Proteome changes underpin improved meat quality and yield of chickens (Gallus gallus) fed the probiotic Enterococcus faecium

BMC Genomics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Zheng, Aijuan ^a   Luo, Jianjie ^a   Meng, Kun ^a   Li, Jianke ^a   Zhang, Shu ^a   Li, Ke ^a   Liu, Guohua ^a   Cai, Huiyi ^a   Bryden, Wayne L ^b   Yao, Bin ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Broiler chicken (Gallus gallus); Carcass; Enterococcus faecium; Meat quality; Pectoral muscle proteome; Probiotics

Indexed keywords

BETA ENOLASE; CHAPERONE; CYTOSKELETON PROTEIN; ENOLASE; LACTIC ACID; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; MUSCLE PROTEIN; PYRUVATE KINASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; PROBIOTIC AGENT; PROTEOME;

ABDOMINAL FAT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL FOOD; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; BROILER; CARCASS; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; ENZYME REGULATION; FOOD QUALITY; GLYCOLYSIS; HUMIDITY; MALE; MEAT COLOR; MEAT QUALITY; NONHUMAN; NUTRITIONAL PARAMETERS; PECTORAL MUSCLE; PH; POULTRY FARMING; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEOMICS; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TWO DIMENSIONAL DIFFERENCE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; UPREGULATION; VALIDITY; WATER HOLDING CAPACITY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MEAT; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; TIME;

ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; GALLUS GALLUS;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; FOOD QUALITY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MEAT; PROBIOTICS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84924283596     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1167     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Seal BS, Lillehoj HS, Donovan DM, Gay CG: Alternatives to antibiotics: a symposium on the challenges and solutions for animal production. Anim Health Res Rev 2013, 14:78-87. 10.1017/S1466252313000030
2. Ponte PI, Prates JA, Crespo JP, Crespo DG, Mourao JL, Alves SP, Bessa RJ, Chaveiro-Soares MA, Ferreira LM, Fontes CM: Improving the lipid nutritive value of poultry meat through the incorporation of a dehydrated leguminous-based forage in the diet for broiler chicks. Poult Sci 2008, 87:1587-1594. 10.3382/ps.2007-00446
3. Givens I: Animal nutrition and lipids in animal products and their contribution to human intake and health. Nutrients 2009, 1:71-82. 10.3390/nu1010071
4. Havenstein G, Ferket P, Qureshi M: Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poult Sci 2003, 82:1500-1508. 10.1093/ps/82.10.1500
5. Havenstein G, Ferket P, Qureshi M: Carcass composition and yield of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poult Sci 2003, 82:1509-1518. 10.1093/ps/82.10.1509
6. Rance KA, McEntee GM, McDevitt RM: Genetic and phenotypic relationships between and within support and demand tissues in a single line of broiler chicken. Brit Poult Sci 2002, 43:518-527. 10.1080/0007166022000004426
7. Fletcher DL: Broiler breast meat color variation, pH, and texture. Poult Sci 1999, 78:1323-1327. 10.1093/ps/78.9.1323
8. Baéza E: Measuring Quality Parameters. Poultry Meat and Processing Quality. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited. 2004.
9. Le Bihan-Duval E, Millet N, Remignon H: Broiler meat quality: effect of selection for increased carcass quality and estimates of genetic parameters. Poult Sci 1999, 78:822-826. 10.1093/ps/78.6.822
10. Strasburg GM, Chiang W: Pale, soft, exudative turkey-The role of ryanodine receptor variation in meat quality. Poult Sci 2009, 88:1497-1505. 10.3382/ps.2009-00181
11. Petracci M, Bianchi M, Cavani C: The European perspective on pale, soft, exudative conditions in poultry. Poult Sci 2009, 88:1518-1523. 10.3382/ps.2008-00508
12. Dransfield E, Sosnicki AA: Relationship between muscle growth and poultry meat quality. Poult Sci 1999, 78:743-746. 10.1093/ps/78.5.743
13. Barbut S: Pale, soft, and exudative poultry meat-Reviewing ways to manage at the processing plant. Poult Sci 2009, 88:1506-1512. 10.3382/ps.2009-00118
14. Pelicano E, Souza P, Souza H, Oba A, Norkus E, Kodawara L, Lima TD: Effect of different probiotics on broiler carcass and meat quality. Rev Bras Ciênc Avíco 2003, 5:207-214.
15. McClain PE, Mullins AM: Relationship of water binding and pH to tenderness of bovine muscles. J Anim Sci 1969, 29:268-271.
16. Judge MD, Cahill VR, Kunkle LE, Deatherage FE: Pork quality II. Physical, chemical and organoleptic relationships in fresh pork. J Anim Sci 1960, 19:145-149.
17. Wood JD, Enser M: Factors influencing fatty acids in meat and the role of antioxidants in improving meat quality. Brit J Nutr 1997,78(Suppl 1):S49-60.
18. Jang A, Liu XD, Shin MH, Lee BD, Lee SK, Lee JH, Jo C: Antioxidative potential of raw breast meat from broiler chicks fed a dietary medicinal herb extract mix. Poult Sci 2008, 87:2382-2389. 10.3382/ps.2007-00506
19. Gladine C, Morand C, Rock E, Bauchart D, Durand D: Plant extracts rich in polyphenols (PERP) are efficient antioxidants to prevent lipoperoxidation in plasma lipids from animals fed n-3 PUFA supplemented diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2007, 136:281-296. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.09.003
20. Rolfe RD: The role of probiotic cultures in the control of gastrointestinal health. J Nutr 2000,130(2S Suppl):396S-402S.
21. Vali N, Samani A, Doosti A: Effect of probiotic on the laying performance of Japanese quails ( Coturnix japonica ). Res Opin Anim Vet Sci 2013, 3:218-220.
22. Shini S, Shini A, Blackall PJ: The potential for probiotics to prevent reproductive tract lesions in free-range laying hens. Anim Prod Sci 2013, 53:1298-1308.
23. Bozkurt M, Küçükyilmaz K, Ayhan V, Çabuk M, Çatll AU: Performance of layer or broiler breeder hens varies in response to different probiotic preparations. Ital J Anim Sci 2011, 10:e31. 10.4081/ijas.2011.e31
24. Tsirtsikos P, Fegeros K, Balaskas C, Kominakis A, Mountzouris KC: Dietary probiotic inclusion level modulates intestinal mucin composition and mucosal morphology in broilers. Poult Sci 2012, 91:1860-1868. 10.3382/ps.2011-02005
25. Dizaji B, Zakeri A, Golbazfarsad A, Faramarzy S, Ranjbari O: Influences of different growth promoters on intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Eur J Exp Biol 2013, 3:32-37.
26. Ziaie H, Bashtani M, Torshizi M, Naeeimipour H, Zeinali H: Effect of antibiotic and its alternatives on morphometric characteristics, mineral content and bone strength of tibia in ross broiler chickens. Global Vet 2011, 7:315-322.
27. Lourenço MC, Kuritza LN, Westphal P, Miglino LB, Pickler L, Kraieski AL, Santin E: Use of probiotic on T cell activation and Salmonella minnesota control in broilers. Pesquisa Vet Brasil 2013, 33:11-14.
28. Sterzo E, Paiva J, Mesquita A, Freitas Neto O, Berchieri A Jr: Organic acids and/or compound with defined microorganisms to control Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis experimental infection in chickens. Rev Bras Ciênc Avíco 2007, 9:69-73.
29. Ribeiro F, Jordan A, Mohnl M, Hulet M: Effects of multispecies probiotic on growth efficiency and performance of turkey hens. World Poultry Sci J 2012a, (Suppl 1):170-172.
30. Hosseini SA, Meimandipour A, Alami F, Mahdavi A, Mohiti-Asli M, Lotfollahian H, Cross D: Effects of ground thyme and probiotic supplements in diets on broiler performance, blood biochemistry and immunological response to sheep red blood cells. Ital J Anim Sci 2013, 12:e19.
31. Abdel-Rahman H, Shawky S, Ouda H, Nafeaa A, Orabi S: Effect of two probiotics and bioflavonoids supplementation to the broilers diet and drinking water on the growth performance and hepatic antioxidant parameters. Global Vet 2013, 10:734-741.
32. Owings WJ, Reynolds DL, Hasiak RJ, Ferket PR: Influence of dietary supplementation with Streptococcus faecium M-74 on broiler body weight, feed conversion, carcass characteristics, and intestinal microbial colonization. Poult Sci 1990, 69:1257-1264. 10.3382/ps.0691257
33. Weis J, Hrnčár C, Pál G, Baraňska B, Bujko J, Malíková L: Effect of probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium M74 supplementation on the carcass parameters of different hybrid combination chickens. Anim Sci Biotechnol 2011, 44:149-152.
34. Endo J, Nakano M: Influence of a probiotic on productivity, meat components, lipid metabolism, caecal flora and metabolites, and raising environment in broiler production. Anim Sci J 1990, 70:207-218.
35. D'Alessandro A, Zolla L: Meat science: from proteomics to integrated omics towards system biology. J Proteomics 2013, 78:558-577.
36. Teltathum T, Mekchay S: Proteome changes in Thai indigenous chicken muscle during growth period. Int J Biol Sci 2009, 5:679-685.
37. Eckersall PD, de Almeida AM, Miller I: Proteomics, a new tool for farm animal science. J Proteomics 2012, 75:4187-4189. 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.05.014
38. Bendixen E, Danielsen M, Hollung K, Gianazza E, Miller I: Farm animal proteomics - a review. J Proteomics 2011, 74:282-293. 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.11.005
39. Wang T, Li A, Yi J, Tao H, Wang Y: Screening, identification and characterization of Enterococcus faecium for feed use. J Chin Cereal Oil Assoc 2010, 25:89-97.
40. Wang T, Li A, Tao H, Yi J: Study on the production technology and properties of microencapsulated Enterococcus faecium. J Northwest A&F Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 2009, 37:51-62.
41. Group A: Arbor Acres Broiler Management Guide. Accessed May 2010. http://cn.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/AA_Broiler/AA-Broiler-Handbook2014i-EN.pdf
42. Zhang L, Yue HY, Zhang HJ, Xu L, Wu SG, Yan HJ, Gong YS, Qi GH: Transport stress in broilers: I. Blood metabolism, glycolytic potential, and meat quality. Poult Sci 2009, 88:2033-2041. 10.3382/ps.2009-00128
43. Honikel KO: Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci 1998, 49:447-457. 10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00034-5
44. Zhang WG, Lonergan SM, Gardner MA, Huff-Lonergan E: Contribution of postmortem changes of integrin, desmin and mu-calpain to variation in water holding capacity of pork. Meat Sci 2006, 74:578-585. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.05.008
45. Remignon H, Desrosiers V, Marche G: Influence of increasing breast meat yield on muscle histology and meat quality in the chicken. Reprod Nutr Dev 1996, 36:523-530. 10.1051/rnd:19960508
46. Zhuang H, Savage EM: Comparison of cook loss, shear force, and sensory descriptive profiles of boneless skinless white meat cooked from a frozen or thawed state. Poult Sci 2013, 92:3003-3009. 10.3382/ps.2012-02801
47. Jaturasitha S, Srikanchai T, Kreuzer M, Wicke M: Differences in carcass and meat characteristics between chicken indigenous to northern Thailand (Black-boned and Thai native) and imported extensive breeds (Bresse and Rhode Island Red). Poult Sci 2008, 87:160-169. 10.3382/ps.2006-00398
48. Saláková A, Straková E, Válková V, Buchtová H, Steinhauserová I: Quality indicators of chicken broiler raw and cooked meat depending on their sex. Acta Vet Brno 2009, 78:497-504. 10.2754/avb200978030497
49. Fletcher DL, Qiao M, Smith DP: The relationship of raw broiler breast meat color and pH to cooked meat color and pH. Poult Sci 2000, 79:784-788. 10.1093/ps/79.5.784
50. Luo J, Zheng A, Meng K, Chang W, Bai Y, Li K, Cai H, Liu G, Yao B: Proteome changes in the intestinal mucosa of broiler ( Gallus gallus ) activated by probiotic Enterococcus faecium. J Proteomics 2013, 91:226-241.
51. Lu Y, Liu X, Shi S, Su H, Bai X, Cai G, Yang F, Xie Z, Zhu Y, Zhang Y: Bioinformatics analysis of proteomic profiles during the process of anti-Thy1 nephritis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012, 11:M111.008755. 10.1074/mcp.M111.008755, M111.008755
52. Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Hackl H, Charoentong P, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, Fridman WH, Trajanoski Z, Galon J: ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1091-1093. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp101
53. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Minguez P, Doerks T, Stark M, Muller J, Bork P: The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res 2011,39(suppl 1):D561-D568.
54. -δδCT method. Methods 2001, 25:402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
55. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL: The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 2009, 55:611-622. 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797
56. Demeterova M, Mariscakova R, Pistl J, Nad P, Samudovska A: The effect of the probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134 in combination with natural humic substances on performance and health of broiler chickens. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2009, 122:370-377.
57. Ouali A: Proteolytic and physicochemical mechanisms involved in meat texture development. Biochimie 1992, 74:251-265. 10.1016/0300-9084(92)90124-W
58. Schreurs FJG: Post-mortem changes in chicken muscle. World Poultry Sci J 2000, 56:319-346. 10.1079/WPS20000023
59. Poso AR, Puolanne E: Carbohydrate metabolism in meat animals. Meat Sci 2005, 70:423-434. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.12.017
60. Najjar VA, Pullman ME: The occurrence of a group transfer involving enzyme (phosphoglucomutase) and substrate. Science 1954, 119:631-634. 10.1126/science.119.3097.631
61. Marcus F, Gontero B, Harrsch PB, Rittenhouse J: Amino acid sequence homology among fructose-1,6-bisphosphatases. Biochem Bioph Res Co 1986, 135:374-381. 10.1016/0006-291X(86)90005-7
62. Marcus F, Harrsch PB: Amino acid sequence of spinach chloroplast fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. Arch Biochem Biophys 1990, 279:151-157. 10.1016/0003-9861(90)90475-E
63. Bowker BC, Grant AL, Forrest JC, Gerrard DE: Muscle metabolism and PSE pork. J Anim Sci 2000,79(suppl 1):1-8.
64. D'Alessandro A, Marrocco C, Rinalducci S, Mirasole C, Failla S, Zolla L: Chianina beef tenderness investigated through integrated Omics. J Proteomics 2012, 75:4381-4398. 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.03.052
65. Okumura T, Yamada R, Nishimura T: Survey of conditioning indicators for pork loins: changes in myofibrils, proteins and peptides during postmortem conditioning of vacuum-packed pork loins for 30 days. Meat Sci 2003, 64:467-473. 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00224-3
66. Guillemin N, Bonnet M, Jurie C, Picard B: Functional analysis of beef tenderness. J Proteomics 2011, 75:352-365. 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.07.026
67. Pancholi V: Multifunctional alpha-enolase: its role in diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci 2001, 58:902-920. 10.1007/PL00000910
68. Smith RM, Galbler NK, Young JM, Cai W, Boddicker NJ, Anderson MJ, Huff-Lonergan E, Dekkers JC, Lonergan SM: Effect of selection for reduced residual feed intake on composition and quality of fresh pork. J Anim Sci 2011, 89:192-200. 10.2527/jas.2010-2861
69. Morzel M, Chambon C, Hamelin M, Santé-Lhoutellier V, Sayd T, Monin G: Proteome changes during pork meat ageing following use of two different pre-slaughter handling procedures. Meat Sci 2004, 67:689-696. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.01.008
70. Goldblatt H: The effect of high salt intake on the blood pressure of rabbits. Lab Invest 1969, 21:126-128.
71. D'Alessandro A, Marrocco C, Zolla V, D'Andrea M, Zolla L: Meat quality of the longissimus lumborum muscle of Casertana and Large White pigs: metabolomics and proteomics intertwined. J Proteomics 2011, 75:610-627. 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.08.024
72. Robson RM: Myofibrillar and cytoskeletal structures and proteins in mature skeletal muscle cells. Utrecht: ECCEAMST. 1995.
73. Koohmaraie M, Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, Lonergan SM, Doumit ME: A muscle hypertrophy condition in lamb (callipyge): characterization of effects on muscle growth and meat quality traits. J Anim Sci 1995, 73:3596-3607.
74. Marinus FW, Jansen J, Broekman KCJA, Reimert H, Heuven HCM: Postmortem proteome degradation profiles of longissimus muscle in Yorkshire and Duroc pigs and their relationship with pork quality traits. Meat Sci 2009, 83:744-751. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.030
75. Melody JL, Lonergan SM, Rowe LJ, Huiatt TW, Mayes MS, Huff-Lonergan E: Early postmortem biochemical factors influence tenderness and water-holding capacity of three porcine muscles. J Anim Sci 2004, 82:1195-1205.
76. Morrison EH, Mielche MM, Purslow PP: Immunolocalisation of intermediate filament proteins in porcine meat. Fibre type and muscle-specific variations during conditioning. Meat Sci 1998, 50:91-104. 10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00019-9
77. Xiong YL: Protein Functionality. Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press. 2004.
78. Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan S: Postmortem Mechanisms of Meat Tenderization. In Quality Attributes of Muscle Foods. Edited by: Xiong Y, Chi-Tang H, Shahidi F. United States: Springer, 1999:229-251.
79. Kendall TL, Koohmaraie M, Arbona JR, Williams SE, Young LL: Effect of pH and ionic strength on bovine m-calpain and calpastatin activity. J Anim Sci 1993, 71:96-104.
80. Cornforth DP: Quality Attributes and their Measurement in Meat, Poultry, and Fish Products. London: Chapman and Hall. 1994.
81. Allen CD, Fletcher DL, Northcutt JK, Russell SM: The relationship of broiler breast color to meat quality and shelf-life. Poult Sci 1998, 77:361-366. 10.1093/ps/77.2.361
82. Barbut S: Colour measurements for evaluating the pale soft exudative (PSE) occurrence in turkey meat. Food Res Int 1993, 26:39-43. 10.1016/0963-9969(93)90103-P
83. Allen CD, Russell SM, Fletcher DL: The relationship of broiler breast meat color and pH to shelf-life and odor development. Poult Sci 1997, 76:1042-1046. 10.1093/ps/76.7.1042
84. Sayd T, Morzel M, Chambon C, Franck M, Figwer P, Larzul C, Le Roy P, Monin G, Cherel P, Laville E: Proteome analysis of the sarcoplasmic fraction of pig semimembranosus muscle: implications on meat color development. J Agric Food Chem 2006, 54:2732-2737. 10.1021/jf052569v
85. D'Alessandro A, Rinalducci S, Marrocco C, Zolla V, Napolitano F, Zolla L: Love me tender: an Omics window on the bovine meat tenderness network. J Proteomics 2012, 75:4360-4380. 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.02.013
86. Lomiwes D, Farouk MM, Wiklund E, Young OA: Small heat shock proteins and their role in meat tenderness: a review. Meat Sci 2014, 96:26-40. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.06.008
87. Mayer MP, Bukau B: Hsp70 chaperones: cellular functions and molecular mechanism. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005, 62:670-684. 10.1007/s00018-004-4464-6
88. Ouali A, Gagaoua M, Boudida Y, Becila S, Boudjellal A, Herrera-Mendez CH, Sentandreu MA: Biomarkers of meat tenderness: present knowledge and perspectives in regards to our current understanding of the mechanisms involved. Meat Sci 2013, 95:854-870. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.010
89. Lomiwes D, Farouk MM, Frost DA, Dobbie PM, Young OA: Small heat shock proteins and toughness in intermediate pHu beef. Meat Sci 2013, 95:472-479. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.022
90. Tavaria M, Gabriele T, Kola I, Anderson RL: A hitchhiker's guide to the human Hsp70 family. Cell Stress Chaperon 1996, 1:23-28. 10.1379/1466-1268(1996)001<0023:AHSGTT>2.3.CO;2
91. Hwang IH, Park BY, Kim JH, Cho SH, Lee JM: Assessment of postmortem proteolysis by gel-based proteome analysis and its relationship to meat quality traits in pig longissimus. Meat Sci 2005, 69:79-91. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.06.019
92. van de Wiel DF, Zhang WL: Identification of pork quality parameters by proteomics. Meat Sci 2007, 77:46-54. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.017
93. Laville E, Sayd T, Terlouw C, Blinet S, Pinguet J, Fillaut M, Glenisson J, Cherel P: Differences in pig muscle proteome according to HAL genotype: implications for meat quality defects. J Agric Food Chem 2009, 57:4913-4923. 10.1021/jf900286x
94. Bonetta L: Protein-protein interactions: interactome under construction. Nature 2010, 468:851-854. 10.1038/468851a