Effects of selection for decreased residual feed intake on composition and quality of fresh pork

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 192-200

  Smith, R M ^a   Gabler, N K ^a   Young, J M ^a   Cai, W ^a   Boddicker, N J ^a   Anderson, M J ^a   Huff Lonergan, E ^a   Dekkers, J C M ^a   Lonergan, S M ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Pork composition; Pork quality; Residual feed intake; Tenderness

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN; CALPASTATIN; MYOSIN HEAVY CHAIN;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; CALORIC INTAKE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; MEAT; METABOLISM; NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; STANDARD; SWINE;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; BODY COMPOSITION; CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEINS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MALE; MEAT; MYOSIN HEAVY CHAINS; NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SWINE;

SUIDAE;

EID: 78650966910     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-2861     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Arlington, VA.
2. Bee, G., A. L. Anderson, S. M. Lonergan, and E. Huff-Lonergan. 2007. Extent of pH decline affects proteolysis of cytoskeletal proteins and water holding capacity in pork. Meat Sci. 76:359-365.
3. Bendall, J. R., and H. J. Swatland. 1988. A review of the relationships of pH with physical aspects of pork quality. Meat Sci. 24:85-126.
4. Blanchard, P. J., M. B. Willis, C. C. Warkup, and M. Ellis. 2000. The influence of carcass backfat and intramuscular fat level on pork eating quality. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80:145-151.
5. Boddicker, N. J. 2010. The effects of ad libitum and restricted feeding on Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake. MS Thesis. Iowa State Univ., Ames.
6. Cai, W., D. S. Casey, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2008. Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine. J. Anim. Sci. 86:287-298.
7. Cameron, N. D., and M. K. Curran. 1995. Responses in carcass composition to divergent selection for components of efficient lean growth-rate in pigs. Anim. Sci. 61:347-359.
8. Cameron, N. D., G. R. Nute, S. N. Brown, M. Enser, and J. D. Wood. 1999. Meat quality of Large White pig genotypes selected for components of efficient lean growth rate. Anim. Sci. 68:115-127.
9. Davis, G. W., G. C. Smith, Z. L. Carpenter, and H. R. Cross. 1975. Relationships of quality indicators to palatability attributes of pork loins. J. Anim. Sci. 41:1305-1313.
10. Devol, D. L., F. K. McKeith, P. J. Bechtel, J. Novakofski, R. D. Shanks, and T. R. Carr. 1988. Variation in composition and palatability trait and relationships between muscle characteristics and palatability in a random sample of pork carcasses. J. Anim. Sci. 66:385-395.
11. Gilbert, H., J. P. Bidanel, J. Gruand, J. C. Caritez, Y. Billon, P. Guillouet, H. Lagant, J. Noblet, and P. Sellier. 2007. Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits. J. Anim. Sci. 85:3182-3188.
12. Goll, D. E., G. Neti, S. W. Mares, and V. F. Thompson. 2008. Myofibrillar protein turnover: The proteasome and the calpains. J. Anim. Sci. 86:E19-E35.
13. Hodgson, R. R., G. W. Davis, G. C. Smith, J. W. Savell, and H. R. Cross. 1991. Relationships between pork loin palatability traits and physical characteristics of cooked chops. J. Anim. Sci. 69:4858-4865.
14. Honikel, K. O., and R. Hamm. 1994. Measurement of water-holding capacity and juiciness. Pages 125-161 in Advances in Meat Research. Vol. 9. A. M. Pearson and T. R. Dutson, ed. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK.
15. Hoque, M. A., H. Kadowaki, T. Shibata, T. Oikawa, and K. Suzuki. 2009. Genetic parameters for measures of residual feed intake and growth traits in seven generations of Duroc pigs. Livest. Sci. 121:45-49.
16. Huff-Lonergan, E., T. J. Baas, M. Malek, J. C. M. Dekkers, K. Prusa, and M. F. Rothschild. 2002. Correlations among selected pork quality traits. J. Anim. Sci. 80:617-627.
17. Huff-Lonergan, E., and S. M. Lonergan. 2005. Mechanisms of water holding capacity in meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci. 71:194-204.
18. Huff-Lonergan, E., T. Mitsuhashi, F. C. Parrish Jr., and R. M. Robson. 1996. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blotting comparisons of purified myofibrils and whole muscle preparations for evaluating titin and nebulin in postmortem bovine muscle. J. Anim. Sci. 74:779-785.
19. Huff-Lonergan, E., W. G. Zhang, and S. M. Lonergan. 2010. Biochemistry of postmortem muscle-Lessons on mechanisms of meat tenderization. Meat Sci. 86:184-195.
20. Johnson, Z. B., J. J. Chewning, and R. A. Nugent. 1999. Genetic parameters for production traits and measures of residual feed intake in Large White swine. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1679-1685.
21. Kim, K. S., N. Larsen, T. Short, G. Plastow, and M. F. Rothschild. 2000. A missense variant of the porcine melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) gene is associated with fatness, growth, and feed intake traits. Mamm. Genome 11:131-135.
22. Lonergan, S. M., E. Huff-Lonergan, and K. J. Prusa. 2002. Sensory and Instrumental Analysis of the Textural Parameters of Pork. Pages 33-38 in 3rd Annual Pork Quality Improvement Symposium, Michigan State University.
23. Lonergan, S. M., E. Huff-Lonergan, L. J. Rowe, D. L. Kuhlers, and S. B. Jungst. 2001a. Selection for lean growth efficiency in Duroc pigs influences pork quality. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2075-2085.
24. Lonergan, S. M., E. Huff-Lonergan, B. R. Wiegand, and L. A. Kriese- Anderson. 2001b. Postmortem proteolysis and tenderization of top loin steaks from Brangus cattle. J. Muscle Foods 12:121-136.
25. Lonergan, S. M., K. J. Stalder, E. Huff-Lonergan, T. J. Knight, R. N. Goodwin, K. J. Prusa, and D. C. Beitz. 2007. Influence of lipid content on pork sensory quality within pH classification. J. Anim. Sci. 85:1074-1079.
26. Melody, J. L., S. M. Lonergan, L. J. Rowe, T. W. Huiatt, M. S. Mayes, and E. Huff-Lonergan. 2004. Early postmortem biochemical factors influence tenderness and water-holding capacity of three porcine muscles. J. Anim. Sci. 82:1195-1205.
27. Nguyen, N. H., C. P. McPhee, and C. M. Wade. 2005. Responses in residual feed intake in lines of Large White pigs selected for growth rate on restricted feeding (measured on ad libitum individual feeding). J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 122:264-270.
28. NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
29. Offer, G., and J. Trinick. 1983. On the mechanism of water holding in meat-The swelling and shrinking of myofibrils. Meat Sci. 8:245-281.
30. Rincker, P. J., J. Killefer, M. Ellis, M. S. Brewer, and F. K. McKeith. 2008. Intramuscular fat content has little influence on the eating quality of fresh pork loin chops. J. Anim. Sci. 86:730-737.
31. Schwab, C. R., T. J. Baas, K. J. Stalder, and J. W. Mabry. 2006. Effect of long-term selection for increased leanness on meat and eating quality traits in Duroc swine. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1577-1583.
32. Zhang, W. G., S. M. Lonergan, M. A. Gardner, and E. Huff-Lonergan. 2006. Contribution of postmortem changes of integrin, desmin and μ-calpain to variation in water holding capacity of pork. Meat Sci. 74:578-585.