Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for fluency-based recognition memory

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 3240-3249

  Andrew Leynes, P ^a   Zish, Kevin ^b  

^a The College of New Jersey   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ERPs; Familiarity; Perceptual fluency; Recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FLUENCY BASED RECOGNITION MEMORY; FLUENCY DISORDER; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; MEMORY; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PUPIL; RESPONSE TIME; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AWARENESS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROC CURVE; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84868327383     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Addante R.J., Ranganath C., Yonelinas A.P. Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection. NeuroImage 2012, 62:439-450.
2. Dew I.T.Z., Cabeza R. The porous boundaries between explicit and implicit memory: behavioral and neural evidence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2011, 1224:174-190.
3. Huang J.Y., Song H., Bargh J.A. Smooth trajectories travel farther into the future: perceptual fluency effects on prediction of trend continuation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2011, 47:506-508.
4. Huber D.E., Clark T.F., Curran T., Winkielman P. Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:1305-1324.
5. Jacoby L.L., Dallas M. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1981, 110:306-340.
6. Jacoby L.L., Kelley C., Brown J., Jasechko J. Becoming famous overnight: limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 56:326-338.
7. Kurilla B.P., Gonsalves B.D. An ERP investigation into the strategic regulation of the fluency heuristic during recognition memory. Brain Research 2012, 1442:36-46.
8. Kurilla B.P., Westerman D.L. Processing fluency affects subjective claims of recollection. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:82-93.
9. Kučera H., Francis W.N. Computational analysis of present day American English 1967, Brown University Press, Providence, Rhode Island.
10. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection theory: a user's guide 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York. 2nd ed.
11. Mecklinger A., Frings C., Rosburg T. Response to Paller et al.: the role of familiarity in making inferences about known quantities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2012, 16:315-316.
12. Nessler D., Mecklinger A., Penney T. Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity and recognition-related familiarity: an electrophysiological exploration. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 22:265-288.
13. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
14. Paller K.A., Lucas H.D., Voss J.L. Assuming too much from 'familiar" brain potentials. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2012, 16:313-315.
15. Paller K.A., Voss J.L., Boehm S.G. Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:243-250.
16. Parks C.M., Yonelinas A.P. Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: comment on Wixted (2007). Psychological Review 2007, 114:188-202.
17. Rass O., Landau J.D., Curran T., Leynes P.A. Event-related potential (ERP) correlates of memory blocking and priming during a word fragment test. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2010, 78:136-150.
18. Reber R., Schwarz N. Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition 1999, 8:338-342.
19. Reber R., Schwarz N., Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004, 8:364-382.
20. Reber R., Winkielman P., Schwarz N. Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science 1998, 9:45-48.
21. Richardson-Klavehn A., Bjork R.A. Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology 1988, 39:475-543.
22. Rugg M.D., Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:251-257.
23. Rugg M.D., Mark R.E., Walla P., Schloerscheidt A.M., Birch C.S., Allan K. Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature 1998, 392:595-598.
24. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 1986, 23:696-703.
25. Snodgrass J.G., Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1988, 117:34-50.
26. Voss J.L., Lucas H.D., Paller J.L More than a feeling: Pervasive influences of memory processing without awareness of retrieval. Cognitive Neuroscience 2012, 3:193-207.
27. Voss J.L., Paller K.A. Real-time neural signals of perceptual priming with unfamiliar geometric shapes. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:9181-9188.
28. Westerman D.L. Relative fluency and illusions of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2008, 15:1196-1200.
29. Westerman D.L., Lloyd M.E., Miller J.K. The attribution of perceptual fluency in recognition memory: the role of expectation. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 47:607-617.
30. Westerman D.L., Miller J.K., Lloyd M.E. Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:619-629.
31. Whittlesea B.W., Jacoby L.L., Girard K. Illusions of immediate memory: evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language 1990, 29:716-732.
32. Whittlesea B.W.A. Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1993, 19:1235-1253.
33. Whittlesea B.W.A. Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:325-348.
34. Whittlesea B.W.A., Williams L. The discrepancy attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:3-13.
35. Whittlesea B.W.A., Williams L. The discrepancy attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:14-33.
36. Wixted J.T. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review 2007, 114:152-176.
37. Woollams A., Taylor J., Karayanidis F., Henson R. Event-related potentials associated with masked priming of test cues to reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:1114-1129.
38. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:441-517.
39. Yonelinas A.P., Parks C.M. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133:800-832.