Choosing the right medium for municipal eParticipation based on stakeholder expectations

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7444 LNCS, Issue , 2012, Pages 25-36

  Johannessen, Marius Rohde ^a   Flak, Leif Skiftenes ^a   Sæbø, Øystein ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

eParticipation; media choice; social media; stakeholder theory

Indexed keywords

DELPHI STUDY; E-PARTICIPATION; FACE-TO-FACE MEETINGS; MEDIA CHOICE; SOCIAL MEDIA; STAKEHOLDER GROUPS; STAKEHOLDER THEORY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 84866039773     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33250-0_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Kitchin, R.: Cyberspace: The world in the wires. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1998)
2. Kjensli, H., et al.: eKommune 2012: Lokal digital agenda. Oslo, Kommuneforlaget AS (2008)
3. Mazzoleni, G., Schulz, W.: "Mediatization" of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication 16(3), 247-261 (1999)
4. Gurevitch, M., Coleman, S., Blumler, J.G.: Political communication -old and new media relationships. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 625(1), 164-181 (2009)
5. Ebbers, W.E., Pieterson, W.J., Noordman, H.N.: Electronic government: Rethinking channel management strategies. Government Information Quarterly 25(2), 181-201 (2008)
6. Gastil, J., Dillard, J.P.: Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation. Political Communication 16(1), 3-23 (1999)
7. Davis, A.: New media and fat democracy: The paradox of online participation. New Media and Society 12(5), 745-761 (2010)
8. Carr, D.S., Halvorsen, K.: An Evaluation of Three Democratic, Community-Based Approaches to Citizen Participation: Surveys, Conversations With Community Groups, and Community Dinners. Society & Natural Resources 14(2), 107-126 (2001)
9. Rayner, S.: Democracy in the age of assessment: Reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making. Science and Public Policy 30(3), 163-170 (2003)
10. Jackson, N.A., Lilleker, D.G.: Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 6(3), 232-250 (2009)
11. Johannessen, M.R., Munkvold, B.E.: Defining the IT Artefact in Social Media for eParticipation: An emsemble view. In: European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS, Barcelona (2012)
12. Tambouris, E., Liotas, N., Tarabanis, K.: A Framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii (2007)
13. Rose, J., Sæbø, Ø.: Designing Deliberation Systems. The Information Society 26(3), 228-240 (2010)
14. Yates, J., Orlikowski, W.J.: Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media. The Academy of Management Review 17(2), 299-326 (1992)
15. Orlikowski, W.J., Yates, J.: Genre Repetoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 39(4), 541-574 (1994)
16. Shepherd, M., Watters, C.: The evolution of cybergenres. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (1998)
17. Yates, J., Orlikowski, W.: Genre Systems: Structuring Interaction through Communicative Norms. Journal of Business Communication 39(1), 13-35 (2002)
18. Päivärinta, T., Sæbø, Ø.: The Genre System Lens on E-Democracy. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 20(2) (2008)
19. Sæbø, Ø., Flak, L.S., Sein, M.K.: Understanding the dynamics in e-Participation initiatives: Looking through the genre and stakeholder lenses. Government Information Quarterly 28(3), 416-425 (2011)
20. Sæbø, Ø.: Understanding twitter™ use among parliament representatives: A genre analysis. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., de Bruijn, H. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 1-12. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
21. Rose, J., Sæbø, Ø.: Democracy Squared: designing on-line political communities to accommodate conflicting interests (2005)
22. Päivärinta, T., Halttunen, V., Tyrväinen, P.: A Genre-Based Method for Information Systems Planning. In: Rossi, M., Siau, K. (eds.) Information Modeling in the New Millenium, pp. 70-93. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2001)
23. Haraldsen, M., et al.: Developing e-Government Portals: From Life-Events through Genres to Requirements. In: The 11th Norwegian Conference on Information Systems (NOKOBIT), Stavanger, Norway (2004)
24. Mingers, J.: Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology. Info. Sys. Research 12(3), 240-259 (2001)
25. Freeman, R.E.: Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston (1984)
26. Flak, L.S., Rose, J.: Stakeholder Governance: Adapting Stakeholder Theory to the e-Government Field. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 16, 642-664 (2005)
27. Scholl, H.J.: Involving Salient Stakeholders. Action Research 2(3) (2004)
28. Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D.: The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information and Management 42(1), 15-29 (2004)
29. Schmidt, R.C.: Managing Delphi Surveys Using Nonparametric Statistical Techniques. Decision Sciences 28(3), 763-774 (1997)
30. Rayens, M.K., Hahn, E.J.: Building Consensus Using the Policy Delphi Method. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice 1(4), 308-315 (2000)
31. Päivärinta, T., Dertz, W.: Pre-determinants of Implementing IT Benefits Management in Norwegian Municipalities: Cultivate the Context. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Ferro, E. (eds.) EGOV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5184, pp. 111-123. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
32. Grönlund, Å., Ranerup, A.: Elektronisk förvaltning, elektronisk demokrati: visioner, verklighet, vidareutveckling. Studentlitteratur, Lund (2001)
33. Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., Skiftenes Flak, L.: The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly 25(3), 400-428 (2008)