Yeast peroxisomes multiply by growth and division

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 178, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 399-410

  Motley, Alison M ^a   Hettema, Ewald H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIN RELATED PROTEIN; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN PEX3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; CELL GROWTH; CELL MATURATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; MEMBRANE; NONHUMAN; PEROXISOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WILD TYPE; YEAST CELL;

DYNAMINS; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; GTP PHOSPHOHYDROLASES; GTP-BINDING PROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; PEROXISOMES; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 34547595860     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 00219525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200702167     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Cerveny, K.L., J.M. McCaffery, and R.E. Jensen. 2001. Division of mitochondria requires a novel DMN1-interacting protein, Net2p. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:309-321.
2. Cheong H., T. Yorimitsu, F. Reggiori, J.E. Legakis, C.W. Wang, and D.J. Klionsky. 2005. Atg17 regulates the magnitude of the autophagic response. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:3438-3453.
3. Duttagupta, R., S. Vasudevan, C.J. Wilusz, and S.W. Peltz. 2003. A yeast homologue of Hsp70, Ssa1p, regulates turnover of the MFA2 transcript through its AU-rich 3′ untranslated region. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:2623-2632.
4. Fagarasanu, A., M. Fagarasanu, G.A. Eitzen, J.D. Aitchison, and R.A. Rachubinski. 2006. The peroxisomal membrane protein Inp2p is the peroxisome-specific receptor for the myosin V motor Myo2p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Dev. Cell. 10:587-600.
5. Fagarasanu, M., A. Fagarasanu, Y.Y. Tam, J.D. Aitchison, and R.A. Rachubinski. 2005. Inp1p is a peroxisomal membrane protein required for peroxisome inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 169:765-775.
6. Farre, J.C., and S. Subramani. 2004. Peroxisome turnover by micropexophagy: an autophagy-related process. Trends Cell Biol. 14:515-523.
7. Fujiki, Y., R.A. Rachubinski, and P.B. Lazarow. 1984. Synthesis of a major integral membrane polypeptide of rat liver peroxisomes on free polysomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 81:7127-7131.
8. Ghaedi, K., M. Honsho, N. Shimozawa, Y. Suzuki, N. Kondo, and Y. Fujiki. 2000. PEX3 is the causal gene responsible for peroxisome membrane assembly-defective Zellweger syndrome of complementation group G. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67:976-981.
9. Gietz, R.D., and A. Sugino. 1988. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 74:527-534.
10. Goldstein, A.L., and J.H. McCusker. 1999. Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 15:1541-1553.
11. Gould, S.J., G.A. Keller, and S. Subramani. 1988. Identification of peroxisomal targeting signals located at the carboxy terminus of four peroxisomal proteins. J. Cell Biol. 107:897-905.
12. Hettema, E.H., W. Girzalsky, M. van Den Berg, R. Erdmann, and B. Distel. 2000. Saccharomyces cerevisiae pex3p and pex19p are required for proper localization and stability of peroxisomal membrane proteins. EMBO J. 19:223-233.
13. Hoepfner, D., M. van den Berg, P. Philippsen, H.F. Tabak, and E.H. Hettema. 2001. A role for Vps1p, actin, and the Myo2p motor in peroxisome abundance and inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 155:979-990.
14. Hoepfner, D., D. Schildknegt, I. Braakman, P. Philippsen, and H.F. Tabak. 2005. Contribution of the endoplasmic reticulum to peroxisome formation. Cell. 122:85-95.
15. Honsho, M., S. Tamura, N. Shimozawa, Y. Suzuki, N. Kondo, and Y. Fujiki. 1998. Mutation in PEX16 is causal in the peroxisome-deficient Zellweger syndrome of complementation group D. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63:1622-1630.
16. Jedd, G., and N.H. Chua. 2002. Visualization of peroxisomes in living plant cells reveals acto-myosin-dependent cytoplasmic streaming and peroxisome budding. Plant Cell Physiol. 43:384-392.
17. Kamasawa, N., I. Ohtsuka, Y. Kamada, M. Ueda, A. Tanaka, and M. Osumi. 1996. Immunoelectron microscopic observation of the behaviors of peroxisomal enzymes inducibly synthesized in an n-alkane-utilizable yeast cell, Candida tropicalis. Cell Struct. Funct. 21:117-122.
18. Kim, P.K., R.T. Mullen, U. Schumann, and J. Lippincott-Schwartz. 2006. The origin and maintenance of mammalian peroxisomes involves a de novo PEX16-dependent pathway from the ER. J. Cell Biol. 173:521-532.
19. Koch, A., M. Thiemann, M. Grabenbauer, Y. Yoon, M.A. McNiven, and M. Schrader. 2003. Dynamin-like protein 1 is involved in peroxisomal fission. J. Biol. Chem. 278:8597-8605.
20. Kragt, A., T. Voorn-Brouwer, M. van den Berg, and B. Distel. 2005. Endoplasmic reticulum-directed Pex3p routes to peroxisomes and restores peroxisome formation in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae pex3Delta strain. J. Biol. Chem. 280:34350-34357.
21. Kunau, W.H. 2005. Peroxisome biogenesis: end of the debate. Curr. Biol. 15:R774-R776.
22. Kuravi, K., S. Nagotu, A.M. Krikken, K. Sjollema, M. Deckers, R. Erdmann, M. Veenhuis, and I.J. van der Klei. 2006. Dynamin-related proteins Vps1p and Dnm1p control peroxisome abundance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Sci. 119:3994-4001.
23. LaGrandeur, T., and R. Parker. 1999. The cis acting sequences responsible for the differential decay of the unstable MFA2 and stable PGK1 transcripts in yeast include the context of the translational start codon. RNA. 5:420-433.
24. Lazarow, P.B. 2003. Peroxisome biogenesis: advances and conundrums. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15:489-497.
25. Lazarow, P.B., and Y. Fujiki. 1985. Biogenesis of peroxisomes. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 1:489-530.
26. Li, X., and S.J. Gould. 2003. The dynamin-like GTPase DLP1 is essential for peroxisome division and is recruited to peroxisomes in part by PEX11. J. Biol. Chem. 278:17012-17020.
27. Maddox, P., E. Chin, A. Mallavarapu, E. Yeh, E.D. Salmon, and K. Bloom. 1999. Microtubule dynamics from mating through the first zygotic division in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 144:977-987.
28. Mano, S., C. Nakamori, M. Kondo, M. Hayashi, and M. Nishimura. 2004. An Arabidopsis dynamin-related protein, DRP3A, controls both peroxisomal and mitochondrial division. Plant J. 38:487-498.
29. Matsuzono, Y., N. Kinoshita, S. Tamura, N. Shimozawa, M. Hamasaki, K. Ghaedi, R.J. Wanders, Y. Suzuki, N. Kondo, and Y. Fujiki. 1999. Human PEX19: cDNA cloning by functional complementation, mutation analysis in a patient with Zellweger syndrome, and potential role in peroxisomal membrane assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:2116-2121.
30. Mullen, R.T., and R.N. Trelease. 2006. The ER-peroxisome connection in plants: development of the "ER semi-autonomous peroxisome maturation and replication" model for plant peroxisome biogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1763:1655-1668.
31. Muntau, A.C., P.U. Mayerhofer, B.C. Paton, S. Kammerer, and A.A. Roscher. 2000. Defective peroxisome membrane synthesis due to mutations in human PEX3 causes Zellweger syndrome, complementation group G. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67:967-975.
32. Nunnari, J., W.F. Marshall, A. Straight, A. Murray, J.W. Sedat, and P. Walter. 1997. Mitochondrial transmission during mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is determined by mitochondrial fusion and fission and the intramitochondrial segregation of mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Biol. Cell. 8:1233-1242.
33. Otsuga, D., B.R. Keegan, E. Brisch, J.W. Thatcher, G.J. Hermann, W. Bleazard, and J.M. Shaw. 1998. The dynamin-related GTPase, Dnm1p, controls mitochondrial morphology in yeast. J. Cell Biol. 143:333-349.
34. Praefcke, G.J., and H.T. McMahon. 2004. The dynamin superfamily: universal membrane tubulation and fission molecules? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5:133-147.
35. Shimozawa, N., T. Nagase, Y. Takemoto, M. Funato, N. Kondo, and Y. Suzuki. 2005. Molecular and neurologic findings of peroxisome biogenesis dis orders. J. Child Neurol. 20:326-329.
36. Song, B.D., and S.L. Schmid. 2003. A molecular motor or a regulator? Dynamin's in a class of its own. Biochemistry. 42:1369-1376.
37. South, S.T., and S.J. Gould. 1999. Peroxisome synthesis in the absence of pre-existing peroxisomes. J. Cell Biol. 144:255-266.
38. South, S.T., K.A. Sacksteder, X. Li, Y. Liu, and S.J. Gould. 2000. Inhibitors of COPI and COPII do not block PEX3-mediated peroxisome synthesis. J. Cell Biol. 149:1345-1360.
39. Tabak, H.F., J.L. Murk, I. Braakman, and H.J. Geuze. 2003. Peroxisomes start their life in the endoplasmic reticulum. Traffic. 4:512-518.
40. Tam, Y.Y., A. Fagarasanu, M. Fagarasanu, and R.A. Rachubinski. 2005. Pex3p initiates the formation of a preperoxisomal compartment from a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280:34933-34939.
41. Tanaka, A., S. Kobayashi, and Y. Fujiki. 2006. Peroxisome division is impaired in a CHO cell mutant with an inactivating point-mutation in dynamin-like protein 1 gene. Exp. Cell Res. 312:1671-1684.
42. Thoms, S., and R. Erdmann. 2005. Dynamin-related proteins and Pex11 proteins in peroxisome division and proliferation. FEBS J. 272:5169-5181.
43. Titorenko, V.I., and R.T. Mullen. 2006. Peroxisome biogenesis: the peroxisomal endomembrane system and the role of the ER. J. Cell Biol. 174:11-17.
44. van der Zand, A., I. Braakman, H.J. Geuze, and H.F. Tabak. 2006. The return of the peroxisome. J. Cell Sci. 119:989-994.
45. Veenhuis, M., I. Keizer-Gunnink, and W. Harder. 1980. An electron microscopical study of the development of peroxisomes during formation and germination of ascospores in the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 46:129-141.
46. Vizeacoumar, F.J., W.N. Vreden, M. Fagarasanu, G.A. Eitzen, J.D. Aitchison, and R.A. Rachubinski. 2006. The dynamin-like protein Vps1p of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae associates with peroxisomes in a Pex19p-dependent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 281:12817-12823.