Voting for policy, not parties: How voters compensate for power sharing

Voting for Policy, Not Parties: How Voters Compensate for Power Sharing

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-224

  Kedar, Orit ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925136035     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511657481     Document Type: Book

References (157)

1. Aardal, Brent, and Henry Valen. Norwegian Election Study 1989 [computer file]. Norwegian Gallup Institute [producer]. Norwegian Social Science Data Services (NSD) [distributor].
2. Abedi, Amir, and Alan Siaroff. 1999. –The Mirror Has Broken: Increasing Divergence between National and Land Elections in Austria.— German Politics, Vol. 8(1): 207-227.
3. Achen, Christopher H. 1978. –Measuring Representation.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 22(3): 475-510.
4. Achen, Christopher H. 2005. –Two-Step Hierarchical Estimation: Beyond Regression Analysis.— Political Analysis, Vol. 13(4): 447-456.
5. Adams, James, Benjamin Bishin, and Jay Dow. 2004. –Representation in Congressional Campaigns: Evidence for Directional/Discounting Effects in U.S. Senate Elections.— Journal of Politics, Vol. 66(2): 348-373.
6. Adams, James, and Samuel Merrill, III. 1999a. –Party Policy Equilibrium for Alternative Spatial Voting Models: An Application to the Norwegian Storting.— European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 36: 235-255.
7. Adams, James, and Samuel Merrill, III. 1999b. –Modeling Party Strategies and Policy Representation in Mutliparty Elections: Why Are Strategies So Extreme?— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 43(3): 765-791.
8. Adams, James F., Samuel Merrill III, and Bernard Grofman. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Aldrich, John H., and Richard D. McKelvey. 1977. –A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential Elections.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 71(1): 111-130.
10. Alesina, Alberto, and Howard Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Alesina, Alberto, N. Rubini, and G. Cohen. 1997. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Alt, James E., and Alberto Alesina. 1998. –Political Economy: An Overview.— In Robert E. Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingeman, eds. A New Handbook of Political Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1995. –Economics, Issues, and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 39(3): 714-744.
14. Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1998. –When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 42(January): 55-96.
15. Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 2000. –A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections.— British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 30(1): 57-75.
16. Austen-Smith, David, and Jeffrey Banks. 1988. American Political Science Review, Vol. 82(2): 405-422.
17. Avakumovic, Ivan. 1978. Socialism in Canada: A Study of the CCF-NDP in Federal and Provincial Politics. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
18. Bailey, Michael. 2001. –An Institutional Reconciliation of Proximity and Directional Voting.— Georgetown University. Mimeo.
19. Barnes, Samuel H. 1997. –Electoral Behavior and Comparative Politics.— In Mark I. Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman, eds. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 115-141.
20. Baron, David P., and Daniel Diermeier. 2001. –Elections, Governments, and Parliaments in Proportional Representation System.— Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116(3): 933-967.
21. Ben Akiva, Moshe, and Steven R. Lerman. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Applications to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Blais et al. 2001. –Measuring Strategic Voting in Multiparty Plurality Elections.— Electoral Studies, Vol. 20(3): 343-352.
23. Brody, Richard A., and Benjamin J. Page. 1972. –Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting.— American Political Science Review 66(2):450-458.
24. Burden, Barry C., and David C.Kimball. 1998. –ANewApproach to the Study of Ticket Splitting.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 92(3): 533-544.
25. Cain, Bruce E. 1978. –Strategic Voting in Britain.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 22(3): 639-655.
26. Campbell, Angus. 1966. –Surge and Decline: A Study of Electoral Change.— Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 24: 397-418.
27. Campbell, James E. 1987. –A Revised Theory of Surge and Decline.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 31(4): 965-979.
28. Campbell, James E. 1991. –The Presidential Surge and Its Midterm Decline in Congressional Elections, 1868-1988.— Journal of Politics, Vol. 53(2): 477-987.
29. Chhibber, Pradeep, and Ken Kollman. 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30. Cho, Sungdai, and James W. Endersby. 2003. –Issues, the Spatial Theory of Voting, and British General Elections: A Comparison of Proximity and Directional Models.— Public Choice, Vol. 114: 275-293.
31. Clark, William Roberts, and Matt Golder. 2006. –Rehabilitating Duverger's Theory: Testing the Mechanical and Strategic Modifying Effects of Electoral Laws.— Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 39(6): 679-708.
32. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 1, 1996-2001. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor].
33. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 2, 2001-2005. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor].
34. Cox, Gary W. 1990. –Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 34(4): 903-935.
35. Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University.
37. Dalton, Russell J. 1985. – Political Parties and Political Representation: Party Support and Party Elites in Nine Nations.— Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 18: 267-299.
38. Davis, Otto A., and Melvin J. Hinich. 1966. –A Mathmatical Model of Policy Formation in a Democratic Society.— In J. L. Bernd, ed. Mathematical Applications in Political Science II, pp. 175-205. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.
39. Davis, Otto A., Melvin Hinich, and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1970. –An Expository Development if a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 64(2): 426-48.
40. de Miguel Moyer, Carolina G., 2007. –Electoral Patterns in Spain: Testing the Moderating Elections Hypothesis.— Paper prepared for delivery at the European Consortium for Political Research, Joint Sessions. Helsinki, May 2007.
41. Dinkel, Rainer. 1977. –Der Zusammenhang zwischen Bundes und Landtagswahlergebnissen— Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Vol. 18(3): 348-360.
42. Döring, Herbert. 1995. –Time as a Scarce Resource: Government Control of the Agenda.— In Herbert Döring, ed. Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.
43. Dow, Jay K. 2001. –A Comparative Spatial Analysis of Majoritarian and Proportional Elections.— Electoral Studies, Vol. 20: 109-125.
44. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
45. Druckman, James N. 2001. –Using Credible Advice to Overcome Framing Effects.— The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 17(1): 62-82.
46. Duch, Raymond. 2001. –A Developmental Model of Heterogeneous Economic Voting in New Democracies.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 95(4): 895-910.
47. Duch, Raymond M., and Randolph T. Stevenson. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties. New York: Wiley.
49. Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
50. Elklit, Jørgen, and Ulrik Kjaer. 2006. –Split-Ticket Voting in Times of Sub- National Government Reorganization: Evidence from Denmark.— Paper prepared for delivery at the symposium:Democracy, Divided Government and Split-Ticket Voting. Harvard University, May 26-27, 2006.
51. Elster, Jon. 1987. The Multiple Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Enelow, James M., and Melvin J. Hinich. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Erikson, Robert E., Michael B. MacKuen, and James A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Ezrow, Lawrwnce. 2008. –Parties' Policy Programmes and the Dog That Didn't Bark: No Evidence That Proportional Systems Promote Extreme Party Positioning.— British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 38(3): 479-497.
55. Ezrow, Lawrwnce. Financial Times Information. September 15, 2002.
56. Fiorina, Morris. 1996. Divided Government. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
57. Frymer, Paul, Thomas P. Kim, and Terri L. Bimes. 1997. –Party Elites, Ideological Voters, and Divided Party Governments.— Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 22(2): 195-216.
58. Gabel, Matthew J., and John D. Huber. 2000. –Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44(1): 94-103.
59. Gaines, Brian J., and Christophe Crombez. 2004. –Another Look at Connections Across German Elections.— Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 16(3): 289-319.
60. Gamson, William. 1961. –A Theory of Coalition Formation.— American Sociological Review, Vol. 26(3): 373-382.
61. Globe and Mail. –The New Democrats.— January 23, 2006.
62. Golder, Matt. 2005. –Democratic Electoral Systems around the World, 1946-2000.— Electoral Studies, Vol. 24(1): 103-121.
63. Golder, Sona N. 2006. The Logic of Pre-electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
64. Grofman, Bernard. 1985. –The Neglected Role of the Status Quo in Models of Issue Voting.— Journal of Politics, Vol. 45: 230-237.
65. Haaretz, February 8, 2006. –The New Campaign Slogan of Meretz: Meretz in the Left - The Person in the Center— (my translation), by Yuli Khromchenko.
66. Heath, A. et al., British General Election Study, 1987 [computer file]. 2nd ed. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], SN: 3887.
67. Hellman, Joel, and Joshua Tucker. 1998. –Post-Communist Elections Project Coding of Presidential Powers.— [Database online] Available from http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~jtucker/pcelections.html.
68. Heston, Alan, Robert Summers, and Bettina Aten, Penn World Table Version 6.1, Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP), October 2002.
69. Hix, Simon. 1998. –Election, Parties, and Institutional Design: A Comparative Perspective on European Union Democracy.— West European Politics, Vol. 21(3): 19-52.
70. Holmberg, Søren. 1989. –Political Representation in Sweden.— Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 12: 1-36.
71. Hotelling, H. 1929. –Stability and Competition.— Economic Journal, Vol. 39: 41-59.
72. Huber, Joel, John W. Payne, and Christopher Puto. 1982. –Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis.— Journal of Consumer Research, 9: 90-98.
73. Huber, John D., Georgia Kernell, and Eduardo L. Leoni. 2005. –Institutional Context, Cognitive Resources and Partisan Attachments across Democracies.— Political Analysis, Vol. 13(4): 365-386.
74. Huber, John D., and G. Bingham Powell, Jr. 1994. –Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy.— World Politics, Vol. 46: 291-326.
75. Huber, John D., and Charles R. Shipan. 2002. Deliberative Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
76. Hug, Simon, and Pascal Sciarini. 2000. –Referendums on European Integration: Do Institutions Matter in the Voter's Decision?— Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 33(1): 3-36.
77. Hug, Simon, and Pascal Sciarini. International Herald Tribune. September 13, 2002. –Schröder and Fischer Present United Front.— By Judy Dempsey.
78. Iversen, Torben. 1994a. –Political Leadership and Representation in West European Democracies: A Test of Three Models of Voting.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 38(1): 45-74.
79. Iversen, Torben. 1994b. –The Logics of Electoral Politics.— Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 27(2): 155-189.
80. Jacobson, Gary C. 1990. The Electoral Origins of Divided Government. Boulder, CO: Westview.
81. Jeffery, Charlie, and Dan Hough. 2003. –Regional Elections in Multi-Level Systems.— European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 10(3): 199-212.
82. Johnston, Richard, and Fred Cutler. 2003. –Popular Foundations of Divided Government in Canada.— Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
83. Kedar, Orit. 2005. –When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 99(2): 185-199.
84. Kedar, Orit. 2005. –How Diffusion of Power in Parliaments Affects Voter Choice.— Political Analysis, Vol. 13(4): 410-429.
85. Kedar, Orit. 2006. –How Voters Work around Institutions: Policy Balancing in Staggered Elections.— Electoral Studies, Vol. 25(3): 509-527.
86. Kern, Holger Lutz, and Jens Hainmueller. 2006. –Electoral Balancing, Divided Government, and 'Midterm' Loss in German Elections.— Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol. 12(2): 127-149.
87. King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. –Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44(April): 347-361.
88. Kollman, Kenneth, J. H. Miller, and Scott E. Page. 1992. –Adaptive Parties in Spatial Elections.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 86: 929-937.
89. Krämer, Jorgen, and Hans Rattinger. 1997. –The Proximity and the Directional Theories of Issue Voting: Comparative Results for the U.S. and Germany.— European Journal of Political Science, Vol. 32: 1-29.
90. Kreppel, Amie. 2006. –Understanding the European Parliament from a Federalist Perspective: The Legislatures of the United States and the European Union Compared.— In Anand Menon and Martin A. Schain, eds., Comparative Federalism: the European Union and the United States in Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
91. Krosnick, John A. 2002. –The Challenges of Political Psychology: Lessons to be Learned from Research on Attitude Perception.— In James H. Kuklinski, ed. Thinking About Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 115-152.
92. Lacy, Dean, and Barry C. Burden. 1999. –The Vote-Stealing and Turnout Effects of Ross Perot in the 1992 U.S. Presidential election.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 43(1): 233-255.
93. Lacy, Dean, and Philip Paolino. 1998. –Downsian Voting and the Separation of Powers.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 42(4): 1180-1199.
94. Laver, Michael, and Kenneth Benoit. 2005. –Estimating Party Positions: Japan in Comparative Context.— Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 6(2): 187-209.
95. Laver, Michael, and William Ben Hunt. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. London: Routledge.
96. Laver, Michael, and Kenneth A. Shepsle. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Parliaments and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
97. Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 2000. –The Institutional Framework: Federalism and Decentralisation in Germany?— In Hellmut Wollmann and Eckhard Schröter, eds., Comparing Public Sector Reform in Britain and Germany: Key Traditions and Trends in Modernisation. Ashgate: Aldershot. pp. 85-106.
98. Lewis, Jeffrey B., and Gary King. 2000. –No Evidence on Directional vs. Proximity Voting.— Political Analysis, Vol. 8(1): 21-33.
99. Lewis-Beck, Michael, 1990. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
100. Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Mary Stegmaier. 2000. –Economic Determinants of ElectoralOutcomes.—AnnualReview of Political Science, Vol. 3: 183-219.
101. Lijphart, Arend 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
102. Lohmann, Susanne, David W. Brady, and Douglas Rivers. 1997. –Party Identification, Retrospective Voting, and Moderating Elections in a Federal System.— Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 30(4): 420-449.
103. Lupia, Arthur. 1994. –Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 88(1): 63-76.
104. Lupia, Arthur. 2002. –Deliberation Disconnected: What It Takes to Improve Civic Competence.— Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 65(3): 133-150.
105. Lupia, Arthur, and Matthew D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106. Macdonald, Stuart Elaine, Ola Listhaug, and George Rabinowitz. 1991. –Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 85(4): 1107-1131.
107. Macdonald, Stuart Elaine, and George Rabinowitz. 1993. –Direction and Uncertainty in a Model of Issue Voting.— Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 5(1): 61-87.
108. Macdonald, Stuart Elaine, George Rabinowitz, and Ola Listhaug. 1998. –On Attempting to Rehabilitate the Proximity Model: Sometimes the Patient Just Can't Be Helped.— Journal of Politics, Vol. 60(3): 653-690.
109. Macdonald, Stuart Elaine, George Rabinowitz, and Ola Listhaug. 2001. –Sophistry versus Science: On Further Efforts to Rehabilitate the Proximity Model.— Journal of Politics, Vol. 63(2): 482-500.
110. MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S. Erikson, and James A. Stimson. 1992. –Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 86(3): 597-611.
111. Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
112. Marsh, Michael. 1998. –Testing the Second-Order Election Model after Four European Elections.— British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 28: 591-607.
113. Marsh, Michael, and Mark N. Franklin. 1996. –The Foundations: Unanswered Questions from the Study of European Elections, 1979-1994.— In van der Eijk, Cees, and Mark N. Franklin, eds., Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 11-32.
114. McDonald, Michael D., and Ian Budge. 2005. Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. New York: Oxford University Press.
115. Mebane, Walter R., Jr. 2000. –Coordination, Moderation, and Institutional Balancing in American Presidential and House Elections.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 94 (1): 37-58.
116. Meguid, Bonnie M. 2005. –Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 99(3): 347-359.
117. Merrill, Samuel III, and James Adams. 2007. –The Effects of Alternative Power-Sharing Arrangements: Do 'Moderating' Institutions Moderate Party Strategies and Government Policy Outputs?— Public Choice, Vol. 131: 413-434.
118. Merrill, Samuel III, Bernard Grofman, and James Adams. 2001. –Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Voter Projections of Party Locations: Evidence from Norway, France, and the USA.— European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 40: 199-221.
119. Möller, Tommy. 1999. –The Swedish Election 1998: A Protest Vote and the Birth of a New Political Landscape?— Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 22(3): 261-276.
120. Niemi, Richard G., Guy Whitten, and Mark N. Franklin. 1992. –Constituency Characteristics, Individual Characteristics, and Tactical Voting in the 1987 British General Election.— British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 22(2): 229-254.
121. Onizuka, Naoko. 2005. –Re-examining Issue Voting in Japan: Direction vs. Proximity.— Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, Massachusetts.
122. Parducci, A. 1965. –Category Judgment: A Range-Frequency Model.— Psychological Review, Vol. 72(6): 407-418.
123. Page, Benjamin I. and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press.
124. Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
125. Powell, G. Bingham, Jr. 1986. –American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 80(1): 17-43.
126. Powell, G. Bingham, Jr. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
127. Powell, G. Bingham, Jr. 2004. –Political Representation in Comparative Politics.— Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 7: 273-296.
128. Powell, G. Bingham, and Guy D. Whitten. 1993. –A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 37(2): 391-414.
129. Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Jonathan B. Slapin. 2006. –Institutions and Coalition Formation: the German Elections of 2005.— West European Politics, Vol. 29(3): 540-559.
130. Quinn, Kevin M., Andrew D. Martin, and Andrew B. Whitford. 1999. –Voter Choice in Multi-Party Democracies: A Test of Competing Theories and Models.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 43(4): 1231-1247.
131. Rabinowitz, George. 1978. –On the Nature of Political Issues: Insights from a Spatial Analysis.— American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 22(4): 793-817.
132. Rabinowitz, George, and Stuart Elaine Macdonald. 1989. –A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 83(1): 93-121.
133. Reif, Karlheinz, and Hermann Schmitt. 1980. –Nine 2nd-order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Elections Results.— European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 8(1): 3-44.
134. Rodden, Jonathan. 2004. –Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning andMeasurement.— Comparative Politics, Vol. 36(4): 481-500.
135. Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
136. Samuels, David J. and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 2003. –Presidentialism, Elections, and Representation.— Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 15(1): 33-60.
137. Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A framework for Analysis. Volume I. London: Cambridge University Press.
138. Scheve, Kenneth, and Michael Tomz. 1999. –Electoral Surprise and the Midterm Loss in US Congressional Elections.— British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 29: 507-521.
139. Schneider, Aaron. 2003. –Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement.— Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 38(3): 32-56.
140. Schuessler, Alexander A. 2000. A Logic of Expressive Choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
141. Shugart, Matthew S. 1995. –The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 89(2): 327-343.
142. Shugart, Matthew S. and John M. Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
143. Simonson, Itamar. 1989. –Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects.— Journal of Consumer Research 16: 158-174.
144. Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
145. Strøm, Kaare. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
146. Tsebelis, George. 1995. –Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism, and Multipartyism.— British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 25: 289-325.
147. Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
148. Tsebelis, George, and Euardo Elamán. 2005. –Presidential Conditional Agenda setting in Latin America.— World Politics, Vol. 57(3): 396-420.
149. Tsebelis, George, and Tatiana P. Rizova. 2007. –Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in the Former Communist Countries.— Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 40(10): 1155-1182.
150. Tversky, Amos, and Itamar Simonson. 1993. –Context-dependent Preferences.— Management Science 39(10): 1179-1189.
151. Van der Eijk, Cees, and Mark N. Franklin. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
152. Warwick, Paul V. 2001. –Coalition Policy in Parliamentary Democracy: Who Gets How Much and When.— Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 34 (10): 1212-1236.
153. Warwick, Paul V. 2004. –Proximity, Directionality, and the Riddle of Relative Party Extremeness.— The Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 16: 263-287.
154. Warwick, Paul V. 2007. –Relative Extremism and Relative Moderation: Strategic Party Positioning in Democratic Systems.— Paper prepared for delivery at the 2007 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.
155. Wedell, Douglas H. 1991. –Distinguishing Among Models of Contextually Induced Preference Reversals.— Journal of Experimental Psychology 17(4): 767-778.
156. Westholm, Anders. 1997. –Distance Versus direction: The Illusory Defeat of the Proximity Theory of Electoral Choice.— American Political Science Review, Vol. 91(4): 865-885.
157. Westholm, Anders. 2001. –On the Return of Epicycles: Some Crossroads in Spatial Modeling Revisited.— Journal of Politics, Vol. 63 (May): 436-481.