We-government: An anatomy of citizen coproduction in the information age

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 167-176

  Linders, Dennis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

collaborative governance; coproduction; crowdsourcing; digital government; e government; government as platform; information age; public administration; service delivery

Indexed keywords

CO-PRODUCTION; COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE; CROWDSOURCING; DIGITAL GOVERNMENT; E-GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT AS PLATFORM; INFORMATION AGE; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; SERVICE DELIVERY;

INTERNET; MANAGEMENT; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 80054779485     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2037556.2037581     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (65)

1. Samuelson, Robert J. 2010. The Age of Austerity. The Washington Post (October 11, 2010).
2. Weber, E. P and Khademian, A. M. 2008. Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68, 2 (2008), 334-349.
3. Donahue, J. 2004. On collaborative governance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard (2004).
4. Kettl, Donald F. 2000. The tranformation of governance: globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review, 60, 6 (2000).
5. Mattson, G. 1986. The promise of citizen coproduction: some persistent issues. Public Productivity Review, 10, 2 (1986).
6. Horne, M. & Shirley, T. 2009. Co-production in public services: a new partnership with citizens (Discussion Paper).
7. Levine, C. & Fisher, G. 1984. Citizenship and service delivery: the promise of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 44 (1984).
8. Whitaker, G. P. 1980. Coproduction: citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, 40, 3 (1980), 240-246.
9. Benkler, Yochai. 2002. Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm. The Yale Law Journal, 112 (2002).
10. Shirky, Clay. 2010. Cognitive Surplus. Penguin Press, New York.
11. Orszag, Peter. 2009. Open Government Directive. Washington, DC: White House.
12. Government 2.0 Taskforce. 2009. Engage: Getting on with Government 2.0. Australian Government.
13. The Gov Monitor. 2010. New Singapore e-Government Masterplan to connect with the people. thegovmonitor.com (June 14, 2010).
14. Cameron, David. 2010. The Next Age of Government (Video). TED 2010.
15. Cameron, David. 2010. The Big Society Speech. The Office of the British Prime Minister.
16. Johnston, E. and Hansen, D. 2011. Design Lessons for Smart Governance Infrastructures. In American Governance 3.0: Rebooting the Public Square? National Academy of Public Administration.
17. O'Reilly, Tim. 2010. Government as a Platform (Chap 2). In Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. O'Reilly Media.
18. Brudney, J. & England, R. 1983. Toward a definition of the Coproduction Concept. Public Administration Review, 43, 1 (1983).
19. Prince, Rosa. 2010. David Cameron launches his Big Society. The Telegraph (telegraph.co.uk) (June 18, 2010).
20. Torres, L. H. 2007. Citizen sourcing in the public interest. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 3, 1 (2007), 134-145.
21. McGuire, M. 2006. Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66 (2006), 33-43. (Pubitemid 44721173)
22. Noveck, B.S. 2009. Wiki Government. Brookings Institutions Press, Washington, DC.
23. Ackerman, J. 2004. Co-Governance for accountability: beyond "Exit" and "Voice". World Development, 32, 3 (2004), 447-463. (Pubitemid 38256911)
24. Dunleavy, P. and Margetts, H. Z. 2010. The Second Wave of Digital Era Governance. 2010 Annual Meeting of APSA.
25. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tickler, J. 2005. New Public Administration Is Dead - Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16 (2005), 467-494. (Pubitemid 43992460)
26. Brandsen, T. and Pestoff, V. 2006. Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public management review, 8, 4 (2006), 493-501.
27. Bovaird, T. & Downe, J. 2008. Innovation in Public Engagement and Co-production of Services (Policy Paper). Cardiff.
28. Amichai-Hamburger, Y. 2008. Potential and promise of online volunteering. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2 (2008), 544-562.
29. Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, 4 (1969), 216-224.
30. Gazley, B. 2008. Beyond the contract: The scope and nature of informal government-nonprofit partnerships. Public administration review, 68, 1 (2008), 141-154.
31. Ostrom, E. 1996. Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24, 6 (1996), 1073-1087.
32. Flanagin, A. J, Stohl, C., and Bimber, B. 2006. Modeling the structure of collective action. Communication Monographs, 73, 1 (2006), 29-54. (Pubitemid 43420788)
33. Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., and Eden, C. 2000. The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management Review, 2, 3 (2000), 337-358.
34. Cooper, T. L, Bryer, T. A, and Meek, J. W. 2006. Citizen- Centered Collaborative Public Management. Public Administration Review, 66 (2006), 76-88. (Pubitemid 44721177)
35. Carlitz, R.D. and Gunn, R.W. 2002. Online rulemaking: A step towards e-governance. Governance Information Quarterly, 19, 4 (2002), 389-405. (Pubitemid 36002899)
36. Kumar, N. and Vragov, R. 2009. Active citizen participation using ICT tools. Communications of the ACM, 52, 1 (Jan 2009), 118-121.
37. Noveck, B.S. Wiki-government. 2008. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, 7 (2008).
38. Padget, J. 2005. E-Government and E-Democracy in Latin America. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2005).
39. Boyd, O.P. 2008. Differences in eDemocracy parties' eParticipation systems. Information Polity, 13, 3 (2008), 167- 188.
40. Vigoda, E. 2002. From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62, 5, 527-540.
41. Benkler, Y. 2003. Freedom in the Commons: Towards a Political Economy of Information. Duke Law Journal, 52, 6 (2003), 1245-1277.
42. Jones, C and Mitnick, S. 2006. Open Source Disaster Recovery: Case Studies of Networked Collaboration. First Monday, 11, 5 (2006).
43. Long, M. 2002. Beyond traditional boundaries: Government in the information age. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61, 1 (2002), 3-12.
44. Prince, R. 2010. David Cameron: Big Society is not a 'cover for cuts'. The Telegraph (telegraph.co.uk) (July 19, 2010).
45. Preece, J. and Shneiderman, B. 2009. The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 1 (2009), 13-32.
46. Bovaird, T. 2007. Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67, 5 (2007), 846-860.
47. Lallana, E. 2004. SMS in business and government in the Philippines. ICT4D Monograph Series. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/ Other/ UNPAN024834.pdf.
48. Shneiderman, B., et al. 2009. National Initaitive for Social Participation. NISP iParticipate.
49. Robinson, D. G, Yu, H., Zeller, W. P, and Felten, E. W. 2009. Government data and the invisible hand. Yale Journal of Law \& Technology, 11 (2009), 160.
50. CS Transform. 2010. Citizen Service Transformation: A manifesto for change in the delivery of public services.
51. Goldsmith, S. and Kettl, D. 2009. Unlocking the Power of Networks: Keys to High Performance Government. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
52. Bertot, J.T., Jaeger, P.T, Munson, S., and Glaisyer, T. 2010. Social media technology and policy for government transparency. Computer, 43, 11 (Nov 2010), 53-59.
53. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: he Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York.
54. Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Benkler.org.
55. Wang, Xu. 1999. Review: Mutual Empowerment of State and Society: Its Natre, Conditions, Mechanisms, and Limits. Comparative Politics, 31, 2 (1999), 231-249.
56. Rethemeyer, R. K. 2007. The Empires Strike Back: Is the Internet Corporatizing Rather Than Democratizing Policy Processes? Public Administration Review, 67, 2, 199-215.
57. Jaeger, P. T and Bertot, J. C. 2010. Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly (2010).
58. Schlozman, K. L, Verba, S., and Brady, H. E. 2010. Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 02 (2010), 487-509.
59. van Dijck, J. & Nieborg, D. 2009. Wikinomics and its discontents: a critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos. New Media & Society, 11, 4 (2009), 855-874.
60. Boulianne, S. 2009. Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26, 2 (2009), 193-211.
61. Carpini, M. X.D. 2000. Gen. com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 4 (2000), 341-349.
62. Jennings, M. K and Zeitner, V. 2003. Internet use and civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 3 (2003), 311-334. (Pubitemid 37528149)
63. Lam, W. F. 1996. Institutional design of public agencies and coproduction: a study of irrigation associations in Taiwan. World development, 24, 6 (1996), 1039-1054. (Pubitemid 126376461)
64. Shneiderman, B. 2009. iParticipate.gov: A National Initiative for Social Participation. Science, 323, 5920, 1426-1427.
65. Castells, M. 2008. The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 78 (2008).