A critical role of the human hippocampus in an electrophysiological measure of implicit memory

NeuroImage

Volumn 109, Issue , 2015, Pages 515-528

  Addante, Richard James ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXPLICIT MEMORY; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; IMPLICIT MEMORY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SAMPLE SIZE; YOUNG ADULT; AMNESIA; BRAIN CORTEX; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED RESPONSE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION;

ADULT; AMNESIA; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84923061440     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.069     Document Type: Article

References (145)

1. Addante R.J. The Electrophysiological and Neuropsychological Organization of Long Term Memory 2011, Center for Neuroscience. University of California, Davis, ProQuest UMI Dissertations Publishing Ann Arbor, MI, p. 137.
2. Addante R.J., Watrous A.J., Yonelinas A.P., Ekstrom A.D., Ranganath C. Prestimulus theta activity predicts correct source memory retrieval. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:10702-10707.
3. Addante R.J., Ranganath C., Olichney J., Yonelinas A.P. Neurophysiological evidence for a recollection impairment in amnesia patients that leaves familiarity intact. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:3004-3014.
4. Addante R.J., Ranganath C., Yonelinas A.P. Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection. Neuroimage 2012, 62:439-450.
5. Annese J., Schenker-Ahmed N.M., Bartsch H., Maechler P., Sheh C., Thomas N., Kayano J., Ghatan A., Bresler N., Frosch M.P., Klaming R., Corkin S. Postmortem examination of patient H.M.'s brain based on histological sectioning and digital 3D reconstruction. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:3122.
6. Bell A.J., Sejnowski T.J. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 1995, 7:1129-1159.
7. Bengson J.J., Lopez-Calderon J., Mangun G.R. The spotlight of attention illuminates failed feature-based expectancies. Psychophysiology 2012, 49:1101-1108.
8. Berry C.J., Henson R.N.A., Shanks D.R. On the relationship between repetition priming and recognition memory: insights from a computational model. J. Mem. Lang. 2006, 55:515-533.
9. Berry C.J., Shanks D.R., Henson R.N. A single-system account of the relationship between priming, recognition, and fluency. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2008, 34:97-111.
10. Berry C.J., Shanks D.R., Henson R.N. A unitary signal-detection model of implicit and explicit memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:367-373.
11. Berry C.J., Shanks D.R., Speekenbrink M., Henson R.N. Models of recognition, repetition priming, and fluency: exploring a new framework. Psychol. Rev. 2012, 119:40-79.
12. Berry C.J., Kessels R.P., Wester A.J., Shanks D.R. A single-system model predicts recognition memory and repetition priming in amnesia. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34:10963-10974.
13. Blaxton T.A. Dissociations among memory measures in memory-impaired subjects: evidence for a processing account of memory. Mem. Cogn. 1992, 20:549-562.
14. Buckner R.L., Petersen S.E., Ojemann J.G., Miezin F.M., Squire L.R., Raichle M.E. Functional anatomical studies of explicit and implicit memory retrieval tasks. J. Neurosci. 1995, 15:12-29.
15. Cermak L.S. A positive approach to viewing processing deficit theories of amnesia. Memory 1997, 5:89-98.
16. Cermak L.S., Verfaellie M., Sweeney M., Jacoby L.L. Fluency versus conscious recollection in the word completion performance of amnesic patients. Brain Cogn. 1992, 20:367-377.
17. Chun M.M., Phelps E.A. Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:844-847.
18. Cohen N.J., Eichenbaum H. Memory, Amnesia, and the Hippocampal System 1993, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
19. Conroy M.A., Hopkins R.O., Squire L.R. On the contribution of perceptual fluency and priming to recognition memory. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2005, 5:14-20.
20. Corkin S. What's new with the amnesic patient H.M.?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:153-160.
21. Curran T. Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Mem. Cogn. 2000, 28:923-938.
22. Curran T. Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1088-1106.
23. Daselaar S.M., Fleck M.S., Prince S.E., Cabeza R. The medial temporal lobe distinguishes old from new independently of consciousness. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:5835-5839.
24. Daselaar S.M., Fleck M.S., Prince S.E., Cabeza R. The medial temporal lobe distinguishes old from new independently of consciousness. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:5835-5839.
25. Degonda N., Mondadori C.R., Bosshardt S., Schmidt C.F., Boesiger P., Nitsch R.M., Hock C., Henke K. Implicit associative learning engages the hippocampus and interacts with explicit associative learning. Neuron 2005, 46:505-520.
26. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
27. The Role of Familiarity in Implicit Learning 2011, Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Z. Dienes, S.R., L. Wan (Eds.).
28. Dobbins I.G., Schnyer D.M., Verfaellie M., Schacter D.L. Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning. Nature 2004, 428:316-319.
29. Duarte A., Ranganath C., Trujillo C., Knight R.T. Intact recollection memory in high-performing older adults: ERP and behavioral evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:33-47.
30. Duzel E., Vargha-Khadem F., Heinze H.J., Mishkin M. Brain activity evidence for recognition without recollection after early hippocampal damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:8101-8106.
31. Eichenbaum H., Cohen N.J. From Conditioning to Conscious Recollection: Memory Systems of the Brain 2001, Oxford Univ, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
32. Eichenbaum H., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 30:123-152.
33. Ekstrom A.D., Kahana M.J., Caplan J.B., Fields T.A., Isham E.A., Newman E.L., Fried I. Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation. Nature 2003, 425:184-188.
34. Fernandez G., Brewer J.B., Zhao Z., Glover G.H., Gabrieli J.D. Level of sustained entorhinal activity at study correlates with subsequent cued-recall performance: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study with high acquisition rate. Hippocampus 1999, 9:35-44.
35. Friedman D. Event-related brain potential investigations of memory and aging. Biol. Psychol. 2000, 54:175-206.
36. Friedman D. The cognitive aging of episodic memory: a view based on the event-related brain potential. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2013, 7:111.
37. Gabrieli J.D. Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1998, 49:87-115.
38. Gabrieli J.D., Vaidya C.J., Stone M., Francis W.S., Thompson-Schill S.L., Fleischman D.A., Tinklenberg J.R., Yesavage J.A., Wilson R.S. Convergent behavioral and neuropsychological evidence for a distinction between identification and production forms of repetition priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1999, 128:479-498.
39. Galli G., Ragazzoni A., Viggiano M.P. Atypical event-related potentials in patients with mild cognitive impairment: an identification-priming study. Alzheimers Dement. 2010, 6:351-358.
40. Gotts S.J., Chow C.C., Martin A. Repetition priming and repetition suppression: a case for enhanced efficiency through neural synchronization. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 3:227-237.
41. Gotts S.J., Chow C.C., Martin A. Repetition priming and repetition suppression: multiple mechanisms in need of testing. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 3:250-259.
42. Groh-Bordin C., Zimmer H.D., Mecklinger A. Feature binding in perceptual priming and in episodic object recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 24:556-567.
43. Groh-Bordin C., Zimmer H.D., Ecker U.K. Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection. Neuroimage 2006, 32:1879-1890.
44. Hafting T., Fyhn M., Molden S., Moser M.B., Moser E.I. Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature 2005, 436:801-806.
45. Hamann S.B., Squire L.R. Intact perceptual memory in the absence of conscious memory. Behav. Neurosci. 1997, 111:850-854.
46. Hannula D.E., Greene A.J. The hippocampus reevaluated in unconscious learning and memory: at a tipping point?. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:80.
47. Hannula D.E., Ranganath C. Medial temporal lobe activity predicts successful relational memory binding. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:116-124.
48. Hannula D.E., Ranganath C. The eyes have it: hippocampal activity predicts expression of memory in eye movements. Neuron 2009, 63:592-599.
49. Hannula D.E., Simons D.J., Cohen N.J. Imaging implicit perception: promise and pitfalls. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6:247-255.
50. Hannula D.E., Tranel D., Cohen N.J. The long and the short of it: relational memory impairments in amnesia, even at short lags. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:8352-8359.
51. Hannula D.E., Ryan J.D., Tranel D., Cohen N.J. Rapid onset relational memory effects are evident in eye movement behavior, but not in hippocampal amnesia. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19:1690-1705.
52. Heit G., Smith M.E., Halgren E. Neural encoding of individual words and faces by the human hippocampus and amygdala. Nature 1988, 333:773-775.
53. Heit G., Smith M.E., Halgren E. Neuronal activity in the human medial temporal lobe during recognition memory. Brain 1990, 113(Pt 4):1093-1112.
54. Henke K. A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11:523-532.
55. Henson R.N.A. Neuroimaging studies of priming. Prog. Neurobiol. 2003, 70:53-81.
56. Horner A.J., Gadian D.G., Fuentemilla L., Jentschke S., Vargha-Khadem F., Duzel E. A rapid, hippocampus-dependent, item-memory signal that initiates context memory in humans. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:2369-2374.
57. Jacoby L.L., Dallas M. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1981, 110:306-340.
58. Jafarpour A., Fuentemilla L., Horner A.J., Penny W., Duzel E. Replay of very early encoding representations during recollection. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34:242-248.
59. Jernigan T.L., Ostergaard A.L., Fennema-Notestine C. Mesial temporal, diencephalic, and striatal contributions to deficits in single word reading, word priming, and recognition memory. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2001, 7:63-78.
60. Johannes S., Munte T.F., Heinze H.J., Mangun G.R. Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 1995, 2:189-205.
61. Kirwan C.B., Shrager Y., Squire L.R. Medial temporal lobe activity can distinguish between old and new stimuli independently of overt behavioral choice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:14617-14621.
62. Kirwan C.B., Shrager Y., Squire L.R. Medial temporal lobe activity can distinguish between old and new stimuli independently of overt behavioral choice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:14617-14621.
63. Kishiyama M.M., Yonelinas A.P., Lazzara M.M. The von Restorff effect in amnesia: the contribution of the hippocampal system to novelty-related memory enhancements. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16:15-23.
64. Knight R. Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature 1996, 383:256-259.
65. Knight R.T., Scabini D. Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998, 15:3-13.
66. Kurilla B.P., Gonsalves B.D. An ERP investigation into the strategic regulation of the fluency heuristic during recognition memory. Brain Res. 2012, 1442:36-46.
67. Levy D.A., Stark C.E., Squire L.R. Intact conceptual priming in the absence of declarative memory. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15:680-686.
68. Leynes A., Zish K. Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for fluency-based recognition memory. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:3240-3249.
69. Leynes P.A., Allen J.D., Marsh R.L. Topographic differences in CNV amplitude reflect different preparatory processes. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1998, 31:33-44.
70. Leynes P.A., Landau J., Walker J., Addante R.J. Event-related potential evidence for multiple causes of the revelation effect. Conscious. Cogn. 2005, 14:327-350.
71. Lopez-Calderon J., Luck S.J. ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:213.
72. Lucas H.D., Paller K.A. Manipulating letter fluency for words alters electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory. Neuroimage 2013, 83:849-861.
73. Luck S.J. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
74. Luck S.J. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique 2014, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Second edition.
75. Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A. Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology 1994, 31:291-308.
76. Luck S.J., Kappenman E.S. Oxford Handbook of Event-related Potential Components 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
77. Maguire E.A., Mullally S.L. The hippocampus: a manifesto for change. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2013, 142:1180-1189.
78. Mangun G.R., Hillyard S.A. Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1991, 17:1057-1074.
79. Manns J.R., Squire L.R. Perceptual learning, awareness, and the hippocampus. Hippocampus 2001, 11:776-782.
80. Mecklinger A., Frings C., Rosburg T. Response to Paller et al.: the role of familiarity in making inferences about unknown quantities. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:315-316.
81. Mento G. The passive CNV: carving out the contribution of task-related processes to expectancy. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:827.
82. Moscovitch M. The hippocampus as a "stupid," domain-specific module: implications for theories of recent and remote memory, and of imagination. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 2008, 62:62-79.
83. Nessler D., Mecklinger A., Penney T.B. Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity and recognition-related familiarity: an electrophysiological exploration. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 22:265-288.
84. Nessler D., Johnson R., Bersick M., Friedman D. Age-related ERP differences at retrieval persist despite age-invariant performance and left-frontal negativity during encoding. Neurosci. Lett. 2008, 432:151-156.
85. Ostergaard A.L. Priming deficits in amnesia: now you see them, now you don't. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 1999, 5:175-190.
86. Otten L.J., Donchin E. Relationship between P300 amplitude and subsequent recall for distinctive events: dependence on type of distinctiveness attribute. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:644-661.
87. Ozubko J.D., Yonelinas A.P. The disruptive effects of processing fluency on familiarity-based recognition in amnesia. Neuropsychologia 2014, 54:59-67.
88. Paller K.A., Voss J.L., Boehm S.G. Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:243-250.
89. Postle B.R., Corkin S. Impaired word-stem completion priming but intact perceptual identification priming with novel words: evidence from the amnesic patient H.M. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:421-440.
90. Ranganath C. A unified framework for the functional organization of the medial temporal lobes and the phenomenology of episodic memory. Hippocampus 2010, 20:1263-1290.
91. Ranganath C., Ritchey M. Two cortical systems for memory-guided behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13:713-726.
92. Ranganath C., Yonelinas A.P., Cohen M.X., Dy C.J., Tom S.M., D'Esposito M. Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:2-13.
93. Reber P.J. The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: a review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:2026-2042.
94. Reber T.P., Luechinger R., Boesiger P., Henke K. Unconscious relational inference recruits the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:6138-6148.
95. Richardson-klavehn A., Bjork R.A. Measures of memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1988, 39:475-543.
96. Rosenbaum R.S., Gilboa A., Moscovitch M. Case studies continue to illuminate the cognitive neuroscience of memory. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014, 1316:105-133.
97. Rugg M.D., Coles M.G.H. The ERP and cognitive psychology: conceptual issues. Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
98. Rugg M.D., Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:251-257.
99. Rugg M.D., Mark R.E., Walla P., Schloerscheidt A.M., Birch C.S., Allan K. Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature 1998, 392:595-598.
100. Schacter D.L., Church B. Implicit memory in amnesic patients: when is auditory priming spared?. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 1995, 1:434-442.
101. Schacter D.L., Graf P. Preserved learning in amnesic patients: perspectives from research on direct priming. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 1986, 8:727-743.
102. Schacter D.L., Chiu C.Y., Ochsner K.N. Implicit memory: a selective review. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1993, 16:159-182.
103. Schacter D.L., Dobbins I.G., Schnyer D.M. Specificity of priming: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 5:853-862.
104. Schacter D.L., Wig G.S., Stevens W.D. Reductions in cortical activity during priming. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007, 17:171-176.
105. Scott R.B., Dienes Z. Fluency does not express implicit knowledge of artificial grammars. Cognition 2010, 114:372-388.
106. Scoville W.B., Milner B. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1957, 20:11-21.
107. Sheldon S.A., Moscovitch M. Recollective performance advantages for implicit memory tasks. Memory 2010, 18:681-697.
108. Sheldon S., Moscovitch M. The nature and time-course of medial temporal lobe contributions to semantic retrieval: an fMRI study on verbal fluency. Hippocampus 2012, 22:1451-1466.
109. Smith M.E., Halgren E. Dissociation of recognition memory components following temporal lobe lesions. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1989, 15:50-60.
110. Smith M.E., Stapleton J.M., Halgren E. Human medial temporal lobe potentials evoked in memory and language tasks. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1986, 63:145-159.
111. Squire L.R. The legacy of patient H.M. for neuroscience. Neuron 2009, 61:6-9.
112. Squire L.R., Zola S.M. Amnesia, memory and brain systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1997, 352:1663-1673.
113. Squire L.R., Wixted J.T., Clark R.E. Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8:872-883.
114. Staresina B.P., Fell J., Do Lam A.T., Axmacher N., Henson R.N. Memory signals are temporally dissociated in and across human hippocampus and perirhinal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:1167-1173.
115. Staresina B.P., Cooper E., Henson R.N. Reversible information flow across the medial temporal lobe: the hippocampus links cortical modules during memory retrieval. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:14184-14192.
116. Suthana N., Fried I. Percepts to recollections: insights from single neuron recordings in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:427-436.
117. Suthana N., Haneef Z., Stern J., Mukamel R., Behnke E., Knowlton B., Fried I. Memory enhancement and deep-brain stimulation of the entorhinal area. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366:502-510.
118. Swaab T.Y., Baynes K., Knight R.T. Separable effects of priming and imageability on word processing: an ERP study. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2002, 15:99-103.
119. Taylor J.R., Henson R.N. Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:3027-3040.
120. Tecce J.J. Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. Psychol. Bull. 1972, 77:73-108.
121. Tulving E., Schacter D.L. Priming and human memory systems. Science 1990, 247:301-306.
122. Urbach T.P., Kutas M. The intractability of scaling scalp distributions to infer neuroelectric sources. Psychophysiology 2002, 39:791-808.
123. Urbach T.P., Kutas M. Interpreting event-related brain potential (ERP) distributions: implications of baseline potentials and variability with application to amplitude normalization by vector scaling. Biol. Psychol. 2006, 72:333-343.
124. Vaidya C.J., Gabrieli J.D., Monti L.A., Tinklenberg J.R., Yesavage J.A. Dissociation between two forms of conceptual priming in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology 1999, 13:516-524.
125. Verfaellie M., Cermak L.S. Perceptual fluency as a cue for recognition judgments in amnesia. Neuropsychology 1999, 13:198-205.
126. Verfaellie M., Treadwell J.R. Status of recognition memory in amnesia. Neuropsychology 1993, 7:5-13.
127. Vilberg K.L., Rugg M.D. Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: a review of evidence from a dual-process perspective. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1787-1799.
128. Voss J.L., Paller K.A. Real-time neural signals of perceptual priming with unfamiliar geometric shapes. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:9181-9188.
129. Voss J.L., Lucas H.D., Paller K.A. More than a feeling: pervasive influences of memory without awareness of retrieval. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 3:193-207.
130. Wagner A.D., Koutstaal W., Maril A., Schacter D.L., Buckner R.L. Task-specific repetition priming in left inferior prefrontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2000, 10:1176-1184.
131. Walter W.G., Cooper R., Aldridge V.J., McCallum W.C., Winter A.L. Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 1964, 203:380-384.
132. Wang T.H., de Chastelaine M., Minton B., Rugg M.D. Effects of age on the neural correlates of familiarity as indexed by ERPs. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24:1055-1068.
133. Westerman D.L. Relative fluency and illusions of recognition memory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2008, 15:1196-1200.
134. Whittlesea B.W. Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not). J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2002, 131:325-348.
135. Whittlesea B.W., Leboe J.P. The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: fluency, generation, and resemblance. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2000, 129:84-106.
136. Whittlesea B.W.A., Leboe J.P. Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart). J. Mem. Lang. 2003, 49:62-79.
137. Whittlesea B.W., Williams L.D. The source of feelings of familiarity: the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2000, 26:547-565.
138. Wig G.S., Grafton S.T., Demos K.E., Kelley W.M. Reductions in neural activity underlie behavioral components of repetition priming. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1228-1233.
139. Wilding E.L. The practice of rescaling scalp-recorded event-related potentials. Biol. Psychol. 2006, 72:325-332.
140. Wolk D.A., Schacter D.L., Berman A.R., Holcomb P.J., Daffner K.R., Budson A.E. An electrophysiological investigation of the relationship between conceptual fluency and familiarity. Neurosci. Lett. 2004, 369:150-155.
141. Woodruff C.C., Hayama H.R., Rugg M.D. Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Brain Res. 2006, 1100:125-135.
142. Woollams A.M., Taylor J.R., Karayanidis F., Henson R.N. Event-related potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:1114-1129.
143. Xu Y., Corkin S. H.M. revisits the Tower of Hanoi Puzzle. Neuropsychology 2001, 15:69-79.
144. Yazar Y., Bergstrom Z.M., Simons J.S. Continuous theta burst stimulation of angular gyrus reduces subjective recollection. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e110414.
145. Yu S.S., Rugg M.D. Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition. Brain Res. 2010, 1320:74-84.