Proteome changes in the intestinal mucosa of broiler (Gallus gallus) activated by probiotic Enterococcus faecium

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 91, Issue , 2013, Pages 226-241

  Luo, Jianjie ^a   Zheng, Aijuan ^a   Meng, Kun ^a   Chang, Wenhuan ^a   Bai, Yingguo ^a   Li, Ke ^a   Cai, Huiyi ^a   Liu, Guohua ^a   Yao, Bin ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

Author keywords

Arbor Acres broiler (Gallus gallus); Enterococcus faecium; Gut microbiota; Intestinal mucosal protein profile

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE; CYCLOPHILIN A; GENOMIC DNA; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; HEMOPEXIN; LACTOFERRIN; MESSENGER RNA; MUCIN 2; PROBIOTIC AGENT; PROCOLLAGEN PROLINE 2 OXOGLUTARATE 4 DIOXYGENASE; PROLINE DIPEPTIDASE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN DISULFIDE ISOMERASE; PROTEOME; PYRUVATE KINASE; SERUM ALBUMIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FOOD INTAKE; GALLUS GALLUS; INTESTINE FLORA; INTESTINE MUCOSA; LACTOBACILLUS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; NUTRIENT; OXIDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SPLEEN; STOMACH; WEIGHT GAIN;

ARBOR ACRES BROILER (GALLUS GALLUS); ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; GUT MICROBIOTA; INTESTINAL MUCOSAL PROTEIN PROFILE;

ANIMALS; ANTIOXIDANTS; CHICKENS; CYTOSKELETON; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; PROBIOTICS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S;

EID: 84882753516     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.07.017     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Fuller R. Probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bacteriol 1989, 66:365-378.
2. Mountzouris K., Tsirtsikos P., Kalamara E., Nitsch S., Schatzmayr G., Fegeros K. Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poult Sci 2007, 86:309-317.
3. Mercenier A., Pavan S., Pot B. Probiotics as biotherapeutic agents: present knowledge and future prospects. Curr Pharm Des 2003, 9:175-191.
4. Saxelin M., Tynkkynen S., Mattila-Sandholm T., de Vos W.M. Probiotic and other functional microbes: from markets to mechanisms. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005, 16:204-211.
5. Gupta V., Garg R. Probiotics. Int J Med Microbiol 2009, 27:202-209.
6. Roberfroid M., Gibson G.R., Hoyles L., McCartney A.L., Rastall R., Rowland I., et al. Prebiotic effects: metabolic and health benefits. Br J Nutr 2010, 104:S1-63.
7. Tannock G.W. Probiotic properties of lactic-acid bacteria: plenty of scope for fundamental R & D. Trends Biotechnol 1997, 15:270-274.
8. Diarra M.S., Rempel H., Champagne J., Masson L., Pritchard J., Topp E. Distribution of antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes in Enterococcus spp. and characterization of isolates from broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76:8033-8043.
9. Rahkila R., Johansson P., Säde E., Björkroth J. Identification of enterococci from broiler products and a broiler processing plant and description of Enterococcus viikkiensis sp. nov. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:1196-1203.
10. Audisio M.C., Oliver G., Apella M.C. Protective effect of Enterococcus faecium J96, a potential probiotic strain, on chicks infected with Salmonella pullorum. J Food Protect 2000, 63:1333-1337.
11. Capcarova M., Weiss J., Hrncar C., Kolesarova A., Pal G. Effect of Lactobacillus fermentum and Enterococcus faecium strains on internal milieu, antioxidant status and body weight of broiler chickens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2010, 94:e215-e224.
12. Placha I., Simonova M.P., Cobanova K., Laukova A., Faix S. Effect of Enterococcus faecium AL41 and Thymus vulgaris essential oil on small intestine integrity and antioxidative status of laying hens. Res Vet Sci 2010, 89:257-261.
13. Samli H.E., Senkoylu N., Koc F., Kanter M., Agma A. Effects of Enterococcus faecium and dried whey on broiler perforance, gut histomorphology and intestinal microbiota. Arch Anim Nutr 2007, 61:42-49.
14. Samli H.E., Dezcan S., Koc F., Ozduven M.L., Okur A.A., Senkoylu N. Effects of Enterococcus faecium supplementation and floor type on performance, morphology of erythrocytes and intestinal microbiota in broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 2010, 51:564-568.
15. Levkut M., Revajova V., Laukova A., Sevcikova Z., Spisakova V., Faixova Z., et al. Leukocytic responses and intestinal mucin dynamics of broilers protected with Enterococcus faecium EF55 and challenged with Salmonella enteritidis. Res Vet Sci 2012, 93:195-201.
16. Okumura N., Hashida-Okumura A., Kita K., Matsubae M., Matsubara T., Takao T., et al. Proteomic analysis of slow- and fast-twitch skeletal muscles. Proteomics 2005, 5:2896-2906.
17. Wang M., Chan L., Si M., Hong H., Wang D. Proteomic analysis of hepatic tissue of zebrafish (Danio rerio) experimentally exposed to chronic microcystin-LR. Toxicol Sci 2010, 113:60-69.
18. Xiao H., Zhang L., Zhou H., Lee J.M., Garon E.B., Wong D.T. Proteomic analysis of human saliva from lung cancer patients using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012, 11:1-12.
19. Wang X., Yang F., Liu C., Zhou H., Wu G., Qiao S., et al. Dietary supplementation with the probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum I5007 and the antibiotic aureomycin differentially affects the small intestinal proteomes of weanling piglets. J Nutr 2012, 142:7-13.
20. Klasing K. Nutritional modulation of resistance to infectious diseases. Poult Sci 1998, 77:1119-1125.
21. Furness J.B., Kunze W.A., Clerc N. The intestine as a sensory organ: neural, endocrine, and immune responses. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 1999, 277:G922-G928.
22. Yan F., Polk D.B. Probiotics: progress toward novel therapies for intestinal diseases. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2010, 26:95-101.
23. Correia M.I., Liboredo J.C., Consoli M.L. The role of probiotics in gastrointestinal surgery. Nutrition 2012, 28:230-234.
24. Wang T., Li A., Yi J., Tao H., Wang Y. Screening, identification and characterization of Enterococcus faecium for feed use. J Chin Cereals Oils Assoc 2010, 25:89-97.
25. Wang T., Li A., Tao H., Yi J. Study on the production technology and properties of microencapsulated Enterococcus faecium. J Northwest Atl Fish Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 2009, 37:51-62.
26. Aviagen Group Arbor Acres Broiler Management Guide Accessed May 2010. http://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/AA_Broiler/AA_Broiler_Manual.pdf.
27. Zhang L., Yue H.Y., Wu S.G., Xu L., Zhang H.J., Yan H.J., et al. Transport stress in broilers. II. Superoxide production, adenosine phosphate concentrations, and mRNA levels of avian uncoupling protein, avian adenine nucleotide translocator, and avian peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1alpha in skeletal muscles. Poult Sci 2010, 89:393-400.
28. Ringø E., Strøm E., Tabachek J.A. Intestinal microflora of salmonids: a review. Aquacult Res 2008, 26:773-789.
29. Spanggaard B., Huber I., Nielsen J., Nielsen T., Appel K., Gram L. The microflora of rainbow trout intestine: a comparison of traditional and molecular identification. Aquaculture 2000, 182:1-15.
30. Li Z., Zhao H., Yang P., Zhao J., Huang H., Xue X., et al. Comparative quantitative analysis of gene expression profiles of glycoside hydrolase family 10 xylanases in the sheep rumen during a feeding cycle. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013, 79:1212-1220.
31. Bakke-McKellep A.M., Penn M.H., Salas P.M., Refstie S., Sperstad S., Landsverk T., et al. Effects of dietary soyabean meal, inulin and oxytetracycline on intestinal microbiota and epithelial cell stress, apoptosis and proliferation in the teleost Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Br J Nutr 2007, 97:699-713.
32. Zhou Z., Shi P., Yao B., He S., Su Y., Ding Z. Comparison of the predominant bacterial community structure in the gastrointestinal wall between Lutjanus sebae and Ephippus orbis based on 16S rDNA PCR-DGGE fingerprint. Acta Hydrobiol Sin 2007, 31:78-84.
33. Denman S.E., McSweeney C.S. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2006, 58:572-582.
34. Zheng A., Liu G., Zhang Y., Hou S., Chang W., Zhang S., et al. Proteomic analysis of liver development of lean Pekin duck (Anas platyrhynchos domestica). J Proteomics 2012, 75:5396-5413.
35. Lu Y., Liu X., Shi S., Su H., Bai X., Cai G., et al. Bioinformatics analysis of proteomic profiles during the process of anti-Thy1 nephritis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012, 11:1-13.
36. Begna D., Fang Y., Feng M., Li J. Mitochondrial proteins differential expression during honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) queen and worker larvae caste determination. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:4263-4280.
37. Bindea G., Mlecnik B., Hackl H., Charoentong P., Tosolini M., Kirilovsky A., et al. ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1091-1093.
38. Franceschini A., Szklarczyk D., Frankild S., Kuhn M., Simonovic M., Roth A., et al. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D808-D815.
39. -δδCT method. Methods 2001, 25:402-408.
40. Bustin S.A., Bene V., Garson J.A., Hellemans J., Huggett J., Kubista M., et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 2009, 55:611-622.
41. Wielen P., Keuzenkamp D., Lipman L., Knapen F., Biesterveld S. Spatial and temporal variation of the intestinal bacterial community in commercially raised broiler chickens during growth. Microb Ecol 2002, 44:286-293.
42. Danicke S., Vahjen W., Simon O., Jeroch H. Effects of dietary fat type and xylanase supplementation to rye-based broiler diets on selected bacterial groups adhering to the intestinal epithelium on transit time of feed, and on nutrient digestibility. Poult Sci 1999, 78:1292-1299.
43. Marteau P., Pochart P., Bouhnik Y., Rambaud J.C. Fate and effects of some transiting microorganisms in the human gastrointestinal tract. World Rev Nutr Diet 1993, 74:1-21.
44. Bonetta L. Protein-protein interactions: interactome under construction. Nature 2010, 468:851-854.
45. Barnes E.M., Impey C., Stevens B. Factors affecting the incidence and anti-salmonella activity of the anaerobic caecal flora of the young chick. J Hyg 1979, 82:263-283.
46. Mead G., Adams B. Some observations on the caecal micro-flora of the chick during the first two weeks of life. Br Poult Sci 1975, 16:169-176.
47. Zhu X.Y., Zhong T., Pandya Y., Joerger R.D. 16S rRNA-based analysis of microbiota from the cecum of broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002, 68:124-137.
48. Barnes E.M. The avian intestinal flora with particular reference to the possible ecological significance of the cecal anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr 1972, 25:1475-1479.
49. Marin F., Luquet G., Mari B., Medakovic D. Molluscan shell proteins: primary structure, origin, and evolution. Curr Top Dev Biol 2008, 80:209-276.
50. Johansson M.E., Larsson J.M., Hansson G.C. The two mucus layers of colon are organized by the MUC2 mucin, whereas the outer layer is a legislator of host-microbial interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108(Suppl. 1):4659-4665.
51. Shirazi T., Longman R.J., Corfield A.P., Probert C.S. Mucins and inflammatory bowel disease. Postgrad Med J 2000, 76:473-478.
52. Tsirtsikos P., Fegeros K., Balaskas C., Kominakis A., Mountzouris K.C. Dietary probiotic inclusion level modulates intestinal mucin composition and mucosal morphology in broilers. Poult Sci 2012, 91:1860-1868.
53. Bontempo V., Di Giancamillo A., Savoini G., Dell'Orto V., Domeneghini C. Live yeast dietary supplementation acts upon intestinal morpho-functional aspects and growth in weanling piglets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006, 129:224-236.
54. Diplock A.T., Charleux J.L., Crozier-Willi G., Kok F.J., Rice-Evans C., Roberfroid M., et al. Functional food science and defence against reactive oxidative species. Br J Nutr 1998, 80:S77-112.
55. Petrof E.O., Kojima K., Ropeleski M.J., Musch M.W., Tao Y., De Simone C., et al. Probiotics inhibit nuclear factor-kappaB and induce heat shock proteins in colonic epithelial cells through proteasome inhibition. Gastroenterology 2004, 127:1474-1487.
56. Mangan M.S., Kaiserman D., Bird P.I. The role of serpins in vertebrate immunity. Tissue Antigens 2008, 72:1-10.
57. Ward P.P., Paz E., Conneely O.M. Multifunctional roles of lactoferrin: a critical review. Cell Mol Life Sci 2006, 22:2540-2548.
58. Cant J.P., McBride B.W., Croom W.J. The regulation of intestinal metabolism and its impact on whole animal energetics. J Anim Sci 1996, 74:2541-2553.
59. Di Garbo A., Johnston M.D., Chapman S.J., Maini P.K. Variable renewal rate and growth properties of cell populations in colon crypts. Phys Rev E 2010, 81:061909.
60. Gordon J.I., Hermiston M.L. Differentiation and self-renewal in the mouse gastrointestinal epithelium. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1994, 6:795-803.
61. Flock A., Bretscher A., Weber K. Immunohistochemical localization of several cytoskeletal proteins in inner ear sensory and supporting cells. Hear Res 1982, 7:75-89.
62. Daudet N., Lebart M.C. Transient expression of the t-isoform of plastins/fimbrin in the stereocilia of developing auditory hair cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2002, 53:326-336.
63. Pantaloni D., Carlier M.F. How profilin promotes actin filament assembly in the presence of thymosin β4. Cell 1993, 75:1007-1014.
64. Meng J., Vardar D., Wang Y., Guo H.C., James F., McKnight C.J. High-resolution crystal structures of villin headpiece and mutants with reduced F-actin binding activity. Biochemistry 2005, 44:11963-11973.
65. Weis J., Hrncár C., Pál G., Baranska B., Bujko J., Malíková L. Effect of probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium M74 supplementation on the carcass parameters of different hybrid combination chickens. Anim Sci Biotechnol 2011, 44:149-152.
66. Vidal M. A unifying view of 21st century systems biology. FEBS Lett 2009, 583:3891-3894.
67. Potters G. Systems biology of the cell. Nat Educ 2010, 3:33.
68. Vidal M., Cusick M.E., Barabasi A.L. Interactome networks and human disease. Cell 2011, 144:986-998.