Identification of novel DNA-damage tolerance genes reveals regulation of translesion DNA synthesis by nucleophosmin

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Ziv, Omer ^a   Zeisel, Amit ^a   Mirlas Neisberg, Nataly ^a   Swain, Umakanta ^a   Nevo, Reinat ^a   Ben Chetrit, Nir ^a   Martelli, Maria Paola ^b   Rossi, Roberta ^b   Schiesser, Stefan ^c   Canman, Christine E ^d   Carell, Thomas ^c   Geacintov, Nicholas E ^e   Falini, Brunangelo ^b   Domany, Eytan ^a   Livneh, Zvi ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE ETA; NUCLEOPHOSMIN; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

BIODEGRADATION; DNA; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; MUTATION; RECOMBINATION; TOLERANCE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA ADDUCT; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DEGRADATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA SYNTHESIS; EXCISION REPAIR; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NUCLEOLAR LOCALIZATION SIGNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; TRANSLESION DNA SYNTHESIS; ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATION; ACUTE MYELOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA; CELL LINE; DNA REPLICATION; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; RADIATION RESPONSE; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

MAMMALIA;

CELL LINE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; HUMANS; LEUKEMIA, MYELOID, ACUTE; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 84923358777     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6437     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Friedberg, E. C. et al. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis (ASM Press, 2006).
2. Lehmann, A. R. & Fuchs, R. P. Gaps and forks in DNA replication: rediscovering old models. DNA Repair 5, 1595-1498 (2006).
3. Friedberg, E. C. Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 943-953 (2005).
4. Prakash, S., Johnson, R. E. & Prakash, L. Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 317-353 (2005).
5. Livneh, Z., Ziv, O. & Shachar, S. Multiple two-polymerase mechanisms in mammalian translesion DNA synthesis. Cell Cycle 9, 729-735 (2010).
6. Sale, J. E., Lehmann, A. R. & Woodgate, R. Y-family DNA polymerases and their role in tolerance of cellular DNA damage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 141-152 (2012).
7. Sutton, M. D. & Walker, G. C. Managing DNA polymerases: coordinating DNA replication, DNA repair, and DNA recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8342-8349 (2001).
8. Izhar, L., Ziv, O., Cohen, I. S., Geacintov, N. & Livneh, Z. Genomic assay reveals tolerance of DNA damage by both translesion DNA synthesis and homology-dependent repair in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E1462-E1469 (2013).
9. Berdichevsky, A., Izhar, L. & Livneh, Z. Error-free recombinational repair predominates over mutagenic translesion replication in E. coli. Mol. Cell 10, 917-924 (2002).
10. Adar, S., Hendel, A., Geacintov, N. & Livneh, Z. Repair of gaps opposite lesions by homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5737-5748 (2009).
11. Blastyak, A., Hajdu, I., Unk, I. & Haracska, L. Role of double-stranded DNA translocase activity of human HLTF in replication of damaged DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 684-693 (2010).
12. Branzei, D. & Foiani, M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 208-219 (2010).
13. Pages, V., Mazon, G., Naiman, K., Philippin, G. & Fuchs, R. P. Monitoring bypass of single replication-blocking lesions by damage avoidance in the Escherichia coli chromosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 9036-9043 (2012).
14. Masutani, C. et al. The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase eta. Nature 399, 700-704 (1999).
15. Johnson, R. E., Kondratick, C. M., Prakash, S. & Prakash, L. hRAD30 mutations in the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum. Science 285, 263-265 (1999).
16. Johnson, R. E., Washington, M. T., Haracska, L., Prakash, S. & Prakash, L. Eukaryotic polymerases i and z act sequentially to bypass DNA lesions. Nature 406, 1015-1019 (2000).
17. Shachar, S. et al. Two-polymerase mechanisms dictate error-free and errorprone translesion DNA synthesis in mammals. EMBO J. 28, 383-393 (2009).
18. Hoege, C., Pfander, B., Moldovan, G. L., Pyrowolakis, G. & Jentsch, S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419, 135-141 (2002).
19. Kannouche, P. L., Wing, J. & Lehmann, A. R. Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 14, 491-500 (2004).
20. Watanabe, K. et al. Rad18 guides pol eta to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination. EMBO J. 23, 3886-3896 (2004).
21. Mosbech, A. et al. DVC1 (C1orf124) is a DNA damage-targeting p97 adaptor that promotes ubiquitin-dependent responses to replication blocks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1084-1092 (2012).
22. Davis, E. J. et al. DVC1 (C1orf124) recruits the p97 protein segregase to sites of DNA damage. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1093-1100 (2012).
23. Hendel, A. et al. PCNA ubiquitination is important, but not essential for translesion DNA synthesis in mammalian cells. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002262 (2011).
24. Huang, T. T. et al. Regulation of monoubiquitinated PCNA by DUB autocleavage. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 339-347 (2006).
25. Karras, G. I. & Jentsch, S. The RAD6 DNA damage tolerance pathway operates uncoupled from the replication fork and is functional beyond S phase. Cell 141, 255-267 (2010).
26. Daigaku, Y., Davies, A. A. & Ulrich, H. D. Ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is separable from genome replication. Nature 465, 951-955 (2010).
27. Diamant, N. et al. DNA damage bypass operates in the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle and exhibits differential mutagenicity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 170-180 (2012).
28. Gohler, T., Sabbioneda, S., Green, C. M. & Lehmann, A. R. ATR-mediated phosphorylation of DNA polymerase eta is needed for efficient recovery from UV damage. J. Cell Biol. 192, 219-227 (2011).
29. Yamada, M. et al. ATR-Chk1-APC/CCdh1-dependent stabilization of Cdc7-ASK (Dbf4) kinase is required for DNA lesion bypass under replication stress. Genes Dev. 27, 2459-2472 (2013).
30. Mansilla, S. F. et al. UV-triggered p21 degradation facilitates damaged-DNA replication and preserves genomic stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 6942-6951 (2013).
31. Soria, G., Podhajcer, O. & Gottifredi, V. P21Cip1/WAF1 downregulation is required for efficient PCNA ubiquitination after UV irradiation. Oncogene 25, 2829-2838 (2006).
32. Avkin, S. et al. p53 and p21 regulate error-prone DNA repair to yield a lower mutation load. Mol. Cell 22, 407-413 (2006).
33. Albertella, M. R., Green, C. M., Lehmann, A. R. & O'Connor, M. J. A role for polymerase eta in the cellular tolerance to cisplatin-induced damage. Cancer Res. 65, 9799-9806 (2005).
34. Doles, J. et al. Suppression of Rev3, the catalytic subunit of Pol{zeta}, sensitizes drug-resistant lung tumors to chemotherapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20786-20791 (2010).
35. Wu, F., Lin, X., Okuda, T. & Howell, S. B. DNA polymerase zeta regulates cisplatin cytotoxicity, mutagenicity, and the rate of development of cisplatin resistance. Cancer Res. 64, 8029-8035 (2004).
36. Xie, K., Doles, J., Hemann, M. T. & Walker, G. C. Error-prone translesion synthesis mediates acquired chemoresistance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20792-20797 (2010).
37. Zhao, Y. et al. Structural basis of human DNA polymerase eta-mediated chemoresistance to cisplatin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7269-7274 (2012).
38. Ziv, O., Geacintov, N., Nakajima, S., Yasui, A. & Livneh, Z. DNA polymerase zeta cooperates with polymerases kappa and iota in translesion DNA synthesis across pyrimidine photodimers in cells from XPV patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11552-11557 (2009).
39. Avkin, S. et al. Quantitative analysis of translesion DNA synthesis across a benzo[a]pyrene-guanine adduct in mammalian cells. The Role of DNA polymerase k. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 53298-53305 (2004).
40. Falini, B. et al. Cytoplasmic nucleophosmin in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 254-266 (2005).
41. Grisendi, S., Mecucci, C., Falini, B. & Pandolfi, P. P. Nucleophosmin and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 493-505 (2006).
42. Wu, M. H., Chang, J. H. & Yung, B. Y. Resistance to UV-induced cell-killing in nucleophosmin/B23 over-expressed NIH 3T3 fibroblasts: enhancement of DNA repair and up-regulation of PCNA in association with nucleophosmin/B23 over-expression. Carcinogenesis 23, 93-100 (2002).
43. Federici, L. & Falini, B. Nucleophosmin mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: a tale of protein unfolding and mislocalization. Protein Sci. 22, 545-556 (2013).
44. Dohner, K. et al. Mutant nucleophosmin (NPM1) predicts favorable prognosis in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: interaction with other gene mutations. Blood 106, 3740-3746 (2005).
45. Schnittger, S. et al. Nucleophosmin gene mutations are predictors of favorable prognosis in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype. Blood 106, 3733-3739 (2005).
46. Wang, W., Budhu, A., Forgues, M. & Wang, X. W. Temporal and spatial control of nucleophosmin by the Ran-Crm1 complex in centrosome duplication. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 823-830 (2005).
47. Kim, J. M. et al. Inactivation of murine Usp1 results in genomic instability and a Fanconi anemia phenotype. Dev. Cell 16, 314-320 (2009).
48. Yang, K., Moldovan, G. L. & D'Andrea, A. D. RAD18-dependent recruitment of SNM1A to DNA repair complexes by a ubiquitin-binding zinc finger. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 19085-19091 (2010).
49. Kim, H., Yang, K., Dejsuphong, D. & D'Andrea, A. D. Regulation of Rev1 by the Fanconi anemia core complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 164-170 (2012).
50. Falbo, K. B. et al. Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1167-1172 (2009).
51. Papamichos-Chronakis, M. & Peterson, C. L. The Ino80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme regulates replisome function and stability. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 338-345 (2008).
52. Pothof, J. et al. Identification of genes that protect the C. elegans genome against mutations by genome-wide RNAi. Genes Dev. 17, 443-448 (2003).
53. Centore, R. C., Yazinski, S. A., Tse, A. & Zou, L. Spartan/C1orf124, a reader of PCNA ubiquitylation and a regulator of UV-induced DNA damage response. Mol. Cell 46, 625-635 (2012).
54. Ogami, K., Cho, R. & Hoshino, S. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel isoform of the non-canonical poly(A) polymerase PAPD7. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 432, 135-140 (2013).
55. Grisendi, S. et al. Role of nucleophosmin in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. Nature 437, 147-153 (2005).
56. Kurki, S. et al. Nucleolar protein NPM interacts with HDM2 and protects tumor suppressor protein p53 from HDM2-mediated degradation. Cancer Cell 5, 465-475 (2004).
57. Vascotto, C. et al. Functional regulation of the apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 by nucleophosmin: impact on tumor biology. Oncogene 33, 2876-2887 (2013).
58. Xia, X. et al. An IKKalpha-nucleophosmin axis utilizes inflammatory signaling to promote genome integrity. Cell Rep. 5, 1243-1255 (2013).
59. Jung, Y. S., Qian, Y. & Chen, X. DNA polymerase eta is targeted by Mdm2 for polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation in response to ultraviolet irradiation. DNA Repair 11, 177-184 (2012).
60. Kim, S. H. & Michael, W. M. Regulated proteolysis of DNA polymerase eta during the DNA-damage response in C. elegans. Mol. Cell 32, 757-766 (2008).
61. Jung, Y. S., Liu, G. & Chen, X. Pirh2 E3 ubiquitin ligase targets DNA polymerase eta for 20S proteasomal degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 1041-1048 (2010).
62. Sekimoto, T. et al. The molecular chaperone Hsp90 regulates accumulation of DNA polymerase eta at replication stalling sites in UV-irradiated cells. Mol. Cell 37, 79-89 (2010).
63. Chen, Y. W., Cleaver, J. E., Hanaoka, F., Chang, C. F. & Chou, K. M. A novel role of DNA polymerase eta in modulating cellular sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. Mol. Cancer Res. 4, 257-265 (2006).
64. Moraes, M. C. et al. Both XPA and DNA polymerase eta are necessary for the repair of doxorubicin-induced DNA lesions. Cancer Lett. 314, 108-118 (2012).
65. Lew, Q. J. et al. NPMc(+) AML cell line shows differential protein expression and lower sensitivity to DNA-damaging and p53-inducing anticancer compounds. Cell Cycle 10, 1978-1987 (2011).
66. Ziv, O., Diamant, N., Shachar, S., Hendel, A. & Livneh, Z. Quantitative measurement of translesion DNA synthesis in mammalian cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 920, 529-542 (2012).
67. Zeisel, A., Amir, A., Kostler, W. J. & Domany, E. Intensity dependent estimation of noise in microarrays improves detection of differentially expressed genes. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 400 (2010).
68. Kamentsky, L. et al. Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software. Bioinformatics 27, 1179-1180 (2011).