Strong artificial selection in domestic mammals did not result in an increased recombination rate

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 510-523

  Munoz Fuentes, Violeta ^a,b,h   Marcet Ortega, Marina ^c   Alkorta Aranburu, Gorka ^d   Forsberg, Catharina Linde ^e   Morrell, Jane M ^e   Manzano Piedras, Esperanza ^a   Soderberg, Arne ^f   Daniel, Katrin ^g   Villalba, Adrian ^c   Toth, Attila ^g   Di Rienzo, Anna ^d   Roig, Ignasi ^c   Vila, Carles ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^e SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^f NATIONAL VETERINARY INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^g DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^h SENCKENBERG RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Canis; Capra; genomics; immunolocalization; MLH1; Ovis; spermatocytes

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN MLH1;

ANTIBODY LABELING; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL SELECTION; DIRECTIONAL SELECTION; DOG; DOMESTIC SPECIES; DOMESTICATION; FEMALE; GOAT; IBEX; MALE; MOUFLON; NONHUMAN; SHEEP; WILD SPECIES; WOLF; ANIMAL; CANIDAE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; MAMMAL; METABOLISM; SPERMATOCYTE;

CANIDAE; CANIS; CANIS FAMILIARIS; CAPRA; CAPRA HIRCUS; CAPRA IBEX; MAMMALIA; OVIS; OVIS ARIES; OVIS ARIES MUSIMON;

ANIMALS; CANIDAE; DOGS; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOMICS; GOATS; MALE; MAMMALS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SHEEP; SPERMATOCYTES;

EID: 84925143137     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu322     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Ahmed IA. 1941. IX.-Cytological analysis of chromosome behaviour in three breeds of dogs. Proc R Soc Edinb Biol. 61:107-118
2. Anderson LK, Reeves A, Webb LM, Ashley T. 1999. Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics 151:1569-1579
3. Arnheim N, Calabrese P, Nordborg M. 2003. Hot and cold spots of recombination in the human genome: the reason we should find them and how this can be achieved. Am J Hum Genet. 73:5-16
4. Auton A, Fledel-Alon A, Pfeifer S, Venn O, Ségurel L, Street T, Leffler EM, Bowden R, Aneas I, Broxholme J., et al. 2012. A fine-scale chimpanzee genetic map from population sequencing. Science 336:193-198
5. Auton A, Li YR, Kidd J, Oliveira K, Nadel J, Holloway JK, Hayward JJ, Cohen PE, Greally JM, Wang J., et al. 2013. Genetic recombination is targeted towards gene promoter regions in dogs. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003984
6. Auton A, McVean G. 2007. Recombination rate estimation in the presence of hotspots. Genome Res. 17:1219-1227
7. Axelsson E, Webster MT, Ratnakumar A, Ponting CP, Lindblad-Toh K. 2012. Death of PRDM9 coincides with stabilization of the recombination landscape in the dog genome. Genome Res. 22:51-63
8. Backstrom N, Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mellenius H, Nam K, Bolund E, Webster MT, Torbjorn.O, Schneider M, Kempenaers B., et al. 2010. The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome. Genome Res. 20:485-495
9. Baker SM, Plug AW, Prolla TA, Bronner CE, Harris AC, Yao X, Christie D-M, Monell C, Arnheim N, Bradley A., et al. 1996. Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over. Nat Genet. 13:336-342
10. Barlow AL, Hultén MA. 1998. Crossing over analysis at pachytene in man. Eur J Hum Genet. 6:350-358
11. Basheva EA, Bidau CJ, Borodin PM. 2008. General pattern of meiotic recombination in male dogs estimated by MLH1 and RAD51 immunolocalization. Chromosome Res. 16:709-719
12. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S 2014. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-5. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4, last accessed 25 November 2014
13. Baudat F, Buard J, Grey C, Fledel-Alon A, Ober C, Przeworski M, Coop G, De Massy B. 2010. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327:836-840
14. Baudat F, Imai Y, deMassy B. 2013. Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 14:794-806
15. Bell G. 2008. Selection, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press
16. Berg IL, Neumann R, Lam KWG, Sarbajna S, Odenthal-Hesse L, May CA, Jeffreys AJ. 2010. PRDM9 variation strongly influences recombination hot-spot activity and meiotic instability in humans. Nat Genet. 42:859-863
17. Berg IL, Neumann R, Sarbajna S, Odenthal-Hesse L, Butler NJ, Jeffreys AJ. 2011. Variants of the protein PRDM9 differentially regulate a set of human meiotic recombination hotspots highly active in African populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 108: 12378-12383
18. Brick K, Smagulova F, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV. 2012. Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice. Nature 484:642-645
19. Browning SR, Browning BL. 2007. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet. 81: 1084-1097
20. Bruford MW, Townsend SJ. 2006. Mitochondrial DNA diversity in modern sheep. In: Zeder MA, Bradley DG, Emshwiller E, Smith BD, editors. Documenting domestication. New genetic and archaeological paradigms. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 306-316
21. Burt A, Bell G. 1987. Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination. Nature 326:803-805
22. Butlin R. 2005. Recombination and speciation. Mol Ecol. 14:2621-2635
23. Calderón PL, Pigozzi MI. 2006. MLH1-focus mapping in birds shows equal recombination between sexes and diversity of crossover patterns. Chromosome Res. 14:605-612
24. Chan AH, Jenkins PA, Song YS. 2012. Genome-wide fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 8: e1003090
25. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1985. Genetic variation in recombination in Drosophila. I. Responses to selection and preliminary genetic analysis. Heredity 54:71-83
26. Clark AG, Wang X, Matise T. 2010. Contrasting methods of quantifying fine structure of human recombination. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 11:45-64
27. Clutton-Brock J. 1999. A natural history of domesticated mammals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
28. Cohen PE, Holloway JK. 2010. Predicting gene networks in human oocyte meiosis. Biol Reprod. 82:469-472
29. Coop G, Przeworski M. 2007. An evolutionary view of human recombination. Nat Rev Genet. 8:23-34
30. Coppinger R, Coppinger L. 2001. Dogs. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
31. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker R, Lunter G, Marth G, Sherry ST., et al. 2011. The Variant Call Format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27:2156-2158
32. Datta M. 1970. Reinvestigation of meioiss in the male goat, Capra hircus, with special reference to chiasma formation in the sex and autosomal bivalents. Cytologia 35:344-353
33. DePristo M, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella K, Maguire J, Hartl C, Philippakis A, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M., et al. 2011. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 43:491-498
34. Dumont BL, Broman KW, Payseur BA. 2009. Variation in genomic recombination rates among heterogeneous stock mice. Genetics 182: 1345-1349
35. Dumont BL, Payseur BA. 2008. Evolution of the genomic rate of recombination in mammals. Evolution 62:276-294
36. Freedman AH, Gronau I, Schweizer RM, Ortega-Del Vecchyo D, Han E, Silva PM, Galaverni M, Fan Z, Marx P, Lorente-Galdos B., et al. 2014. Genome sequencing highlights the dynamic early history of dogs. PLoS Genet. 10:e1004016
37. Gornall RJ. 1983. Recombination systems and plant domestication. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 20:375-383
38. Groenen MAM, Wahlberg P, Foglio M, Cheng HH, Megens H-J, Crooijmans RPMA, Besnier F, Lathrop M, Muir WM, Wong GK-S., et al. 2009. A high-density SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate. Genome Res. 19:510-519
39. Hansson B, Akesson M, Slate J, Pemberton JM. 2005. Linkage mapping reveals sex-dimorphic map distances in a passerine bird. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 272:2289-2298
40. Holloway JK, Booth J, Edelmann W, McGowan CH, Cohen PE. 2008. MUS81 generates a subset of MLH1-MLH3-independent crossovers in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000186
41. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J. 50:346-363
42. Hultén MAJ. 1974. Chiasma distribution at diakinesis in the normal human male. Hereditas 76:55-78
43. Jagiello GM, Miller WA, Ducayen MB, Lin JS. 1974. Chiasma frequency and disjunctional behavior of ewe and cow oocytes matured in vitro. Biol Reprod. 10:354-363
44. Jeffreys AJ, Neumann R. 2005. Factors influencing recombination frequency and distribution in a human meiotic crossover hotspot. Hum Mol Genet. 14:2277-2287
45. Jeffreys AJ, Neumann R. 2009. The rise and fall of a human recombination hot spot. Nat Genet. 41:625-629
46. Jensen-Seaman MI, Furey TS, Payseur BA, Lu Y, Roskin KM, Chen C-F, Thomas MA, Haussler D, Jacob HJ. 2004. Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes. Genome Res. 14: 528-538
47. Kauppi L, Jeffreys AJ, Keeney S. 2004. Where the crossovers are: recombination distributions in mammals. Nat Rev Genet. 5:413-424
48. Kirkness EF, Grindberg RV, Yee-Greenbaum J, Marshall CR, Scherer SW, Lasken RS, Venter JC. 2013. Sequencing of isolated sperm cells for direct haplotyping of a human genome. Genome Res. 23:826-32
49. Kong A, Gudbjartsson DF, Sainz J, Jonsdottir GM, Gudjonsson SA, Richardsson B, Sigurdardottir S, Barnard J, Hallbeck B, Masson G., et al. 2002. A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome. Nat Genet. 31:241-247
50. Lenormand T, Dutheil J. 2005. Recombination Difference between Sexes: A Role for Haploid Selection. PLoS Biol. 3:e63
51. Lenormand T, Otto SP. 2000. The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment. Genetics 156:423-438
52. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754-1760
53. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 2009. The Sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078-2079
54. Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, Kamal M, Clamp M, Chang JL, Kulbokas EJ III, Zody MC., et al. 2005. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438:803-819
55. Logue DN. 1977. Meiosis in the domestic ruminants with particular reference to Robertsonian translocations. Genet Sel Evol. 9:1-15
56. Long S. 1978. Chiasma counts and non-disjunction frequencies in normal ram and in rams carrying the Massey I (t1) translocation. J Reprod Fertil. 53:353-356
57. Lu S, Zong C, Fan W, Yang M, Li J, Chapman AR, Zhu P, Hu X, Xu L, Yan L., et al. 2012. Probing meiotic recombination and aneuploidy of single sperm cells by whole-genome sequencing. Science 338: 1627-1630
58. Luikart G, Fernández H, Mashkour M, England PR, Taberlet P. 2006. Origins and diffusion of domestic goats inferred from DNA markers. In: Zeder MA, Bradley DG, Emshwiller E, Smith BD, editors. Documenting domestication. New genetic and archaeological paradigms. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 294-305
59. Lynn A, Ashley T, Hassold T. 2004. Varitation in human meiotic recombination. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 5:317-349
60. Maddox JF, Cockett NE. 2007. An update on sheep and goat linkage maps and other genomic resources. Small Rumin Res. 70:4-20
61. Martin DP, Lemey P, Lott M, Moulton V, Posada D, Lefeuvre P. 2010. RDP3: a flexible and fast computer program for analyzing recombination. Bioinformatics 26:2462-2463
62. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M., et al. 2010. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20:1297-1303
63. McVean GAT, Myers SR, Hunt S, Deloukas P, Bentley DR, Donnelly P. 2004. The fine-scale structure of recombination rate variation in the human genome. Science 304:581-584
64. Muñoz-Fuentes V, Di Rienzo A, Vilá C. 2011. Prdm9, a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots, is not functional in dogs and their wild relatives, wolves and coyotes. PLoS One 6: e25498
65. Muñoz-Fuentes V, Linde Forsberg C, Vilá C, Morrell JM. 2014. Singlelayer centrifugation separates spermatozoa from diploid cells in epididymal samples from gray wolves, Canis lupus (L.). Theriogenology 82:773-776
66. Myers S, Freeman C, Auton A, Donnelly P, McVean G. 2008. A common sequence motif associated with recombination hot spots and genome instability in humans. Nat Genet. 40:1124-1129
67. Otto SP, Barton NH. 2001. Selection for recombination in small populations. Evolution 55:1921-1931
68. Otto SP, Lenormand T. 2002. Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat Rev Genet. 3:252-261
69. Page SL, Hawley RS. 2003. Chromosome choreography: the meiotic ballet. Science 301:785-789
70. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Sapienza C. 2001. Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals. Mamm Genome. 12:318-322
71. Patterson N, Richter DJ, Gnerre S, Lander ES, Reich D. 2006. Genetic evidence for complex speciation of humans and chimpanzees. Nature 441:1103-1108
72. Poissant J, Hogg JT, Davis CS, Miller JM, Maddox JF, Coltman DW. 2010. Genetic linkage map of a wild genome: genomic structure, recombination and sexual dimorphism in bighorn sheep. BMC Genomics 11:524
73. Ponting CP. 2011. What are the genomic drivers of the rapid evolution of PRDM9?. Trends Genet. 27 165-171
74. Posada D, Crandall KA, Holmes EC. 2002. Recombination in evolutionary genomics. Annu Rev Genet. 36:75-97
75. Pritchard JK, Przeworski M. 2001. Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am J Hum Genet. 69:1-14
76. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26:841-842
77. R Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
78. Rees H, Dale PJ. 1974. Chiasmata and variability in Lolium and Festuca populations. Chromosoma 47:335
79. Roig I, Liebe B, Egozcue J, Cabero L, Garcia M, Scherthan H. 2004. Femalespecific features of recombinational double-stranded DNA repair in relation to synapsis and telomere dynamics in human oocytes. Chromosoma 113:22-33
80. Ross-Ibarra J. 2004. The evolution of recombination under domestication: a test of two hypotheses. Am Nat. 163:105-112
81. Samollow P. 2010. Marsupial linkage maps. In: Deakin JE, Waters PD, Marshall Graves JA, editors. Marsupial genetics and genomics. The Netherlands: Springer. p. 75-99
82. Schibler L, Vaiman D, Oustry A, Giraud-Delville C, Cribiu EP. 1998. Comparative gene mapping: a fine-scale survey of chromosome rearrangements between ruminants and humans. Genome Res. 8: 901-915
83. Schmid-Hempel P, Jokela J. 2002. Socially structured populations and evolution of recombination under antagonistic coevolution. Am Nat. 160:403-408
84. Shin J-H, Blay S, McNeney B, Graham J. 2006. LDheatmap: an R function for graphical display of pairwise linkage disequilibria between single nucleotide polymorphisms. J Stat Soft. 16Code Snippet 3
85. Smukowski CS, Noor MAF. 2011. Recombination rate variation in closely related species. Heredity 107:496-508
86. Steiner WW, Smith GR. 2005. Optimizing the nucleotide sequence of a meiotic recombination hotspot in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 169:1973-1983
87. Stumpf MPH, McVean GAT. 2003. Estimating recombination rates from population-genetic data. Nat Rev Genet. 4:959-968
88. Tease C, Hultén MA. 2004. Inter-sex variation in synaptonemal complex lengths largely determine the different recombination rates in male and female germ cells. Cytogenet Genome Res. 107: 208-215
89. Tortereau F, Servin B, Frantz L, Megens H-J, Milan D, Rohrer G, Wiedmann R, Beever J, Archibald A, Schook L., et al. 2012. A high density recombination map of the pig reveals a correlation between sex-specific recombination and GC content. BMC Genomics 13:586
90. Vallente R, Cheng E, Hassold T. 2006. The synaptonemal complex and meiotic recombination in humans: new approaches to old questions. Chromosoma 115:241-249
91. van Oers K, Santure AW, De Cauwer I, van Bers NE, Crooijmans RP, Sheldon BC, Visser ME, Slate J, Groenen MA. 2014. Replicated high-density genetic maps of two great tit populations reveal finescale genomic departures from sex-equal recombination rates. Heredity 112:307-316
92. Vilá C, Savolainen P, Maldonado JE, Amorim IR, Rice JE, Honeycutt RL, Crandall KA, Lundeberg J, Wayne RK. 1997. Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science 276:1687-1689
93. Wada MY, Imai HT. 1995. Theoretical analyses of chiasmata using a novel chiasma graph method applied to Chinese hamsters, mice, and dog. Jpn J Genet. 70:233-265
94. Wang J, Fan HC, Behr B, Quake Stephen R. 2012. Genome-wide singlecell analysis of recombination activity and de novo mutation rates in human sperm. Cell 150:402-412
95. Wayne RK. 1986a. Cranial morphology of domestic and wild canids-the influence of development on morphological change. Evolution 40:243-261
96. Wayne RK. 1986b. Limb morphology of domestic and wild canids-the influence of development on morphological change. J Morphol. 187: 301-319
97. Wilfert L, Gadau J, Schmid-Hempel P. 2007. Variation in genomic recombination rates among animal taxa and the case of social insects. Heredity 98:189-197
98. Winckler W, Myers SR, Richter DJ, Onofrio RC, McDonald GJ, Bontrop RE, McVean GA, Gabriel SB, Reich D, Donnelly P., et al. 2005. Comparison of fine-scale recombination rates in humans and chimpanzees. Science 308:107-111
99. Wong AK, Ruhe AL, Dumont BL, Robertson KR, Guerrero G, Shull SM, Ziegle JS, Millon LV, Broman KW, Payseur BA., et al. 2010. A comprehensive linkage map of the dog genome. Genetics 184: 595-605