Multiple Time-Intensity Analysis and Temporal Dominance of Sensations of Chocolate Dairy Dessert Using Prebiotic and Different High-Intensity Sweeteners

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 339-350

  Morais, E C ^a   Pinheiro, A C M ^b   Nunes, C A ^b   Bolini, H M A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF LAVRAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DAIRIES; FOOD ADDITIVES; PEPTIDES; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SUGAR (SUCROSE); SUGAR SUBSTITUTES;

DAIRY DESSERTS; HIGH INTENSITY; MILK CHOCOLATE; MILK POWDER; NOVEL CONCEPT; OFF-FLAVORS; TEMPORAL PROFILE; TIME INTENSITIES;

QUALITY CONTROL;

CELASTRACEAE;

EID: 84924104308     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joss.12115     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abegaz, E.G., Mayhew, D.A., Butchko, H.H., Stargel, W.W., Comer, C.P. and Andress, S.E. 2012. Aspartame. In Alternative Sweeteners, 4th Ed. (L.O.B. Nabors, ed.) pp. 159-180, CRC Press, London, UK.
2. Aidoo, R.P., Depypere, F., Afoakwa, E.O. and Dewettinck, K. 2013. Industrial manufacture of sugar-free chocolates - Applicability of alternative sweeteners and carbohydrate polymers as raw materials in product development. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 32, 84-96.
3. Aidoo, R.P., Afoakwa, E.O. and Dewettinck, K. 2014. Optimization of inulin and polydextrose mixtures as sucrose replacers during sugar-free chocolate manufacture - Rheological, microstructure and physical quality characteristics. J. Food Eng. 126, 35-42.
4. Albert, A., Salvador, A., Schlich, P. and Fiszman, P. 2012. Comparison between temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) and key-attribute sensory profiling for evaluating solid food with contrasting textural layers: Fish sticks. Food Qual. Prefer. 24, 111-118.
5. Alves, L.R., Battochio, J.R. and Cardoso, J.M.P. 2008. Time-intensity profile and internal preference mapping of strawberry jam. J. Sensory Studies 23, 125-135.
6. Arcia, P.L., Costell, E. and Tárrega, A. 2011. Inulin blend as prebiotic and fat replacer in dairy desserts: Optimization by response surface methodology. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 2192-2200.
7. Ares, F., Arrarte, E. and De León, T. 2010. Influence of fibre enrichment declaration on consumers' perception of functional milk desserts. Braz. J. Food Technol. 6° SENSIBER, 106-114.
8. Ares, F., Arrarte, E., De León, T., Ares, G. and Gámbaro, A. 2012. Development of functional milk desserts enriched with resistant starch based on consumers' perception. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 18, 465-475.
9. ASTM. 1999. Standard Guide for Time-Intensity Evaluation of Sensory Attributes, (E-1909) ASTM Book of Standards 15.07. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
10. ASTM. 2013. Standard Guide for Time-Intensity Evaluation of Sensory Attributes, (E1909-13). American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
11. Bolini, H.M.A. 2012. Time-intensity analysis of flavors and tastes TIAF - Institute National of Property Industry. Register INPI 12445-5.
12. Bolini-Cardello, H.M.A., Silva, M.A.A.P. and Damásio, M.H. 1999. Measurement of the relative sweetness of stevia extract, aspartame and cyclamate/saccharin blend as compared to sucrose at different concentrations. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 54, 119-130.
13. Cadena, R.S. and Bolini, H.M.A. 2011. Time-intensity analysis and acceptance test for traditional and light vanilla ice cream. Food Res. Int. 44, 677-683.
14. Cadena, R.S., Cruz, A.G., Netto, R.R., Castro, W.F., Faria, J.A.F. and Bolini, H.M.A. 2013. Sensory profile and physicochemical characteristics of mango nectar sweetened with high intensity sweeteners throughout storage time. Food Res. Int. 54, 1670-1679.
15. Carakostas, M., Prakash, A., Kinghorn, D., Wu, C.D. and Soerjato, D.D. 2012. Steviol glycosides. In Alternative Sweeteners, 4th Ed. (L.O.B. Nabors, ed.) pp. 159-180, CRC Press, London, UK.
16. Damásio, M.H. and Costell, E. 1991. Análisis sensorial descriptivo: Generación de descriptores y selección de catadores. Rev. Agroquím. Tecnol. Aliment. 31, 165-178.
17. Di Monaco, R., Miele, N.A., Picone, D., Mais, P. and Cavella, S. 2013. Taste detection and recognition thresholds of the modified monellin sweetener: MNEI. J. Sensory Studies 28, 25-33.
18. Dijksterhuis, G.B. and Piggott, J.R. 2001. Dynamic methods of sensory analysis. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 11, 284-290.
19. Dinnella, C., Masi, C., Zoboli, G. and Monteleone, E. 2012. Sensory functionality of extra-virgin olive oil in vegetable foods assessed by temporal dominance of sensations and descriptive analysis. Food Qual. Prefer. 26, 141-150.
20. Granato, D., Ribeiro, J.C.B., Castro, I.A. and Masson, M.L. 2010. Sensory evaluation and physicochemical optimisation of soy-based desserts using response surface methodology. Food Chem. 121, 899-906.
21. Granato, D., Masson, M.L. and Ribeiro, J.C.B. 2012. Sensory acceptability and physical stability evaluation of a prebiotic soy-based dessert developed with passion fruit juice. Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment. 32, 119-125.
22. Grotz, V.L., Molinary, S., Peterson, R.C., Quinlan, M.E. and Reo, R. 2012. Sucralose. In Alternative Sweeteners, 4th Ed. (L.O.B. Nabors, ed.) pp. 159-180, CRC Press, London, UK.
23. Guinard, J.X., Zoumas-Morse, C., Mori, L., Uatoni, B., Panyam, D. and Kilara, A. 1997. Sugar and fat effects on sensory properties of ice cream. J. Food Sci. 62, 1087-1094.
24. Harwood, M.L., Ziegler, G.R. and Hayes, J.E. 2013. Tolerance for high flavanol cocoa powder in semisweet chocolate. Nutrients 5, 2258-2267.
25. Heikel, B., Krebs, E., Kohn, E. and Busch-Stockfisch, M. 2012. Optimizing synergism of binary mixtures of selected alternative sweeteners. J. Sensory Studies 27, 295-303.
26. Labbe, D., Schlich, P., Pineau, N., Gilbert, F. and Martin, N. 2009. Temporal dominance of sensations and sensory profiling: A comparative study. Food Qual. Prefer. 20, 216-221.
27. MacFie, H.J., Bratchell, N., Greenhoff, K. and Vallis, L.V. 1989. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effect in halls tests. J. Sensory Studies 4, 129-148.
28. Mayhew, D.A., Meyers, B.I., Stargel, W.W., Comer, C.P., Andress, S.E. and Butchko, H.H. 2012. Neotame. In Alternative Sweeteners, 4th Ed. (L.O.B. Nabors, ed.) pp. 133-150, CRC Press, London, UK.
29. Meilgaard, M., Civille, G.V. and Carr, B.T. 2004. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 4th Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton.
30. Melo, L., Childs, J.L., Drake, M.A., Bolini, H.M.A. and Efraim, P. 2010. Expectations and acceptability of diabetic and reduced-calorie milk chocolates among non-diabetics and diabetics in the U.S.A. J. Sensory Studies 25, 133-152.
31. Moraes, P.C.B.T. and Bolini, H.M.A. 2010. Different sweeteners in beverages prepared with instant and roasted ground coffee: Ideal and equivalent sweetness. J. Sensory Studies 25, 1-11.
32. Morais, E.C., Cruz, A.G. and Bolini, H.M.A. 2013. Gluten-free bread: Multiple time-intensity analysis, physical characterisation and acceptance test. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 48, 2176-2184.
33. Morais, E.C., Morais, A.R., Cruz, A.G. and Bolini, H.M.A. 2014. Development of chocolate dairy dessert with addition of prebiotics and replacement of sucrose with different high intensity sweeteners. J. Dairy Sci. 97, 2600-2609.
34. Nabors, L.O.B. 2012. Alternative Sweeteners, 4th Rev. Ed., CRC Press, London, UK.
35. Nofre, C. and Tinti, J.M. 2000. Neotame, discovery, properties, utility. Food Chem. 69, 245-257.
36. Palazzo, A.B. and Bolini, H.M.A. 2009. Multiple time-intensity analysis and acceptance of raspberry-flavored gelatin. J. Sensory Studies 24, 648-663.
37. Palazzo, A.B. and Bolini, H.M.A. 2014. Multiple time-intensity analysis: Sweetness, bitterness, chocolate flavor and melting rate of chocolate with sucralose, rebaudioside and neotame. J. Sensory Studies 29, 21-32.
38. Palazzo, A.B., Carvalho, M.A.R., Efraim, P. and Bolini, H.M.A. 2011. The determination of isosweetness concentrations of sucralose, rebaudioside and neotame as sucrose substitutes in new diet chocolate formulations using the time-intensity analysis. J. Sensory Studies 26, 291-297.
39. Pineau, N., Cordelle, S., Imbert, A., Rogeaux, M. and Schlich, P. 2003. Dominance temporelle des sensations. Codage et analyse d'un noveau type de données sensorielles. XXXVèmes Journées de Statistiques. 777-780, Lyon.
40. Pineau, N., Schlich, P., Cordelle, S., Mathonnière, C., Issanchou, S., Imbert, A., Rogeaux, M., Etiévant, P. and Koster, E. 2009. Temporal dominance of sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time-intensity. Food Qual. Prefer. 20, 450-455.
41. Pinheiro, A.C.M., Nunes, C.A. and Vietoris, V. 2013. SensoMaker: A tool for sensorial characterization of food products. Ciênc. Agrotec. 37, 199-201.
42. Pinheiro, M.V.S., Oliveira, M.N., Penna, A.L.B. and Tamime, A.Y. 2005. The effect of different sweeteners in low-calorie yogurts - A review. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 58, 193-199.
43. Portmann, M.O. and Kilcast, D. 1996. Psychophysical characterization of new sweeteners of commercial importance for the EC food industry. Food Chem. 56, 291-302.
44. Reis, C.R., Minim, V.P.R., Bolini, H.M.A., Dias, B.R.P., Minim, L.A. and Ceresino, E.B. 2011. Sweetness equivalence of different sweeteners in strawberry-flavored yogurt. J. Food Qual. 34, 163-170.
45. Saint-Eve, A., Déléris, I., Panouillé, M., Dakowski, F., Cordelle, S. and Schlich, P. 2011. How texture influence aroma and taste perception over time in candies? Chemosens. Percept. 4, 32-41.
46. SAS Institute. 2008. SAS User's Guide. Statistics Version 9.1.2 Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
47. Sokolowsky, M. and Fischer, U. 2012. Evaluation of bitterness in white wine applying descriptive analysis, time-intensity analysis, and temporal dominance of sensations analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 732, 46-52.
48. Souza, V.R., Pinheiro, A.C.M., Carneiro, J.D.S., Pinto, S.M., Abreu, L.R. and Menezes, C.C. 2011. Analysis of various sweeteners in petit suisse cheese: Determination of the ideal and equivalent sweetness. J. Sensory Studies 26, 339-345.
49. Souza, V.R., Freire, T.V.M., Saraiva, C.G., Carneiro, J.D.S., Pinheiro, A.C.M. and Nunes, C.A. 2013. Salt equivalence and temporal dominance of sensations of different sodium chloride substitutes in butter. J. Dairy Res. 80, 319-325.
50. Stone, H., Bleibaum, R.N. and Thomas, H.A. 2012. Sensory Evaluation Practices, 4th Ed., Academic Press, New York. 438p.
51. Tárrega, A. and Costell, E. 2007. Colour and consistency of semi-solid dairy desserts: Instrumental and sensory measurements. J. Food Eng. 78, 655-661.
52. Ventanas, S., Puolanne, E. and Tuorila, H. 2010. Temporal changes of flavor and texture in cooked bologna type sausages as affected by fat and salt content. Meat Sci. 85, 410-419.
53. Verbeken, D., Bael, K., Thas, O. and Dewetjinck, K. 2006. Interactions between k-carrageenan, milk proteins and modified starch in sterilized dairy desserts. Int. Dairy J. 16, 482-488.
54. Villegas, B., Carbonell, I. and Costell, E. 2007. Inulin milk beverages: Sensory differences in thickness and creaminess using R-index analysis of the ranking data. J. Sensory Studies 22, 377-393.
55. Walkeling, I.N. and MacFie, J.H. 1995. Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of k samples from t may be tested. Food Qual. Prefer. 6, 299-308.
56. Wiet, S.G., Ketelsen, S.M., Davis, T.R. and Beyts, P.K. 1993. Fat concentration affects sweetness and sensory profiles of sucrose, sucralose, and aspartame. J. Food Sci. 58, 599-666.