On the move: Organelle dynamics during mitosis

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 112-124

  Jongsma, Marlieke L M ^a,b   Berlin, Ilana ^a   Neefjes, Jacques ^a  

^a NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^b SANQUIN RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Endosomes; ER; Intracellular compartments; Mitochondria; Mitosis; Organelle inheritance

Indexed keywords

AUTOPHAGOSOME; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIVISION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL ORGANELLE; CELL STRUCTURE; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DNA REPLICATION; ENDOCYTOSIS; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; ENDOSOME; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; GENETIC ORGANIZATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; GOLGI COMPLEX; INHERITANCE; INTRACELLULAR MEMBRANE; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; MAMMAL CELL; MITOCHONDRION; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PEROXISOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEGREGATION ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TRANS GOLGI NETWORK; ANIMAL; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL;

MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; CELL MEMBRANE; ENDOCYTOSIS; HUMANS; MITOSIS; ORGANELLES;

EID: 84923282192     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.10.005     Document Type: Review

References (136)

1. Foley E.A., Kapoor T.M. Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14:25-37.
2. Elia N., et al. Dynamics of endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery during cytokinesis and its role in abscission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:4846-4851.
3. Menendez-Benito V., et al. Spatiotemporal analysis of organelle and macromolecular complex inheritance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:175-180.
4. Reits E., et al. Peptide diffusion, protection, and degradation in nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments before antigen presentation by MHC class I. Immunity 2003, 18:97-108.
5. Cronshaw J.M., et al. Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158:915-927.
6. Wente S.R. Gatekeepers of the nucleus. Science 2000, 288:1374-1377.
7. Hu J., et al. Membrane proteins of the endoplasmic reticulum induce high-curvature tubules. Science 2008, 319:1247-1250.
8. Voeltz G.K., et al. A class of membrane proteins shaping the tubular endoplasmic reticulum. Cell 2006, 124:573-586.
9. Shibata Y., et al. Mechanisms determining the morphology of the peripheral ER. Cell 2010, 143:774-788.
10. English A.R., et al. Peripheral ER structure and function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:596-602.
11. Wray S., Burdyga T. Sarcoplasmic reticulum function in smooth muscle. Physiol Rev. 2010, 90:113-178.
12. Barlowe C. COPII-dependent transport from the endoplasmic reticulum. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2002, 14:417-422.
13. Puhka M., et al. Endoplasmic reticulum remains continuous and undergoes sheet-to-tubule transformation during cell division in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179:895-909.
14. Lu L., et al. Cisternal organization of the endoplasmic reticulum during mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20:3471-3480.
15. Poteryaev D., et al. Involvement of the actin cytoskeleton and homotypic membrane fusion in ER dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:2139-2153.
16. Puhka M., et al. Progressive sheet-to-tubule transformation is a general mechanism for endoplasmic reticulum partitioning in dividing mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23:2424-2432.
17. Daigle N., et al. Nuclear pore complexes form immobile networks and have a very low turnover in live mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 154:71-84.
18. Reits E.A., et al. Dynamics of proteasome distribution in living cells. EMBO J. 1997, 16:6087-6094.
19. Ellenberg J., et al. Nuclear membrane dynamics and reassembly in living cells: targeting of an inner nuclear membrane protein in interphase and mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 138:1193-1206.
20. Yang L., et al. Integral membrane proteins of the nuclear envelope are dispersed throughout the endoplasmic reticulum during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 137:1199-1210.
21. Brachner A., Foisner R. Evolvement of LEM proteins as chromatin tethers at the nuclear periphery. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2011, 39:1735-1741.
22. Gorjanacz M., et al. Caenorhabditis elegans BAF-1 and its kinase VRK-1 participate directly in post-mitotic nuclear envelope assembly. EMBO J. 2007, 26:132-143.
23. Nichols R.J., et al. The vaccinia-related kinases phosphorylate the N' terminus of BAF, regulating its interaction with DNA and its retention in the nucleus. Mol. Biol. Cell 2006, 17:2451-2464.
24. Molitor T.P., Traktman P. Depletion of the protein kinase VRK1 disrupts nuclear envelope morphology and leads to BAF retention on mitotic chromosomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 2014, 25:891-903.
25. Vedrenne C., et al. Phosphorylation controls CLIMP-63-mediated anchoring of the endoplasmic reticulum to microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:1928-1937.
26. Schlaitz A.L., et al. REEP3/4 ensure endoplasmic reticulum clearance from metaphase chromatin and proper nuclear envelope architecture. Dev. Cell 2013, 26:315-323.
27. Smyth J.T., et al. Phosphoregulation of STIM1 leads to exclusion of the endoplasmic reticulum from the mitotic spindle. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:1487-1493.
28. Anderson D.J., Hetzer M.W. Shaping the endoplasmic reticulum into the nuclear envelope. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121:137-142.
29. Lu L., et al. Formation of the postmitotic nuclear envelope from extended ER cisternae precedes nuclear pore assembly. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 194:425-440.
30. Asencio C., et al. Coordination of kinase and phosphatase activities by Lem4 enables nuclear envelope reassembly during mitosis. Cell 2012, 150:122-135.
31. Vagnarelli P., et al. Repo-Man coordinates chromosomal reorganization with nuclear envelope reassembly during mitotic exit. Dev. Cell 2011, 21:328-342.
32. Fischle W., et al. Regulation of HP1-chromatin binding by histone H3 methylation and phosphorylation. Nature 2005, 438:1116-1122.
33. Ye Q., et al. Domain-specific interactions of human HP1-type chromodomain proteins and inner nuclear membrane protein LBR. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:14983-14989.
34. Dultz E., et al. Systematic kinetic analysis of mitotic dis- and reassembly of the nuclear pore in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 180:857-865.
35. Fichtman B., et al. Inner/outer nuclear membrane fusion in nuclear pore assembly: biochemical demonstration and molecular analysis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:4197-4211.
36. Macaulay C., Forbes D.J. Assembly of the nuclear pore: biochemically distinct steps revealed with NEM, GTP gamma S, and BAPTA. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 132:5-20.
37. Walther T.C., et al. RanGTP mediates nuclear pore complex assembly. Nature 2003, 424:689-694.
38. Dultz E., Ellenberg J. Live imaging of single nuclear pores reveals unique assembly kinetics and mechanism in interphase. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191:15-22.
39. Helle S.C., et al. Organization and function of membrane contact sites. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1833:2526-2541.
40. 2+ and cholesterol at the endosome-ER interface. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127:929-938.
41. Rocha N., et al. Cholesterol sensor ORP1L contacts the ER protein VAP to control Rab7-RILP-p150 Glued and late endosome positioning. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 185:1209-1225.
42. Preuss D., et al. Characterization of the Saccharomyces Golgi complex through the cell cycle by immunoelectron microscopy. Mol. Biol. Cell 1992, 3:789-803.
43. He C.Y. Golgi biogenesis in simple eukaryotes. Cell. Microbiol. 2007, 9:566-572.
44. Segui-Simarro J.M., Staehelin L.A. Cell cycle-dependent changes in Golgi stacks, vacuoles, clathrin-coated vesicles and multivesicular bodies in meristematic cells of Arabidopsis thaliana: a quantitative and spatial analysis. Planta 2006, 223:223-236.
45. Kornfeld R., Kornfeld S. Assembly of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1985, 54:631-664.
46. Yadav S., et al. A primary role for Golgi positioning in directed secretion, cell polarity, and wound healing. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20:1728-1736.
47. Acharya U., et al. Signaling via mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK1) is required for Golgi fragmentation during mitosis. Cell 1998, 92:183-192.
48. Sutterlin C., et al. Polo-like kinase is required for the fragmentation of pericentriolar Golgi stacks during mitosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:9128-9132.
49. Hidalgo C.C., et al. Mitotic Golgi partitioning is driven by the membrane-fissioning protein CtBP3/BARS. Science 2004, 305:93-96.
50. Sutterlin C., et al. Fragmentation and dispersal of the pericentriolar Golgi complex is required for entry into mitosis in mammalian cells. Cell 2002, 109:359-369.
51. Liberali P., et al. The closure of Pak1-dependent macropinosomes requires the phosphorylation of CtBP1/BARS. EMBO J. 2008, 27:970-981.
52. Colanzi A., et al. The Golgi mitotic checkpoint is controlled by BARS-dependent fission of the Golgi ribbon into separate stacks in G2. EMBO J. 2007, 26:2465-2476.
53. Farmaki T., et al. Forward and retrograde trafficking in mitotic animal cells. ER-Golgi transport arrest restricts protein export from the ER into COPII-coated structures. J. Cell Sci. 1999, 112:589-600.
54. Featherstone C., et al. Newly synthesized G protein of vesicular stomatitis virus is not transported to the Golgi complex in mitotic cells. J. Cell Biol. 1985, 101:2036-2046.
55. Xiang Y., et al. Active ADP-ribosylation factor-1 (ARF1) is required for mitotic Golgi fragmentation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:21829-21837.
56. Altan-Bonnet N., et al. A role for Arf1 in mitotic Golgi disassembly, chromosome segregation, and cytokinesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:13314-13319.
57. Zaal K.J., et al. Golgi membranes are absorbed into and reemerge from the ER during mitosis. Cell 1999, 99:589-601.
58. Altan-Bonnet N., et al. Golgi inheritance in mammalian cells is mediated through endoplasmic reticulum export activities. Mol. Biol. Cell 2006, 17:990-1005.
59. Kano F., et al. Cdc2 kinase-dependent disassembly of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) exit sites inhibits ER-to-Golgi vesicular transport during mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15:4289-4298.
60. Prescott A.R., et al. Evidence for prebudding arrest of ER export in animal cell mitosis and its role in generating Golgi partitioning intermediates. Traffic 2001, 2:321-335.
61. Lippincott-Schwartz J., et al. Rapid redistribution of Golgi proteins into the ER in cells treated with brefeldin A: evidence for membrane cycling from Golgi to ER. Cell 1989, 56:801-813.
62. Seemann J., et al. Partitioning of the matrix fraction of the Golgi apparatus during mitosis in animal cells. Science 2002, 295:848-851.
63. Axelsson M.A., Warren G. Rapid, endoplasmic reticulum-independent diffusion of the mitotic Golgi haze. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15:1843-1852.
64. Puri S., et al. Dispersal of Golgi matrix proteins during mitotic Golgi disassembly. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117:451-456.
65. Shima D.T., et al. An ordered inheritance strategy for the Golgi apparatus: visualization of mitotic disassembly reveals a role for the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 141:955-966.
66. Jesch S.A., et al. Mitotic Golgi is in a dynamic equilibrium between clustered and free vesicles independent of the ER. Traffic 2001, 2:873-884.
67. Pecot M.Y., Malhotra V. Golgi membranes remain segregated from the endoplasmic reticulum during mitosis in mammalian cells. Cell 2004, 116:99-107.
68. Wei J.H., Seemann J. The mitotic spindle mediates inheritance of the Golgi ribbon structure. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:391-397.
69. Gaietta G.M., et al. Golgi twins in late mitosis revealed by genetically encoded tags for live cell imaging and correlated electron microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:17777-17782.
70. Jokitalo E., et al. Golgi clusters and vesicles mediate mitotic inheritance independently of the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 154:317-330.
71. Henne W.M., et al. The ESCRT pathway. Dev. Cell 2011, 21:77-91.
72. Neefjes J., et al. Towards a systems understanding of MHC class I and MHC class II antigen presentation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11:823-836.
73. Wubbolts R., et al. Direct vesicular transport of MHC class II molecules from lysosomal structures to the cell surface. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 135:611-622.
74. Bonifacino J.S., Rojas R. Retrograde transport from endosomes to the trans-Golgi network. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:568-579.
75. Rohn W.M., et al. Bi-directional trafficking between the trans-Golgi network and the endosomal/lysosomal system. J. Cell Sci. 2000, 113:2093-2101.
76. Metcalf D.J., et al. Formation and function of Weibel-Palade bodies. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121:19-27.
77. Wasmeier C., et al. Melanosomes at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121:3995-3999.
78. Jenkins M.R., Griffiths G.M. The synapse and cytolytic machinery of cytotoxic T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2010, 22:308-313.
79. Underhill D.M., Goodridge H.S. Information processing during phagocytosis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 12:492-502.
80. Fawcett D.W. Surface specializations of absorbing cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1965, 13:75-91.
81. Schweitzer J.K., et al. Endocytosis resumes during late mitosis and is required for cytokinesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:41628-41635.
82. Warren G., et al. Recycling of transferrin receptors in A431 cells is inhibited during mitosis. EMBO J. 1984, 3:2217-2225.
83. Boucrot E., Kirchhausen T. Endosomal recycling controls plasma membrane area during mitosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:7939-7944.
84. Tacheva-Grigorova S.K., et al. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis persists during unperturbed mitosis. Cell Rep. 2013, 4:659-668.
85. Kozik P., et al. A screen for endocytic motifs. Traffic 2010, 11:843-855.
86. Fielding A.B., et al. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is inhibited during mitosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:6572-6577.
87. Pypaert M., et al. Coated pits in interphase and mitotic A431 cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1987, 45:23-29.
88. Kaur S., et al. An unmet actin requirement explains the mitotic inhibition of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Elife 2014, 3:e00829.
89. Takatsu H., et al. Mitosis-coupled, microtubule-dependent clustering of endosomal vesicles around centrosomes. Cell Struct. Funct. 2013, 38:31-41.
90. Hehnly H., Doxsey S. Rab11 endosomes contribute to mitotic spindle organization and orientation. Dev. Cell 2014, 28:497-507.
91. Bergeland T., et al. Mitotic partitioning of endosomes and lysosomes. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:644-651.
92. Arden S.D., et al. Myosin VI is required for targeted membrane transport during cytokinesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18:4750-4761.
93. Goss J.W., Toomre D.K. Both daughter cells traffic and exocytose membrane at the cleavage furrow during mammalian cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181:1047-1054.
94. Wilson G.M., et al. The FIP3-Rab11 protein complex regulates recycling endosome targeting to the cleavage furrow during late cytokinesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:849-860.
95. Skop A.R., et al. Dissection of the mammalian midbody proteome reveals conserved cytokinesis mechanisms. Science 2004, 305:61-66.
96. Fielding A.B., et al. Rab11-FIP3 and FIP4 interact with Arf6 and the exocyst to control membrane traffic in cytokinesis. EMBO J. 2005, 24:3389-3399.
97. Simon G.C., et al. Sequential Cyk-4 binding to ECT2 and FIP3 regulates cleavage furrow ingression and abscission during cytokinesis. EMBO J. 2008, 27:1791-1803.
98. Montagnac G., et al. ARF6 Interacts with JIP4 to control a motor switch mechanism regulating endosome traffic in cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:184-195.
99. Dambournet D., et al. Rab35 GTPase and OCRL phosphatase remodel lipids and F-actin for successful cytokinesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:981-988.
100. Schiel J.A., et al. FIP3-endosome-dependent formation of the secondary ingression mediates ESCRT-III recruitment during cytokinesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14:1068-1078.
101. Schiel J.A., et al. Endocytic membrane fusion and buckling-induced microtubule severing mediate cell abscission. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:1411-1424.
102. Glick D., et al. Autophagy: cellular and molecular mechanisms. J. Pathol. 2010, 221:3-12.
103. Eskelinen E.L., et al. Inhibition of autophagy in mitotic animal cells. Traffic 2002, 3:878-893.
104. Liu L., et al. Robust autophagy/mitophagy persists during mitosis. Cell Cycle 2009, 8:1616-1620.
105. Pohl C., Jentsch S. Midbody ring disposal by autophagy is a post-abscission event of cytokinesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:65-70.
106. Dubreuil V., et al. Midbody and primary cilium of neural progenitors release extracellular membrane particles enriched in the stem cell marker prominin-1. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 176:483-495.
107. Ettinger A.W., et al. Proliferating versus differentiating stem and cancer cells exhibit distinct midbody-release behaviour. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2:503.
108. Crowell E.F., et al. Engulfment of the midbody remnant after cytokinesis in mammalian cells. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127:3840-3851.
109. Chen H., et al. Mitofusins Mfn1 and Mfn2 coordinately regulate mitochondrial fusion and are essential for embryonic development. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160:189-200.
110. Eura Y., et al. Two mitofusin proteins, mammalian homologues of FZO, with distinct functions are both required for mitochondrial fusion. J. Biochem. 2003, 134:333-344.
111. Cipolat S., et al. OPA1 requires mitofusin 1 to promote mitochondrial fusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:15927-15932.
112. Olichon A., et al. Loss of OPA1 perturbates the mitochondrial inner membrane structure and integrity, leading to cytochrome c release and apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:7743-7746.
113. Smirnova E., et al. Dynamin-related protein Drp1 is required for mitochondrial division in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2001, 12:2245-2256.
114. Ingerman E., et al. Dnm1 forms spirals that are structurally tailored to fit mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 170:1021-1027.
115. Schmid S.L., Frolov V.A. Dynamin: functional design of a membrane fission catalyst. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 27:79-105.
116. Taguchi N., et al. Mitotic phosphorylation of dynamin-related GTPase Drp1 participates in mitochondrial fission. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:11521-11529.
117. Park Y.Y., Cho H. Mitofusin 1 is degraded at G2/M phase through ubiquitylation by MARCH5. Cell Div. 2012, 7:25.
118. Lawrence E.J., Mandato C.A. Mitochondria localize to the cleavage furrow in Mammalian cytokinesis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e72886.
119. Kim P.K., et al. The origin and maintenance of mammalian peroxisomes involves a de novo PEX16-dependent pathway from the ER. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 173:521-532.
120. Ma C., et al. Peroxisome assembly: matrix and membrane protein biogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 193:7-16.
121. Smith J.J., Aitchison J.D. Peroxisomes take shape. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14:803-817.
122. Motley A.M., Hettema E.H. Yeast peroxisomes multiply by growth and division. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 178:399-410.
123. Verzijlbergen K.F., et al. Recombination-induced tag exchange to track old and new proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:64-68.
124. Wiemer E.A., et al. Visualization of the peroxisomal compartment in living mammalian cells: dynamic behavior and association with microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 136:71-80.
125. Kobayashi S., et al. Fis1, DLP1, and Pex11p coordinately regulate peroxisome morphogenesis. Exp. Cell Res. 2007, 313:1675-1686.
126. Itoyama A., et al. Mff functions with Pex11pbeta and DLP1 in peroxisomal fission. Biol. Open 2013, 2:998-1006.
127. Schrader M. Shared components of mitochondrial and peroxisomal division. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1763:531-541.
128. Hoepfner D., et al. A role for Vps1p, actin, and the Myo2p motor in peroxisome abundance and inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 155:979-990.
129. Fagarasanu A., et al. The peroxisomal membrane protein Inp2p is the peroxisome-specific receptor for the myosin V motor Myo2p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Dev. Cell 2006, 10:587-600.
130. Chang J., et al. Pex3 peroxisome biogenesis proteins function in peroxisome inheritance as class V myosin receptors. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187:233-246.
131. Otzen M., et al. Pex19p contributes to peroxisome inheritance in the association of peroxisomes to Myo2p. Traffic 2012, 13:947-959.
132. Fagarasanu M., et al. Inp1p is a peroxisomal membrane protein required for peroxisome inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 169:765-775.
133. Munck J.M., et al. A dual function for Pex3p in peroxisome formation and inheritance. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187:463-471.
134. Knoblach B., et al. An ER-peroxisome tether exerts peroxisome population control in yeast. EMBO J. 2013, 32:2439-2453.
135. Friedman J.R., et al. Endoplasmic reticulum-endosome contact increases as endosomes traffic and mature. Mol. Biol. Cell 2013, 24:1030-1040.
136. Korobova F., et al. An actin-dependent step in mitochondrial fission mediated by the ER-associated formin INF2. Science 2013, 339:464-467.