Imaging implicit perception: Promise and pitfalls

Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 247-255

  Hannula, Deborah E ^a   Simons, Daniel J ^a   Cohen, Neal J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROIMAGING; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ANIMALS; AWARENESS; BRAIN MAPPING; CONSCIOUSNESS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 14844285431     PISSN: 1471003X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrn1630     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Reingold, E. M. & Merikle, P. M. Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness, Percept. Psychophys. 44, 563-575 (1988).
2. Reingold, E. M. & Merikle, P. M. On the inter-relatedness of theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes. Mind Lang. 5, 9-28 (1990).
3. Erdelyi, M. H. Subliminal perception and its cognates: theory, indeterminacy, and time. Conscious. Cogn. 13, 73-91 (2004).
4. Bachmann, T. Inaptitude of the signal detection theory, useful vexation from the microgenetic view, and inevitability of neurobiological signatures in understanding perceptual (un)awareness. Conscious. Cogn. 13, 101-106 (2004).
5. Bornstein, R. F. Subliminality, consciousness, and temporal shifts in awareness: implications within and beyond the laboratory. Conscious. Cogn. 13, 613-618 (2004).
6. Erdelyi, M. H. Comments on commentaries: Kihlstrom, Bachmann, Reingold, and Snodgrass. Conscious. Cogn. 13, 430-433 (2004).
7. Kihlstrom, J. F. Availability, accessibility, and subliminal perception. Conscious. Cogn. 13, 92-100 (2004).
8. Reingold, E. M. Unconscious perception: assumptions and interpretive difficulties. Conscious. Cogn. 13, 117-122 (2004).
9. Snodgrass, M. The dissociation paradigm and its discontents: how can unconscious perception or memory be inferred? Conscious. Cogn. 13, 107-116 (2004).
10. Snodgrass, M., Bernat, E. & Shevrin, H. Unconscious perception: a model-based approach to method and evidence. Percept. Psychophys. 66, 846-867 (2004).
11. Haase, S. J. & Fiske, G. D. Valid distinctions between conscious and unconscious perception. Percept. Psychophys. 66, 868-871 (2004).
12. Holender, O. & Duscherer, K. Unconscious perception: the need for a paradigm shift. Percept. Psychophys. 66, 872-881 (2004).
13. Reingold, E. M. Unconscious perception and the classic dissociation paradigm: a new angle? Percept. Psychophys. 66, 882-887 (2004).
14. Snodgrass, M., Bernat, E. & Shevrin, H. Unconscious perception at the objective detection threshold exists. Percept. Psychophys. 66, 888-895 (2004).
15. Meldender, D. Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: a survey and appraisal. Behav. Brain Sci. 9, 1-66 (1986).
16. Poppel, E., Held, R. & Frost, D. Residual visual function after brain wounds involving the central visual pathways in man. Nature 243, 295-296 (1973).
17. Weiskrantz, L., Warrington, E. K., Sanders, M. D. & Marshall, J. Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain 97, 709-728 (1972).
18. Blythe, I. M., Kennard, C. & Ruddock, K. H. Residual vision in patients with retrogeniculate lesions of the visual pathways. Brain 110, 887-905 (1937).
19. Eriksen, C. W. in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation Vol. 6 (ed. Jones, M. R.) 169-227 (Univ. Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, 1958).
20. Eriksen, C. W. Discrimination and learning without awareness: a methodological survey and evaluation. Psychol. Rev. 67, 279-300 (1960).
21. Bjorkman, M., Juslin, P. & Winman, A. Realism of confidence in sensory discrimination: the underconfidence phenomenon. Percept. Psychophys. 54, 75-81 (1993).
22. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124-1131 (1974).
23. Kunimoto, C. Miller, J. & Pashler, H. Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses. Conscious. Cogn. 10, 294-340 (2001).
24. Azzopardi, P. & Cowey, A. Blindsight and visual awareness. Conscious. Cogn. 7, 292-311 (1998).
25. Wolfe, J. M. in Fleeting Memories: Cognition of Brief Visual Stimuli (ed. Coltheart, V.) 71-94 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999).
26. Macmillan, N. A. The psychophysics of subliminal perception. Behav. Brain Sci. 9, 38-39 (1986).
27. Snodgrass, M., Shevrin, H. & Kopka, M. The mediation of intentional judgments by unconscious perceptions: the influence of task strategy, task preference, word meaning, and motivation. Conscious. Cogn. 2, 169-193 (1993).
28. Draine, S. C. & Greenwald, A. G. Replicable unconscious semantic priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 127, 286-303 (1998).
29. Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R. & Schuh, E. S. Activation by marginally perceptible ('subliminal') stimuli: dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 124, 22-42 (1995).
30. Klauer, K. C., Greenwald, A. G. & Draine, S. C. Correcting for measurement error in detecting unconscious cognition: comment on Draine & Greenwald. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 127, 318-319 (1998).
31. Dosher, B. A. The response-window regression method - some problematic assumptions: comment on Draine and Greenwald (1998). J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 127, 311-317 (1998).
32. Merikle, P. M. & Reingold, E. M. On demonstrating unconscious perception: comments on Draine and Greenwald. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 127, 304-310 (1998).
33. Miller, J. Measurement error in subliminal perception experiments: simulation analyses of two regression methods. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26, 1461-1477 (2000).
34. Kunst-Wilson, W. R. & Zajonc, R. B. Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science 207, 557-558 (1980).
35. Merikle, P. M. & Reingold, E. M. Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 17, 224-233 (1991).
36. Whittlesea, B. & Price, J. Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: rethinking the mere exposure effect. Mem. Cogn. 29, 234-246 (2001).
37. Jacoby, L. L. A process dissociation framework: separating automatic and intentional uses of memory. J. Mem. Lang. 30, 513-541 (1991).
38. Debner, J. & Jacoby, L. L. Unconscious perception: attention, awareness and control. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20, 304-317 (1994).
39. Visser, T. A. W. & Merikle, P. M. Conscious and unconscious processes: the effects of motivation. Conscious. Cogn. 8, 94-113 (1999).
40. Baars, B. J. A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1988).
41. Baars, B. J. The conscious access hypothesis: origins and recent evidence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 47-52 (2002).
42. Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M. & Changeux, J. P. A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14529-14534 (1998).
43. Dehaene, S. & Naccacne, L. Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and workspace framework. Cognition 79, 1-37 (2001).
44. Dehaene, S. et al. Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neurosci. 4, 752-758 (2001).
45. Coles, M. G., Gratton, G. & Donchin, E. Detecting early communication: using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biol. Psychol. 26, 69-89 (1988).
46. Dehaene, S. et al. Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature 395, 597-600 (1998).
47. Elmer, M. & Schlaghecken, F. Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biol. Psychol. 64, 7-26 (2003).
48. Naccache, L. & Dehaene, S. The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. Cereb. Cortex 11, 966-974 (2001).
49. Dehaene, S. et al. Letter binding and invariant recognition of masked words. Psychol. Sci. 15, 307-313 (2004).
50. Deacon, D., Hewitt, S., Yang, C. & Nagata, M. Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. Cogn. Brain Res. 9, 137-146 (2000).
51. Stenberg, G., Lindgren, M., Johansson, M., Olsson, A. & Rosen, I. Semantic processing without conscious identification: evidence from event-related potentials. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25, 973-1004 (2000).
52. Kiefer, M. & Spitzer, M. Time course of conscious and unconscious semantic brain activation. Neuroreport 11, 2401-2407 (2000).
53. Kiefer, M. The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. Cogn. Brain Res. 13, 27-39 (2002).
54. Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207, 203-205 (1980).
55. Brown, C. & Hagoort, P. The processing nature of the N400: evidence from masked priming. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5, 34-44 (1993).
56. Ruz, M., Madrid, E., Lupianez, J. & Tudela, P. High density ERP indices of conscious and unconscious semantic priming. Cogn. Brain Res. 17, 719-731 (2003).
57. LeDoux, J. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life (Simon & Schuster, New York, 1996).
58. Linke, R., De Lima, A. D., Schwegler, H. & Pape, H. C. Direct synaptic connections of axons from superior colliculus with identified thalamo-amygdaloid projection neurons in the rat: possible substrates of a subcortical visual pathway to the amygdala. J. Comp. Neurol. 403, 158-170 (1999).
59. Whalen, P. J. et al. Masked presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge. J. Neurosci. 18, 411-418 (1998).
60. Morris, J. S., Ohman, A. & Dolan, R. J. Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala. Nature 393, 467-470 (1998).
61. Nomura, M. et al. Functional association of the amygdala and ventral prefrontal cortex during cognitive evaluation of facial expressions primed by masked angry faces: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 21, 352-363 (2004).
62. Phillips, M. L. et al. Differential neural responses to overt and covert presentations of facial expressions of fear and disgust. Neuroimage 21, 1484-1496 (2004).
63. Morris, J. S., Ohman, A. & Dolan, R. J. A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating 'unseen ' fear. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1680-1685 (1999).
64. Morris, J. S., DeGelder, B., Weiskrantz, L. & Dolan, R. J. Differential extrageniculostriate and amygdala responses to presentation of emotional faces in a cortically blind field. Brain 124, 1241-1252 (2001).
65. Vuilleumier, P. et al. Neural response to emotional faces with and without awareness: event-related fMRI in a parietal patient with visual extinction and spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 40, 2156-2166 (2002).
66. Driver, J. & Vuilleumier, P. Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition 79, 39-88 (2001).
67. Pasley, B. N., Mayes, L. C. & Schulte, R. T. Subcortical discrimination of unperceived objects during binocular rivalry. Neuron 42, 163-172 (2004).
68. Williams, L. M. et al. Mapping the time course of nonconscious and conscious perception of fear: an integration of central and peripheral measures. Hum. Brain Mapp. 21, 64-74 (2004).
69. Liddell, B. J., Williams, L. M., Rathjen, J., Shevrin, H. & Gordon, E. A temporal dissociation of subliminal versus supraliminal fear perception: an event-related potential study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 480-488 (2004).
70. Krolak-Salmon, P., Henaff, M. A., Vighetto, A., Bertrand, O. & Mauguiere, F. Early amygdala reaction to fear spreading in occipital, temporal, and frontal cortex: a depth electrode ERP study in human. Neuron 42, 665-676 (2004).
71. Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J. & Dolan, R. J. Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions. Nature Neurosci. 6, 624-631 (2003).
72. Pessoa, L., McKenna, M., Gutierrez, E. & Ungerleider, L. G. Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11458-11463 (2002).
73. Esteves, F. & Ohman, A. Masking the face: recognition of emotional facial expressions as a function of the parameters of backward masking. Scand. J. Psychol. 34, 1-18 (1993).
74. Broadbent, D. E. Perception and Communication (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1987.
75. Deutsch, J. A. & Deutsch, D. Attention: some theoretical considerations. Psychol. Rev. 70, 51-61 (1963).
76. Treisman, A. M. Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychol. Rev. 76, 282-299 (1969).
77. Dulany, D. E. in Scientific Approaches to Consciousness (eds Cohen, J. D. & Schooler, J. W.) 179-212 (Carnegie Mellon Symposia on Cognition, Hillsdale, New Jersey 1997).
78. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T. & Rensink, R. A. Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 129, 481-507 (2000).
79. Lamme, V. A. F., Zipser, K. & Spekreijse, H. Masking interrupts figure-ground signals in V1. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14, 1044-1053 (2002).
80. Rolls, E. T., Tovee, M. J. & Panzeri, S. The neurophysioiogy of backward visual masking: information analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 300-311 (1999).
81. Macknik, S. L. & Livingstone, M. S. Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system. Nature Neurosci. 1, 144-149 (1998).
82. Marcel, A. J. Conscious and unconscious perception: an approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cogn. Psychol. 15, 283-300 (1983).
83. Marcel, A. J. in Attention and Performance VIII (ed. Nickerson, R. S.) 435-457 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1980).
84. Marcel, A. J. Conscious and unconscious perception: experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 15, 197-237 (1983).
85. Merikle, P. M. & Reingold, E. M. in Perception Without Awareness: Cognitive, Clinical, and Social Perspectives (eds Bornstein, R. F. & Pittman, T. S.) 55-80 (Guilford, New York, 1992).
86. Stoerig, P. & Cowey, A. Blindsight in man and monkey. Brain 120, 535-559 (1997).
87. Weiskrantz, L. Roots of blindsight. Prog. Brain Res. 144, 229-241 (2004).
88. Wiens, S. et al. Keeping it short: a comparison of methods for brief picture presentation. Psychol. Sci. 15, 282-285 (2004).
89. Abrams, R. L. & Greenwald, A. G. Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning. Psychol. Sci. 11, 118-124 (2000).
90. Gazaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B. & Mangun, G. R. Cognitive Neuroscience: the Biology of the Mind 2nd Edn (W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 2002).