Everyday conditional reasoning: A working memory-dependent tradeoff between counterexample and likelihood use

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 107-119

  Verschueren, Niki ^a   Schaeken, Walter ^a   D'Ydewalle, Gery ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; THINKING; WORKING MEMORY; COGNITION; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; PERIODICITY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGY;

COGNITION; HUMANS; MEMORY; PERIODICITY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 20644449861     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195301     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. BADDELEY, A. D., & LOGIE, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple component model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. BARROUILLET, P., & LECAS, J. F. (1999). Mental models in conditional reasoning and working memory. Thinking & Reasoning, 5, 289-302.
3. BINDRA, D., CLARKE, K. A., & SHULTZ, T. R. (1980). Understanding predictive relations of necessity and sufficiency in formally equivalent "causal" and "logical" problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 422-443.
4. BYRNE, R. M. J., ESPINO, O., & SANTAMARIA, C. (1999). Counterexamples and the suppression of inferences. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 347-373.
5. CAMPBELL, J. I. D., & GUNTER, R. (2002). Calculations, culture and the repeated operant effect. Cognition, 86, 71-96.
6. COPELAND, D. E., & RADVANSKY, G. A. (2004). Working memory and syllogistic reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1437-1457.
7. CUMMINS, D. D., LUBART, T., ALKSNIS, O., & RIST, R. (1991). Conditional reasoning and causation. Memory & Cognition, 19, 274-282.
8. DE NEYS, W. (2003). In search of counterexamples: A specification of the memory search process for stored counterexamples during conditional reasoning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven.
9. DE NEYS, W.. D'YDEWALLE, G., SCHAEKEN, W., & VOS, G. (2002). A Dutch computerized and group administrable adaptation of the operation span test. Psychologica Belgica, 42, 177-190.
10. DIEUSSAERT, K., SCHAEKEN, W., SCHROYENS, W., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (1999). Strategies for dealing with complex deductive problems: Combining and dividing. Psychologica Belgica, 39, 215-234.
11. ENGLE, R. W., TUHOLSKI, S. W., LAUGHLIN, J. E., & CONWAY, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309-331.
12. ERICSSON, K. A., & SIMON, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. EVANS, J. ST. B. T. ( 1993). The mental model theory of conditional reasoning: Critical appraisal and revision. Cognition, 48, 1-20.
14. EVANS, J. ST. B. T., HANDLEY, S. J., & OVER, D. E. (2003). Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, & Cognition, 29, 321-335.
15. EVANS, J. ST. B. T., & OVER, D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
16. FORD, M. (1995). Two modes of mental representation and problem solution in syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 54, 1-71.
17. GEORGE, C. (1997). Reasoning with uncertain premises. Thinking & Reasoning, 3, 161-189.
18. GILHOOLY, K. J., LOGIE, R. H., & WYNN, V. (1999). Syllogistic reasoning tasks, working memory, and skill. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 473-498.
19. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (1994). Mental models and probabilistic thinking. Cognition, 50, 189-209.
20. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N., & BYRNE, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
21. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N., & BYRNE, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics and inference. Psychological Review, 109, 646-678.
22. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N., BYRNE, R. M. J., & SCHAEKEN, W. (1992). Prepositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review, 99, 418-439.
23. KANE, M. J., BLECKLEY, M. K., CONWAY, A. R. A., & ENGLE, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169-183.
24. KLACZYNSKI, P. A. (2001). Analytic and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision making. Child Development, 72, 844-861.
25. KLAUER, K. C., STEGMAIER, R., & MEISER, T. (1997). Working memory involvement in propositional and spatial reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 3, 9-47.
26. KYLLONEN, P. C., & CHRISTAL, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389-433.
27. LA POINTE, L. B., & ENGLE, R. W. (1990). Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 1118-1133.
28. LIU, I., LO, K., & WU, J. (1996). A probabilistic interpretation of "if-then." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 828-844.
29. MARKOVITS, H., & BARROUILLET, P. (2002). The development of conditional reasoning: A mental model account. Developmental Review, 22, 5-36.
30. MARKOVITS, H., DOYON, C., & SIMONEAU, M. (2002). Individual differences in working memory and conditional reasoning with concrete and abstract content. Thinking & Reasoning, 8, 97-107.
31. MARKOVITS, H., FLEURY, M. L., QUINN, S., & VENET, M. (1998). The development of conditional reasoning and the structure of semantic memory. Child Development, 69, 742-755.
32. MEISER, T., KLAUER, K. C., & NAUMER, B. (2001). Propositional reasoning and working memory: The role of prior training and pragmatic content. Acta Psychologica, 106, 303-327.
33. MIYAKE, A., FRIEDMAN, N. P., EMERSON, M. J., WITZKI, A. H., & HOWERTER, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
34. MIYAKE, A., & SHAH, P. (EDS.) (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. MOSKOWITZ, G. B., SKURNIK, I., & GALINSKY, A. D. (1999). The history of dual-process notions and the future of preconscious control. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in socialpsychology (pp. 12-41). New York: Guilford Press.
36. OAKSFORD, M., CHATER, N., & LARKIN, J. (2000). Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 883-899.
37. OBERAUER, K., SÜSS, H.-M., SCHULZE, R., WILHELM, O., & WITTMANN, W. W. (2000). Working memory capacity - Facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality & Individual Differences, 29, 1017-1045.
38. OBERAUER, K., SÜSS, H.-M., WILHELM, O., & WITTMANN, W. W. (2003). The multiple facets of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31, 167-193.
39. OBERAUER, K., & WILHELM, O. (2003). The meaning(s) of conditionals: Conditional probabilities, mental models, and personal utilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 680-693.
40. PAYNE, J. W. (1994). Thinking-aloud: Insights into information processing. Psychological Science, 5, 245-248.
41. POLITZER, G., & BOURMAUD, G. (2002). Deductive reasoning from uncertain conditionals. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 345-381.
42. ROSEN, V. M., & ENGLE, R. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 211-227.
43. SCHROYENS, W., & SCHAEKEN, W. (2004). Guilt by association: On iffy propositions and the proper treatment of mental-models theory. Current Psychology Letters, 12 (1). Available at http://cpl.revues.org/document411.html.
44. STANOVICH, K. E., & WEST, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioural & Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
45. STENNING, K., & VAN LAMBALGEN, M. (2001). Semantics as a foundation for psychology: A case study of Wason's selection task. Journal of Logic, Language. & Information, 10, 273-317.
46. STEVENSON, R. J., & OVER, D. E. (1995). Deduction from uncertain premises. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 613-643.
47. THOMPSON, V. (2000). The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning. Cognition, 76, 209-268.
48. TOMS, M., MORRIS, N., & WARD, D. (1993). Working memory and conditional reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 679-699.
49. TURNER, M. L., & ENGLE, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 127-154.
50. VENET, M., & MARKOVITS, H. (2001). Understanding uncertainty with abstract conditional premises. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 74-99.
51. VERSCHUEREN, N., SCHAEKEN, W., DE NEYS, W., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (2004). The difference between generating counterexamples and using them during reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1285-1308.
52. VERSCHUEREN, N., SCHAEKEN, W., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (2003a). Two reasoning mechanisms for solving the conditional fallacies. In A. Markman & L. Barsalou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1176-1181). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. VERSCHUEREN, N., SCHAEKEN, W., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (2003b). A verbal protocol study on causal conditional reasoning (Tech. Rep. No. 301). Leuven: University of Leuven, Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.
54. VERSCHUEREN, N., SCHAEKEN, W., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (in press). A dualprocess theory on causal conditional reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning.
55. WEIDENFELD, A., & OBERAUER, K. (2003). Reasoning from causal and noncausal conditionals: Testing an integrated framework. In A. Markman & L. Barsalou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1212-1217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.