Atypical actinobacillosis in bulls in Argentina: Granulomatous dermatitis and lymphadenitis;Uso de probiótico sobre a ativação de células t e controle de salmonella minnesota em frangos de corte

Pesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 11-14

  Lourenço, Mariana C ^a   Kuritza, Leandro N ^a   Westphal, Patrick ^a   Miglino, Leonardo B ^a   Pickler, Larissa ^a   Kraieski, Antonio L ^a   Santin, Elizabeth ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Enterococcus; Immunity; Lactobacillus; Lymphocytes; Probiotics; Salmonella minnesota

Indexed keywords

AVES; BIFIDOBACTERIUM BIFIDUM; ENTEROCOCCUS; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; GALLUS GALLUS; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SUBSP. ENTERICA SEROVAR MINNESOTA; SALMONELLA SP.; STREPTOCOCCUS THERMOPHILUS;

EID: 84875589188     PISSN: 0100736X     EISSN: 16785150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-736X2013000100003     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Asheg A, Levkut M., Revajova V., Sevcikova Z., Kolodzieyski L. & Pistl J. 2002. T lymphocyte subpopulations and B lymphocyte cells in caecum and spleen of chicks infected with Salmonella enteritidis. Acta Histo-chem. 104:435-439.
2. Arstila T.P., Vainio O. & Lassila 0. 1994. Central role of CD4+ T cells in avian immune response. Poult. Sci. 73:1019-1026.
3. Borchers A.T., Selmi C, Meyers F.J., Keen C.L. & Gershwin M.E. 2009. Pro-biotics and immunity. J. Gastroenterol. 44(1)26-46.
4. Brasil 2003. Instrucao Normativa ne 6 publicada em 26 de agosto de 2003. MAPA, Brasília.
5. Chichlowski M., Croom J., McBride B.W., Havenstein G.B. & Koci M.D. 2007. Metabolic and prysiological impact of probiotics or direct-fed-micro- bials on poultry: A brief review of current knowledge. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 6:694-704.
6. Fanelli M.J., Sadler W.W., Franti C.E. & Brownell J.R. 1971. Localization of Salmonellae within the intestinal tract of chickens. Avian Dis. 15(2):366-375.
7. Gaboriau-Routhiau V. & Moreau M.C. 1996. Gut flora allows recovery of oral tolerance to ovalbumin in mice after transient breakdown mediated by cholera toxin or Escherichia coli heat labile enterotoxin. Pediatr. Res. 39:625-629.
8. Gabriel I., Lessire M., Mallet S. & Guillot J.F. 2006. Microflora of the digestive tract: Critical factors and consequences for poultry. World Poult. Sci. J. 62:499-511.
9. Higgins J.P., Higgins S.E., Vicente J.L., Wolfenden A.D., Tellez G. & Hargis B.M. 2007. Temporal Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria Probiotic Culture on Salmonella in Neonatal Broilers. Poult. Sci. 86:1662-1666.
10. Higgins J.P., Higgins S.E., Wolfenden A.D., Henderson S.N., Torres-Rodriguez A., Vicente J.L., Hargis B.M. & Tellez G. 2010. Effect of lactic acid bacteria probiotic culture treatment timing on Salmonella Enteritidis in neonatal broilers. Poult. Sci. 89:243-247.
11. Isolauri E., Sutas Y., Kankaanpaa P., Arvilommi H. & Salminen S. 2001. Pro-biotics: effects on immunity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:444S-450S.
12. Lee K., Lillehoj H.S. & Siragusa G.R. 2010. Direct-Fed Microbials and Their Impact on the Intestinal Microflora and Immune System of Chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 47:106-104.
13. Lillehoj H.S. & Chung K.S. 1992. Postnatal development of T-lymphocyte subpopulations in intestinal intraepithelium and lamina propria in chickens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 31:347-360.
14. Lourenço M.C. 2011. Efeito dos mananoligossacarídeos sobre a resposta imunológica de frangos de corte. Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciências Veterinárias, Curso de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veteriná rias, Univer-sidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR. 55p.
15. Mouni F., Aissi E., Hernandez J., Gorocica P., Bouquelet S., Zenteno E., Lascurain R. & Garfias Y. 2009. Effect of Bifidobacterium bifidum DSM 20082 cytoplasmatic fraction on human imune cells. Immunol. Invest. 38(1):104-115.
16. National Research Concil 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
17. Noujain J.C., Andreatti Filho L., Lima E.T., Okamoto A.S., Amorim R.L. & Torres Neto R. 2008. Detection of T lymphocytes in intestine of broiler chicks treated with Lactobacillus spp. and challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Poult. Sci. 87:927-933.
18. Nurmi E. & Rantala M. 1973. New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature 241:210-211.
19. Revolledo L., Ferreira A.J.P. & Mead G.C. 2006. Prospects in Salmonella control: Competitive exclusion, probiotics and enhancement of avian intestinal immunity. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15:341-351.
20. Voss-Rech D., Vaz C.S.L., Alves L., Coldebella A., Leão J.A., Rodrigues D. & Back A. 2011. Caracterização fenotípica e genotípica de Salmonella spp. isoladas de aviários de frangos de corte no Brasil entre 2009 e 2010. Anais Conferência Facta 2011 de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, Santos, SP. (Resumo)
21. Zou F.C., Jiang Y.P., Nie K., Shang Y.X. & Li H.L. 2006. Dynamic changes of CD4+ and CD8 T lymphocyte subpopulations in blood of chicks infected with Eimeria tenella. Poult. Husbandry Dis. Control 1:4-7.