Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: Evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection

NeuroImage

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 439-450

  Addante, Richard J ^a,b   Ranganath, Charan ^a   Yonelinas, Andrew P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Episodic memory; Event related potentials; Familiarity; Recollection; Source memory

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EPISODIC MEMORY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RECOGNITION MEMORY; SOURCE MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861717165     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.031     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Addante R.J., Watrous A.J., Yonelinas A.P., Ekstrom A.D., Ranganath C. Prestimulus theta activity predicts correct source memory retrieval. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108(26):10702-10707. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural].
2. Allan K., Rugg M.D. Neural correlates of cued recall with and without retrieval of source memory. Neuroreport 1998, 9(15):3463-3466.
3. Allan K., Wilding E.L., Rugg M.D. Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 1998, 98(2-3):231-252.
4. Aly M., Knight R.T., Yonelinas A.P. Faces are special but not too special: spared face recognition in amnesia is based on familiarity. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(13):3941-3948.
5. Bader R., Mecklinger A., Hoppstadter M., Meyer P. Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: evidence from event-related potentials. NeuroImage 2010, 50(2):772-781.
6. Bell A.J., Sejnowski T.J. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 1995, 7(6):1129-1159.
7. Bowles B., Crupi C., Mirsattari S.M., Pigott S.E., Parrent A.G., Pruessner J.C., et al. Impaired familiarity with preserved recollection after anterior temporal-lobe resection that spares the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104(41):16382-16387.
8. Cansino S., Trejo-Morales P. Neurophysiology of successful encoding and retrieval of source memory. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2008, 8(1):85-98.
9. Curran T. Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Mem. Cognit. 2000, 28(6):923-938.
10. Curran T. Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(8):1088-1106.
11. Curran T., Doyle J. Picture superiority doubly dissociates the ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23(5):1247-1262.
12. Curran T., Tanaka J.W., Weiskopf D.M. An electrophysiological comparison of visual categorization and recognition memory. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2002, 2(1):1-18.
13. Curran T., DeBuse C., Woroch B., Hirshman E. Combined pharmacological and electrophysiological dissociation of familiarity and recollection. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26(7):1979-1985.
14. Curran T., DeBuse C., Leynes P.A. Conflict and criterion setting in recognition memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2007, 33(1):2-17.
15. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004, 134(1):9-21.
16. Diana R.A., Reder L.M., Arndt J., Park H. Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2006, 13(1):1-21.
17. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11(9):379-386.
18. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. Medial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22(8):1808-1818.
19. Diana R.A., Van den Boom W., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. ERP correlates of source memory: unitized source information increases familiarity-based retrieval. Brain Res. 2011, 1367:278-286.
20. Duarte A., Ranganath C., Winward L., Hayward D., Knight R.T. Dissociable neural correlates for familiarity and recollection during the encoding and retrieval of pictures. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2004, 18(3):255-272.
21. Duzel E., Yonelinas A.P., Mangun G.R., Heinze H.J., Tulving E. Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997, 94(11):5973-5978.
22. Duzel E., Cabeza R., Picton T.W., Yonelinas A.P., Scheich H., Heinze H.J., et al. Task-related and item-related brain processes of memory retrieval. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96(4):1794-1799.
23. Duzel E., Vargha-Khadem F., Heinze H.J., Mishkin M. Brain activity evidence for recognition without recollection after early hippocampal damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98(14):8101-8106.
24. Ecker U.K., Zimmer H.D., Groh-Bordin C. Color and context: an ERP study on intrinsic and extrinsic feature binding in episodic memory. Mem. Cognit. 2007, 35(6):1483-1501. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't].
25. Ecker U.K., Zimmer H.D., Groh-Bordin C. The influence of object and background color manipulations on the electrophysiological indices of recognition memory. Brain Res. 2007, 1185:221-230. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't].
26. Eichenbaum H., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 30:123-152.
27. Friedman D. Event-related brain potential investigations of memory and aging. Biol. Psychol. 2000, 54(1-3):175-206.
28. Friedman D., Johnson R. Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: a selective review. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2000, 51(1):6-28.
29. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Bersick M. The late negative episodic memory effect: the effect of recapitulating study details at test. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 23(2-3):185-198.
30. Gold J.J., Smith C.N., Bayley P.J., Shrager Y., Brewer J.B., Stark C.E., et al. Item memory, source memory, and the medial temporal lobe: concordant findings from fMRI and memory-impaired patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103(24):9351-9356.
31. Gruber M.J., Otten L.J. Voluntary control over prestimulus activity related to encoding. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30(29):9793-9800.
32. Guo C., Duan L., Li W., Paller K.A. Distinguishing source memory and item memory: brain potentials at encoding and retrieval. Brain Res. 2006, 1118(1):142-154.
33. Herron J.E. Decomposition of the ERP late posterior negativity: effects of retrieval and response fluency. Psychophysiology 2007, 44(2):233-244.
34. Hicks J.L., Marsh R.L., Ritschel L. The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2002, 28(3):503-508.
35. Johansson M., Mecklinger A. The late posterior negativity in ERP studies of episodic memory: action monitoring and retrieval of attribute conjunctions. Biol. Psychol. 2003, 64(1-2):91-117.
36. Johnson M.K., Hashtroudi S., Lindsay D.S. Source monitoring. Psychol. Bull. 1993, 114(1):3-28.
37. Johnson M.K., Kounios J., Nolde S.F. Electrophysiological brain activity and memory source monitoring. Neuroreport 1997, 8(5):1317-1320.
38. Johnson R., Kreiter K., Zhu J., Russo B. A spatio-temporal comparison of semantic and episodic cued recall and recognition using event-related brain potentials. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 1998, 7(2):119-136.
39. Johnson M.K., Verfaellie M., Dunlosky J. Introduction to the special section on integrative approaches to source memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2008, 34(4):727-729.
40. Kim A.S., Vallesi A., Picton T.W., Tulving E. Cognitive association formation in episodic memory: evidence from event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(14):3162-3173. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't].
41. Kirwan C.B., Wixted J.T., Squire L. Activity in the medial temporal lobe predicts memory strength, whereas activity in the prefrontal cortex predicts recollection. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:10541-10548.
42. Klem G.H., Luders H.O., Jasper H.H., Elger C. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 1999, 52:3-6.
43. Levine B., Freedman M., Dawson D., Black S., Stuss D. Ventral frontal contribution to self-regulation: convergence of episodic memory and inhibition. Neurocase 1999, 5(3):263-275.
44. Leynes P.A., Phillips M.C. Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for varied recollection during source monitoring. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2008, 34(4):741-751.
45. Leynes P.A., Landau J., Walker J., Addante R.J. Event-related potential evidence for multiple causes of the revelation effect. Conscious. Cogn. 2005, 14(2):327-350.
46. Mecklinger A. Electrophysiological measures of familiarity memory. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2006, 37(4):292-299.
47. Mecklinger A., Brunnemann N., Kipp K. Two processes for recognition memory in children of early school age: an event-related potential study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23(2):435-446.
48. Mitchell K.J., Johnson M.K. Source monitoring 15years later: what have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory?. Psychol. Bull. 2009, 135(4):638-677.
49. Montaldi D., Mayes A.R. The role of recollection and familiarity in the functional differentiation of the medial temporal lobes. Hippocampus 2010, 20:1291-1314. 10.1002/hipo.20853.
50. Montaldi D., Spencer T.J., Roberts N., Mayes A.R. The neural system that mediates familiarity memory. Hippocampus 2006, 16(5):504-520.
51. Nyhus E., Curran T. Semantic and perceptual effects on recognition memory: evidence from ERP. Brain Res. 2009, 1283:102-114. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.].
52. Otten L.J., Quayle A.H., Akram S., Ditewig T.A., Rugg M.D. Brain activity before an event predicts later recollection. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9(4):489-491.
53. Paller K.A., Voss J.L., Boehm S.G. Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11(6):243-250.
54. Parks C.M., Yonelinas A.P. Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: comment on Wixted (2007). Psychol. Rev. 2007, 114(1):188-202. discussion 203-189.
55. Parks C.M., Yonelinas A.P. Evidence for a memory threshold in second-choice recognition memory responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106(28):11515-11519.
56. Quamme J.R., Frederick C., Kroll N.E., Yonelinas A.P., Dobbins I.G. Recognition memory for source and occurrence: the importance of recollection. Mem. Cognit. 2002, 30(6):893-907.
57. Ranganath C. A unified framework for the functional organization of the medial temporal lobes and the phenomenology of episodic memory. Hippocampus 2010, 20(11):1263-1290.
58. Ranganath C., Yonelinas A.P., Cohen M.X., Dy C.J., Tom S.M., D'Esposito M. Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(1):2-13.
59. Rugg M.D., Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11(6):251-257.
60. Rugg M.D., Wilding E.L. Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4(3):108-115.
61. Rugg M.D., Mark R.E., Walla P., Schloerscheidt A.M., Birch C.S., Allan K. Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature 1998, 392(6676):595-598.
62. Rugg M.D., Walla P., Schloerscheidt A.M., Fletcher P.C., Frith C.D., Dolan R.J. Neural correlates of depth of processing effects on recollection: evidence from brain potentials and positron emission tomography. Exp. Brain Res. 1998, 123(1-2):18-23.
63. Senkfor A.J., Van Petten C. Who said what? An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1998, 24(4):1005-1025.
64. Spaniol J., Davidson P.S., Kim A.S., Han H., Moscovitch M., Grady C.L. Event-related fMRI studies of episodic encoding and retrieval: meta-analyses using activation likelihood estimation. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(8-9):1765-1779. [Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't].
65. Trott C.T., Friedman D., Ritter W., Fabiani M., Snodgrass J.G. Episodic priming and memory for temporal source: event-related potentials reveal age-related differences in prefrontal functioning. Psychol. Aging 1999, 14(3):390-413.
66. Tsivilis D., Otten L.J., Rugg M.D. Context effects on the neural correlates of recognition memory: an electrophysiological study. Neuron 2001, 31(3):497-505.
67. Vilberg K.L., Moosavi R.F., Rugg M.D. The relationship between electrophysiological correlates of recollection and amount of information retrieved. Brain Res. 2006, 1122(1):161-170.
68. Voss J.L., Paller K.A. Neural correlates of conceptual implicit memory and their contamination of putative neural correlates of explicit memory. Learn. Mem. 2007, 14(4):259-267.
69. Wais P.E., Wixted J.T., Hopkins R.O., Squire L.R. The hippocampus supports both the recollection and the familiarity components of recognition memory. Neuron 2006, 49(3):459-466.
70. Wais P.E., Squire L.R., Wixted J.T. In search of recollection and familiarity signals in the hippocampus. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22(1):109-123.
71. Wiegand I., Bader R., Mecklinger A. Multiple ways to the prior occurrence of an event: an electrophysiological dissociation of experimental and conceptually driven familiarity in recognition memory. Brain Res. 2010, 1360:106-118.
72. Wilding E.L. Separating retrieval strategies from retrieval success: an event-related potential study of source memory. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37(4):441-454.
73. Wilding E.L. In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection?. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2000, 35(1):81-87. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't].
74. Wilding E.L., Rugg M.D. An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain 1996, 119(Pt 3):889-905.
75. Wilding E.L., Doyle M.C., Rugg M.D. Recognition memory with and without retrieval of context: an event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33(6):743-767.
76. Wolk D.A., Schacter D.L., Berman A.R., Holcomb P.J., Daffner K.R., Budson A.E. An electrophysiological investigation of the relationship between conceptual fluency and familiarity. Neurosci. Lett. 2004, 369(2):150-155. [Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.].
77. Woodruff C.C., Hayama H.R., Rugg M.D. Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Brain Res. 2006, 1100(1):125-135.
78. Yonelinas A.P. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1999, 25(6):1415-1434.
79. Yonelinas A.P. Components of episodic memory: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2001, 356(1413):1363-1374.
80. Yonelinas A.P. Consciousness, control, and confidence: the 3 Cs of recognition memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2001, 130(3):361-379.
81. Yonelinas A.P., Levy B.J. Dissociating familiarity from recollection in human recognition memory: different rates of forgetting over short retention intervals. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2002, 9(3):575-582.
82. Yonelinas A.P., Parks C.M. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. Psychol. Bull. 2007, 133(5):800-832.
83. Yonelinas A.P., Hopfinger J.B., Buonocore M.H., Kroll N.E., Baynes K. Hippocampal, parahippocampal and occipital-temporal contributions to associative and item recognition memory: an fMRI study. Neuroreport 2001, 12(2):359-363.
84. Yonelinas A.P., Kroll N.E., Quamme J.R., Lazzara M.M., Sauve M.J., Widaman K.F., et al. Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5(11):1236-1241.
85. Yonelinas A.P., Aly M., Wang W.C., Koen J.D. Recollection and familiarity: examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus 2010, 20(11):1178-1194.
86. Yovel G., Paller K.A. The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: when a face seems familiar but is not remembered. NeuroImage 2004, 21(2):789-800.
87. Yu S.S., Rugg M.D. Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition. Brain Res. 2010, 1320:74-84.