Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 13, 2012, Pages 3027-3040

  Taylor, Jason R ^a   Henson, Richard N ^a  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Context; Episodic; Priming; Remember know; Source memory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FAMILIARITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MASKED CONCEPTUAL PRIME; MEASUREMENT; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; RECOGNITION; RECOLLECTION; SEMANTICS; THEORY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84868303234     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.029     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Atkinson R.C., Juola J.F. Search and decision processes in recognition memory. Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology,Vol. 1. Learning, memory & thinking 1974, Freeman, San Francisco. D.H. Krantz, R.C. Atkinson, R.D. Luce, P. Suppes (Eds.).
2. Bodner G.E., Masson M.E. Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10(3):645-652.
3. Brown A.A., Bodner G.E. Re-examining dissociations between remembering and knowing: Binary judgments vs. independent ratings. Journal of Memory and Language 2011, 65:98-108.
4. Brown M.W., Xiang J.Z. Recognition memory: Neuronal substrates of the judgement of prior occurrence. Progress in Neurobiology 1998, 55:149-189.
5. Clark S.E., Gronlund S.D. Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3:37-60.
6. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. Medial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:1808-1818.
7. Donaldson W. The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory & Cognition 1996, 24:523-533.
8. Gardiner J.M., Parkin A.J. Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 1990, 18:579-583.
9. Gardiner J.M., Ramponi C., Richardson-Klavehn A. Recognition memory and decision processes: A meta-analysis of remember, know, and guess responses. Memory 2002, 10:83-98.
10. Geraci L., McCabe D.P., Guillory J.J. On interpreting the relationship between remember-know judgments and confidence: The role of instructions. Consciousness & Cognition 2009, 18:701-709.
11. Greve A., Donaldson D., van Rossum M.C.W. A single-trace dual-process model of episodic memory: A novel computational account of familiarity and recollection. Hippocampus 2010, 20:235-251.
12. Hicks J., Marsh R.L. Remember-know judgments can depend on how the question is asked. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999, 6:117-122.
13. Higham P.A., Vokey J.R. Judgement heuristics and recognition memory: Prime identification and target processing fluency. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28:574-584.
14. Higham P.A., Vokey J.R. Illusory recollection and dual-process models of recognition memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 2004, 57:714-744.
15. Hintzman D.L. Research Strategy in the Study of Memory: Fads, Fallacies, and the Search for the "Coordinates of Truth". Perspectives on Psychological Science 2001, 6:253-271.
16. Huber D.E., Clark T.F., Curran T., Winkielman P. Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: Testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 2008, 34:1305-1324.
17. Humphreys M.S. Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 1978, 17:175-187.
18. Jacoby, L. L., Yonelinas, A. P., & Jennings, J. (1997). The relation between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 13-47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:513-541.
20. Jacoby L.L., Whitehouse K. An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1989, 118:126-135.
21. Johnson M.K., Hashtroudi S., Lindsay D.S. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 114:3-28.
22. Klinger M.R. The roles of attention and awareness in the false recognition effect. The American Journal of Psychology 2001, 114:93-114.
23. Knowlton B.J., Squire L.R. Remembering and knowing: Two different expressions of declarative memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:699-710.
24. Kucera H., Francis W.N. Computational analysis of present-day American English 1967, Brown University Press, Providence, RI.
25. Kurilla B.P., Westerman D.L. Processing fluency affects subjective claims of recollection. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:82-92.
26. Lucas M. Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7:618-630.
27. Lucas, H. D., Taylor, J. R., Henson, R. N., & Paller, K. A. (in this issue). Many roads lead to recognition: Electrophysiological correlates of familiarity derived from short-term masked repetition priming.
28. Mandler G. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review 1980, 87:252-271.
29. Mayes A.R., Gooding P.A., van Eijk R. A new theoretical framework for explicit and implicit memory. Psyche 1997, 3(2). http://www.theassc.org/files/assc/2289.pdf.
30. Mayes A., Montaldi D., Migo E. Associative memory and the medial temporal lobes. Trends in Cognitive Science 2007, 11:126-135.
31. McCabe D.P., Geraci L. The influence of instructions and terminology on remember-know judgments. Consciousness & Cognition 2009, 18:401-413.
32. Mickes L., Wais P.E., Wixted J.T. Recollection is a continuous process: Implications for dual process theories of recognition memory. Psychological Science 2009, 20:509-515.
33. Migo, E. M., Mayes, A. R., & Montaldi, D. (2012). Measuring recollection and familiarity: Improving the remember/know procedure. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1435-1455.
34. Montaldi D., Mayes A.R. Familiarity, recollection and medial temporal lobe function: An unresolved issue. Trends in Cognitive Science 2011, 15:339-340.
35. Montaldi D., Mayes A.R. The role of recollection and familiarity in the functional differentiation of the medial temporal lobes. Hippocampus 2010, 20:1291-1314.
36. Montaldi D., Spencer T.J., Roberts N., Mayes A.R. The neural system that mediates familiarity memory. Hippocampus 2006, 16(5):504-520.
37. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
38. Norman K.A. How hippocampus and cortex contribute to recognition memory: Revisiting the complementary learning systems model. Hippocampus 2010, 20:1217-1227.
39. Norman K.A., O'Reilly R.C. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychological Review 2003, 110:611-646.
40. Rajaram S., Geraci L. Conceptual fluency selectively influences knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:1070-1074.
41. Rajaram S. Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition 1993, 21:89-102.
42. Rotello C.M., Macmillan N.A., Reeder J.A. Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal-detection model. Psychological Review 2004, 111,. 588-616.
43. Rugg M.D., Wilding E.L. Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Science 2000, 4:108-115.
44. Schacter D.L., Tulving E. Memory systems 1994, MIT Press, Cambridge.
45. Slotnick S.D. Remember source memory ROCs indicate recollection is a continuous process. Memory 2010, 18:27-39.
46. Staresina B.P., Davachi L.J. Selective and shared contributions of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex to episodic item and associative encoding. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:1478-1489.
47. Taylor, J. R., Buratto, L., & Henson, R. N. in press. Behavioural and neural evidence for masked conceptual priming of recollection Cortex.
48. Tulving E. Elements of episodic memory 1983, Oxford University Press, New York.
49. Tulving E. Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology 1985, 26:1-12.
50. Tunney R.J., Fernie G. Repetition priming affects guessing not familiarity. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2007, 3:40.
51. Van den Bussche E., Van den Noortgate W., Reynvoet B. Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2009, 135:452-477.
52. Watkins M.J., Gardiner J.M. Appreciation of Generate-Recognize Theory of Recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 1979, 18:687-704.
53. Whittlesea B.W.A., Williams L.D. Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica 1998, 96:141-165.
54. Whittlesea B.W.A., Williams L.D. The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:14-33.
55. Wixted J.T., Mickes L. A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. Psychological Review 2010, 117:1025-1054.
56. Woollams A.M., Taylor J.R., Karayanidis F., Henson R.N. Event-related potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:1114-1129.
57. Yonelinas A.P. Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition 1997, 25:747-763.
58. Yonelinas A.P., Jacoby L.L. Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness & Cognition 1996, 5:131-141.
59. Yonelinas A.P., Jacoby L.L. The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency. Journal of Memory and Language 1995, 34:622-643.
60. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46(3):441-517.