Citizens' engagement on local governments' facebook sites. an empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in western europe

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 52-62

  Bonsón, Enrique ^a   Royo, Sonia ^b   Ratkai, Melinda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUELVA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

E Government; E Participation; Government 2.0; Media and content types; Public administration styles; Voluntary reporting; We Government

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922406228     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Abdelsalam H.M., Reddick C.G., Gamal S., Al-shaar A. Social media in Egyptian government websites: Presence, usage, and effectiveness. Government Information Quarterly 2013, 30(4):406-416.
2. Al-Debei M.M., Al-Lozi E., Papazafeiropoulou A. Why people keep coming back to Facebook: Explaining and predicting continuance participation from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective. Decision Support Systems 2013, 55(1):43-54.
3. Alexa.com. Retrieved from, (Accessed: 30.12.2013). http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/facebook.com.
4. Allegretti G., Herzberg C. Participatory budgets in Europe: Between efficiency and growing local democracy 2004, Transnational Institute, Amsterdam, (Retrieved from http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/archives/reports/newpol/participatory.pdf [Accessed 07.10.2014]).
5. Allen B.L., Juillet G., Paquet J., Roy J. E-governance and government on-line in Canada: Partnerships, people and prospects. Government Information Quarterly 2001, 18(2):93-104.
6. Bannister F., Connolly R. The trouble with transparency: A critical review of openness in e-government. Policy & Internet 2011, 3(1):1-30.
7. Bertot J.C., Jaeger P.T., Grimes J.M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(3):264-271.
8. Bonsón E., Ratkai M. A set of metrics to assess stakeholder engagement and social legitimacy on a corporate Facebook page. Online Information Review 2013, 37(5):787-803.
9. Bonsón E., Royo S., Ratkai M. Facebook practices in Western European municipalities. An empirical analysis of activity and citizens' engagement. Administration & Society 2014, 10.1177/0095399714544945.
10. Bonsón E., Torres L., Royo S., Flores F. Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly 2012, 29(2):123-132.
11. Byrd S. Hi fans! Tell us your story! Incorporating a stewardship-based social media strategy to maintain brand reputation during a crisis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 2012, 17(3):241-254.
12. Christodoulides G. Branding in the post-Internet era. Marketing Theory 2009, 9(1):141-144.
13. Conroy M., Feezell J.T., Guerrero M. Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior 2012, 28(5):1535-1546.
14. Dekay S.H. How large companies react to negative Facebook comments. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 2012, 17(3):289-299.
15. Eccles R., Krzus M.P. One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy 2010, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.
16. Ellison N., Hardey M. Developing political conversations? Information. Communication & Society 2013, 16(6):878-889.
17. Ellison N., Hardey M. Social media and local government: Citizenship, consumption and democracy. Local Government Studies 2014, 40(1):21-40.
18. Ferro E., Loukis E., Charalabidis Y., Osella M. Analyzing the centralised use of multiple social media by government from innovations diffusion theory perspective. In Electronic Participation. Proceeding of 5th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, Koblenz, Germany, September 17-19 2013, 95-108.
19. García-Sánchez I.M., Rodríguez-Domínguez L., Gallego-Álvarez I. The relationship between political factors and the development of e-participatory government. The Information Society 2011, 27(4):233-251.
20. Graham M., Avery E.J. Government public relations and social media: An analysis of the perceptions and trends of social media use at the local government level. Public Relations Journal 2013, 7(4):1-21.
21. Grimmelikhuijsen S. Do transparent government agencies strengthen trust?. Information Policy 2009, 14(3):173-186.
22. Grimmelikhuijsen S., Porumbescu G., Hong B., Im T. The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review 2013, 73(4):575-586.
23. Gummerus J., Liljander V., Weman E., Pihlström M. Customer engagement in a Facebook brand community. Management Research Review 2012, 35(9):857-877.
24. Haigh M.M., Brubaker P., Whiteside E. Facebook: Examining the information presented and its impact on stakeholders. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 2013, 18(1):52-69.
25. Halpern D., Katz J.E. From e-government to social network government: Towards a transition model. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Web Science Conference, Evanston, Illinois 2012.
26. Hofmann S., Beverungen D., Räckers M., Becker J. What makes local governments' online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook. Government Information Quarterly 2013, 30(4):387-396.
27. Johannessen M.R., Flak L.S., Sæbø Ø. Choosing the right medium for municipal e-participation based on stakeholder expectations. Electronic Participation 2012, 25-36. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
28. Karkin N. Web 2.0 tools for public participation through government websites. Gestión y Política Pública, Special Issue on Electronic Government 2013, 307-331.
29. Katz J., Halpern D. Political and developmental correlates of social media participation in government: A global survey of national leadership websites. International Journal of Public Administration 2013, 36(1):1-15.
30. Khan G.F., Yoon H.Y., Kim J., Park H.W. From e-government to social government: Twitter use by Korea's central government. Online Information Review 2014, 38(1):95-113.
31. Kickert W. Public management in the United States and Europe. Public Management and Administrative reform in Western Europe 1997, 15-38. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. W. Kickert (Ed.).
32. Kim S., Kim H.J., Lee H. An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of open. Government Information Quarterly 2009, 26(1):42-50.
33. Lee G., Kwak Y.H. An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly 2012, 29(4):492-503.
34. Leston-Bandeira C., Bender D. How deeply are parliaments engaging on social media. Information Polity 2013, 18(4):281-297.
35. Levine C., Fisher G. Citizenship and service delivery: The promise of coproduction. Public Administration Review 1984, 44(Special Issue):178-189.
36. Li M.-H., Feeney M.K. Adoption of electronic technologies in local U.S. governments: Distinguishing between e-services and communication technologies. The American Review of Public Administration 2014, 44(1):75-91.
37. Linders D. We-government: an anatomy of citizen e-participation in the Information Age. Proceeding of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research 2011, 167-176.
38. Linders D. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen e-participation in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly 2012, 29:446-454.
39. Long M. Beyond traditional boundaries: Government in the information age. Australian Journal of Public Administration 2002, 61(1):3-12.
40. Magro M.J. A review of social media use in e-government. Administrative Sciences 2012, 2:148-161.
41. Maor M. Feeling the heat? Anticorruption mechanisms in comparative perspective. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 2004, 17(11):1-28.
42. Martí C., Royo S., Acerete B. The effect of new legislation on the disclosure of performance indicators: The case of Spanish local governments. International Journal of Public Administration 2012, 35(13):873-885.
43. Meijer A.J. New media and the coproduction of safety: An empirical analysis of Dutch practices. The American Review of Public Administration 2014, 44(1):17-34.
44. Meijer A., Thaens M. Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American police departments. Government Information Quarterly 2013, 30(4):343-350.
45. Mergel I. The social media innovation challenge in the public sector. Information Polity 2012, 17:281-292.
46. Michel H. E-Administration, E-government, E-Governance and the learning city: A typology of citizenship management using ICTs. The Electronic Journal of E-government 2005, 3(4):213-218.
47. Mossberger K., Wu Y., Crawford J. Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly 2013, 30(4):351-358.
48. Nam T. Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly 2012, 29(1):12-20.
49. OECD Citizens as partners. Information, consultation and public participation in policy-making 2001, OECD, Paris.
50. Oliveira G.H.M., Welch E.W. Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context. Government Information Quarterly 2013, 30(4):397-405.
51. Panagiotopoulos P., Barnett J., Brooks L. Social Media and government responsiveness: The case of the UK Food Standards Agency. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2013, 8074:310-321.
52. Panagiotopoulos P., Moody C., Elliman T. Institutional diffusion of eParticipation in the English local government: Is central policy the way forward?. Information Systems Management 2012, 29(4):295-304.
53. Papenfuß U., Schaefer C. Improving public accountability by aligning reporting to organizational changes in public service provision - an empirical Internet study of all Austrian, German and Swiss towns and states from an agency-theory perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences 2010, 76(3):555-576.
54. Pew Research Center Social media update 2013 Retrieved from, (Last accessed: 10 January 2014). http://www.pewinternet.org.
55. Pfeffer J., Salancik G. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective 1978, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
56. Picazo-Vela S., Gutiérrez-Martínez I., Luna-Reyes L.F. Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly 2012, 29:504-511.
57. Pina V., Lourdes T., Royo S. Are ICTs improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local governments? An empirical study. Public Administration 2007, 85(2):449-472.
58. Pina V., Lourdes T., Royo S. E-government evolution in EU local governments: A comparative perspective. Online Information Review 2009, 36(6):1137-1168.
59. Pina V., Lourdes T., Royo S. Is E-government promoting convergence towards more accountable local governments?. International Public Management Journal 2010, 13(4):350-380.
60. Ramanadhan S., Mendez S.R., Rao M., Viswanath K. Social media use by community-based organizations conducting health promotion: A content analysis. BMC Public Health 2013, 13(1).
61. Reddick C.G., Norris D.F. Social media adoption at the American grass roots: Web 2.0 or 1.5?. Government Information Quarterly 2013, 30(4):498-507.
62. Royo S., Yetano A., Acerete B. E-participation and environmental protection: Are local governments really committed?. Public Administration Review 2014, 74(1):87-98.
63. Rustad E., Saebo O. How, why and whom do local politicians engage on Facebook?. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2013, 8075:69-79.
64. Shu W., Chuang Y.-H. The perceived benefits of 6-degree-separation social networks. Internet Research 2011, 21(1):26-45.
65. Snead J.T. Social media use in the U.S. Executive branch. Government Information Quarterly 2013, 30(1):56-63.
66. Torres L. Trajectories in the modernisation of public administration in European continental countries. Australian Journal of Public Administration 2004, 63(3):99-112.
67. Torres L.H. Citizen sourcing in the public interest. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 2007, 3(1):134-145.
68. Torres L., Pina V. Public-private partnership and private finance initiatives in the EU and Spanish local governments. The European Accounting Review 2001, 10(3):601-619.
69. Torres L., Pina V., Acerete B. E-governance developments in European Union cities: Reshaping government's relationship with citizens. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 2006, 19(2):277-302.
70. Vragov R., Kumar N. The impact of information and communication technologies on the costs of democracy. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2013, 12(6):440-448.
71. Waterman R.W., Meier K.J. Principal-agent models: An expansion?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1998, 8(2):173-202.
72. Waters R.D., Burnett E., Lamm A., Lucas J. Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review 2009, 35(2):102-106.