Voter choice in multi-party democracies: A test of competing theories and models

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 1231-1247

  Quinn, Kevin M ^b   Martin, Andrew D ^a   Whitford, Andrew B ^b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033211785     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2991825     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Albert, James H., and Siddhartha Chib. 1993. "Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data." Journal of the American Statistical Association 88:669-679.
2. Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1998. "When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multi-Candidate Elections." American Journal of Political Science 42:55-96.
3. Andeweg, Rudy B., and Galen A. Irwin. 1993. Dutch Government and Politics. New York: St. Martin's Press.
4. Budge, Ian, David Robertson, and David Hearl. 1987. Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Butler, David, and Dennis Kavanagh. 1980. The British General Election of 1979. London: MacMillan.
6. Chib, Siddhartha. 1995. "Marginal Likelihood From the Gibbs Output." Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:1313-1321.
7. Chib, Siddhartha, Edward Greenberg, and Yuxin Chen. 1998. "MCMC Methods for Fitting and Comparing Multinomial Response Models." Typescript. Washington University in St. Louis.
8. DeGroot, Morris H. 1986. Probability and Statistics. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley.
9. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
10. Dutter, Lee E. 1985. "Spatial Preferences and Voter Choices in the Dutch Electorate." Comparative Political Studies 18:251-263.
11. Van der Eijk, Cees, and Kees Niemöller. 1987. "Electoral Alignments in the Netherlands." Electoral Studies 6:17-39.
12. Enelow, James, and Melvin Hinich. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Institut für Sozialwissenschaften and Europa-Institut of the Universität Mannheim. 1983. European Elections Study: European Political Parties' Middle-Level Elites. Köln: Köln Zentralarchiv.
14. Kass, Robert E., and Adrian E. Raftery. 1995. "Bayes Factors." Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:773-795.
15. Keane, Michael P. 1992. "A Note on Identification in the Multinomial Probit Model." Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 10:193-200.
16. Lacy, Dean, and Barry C. Burden. 1999. "The Vote-stealing and Turnout Effects of Ross Perot in the 1992 US Presidential Election." American Journal of Political Science 43:233-255.
17. Lijphart, Arend. 1975. The Politics of Accomodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands, 2nd ed. Berekely: University of California Press.
18. May, John D. 1973. "Opionion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of the Curvilinear Disparity." Political Studies XXI: 135-151.
19. McFadden, Daniel. 1974. "Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior." In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Paul Zarembka, New York: Academic Press.
20. Rabier, Jacques-Rene, and Ronald Inglehardt. 1981. Euro-Barometer 11 - April, 1979: The Year of the Child in Europe. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
21. Rose, Richard, and Ian McAllister. 1986. Voters Begin to Choose: From Closed-Class to Open Elections in Britain. London: Sage Publications.
22. Schofield, Norman J., Andrew D. Martin, Kevin M. Quinn, and Andrew B. Whitford. 1998. "Multi-party Electoral Competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A Model Based on Multinomial Probit." Public Choice 97:257-293.
23. Whitten, Guy D., and Harvey D. Palmer. 1996. "Heightening Comparativists' Concern for Model Choice: Voting Behavior in Great Britain and the Netherlands." American Journal of Political Science 40:231-260.