3.0 T versus 1.5 T: Coil Design Similarities and Differences

Neuroimaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 249-257

  Duensing, Randy ^a   Fitzsimmons, Jeffrey ^a  

^a Invivo Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVICE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

BRAIN; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33646826501     PISSN: 10525149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2006.03.001     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Hoult D.I., and Richards R.E. Sensitivity of the zeugmatographic experiment involving human samples. J Magn Reson 34 (1979) 425-433
2. Roemer P.B., Edelstein W.A., Hayes C.E., et al. The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med 24 (1990) 85-89
3. Ackerman J.J.H., Grove T.H., Wong G.G., et al. Radda. Nature 283 (1980) 167-170
4. El Yousef S.J., Alfidi R.J., Duchesneau R.H., et al. Initial experience with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging of the human breast. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7 2 (1983) 215-218
5. Evelhoch J.L., and Ackerman J.J.H. NMR T-1 measurements in inhomogenous B1 with surface coils. J Magn Reson 53 (1983) 52-64
6. Axel L. Surface coil magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8 (1984) 381-384
7. Peterson D., Beck B.L., and Duensing G.R. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 10 (2002) 850
8. Chen C.N., Hoult D.I. Signal and noise. In: Biomedical magnetic resonance technology. New York: Adam Hilger; 1989 p. 118
9. Buchli R., Saner M., Meier D., et al. Increased RF power absorption in MR imaging due to RF coupling between body coil and surface coil. Magn Reson Med 9 1 (1989) 105-112
10. Pruessmann K.P., Weiger M., Sheidegger M.B., et al. SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42 (1999) 952-962
11. Schmitt F., Grosu D., Mohr C., et al. 3 Tesla MRI: successful results with higher field strengths. Radiologe 44 1 (2004) 31-48
12. Beck B.L., Jenkins K., and Caserta J. Observation of significant signal voids in images of large biological samples at 11.1 T. Magn Reson Med 51 6 (2004) 1103-1107
13. Ibrahim T.S., Kangarlu A., and Chakeress D.W. Design and performance issues of RF coils utilized in ultra high field MRI: experimental and numerical evaluations. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52 7 (2005) 1278-1284
14. Katscher U., Bornert P., Leussler C., et al. Transmit SENSE. Magn Reson Med 49 1 (2003) 144-150
15. Duensing G.R., Beck B.L., Goldberg R.T., et al. Wave independence through serial excitation. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 13 (2005) 904