a review. Semin Hear 2008;29(1):3-9.
8. Gerhardt KJ, Abrams RM. Fetal hearing: characterization of the stimulus and response. Semin Perinatol 1996;20(1):11-20.
9. Griffiths SK, Brown WS Jr, Gerhardt KJ, Abrams RM, Morris RJ. The perception of speech sounds recorded within the uterus of a pregnant sheep. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;96(4):2055-2063.
10. Arulkumaran S, Talbert D, Hsu TS, Chua S, Anandakumar C, Ratnam SS. In-utero sound levels when vibroacoustic stimulation is applied to the maternal abdomen: an assessment of the possibility of cochlea damage in the fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99(1):43-45.
11. National Research Council Committee on Hearing. Bioacoustics and biomechanics: prenatal effects of exposure to high-level noise. Defense Technical Information Center Technical Report document NAS-3-82. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 1982.
12. Shellock FG, Ziarati M, Atkinson D, Chen DY. Determination of gradient magnetic field-induced acoustic noise associated with the use of echo planar and three-dimensional, fast spin echo techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8(5):1154-1157.
13. Price DL, De Wilde JP, Papadaki AM, Curran JS, Kitney RI. Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13(2):288-293.
14. McJury MJ. Acoustic noise levels generated during high field MR imaging. Clin Radiol 1995;50(5):331-334.
15. Counter SA, Olofsson A, Grahn HF, Borg E. MRI acoustic noise: sound pressure and frequency analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7(3):606-611.
16. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Regulations (Standards-29 CFR). Part 1910.95: occupational noise exposure. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration Web site. http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show-document?p-table= STANDARDS&p-id=9735. Published June 27, 1974. Updated December 12, 2008. Accessed December 14, 2009.
17. UK Health and Safety Executive. The control of noise at work regulations 2005. UK Health and Safety Executive Web site. http://www.hse.gov.uk/noise/ regulations.htm. Published June 28, 2005. Accessed December 14, 2009.
18. Brummett RE, Talbot JM, Charuhas P. Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging. Radiology 1988;169(2):539-540.
19. Wagner W, Staud I, Frank G, Dammann F, Plontke S, Plinkert PK. Noise in magnetic resonance imaging: no risk for sensorineural function but increased amplitude variability of otoacoustic emissions. Laryngoscope 2003;113(7):1216-1223.
20. Radomskij P, Schmidt MA, Heron CW, Prasher D. Effect of MRI noise on cochlear function. Lancet 2002;359(9316):1485-1486.
21. Glover P, Hykin J, Gowland P, Wright J, Johnson I, Mansfield P. An assessment of the intrauterine sound intensity level during obstetric echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 1995;68(814):1090-1094.
22. McJury M, Shellock FG. Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12(1):37-45.
23. UK National Health Service. Newborn Hearing Screening Programme Web site. http://hearing.screening.nhs.uk. Accessed December 14, 2009.
24. Davis A, Bamford J, Wilson I, Ramkalawan T, Forshaw M, Wright S. A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment. Health Technol Assess 1997;1(10):i-iv, 1-176.
25. Wessex Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Trial Group. Controlled trial of universal neonatal screening for early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment. Lancet 1998;352(9145):1957-1964.
26. Kennedy C, McCann D. Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89(5):F378-F383.
27. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;64(5):1386-1391.
28. Kemp DT, Ryan S. The use of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal hearing screening programs. Semin Hear 1993;14(1):30-45.
29. Thornton AR, Kimm L, Kennedy CR. Methodological factors involved in neonatal screening using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response testing. Hear Res 2003;182(1-2):65-76.
30. Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004;232(3):635-652.
31. De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL. A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2005;87(2-3):335-353.
32. Kok RD, de Vries MM, Heerschap A, van den Berg PP. Absence of harmful effects of magnetic resonance exposure at 1.5 T in utero during the third trimester of pregnancy: a follow-up study. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22(6):851-854.
33. Clements H, Duncan KR, Fielding K, Gowland PA, Johnson IR, Baker PN. Infants exposed to MRI in utero have a normal paediatric assessment at 9 months of age. Br J Radiol 2000;73(866):190-194.
34. Myers C, Duncan KR, Gowland PA, Johnson IR, Baker PN. Failure to detect intrauterine growth restriction following in utero exposure to MRI. Br J Radiol 1998;71(845):549-551.
35. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, Gowland PA, Mansfield P. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170(1 pt 1):32-33.
36. MRC Hearing and Communication Group. NHS Newborn Hearing Screening Programme Centre annual report 2006/2007. Manchester, England: University of Manchester, 2007.
37. Uus K, Bamford J. Effectiveness of population-based newborn hearing screening in England: ages of interventions and profile of cases. Pediatrics 2006;117(5):e887-e893.
38. van Straaten HL, Hille ET, Kok JH, Verkerk PH; Dutch NICU Neonatal Hearing Screening Working Group. Implementation of a nation-wide automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening programme in neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr 2003;92(3):332-338.
39. Stevens JC, Webb HD, Hutchinson J, Connell J, Smith MF, Buffin JT. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal screening. Ear Hear 1990;11(2):128-133.
40. Norton SJ. Application of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions to pediatric populations. Ear Hear 1993;14(1):64-73.
41. Harrison WA, Norton SJ. Characteristics of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear 1999;20(1):75-86.
42. Birnholz JC, Benacerraf BR. The development of human fetal hearing. Science 1983;222(4623):516-518.