Comparison of brain MR images at 1.5T using BLADE and rectilinear techniques for patients who move during data acquisition

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 77-82

  Nyberg, E ^a   Sandhu, G S ^a   Jesberger, J ^c   Blackham, K A ^a   Hsu, D P ^a   Griswold, M A ^a,b   Sunshine, Jeffrey L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOVERSETAMIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BRAIN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MOTION; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PERIODICALLY ROTATED OVERLAPPING PARALLEL LINES WITH ENHANCED RECONSTRUCTION; RADIOLOGIST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856092686     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2737     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Murphy KJ, Brunberg JA. Adult claustrophobia, anxiety and sedation in MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:51-54
2. Glover GH, Pauly JM. Projection reconstruction techniques for reduction of motion effects in MRI. Magn Reson Med 1992;28:275-89 (Pubitemid 23027667)
3. Ehman RL, Felmlee JP. Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structures. Radiology 1989;173:255-63 (Pubitemid 19242442)
4. Sachs TS, Meyer CH, Irarrazabal P, et al. The diminishing variance algorithm for real-time reduction of motion artifacts in MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:412-22
5. Qin L, van Gelderen P, Derbyshire JA, et al. Prospective head-movement correction for high-resolution MRI using an in-bore optical tracking system. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:924-34
6. Forbes KP, Pipe JG, Karis JP, et al. Improved image quality and detection of acute cerebral infarction with PROPELLER diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2002;225:551-55 (Pubitemid 35239261)
7. Forbes KP, Pipe JG, Karis JP, et al. Brain imaging in the unsedated pediatric patient: comparison of periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction and single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:794-98 (Pubitemid 36617403)
8. Pipe JG. Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:963-69 (Pubitemid 29521487)
9. Mahmoud OM, Tominaga A, Amatya VJ, et al. Role of PROPELLER diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the diagnosis of sellar and parasellar lesions. Eur J Radiol 2010;79:420-7
10. Arfanakis K, Tamhane AA, Pipe JG, et al. k-space undersampling in PROPELLER imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:675-83 (Pubitemid 40332289)
11. Pipe JG, Farthing VG, Forbes KP. Multishot diffusion-weighted FSE using PROPELLER MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:42-52 (Pubitemid 34019691)
12. Wintersperger BJ, Runge VM, Biswas J, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla using BLADE compared with standard rectilinear data sampling. Invest Radiol 2006;41:586-92 (Pubitemid 44284181)
13. Vertinsky AT, Rubesova E, Krasnokutsky MV, et al. Performance of PROPELLER relative to standard FSE T2-weighted imaging in pediatric brain MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39:1038-47
14. von Kalle T, Blank B, Fabig-Moritz C, et al. Reduced artefacts and improved assessment of hyperintense brain lesions with BLADE MR imaging in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Pediatr Radiol 2009
15. Skare S, Newbould RD, Nordell A, et al. An auto-calibrated, angularly continuous, two-dimensional GRAPPA kernel for propeller trajectories. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1457-65
16. Chuang TC, Huang TY, Lin FH, et al. PROPELLER-EPI with parallel imaging using a circularly symmetric phased-array RF coil at 3.0 T: application to high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:1352-58
17. Larson PE, Lustig MS, Nishimura DG. Anisotropic field-of-view shapes for improved PROPELLER imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27:470-79
18. Devaraj A, Pipe JG. Elliptical field-of-view PROPELLER imaging. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:808-14
19. Deng J, Larson AC. Multishot targeted PROPELLER magnetic resonance imaging: description of the technique and initial applications. Invest Radiol 2009;44:454-62
20. Pipe JG, Zwart N. Turboprop: improved PROPELLER imaging. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:380-85 (Pubitemid 43238107)