DNA damage bypass operates in the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle and exhibits differential mutagenicity

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 170-180

  Diamant, Noam ^a   Hendel, Ayal ^a   Vered, Ilan ^a   Carell, Thomas ^b   Reißner, Thomas ^b   De Wind, Niels ^c   Geacinov, Nicholas ^d   Livneh, Zvi ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; DNA POLYMERASE; DNA POLYMERASE REV1; DNA POLYMERASE ZETA; PROTEIN ANTIBODY; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CANCER CELL CULTURE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA SYNTHESIS; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MOUSE; MUTAGENICITY; NONHUMAN; OSTEOSARCOMA CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSLESION DNA SYNTHESIS; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELLS, CULTURED; DNA; DNA DAMAGE; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; G2 PHASE; HUMANS; MICE; MUTAGENESIS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASES; REPLICATION PROTEIN A; S PHASE; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 84855283994     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr596     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Prakash, S., Johnson, R.E. and Prakash, L. (2005) Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 74, 317-353. (Pubitemid 40995510)
2. Livneh, Z., Ziv, O. and Shachar, S. (2010) Multiple two-polymerase mechanisms in mammalian translesion DNA synthesis. Cell Cycle, 9, 729-735.
3. Friedberg, E.C., Walker, G.C., Siede, W., Wood, R.D., Schultz, R.A. and Ellenberger, T. (2006) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, 2nd edn. ASM Press, WA.
4. Yang, W. and Woodgate, R. (2007) What a difference a decade makes: Insights into translesion synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 15591-15598. (Pubitemid 350035345)
5. Masutani, C., Kusumoto, R., Yamada, A., Dohmae, N., Yokoi, M., Yuasa, M., Araki, M., Iwai, S., Takio, K. and Hanaoka, F. (1999) The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase eta. Nature, 399, 700-704. (Pubitemid 29289067)
6. Johnson, R.E., Kondratick, C.M., Prakash, S. and Prakash, L. (1999) hRAD30 mutations in the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum. Science, 285, 263-265. (Pubitemid 29330001)
7. Ohmori, H., Friedberg, E.C., Fuchs, R.P.P., Goodman, M.F., Hanaoka, F., Hinkle, D., Kunkel, T.A., Lawrence, C.W., Livneh, Z., Nohmi, T. et al. (2001) The Y-family of DNA polymerases. Mol. Cell, 8, 7-8. (Pubitemid 32772900)
8. Shachar, S., Ziv, O., Avkin, S., Adar, S., Wittschieben, J., Reissner, T., Chaney, S., Friedberg, E.C., Wang, Z., Carell, T. et al. (2009) Two-polymerase mechanisms dictate error-free and error-prone translesion DNA synthesis in mammals. EMBO J, 28, 383-393.
9. Johnson, R.E., Washington, M.T., Haracska, L., Prakash, S. and Prakash, L. (2000) Eukaryotic polymerases i and z act sequentially to bypass DNA lesions. Nature, 406, 1015-1019.
10. Yoon, J.H., Prakash, L. and Prakash, S. (2009) Highly error-free role of DNA polymerase eta in the replicative bypass of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers in mouse and human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 18219-18224.
11. Hoege, C., Pfander, B., Moldovan, G.L., Pyrowolakis, G. and Jentsch, S. (2002) RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature, 419, 135-141. (Pubitemid 35025438)
12. Stelter, P. and Ulrich, H.D. (2003) Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature, 425, 188-191. (Pubitemid 37150898)
13. Kannouche, P.L., Wing, J. and Lehmann, A.R. (2004) Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell, 14, 491-500. (Pubitemid 38648802)
14. Avkin, S., Sevilya, Z., Toube, L., Geacintov, N.E., Chaney, S.G., Oren, M. and Livneh, Z. (2006) p53 and p21 regulate error-prone DNA repair to yield a lower mutation load. Mol. Cell, 22, 407-413.
15. Friedberg, E.C., Lehmann, A.R. and Fuchs, R.P. (2005) Trading places: how do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis? Mol. Cell, 18, 499-505. (Pubitemid 40726227)
16. Rupp, W.D. and Howard-Flanders, P. (1968) Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J. Mol. Biol., 31, 291-304.
17. Lopes, M., Foiani, M. and Sogo, J.M. (2006) Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol. Cell, 21, 15-27. (Pubitemid 43017845)
18. Jansen, J.G., Tsaalbi-Shtylik, A., Hendriks, G., Gali, H., Hendel, A., Johansson, F., Erixon, K., Livneh, Z., Mullenders, L.H., Haracska, L. et al. (2009) Separate domains of Rev1 mediate two modes of DNA damage bypass in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol., 29, 3113-3123.
19. Torres-Ramos, C.A., Prakash, S. and Prakash, L. (2002) Requirement of RAD5 and MMS2 for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol., 22, 2419-2426. (Pubitemid 34224644)
20. Karras, G.I. and Jentsch, S. (2010) The RAD6 DNA damage tolerance pathway operates uncoupled from the replication fork and is functional beyond S phase. Cell, 141, 255-267.
21. Daigaku, Y., Davies, A.A. and Ulrich, H.D. (2010) Ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is separable from genome replication. Nature, 465, 951-955.
22. Avkin, S., Goldsmith, M., Velasco-Miguel, S., Geacintov, N., Friedberg, E.C. and Livneh, Z. (2004) Quantitative analysis of translesion DNA synthesis across a benzo[a]pyrene-guanine adduct in mammalian cells. The Role of DNA polymerase k. J. Biol. Chem., 279, 53298-53305. (Pubitemid 40051834)
23. Poltoratsky, V., Horton, J.K., Prasad, R. and Wilson, S.H. (2005) REV1 mediated mutagenesis in base excision repair deficient mouse fibroblast. DNA Repair, 4, 1182-1188. (Pubitemid 41316595)
24. Dart, D.A., Adams, K.E., Akerman, I. and Lakin, N.D. (2004) Recruitment of the cell cycle checkpoint kinase ATR to chromatin during S-phase. J. Biol. Chem., 279, 16433-16440. (Pubitemid 38509341)
25. Lehmann, A.R. and Fuchs, R.P. (2006) Gaps and forks in DNA Replication: Rediscovering old models. DNA Repair, 5, 1595-1498.
26. Jazayeri, A., Falck, J., Lukas, C., Bartek, J., Smith, G.C., Lukas, J. and Jackson, S.P. (2006) ATM-and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol., 8, 37-45. (Pubitemid 43064795)
27. Richard, D.J., Bolderson, E. and Khanna, K.K. (2009) Multiple human single-stranded DNA binding proteins function in genome maintenance: structural, biochemical and functional analysis. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 44, 98-116.
28. Boutros, R. and Ducommun, B. (2008) Asymmetric localization of the CDC25B phosphatase to the mother centrosome during interphase. Cell Cycle, 7, 401-406. (Pubitemid 351366504)
29. Jansen, J.G., Tsaalbi-Shtylik, A., Hendriks, G., Verspuy, J., Gali, H., Haracska, L. and de Wind, N. (2009) Mammalian polymerase zeta is essential for post-replication repair of UV-induced DNA lesions. DNA Repair, 8, 1444-1451.
30. Guo, C., Fischhaber, P.L., Luk-Paszyc, M.J., Masuda, Y., Zhou, J., Kamiya, K., Kisker, C. and Friedberg, E.C. (2003) Mouse Rev1 protein interacts with multiple DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis. EMBO J., 22, 6621-6630. (Pubitemid 38009608)
31. Waters, L.S. and Walker, G.C. (2006) The critical mutagenic translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 is highly expressed during G(2)/M phase rather than S phase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 8971-8976. (Pubitemid 43902518)
32. Moldovan, G.L., Pfander, B. and Jentsch, S. (2007) PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell, 129, 665-679. (Pubitemid 46802385)
33. Ziv, O., Geacintov, N., Nakajima, S., Yasui, A. and Livneh, Z. (2009) DNA polymerase zeta cooperates with polymerases kappa and iota in translesion DNA synthesis across pyrimidine photodimers in cells from XPV patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 11552-11557.
34. Hendel, A., Ziv, O., Gueranger, Q., Geacintov, N. and Livneh, Z. (2008) Reduced fidelity and increased efficiency of translesion DNA synthesis across a TT cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer, but not a TT 6-4 photoproduct, in human cells lacking DNA polymerase eta. DNA Repair, 7, 1636-1646.
35. Gentil, A., Le Page, F., Margot, A., Lawrence, C.W., Borden, A. and Sarasin, A. (1996) Mutagenicity of a unique thymine-thymine dimer or thymine-thymine pyrimidine pyrimidone (6-4) photoproduct in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res., 24, 1837-1840. (Pubitemid 26156065)
36. Berdichevsky, A., Izhar, L. and Livneh, Z. (2002) Error-free recombinational repair predominates over mutagenic translesion replication in E. coli. Mol. Cell, 10, 917-924. (Pubitemid 35335645)
37. Izhar, L., Goldsmith, M., Dahan, R., Geacintov, N., Lloyd, R.G. and Livneh, Z. (2008) Analysis of strand transfer and template switching mechanisms in Escherichia coli: Predominance of strand transfer. J. Mol. Biol., 381, 803-809.
38. Adar, S., Hendel, A., Geacintov, N. and Livneh, Z. (2009) Repair of gaps opposite lesions by homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, 5737-5748.
39. Branzei, D. and Foiani, M. (2010) Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 11, 208-219.
40. Zhang, H. and Lawrence, C.W. (2005) The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 15954-15959. (Pubitemid 41552849)
41. Gan, G.N., Wittschieben, J.P., Wittschieben, B.O. and Wood, R.D. (2008) DNA polymerase zeta (pol zeta) in higher eukaryotes. Cell Res., 18, 174-183.
42. Ogi, T., Limsirichaikul, S., Overmeer, R.M., Volker, M., Takenaka, K., Cloney, R., Nakazawa, Y., Niimi, A., Miki, Y., Jaspers, N.G. et al. (2010) Three DNA polymerases, recruited by different mechanisms, carry out NER repair synthesis in human cells. Mol. Cell, 37, 714-727.
43. Stamatoyannopoulos, J.A., Adzhubei, I., Thurman, R.E., Kryukov, G.V., Mirkin, S.M. and Sunyaev, S.R. (2009) Human mutation rate associated with DNA replication timing. Nat. Genet., 41, 393-395.
44. Lang, G.I. and Murray, A.W. (2011) Mutation rates across budding yeast Chromosome VI are correlated with replication timing. Genome Biol. Evol., Epub ahead of print, doi:10.1093/gbe/ evr054.
45. Heller, R.C. and Marians, K.J. (2006) Replication fork reactivation downstream of a blocked nascent leading strand. Nature, 439, 557-562. (Pubitemid 43185374)
46. Langston, L.D. and O'Donnell, M. (2006) DNA replication: keep moving and don't mind the gap. Mol. Cell, 23, 155-160. (Pubitemid 44062369)
47. Elvers, I., Johansson, F., Groth, P., Erixon, K. and Helleday, T. (2011) UV stalled replication forks restart by re-priming in human fibroblasts. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, 1360-1371.