Repetition priming and repetition suppression: Multiple mechanisms in need of testing

Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 3, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 250-259

  Gotts, Stephen J ^a   Chow, Carson C ^b   Martin, Alex ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Prediction; Repetition priming; Repetition suppression; Synchrony

Indexed keywords

BAYES EXPLAINING AWAY MODEL; BRAIN FUNCTION; EDITORIAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACILITATION; FACILITATION MODEL; MEMORY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; REPETITION PRIMING; REPETITION SUPPRESSION; SHARPENING MODEL; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYNCHRONIZATION; SYNCHRONY MODEL;

EID: 84864701276     PISSN: 17588928     EISSN: 17588936     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2012.697054     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. Ackley, D. H., Hinton, G. E. and Sejnowski, T. J. 1985. A learning algorithm for Boltzmann machines. Cognitive Science, 9: 147-169.
2. Buschman, T. J. and Miller, E. K. 2007. Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. Science, 315: 1860-1862.
3. Desimone, R. and Duncan, J. 1995. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18: 193-222.
4. Gilbert, J. R., Gotts, S. J., Carver, F. W. and Martin, A. 2010. Object repetition leads to local increases in the temporal coordination of neural responses. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4: 30
5. Gregoriou, G. G., Gotts, S. J., Zhou, H. and Desimone, R. 2009. High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention. Science, 324: 1207-1210.
6. Gregoriou, G. G., Gotts, S. J. and Desimone, R. 2012. Cell-type-specific synchronization of neural activity in FEF with V4 during attention. Neuron, 73: 581-594.
7. Grossberg, S. 1976. Adaptive pattern classification and universal recoding: II. Feedback, expectation, olfaction, and illusions. Biological Cybernetics, 23: 187-202.
8. Kiebel, S. J., Garrido, M. I., Moran, R. J. and Friston, K. J. 2008. Dynamic causal modelling for EEG and MEG. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 2: 121-136.
9. Lee, T. S. and Mumford, D. 2003. Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 20: 1434-1448.
10. Li, L., Miller, E. K. and Desimone, R. 1993. The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69: 1918-1929.
11. Martin, A. and Gotts, S. J. 2005. Making the causal link: Frontal cortex activity and repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 8: 1134-1135.
12. McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. 1981. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88: 375-407.
13. Minsky, M. and Papert, S. 1969. Perceptrons, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Mumford, D. 1992. On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. Biological Cybernetics, 66: 241-251.
15. O'Reilly, R. C. 1998. Six principles for biologically based computational models of cortical cognition. Trends in Cognition Science, 2: 455-462.
16. Weiner, K. S., Sayres, R., Vinberg, J. and Grill-Spector, K. 2010. fMRI-adaptation and category selectivity in human ventral temporal cortex: Regional differences across time scales. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103: 3349-3365.
17. Woloszyn, L. and Sheinberg, D. L. 2012. Effects of long-term visual experience on responses of distinct classes of single units in inferior temporal cortex. Neuron, 74: 193-205.