A review of social media use in e-government

Administrative Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 148-161

  Magro, Michael J ^a  

^a SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E government; Social media; Social networking

Indexed keywords

EID: 85118770860     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20763387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/admsci2020148     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD e-Government Studies: The e-Government Imperative; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2003.
2. Osimo, D. Web 2.0 in government: Why and how? JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies: Seville, Spain, 2008. Available online: ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/EURdoc/JRC45269.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2011).
3. Gibson, R.K. New media and the revitalisation of politics. Representation 2008, 45, 289–299.
4. Kes-Erkul, A.; Erkul, R.E. Web 2.0 in the process of e-participation: The case of organizing for America and the Obama Administration. National Center for Digital Government working paper. National Center for Digital Government Working Paper Series 2009, 1, 1-19. Available online: http://scholarworks.umass.edu/ncdg/32/(accessed on 26 November 2011).
5. Magro, M.J.; Ryan, S.D.; Sharp, J.H. Using social networking for educational and cultural adaptation: An exploratory study. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 2009, 10, 1–16.
6. Bertot, J.C.; Jaeger, P.T.; Grimes, J.M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Gov. Inf. Q. 2010, 27, 264–271.
7. Couldry, N. New media for global citizens? The future of the digital divide debate. Brown J. World Aff. 2007, 14, 249–261.
8. Shi, Y. The accessibility of Chinese local government web sites: An exploratory study. Gov. Inf. Q. 2007, 24, 377–403.
9. Shin, D. A critique of Korean National Information Strategy: Case of national information infrastructures. Gov. Inf. Q. 2007, 24, 624–645.
10. Carter, L.; Weerakkody, V. E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Inf. Syst. Front. 2008, 10, 473–482.
11. Chang, A.; Kannon, P.K. Leveraging Web 2.0 in government. E-Government Technology Series, IBM Center for the Business of E-Government: Washington, DC, USA, 2008. Available online: http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/chang_fall08.pdf (accessed on 24 November 2011).
12. Belanger, F.; Carter, L. Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2008, 17, 165–176.
13. Kolsaker, A.; Lee-Kelley, L. Citizens’ attitudes towards e-government and e-governance: A UK study. Int. J. Public Sector Manag. 2008, 21, 723–738.
14. Breindl, Y.; Francq, P. Can Web 2.0 applications save e-democracy? A study of how new internet applications may enhance citizen participation in the political process online. Int. J. Electron. Democr. 2008, 1, 14–31.
15. Klein, P. Web 2.0: Reinventing democracy. CIO Insight Magazine 2008. Available online: http://anthonydwilliams.com/wp-content/uploads/web2_reinventingdemocracy.pdf (accessed on 26 November 2011).
16. Heeks, R.; Stanforth, C. Understanding e-Government project trajectories from an actor-network perspective. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2007, 16, 165–177.
17. Best, M.L.; Kumar, R. Sustainability failures of rural telecenters: Challenges from the Sustainable Access in Rural India (SARI) project. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 2008, 4, 31–45.
18. Zappen, J.P.; Harrison, T.M.; Watson, D. A New Paradigm for Designing e-government: Web 2.0 and Experience Design. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference, Montreal, Canada, 18–21 May 2008; pp. 17–26.
19. Chan, C.M.L.; Lau, Y.; Pan S.L. E-government implementation: A macro analysis of Singapore’s e-government initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. 2008, 25, 239–255.
20. Alonso, J.M.; Ambur, M.A.; Amutio, M.A. Improving access to government through better use of the Web. W3C Interest Group Note 12 May 2009. Available online: http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-egov-improving-20090512/(accessed on 28 November 2011).
21. Freeman, R.J.; Loo, P. Web 2.0 and E-government at the Municipal Level. In Proceedings of 2009 World Congress on Privacy, Security and Trust and the Management of e-Business, Saint John, NB, Canada, 25–27 August 2009; pp. 70–78.
22. Alshawi, S.; Alalwany, H. E-government evaluation: Citizen’s perspective in developing countries. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2009, 15, 193–208.
23. Verdegem, P.; Verleye, G. User-centered e-government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Gov. Inf. Q. 2009, 26, 487–497.
24. Lean, O.K.; Zailani, S.; Ramayah, T.; Fernando, Y. Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2009, 29, 458–475.
25. Park, J.; Cho, K. Declining relational trust between government and publics, and potential prospects of social media in the government public relations. In Proceedings of EGPA Conference 2009 The Public Service: Service Delivery in the Information Age, St. Julian’s, Malta, 2009. Available online: http://www.egpa2009.com/documents/psg1/ParkCho.pdf (accessed on 24 November 2011).
26. Fitch, K. Making friends in the Wild West: Singaporean public relations practitioners’ perceptions of working in social media. Prism 2009, 6, 1–14.
27. Bekkers, V. Flexible information infrastructures in Dutch e-government collaboration arrangements: Experiences and policy implications. Gov. Inf. Q. 2009, 26, 60–68.
28. Misuraca, G. Futuring e-government: Governance and policy implications for designing an ICT-enabled knowledge society. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Bogota, Colombia, 10–13 November 2009; pp. 83–90.
29. Ferro, E.; Molinari, F. Framing Web 2.0 in the process of public sector innovation: Going down the participation ladder. Eur. J. ePractice 2010, 9, 20–34.
30. Ochara-Muganda, N.; Van Belle, J. A proposed framework for E-Government knowledge infrastructures for Africa’s transition economies. J. e-Government Stud. Best Pract. 2010, 303226, 1–9.
31. Bonson, E.; Torres, L.; Royo, S.; Flores, F. Local E-Government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Gov. Inform. Q. 2012, March. Available online: http://www.aeca.es/pub/on_line/comunicaciones_xvicongresoaeca/cd/18f.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2011).
32. Millard, J. Government 1.5—Is the bottle half full or half empty? Eur. J. ePractice 2010, 9, 35–48.
33. Ostling, A. ICT in politics: From peaks of inflated expectations to voids of disillusionment. Eur. J. ePractice 2010, 9, 49–56.
34. Parvcek, P.; Sachs, M. Open Government—Information Flow in Web 2.0. Eur. J. ePractice 2010, 9, 57–68.
35. Dadashzadeh, M. Social media in government: From eGovernment to eGovernance. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2010, 8, 81–86.
36. Dunleavy, P.; Margetts, H. The Second Wave of Digital Era Governance. In Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, USA, 2–5 September 2010; pp. 1–32.
37. Hrdinova, J.; Helbig, N.; Peters, C.S. Designing social media policy for government: Eight essential elements. Center for Technology in Government: Albany, NY, USA, 2010. Available online: http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/guides/social_media_policy/social_media _policy.pdf (accessed on 28 November 2011).
38. Taylor-Smith, E.; Lindner, R. Social Networking Tools Supporting Constructive Involvement Throughout the Policy-Cycle. In Proceedings of 2010 4th International Conference on Electronic Democracy, Centre for E-Government, Danube-University, Krems, Austria, 7 May 2010.
39. Bianchi, T.; Cottica, A. Harnessing the unexpected: A public administration interacts with creatives on the web. Eur. J. ePractice 2010, 9, 82–90.
40. Jaeger, P.T.; Bertot, J.C. Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Gov. Inf. Q. 2010, 27, 371–376.
41. Chun, S.A.; Shulman, S.; Sandoval, R.; Hovy, E. Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Inf. Polity 2010, 15, 1–9.
42. Huang, C.; Chan, E.; Hyder, A.A. Web 2.0 and Internet social networking: A new tool for disaster management? – Lessons from Taiwan. Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 2010, 10, 1–5.
43. Jaeger, P.T.; Paquette, S.; Simmons, S.N. Information policy in national political campaigns: A comparison of the 2008 campaigns for president of the United States and prime minister of Canada. J. Inf. Technol. Polit. 2010, 7, 67–82.
44. Mourtada, R.; Salem, F. Civil Movements: The Impact of Facebook and Twitter. Arab Social Media Report, May, 2011. Available online: http://www.dsg.fohmics.net/En/Publication/Pdf_En/DSG_Arab_Social_Media_Report_No_2.pdf (accessed on 29 November 2011).
45. Ngak, C. Occupy Wall Street Uses Social Media to Spread Nationwide. CBS News, 7 October 2011. Available online: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20117291-501465.html (accessed on 30 November 2011).
46. Shirky, C. The political power of social media. Foreign Aff. 2011, January/February, 1–9.
47. Ghannam, J. Social media in the Arab world: Leading up to the uprisings in 2011. Center for International Media Assistance: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. Available online: http://www.hirondelle.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/SocialMediaintheArabWorldCIMA 2011.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2011).
48. Harb, Z. Arab revolutions and the social media effect. M/C–A Journal of Media and Culture 2011, 14, No. 2. Available online: http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/viewArticle/364 (accessed on 14 February 2012).
49. Mergel, I. The Use of social media to dissolve knowledge silos in government. In The Future of Public Administration, Public Management, and Public Service Around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective; O’Leary, R., Kim, S., Van Slyke, D.M., Eds.; Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
50. Yates, D.; Paquette, S. Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2011, 31, 6–13.
51. Nakki, P.; Back, A.; Ropponen, T. Social Media for Citizen Participation: Report of the Somus Project; Publication 755; VTT Technical Research Center: Espoo, Finland, 2011. Available online: http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/2011/P755.pdf (accessed on 22 November 2011).
52. Queensland Police Service. Disaster management and social media—A case study. Queensland Police Service: Queensland, Australia, 2011. Available online: http://www.police.qld.gov.au/Resources/Internet/services/reportsPublications/documents/QPSSocialMediaCaseStudy.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2012).
53. Hariche, A.C.; Loiseau, E.; Mac Erlaine, R. Web-Enabled Social Cohesion: Harnessing Participation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Cohesion and Development, Paris, France, 20–21 January 2011; pp. 1–32.
54. Crowe, A. The social media manifesto: A comprehensive review of the impact of social media on emergency management. J. Bus. Contin. Emerg. Plan. 2010, 5, 409–420.
55. Hellman, R. The Cloverleaves of Social Media Challenges for e-Governments. In Proceedings of eChallenges e-2011 Conference, Florence, Italy, 26–28 October 2011; pp. 1–8.
56. Charalabis, Y.; Loukis, E. Transforming government agencies’ approach to e-participation through efficient exploitation of social media. In Proceedings of the 2011 European Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland, 9–11 June 2011; pp. 1–12.
57. Verdegem, P. Social media for digital and social inclusion: Challenges for information society 2.0 research and policies. TripleC 2011, 9, 28–38.
58. Lampe, C.; LaRose, R.; Steinfield, C.; DeMaagd, K. Inherent barriers to the use of social media for public policy informatics. Public Sector Innov. J. 2011, 16, 1–17.
59. Mcnamara, J. Social Media Strategy and Governance: Gaps, Risks and Opportunities; University of Technology Sydney: Sydney, Australia, 2011; Available online: http://79.170.44.76/amecks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/social-media-strategy-and-governance-report-UTS.pdf (accessed on 11 February 2012).
60. Njuru, J.W. Perspectives of Kenyan students in the United States on e-government and citizen participation. J. Glob. Aff. Public Policy 2011, 1, 1–34.
61. Margetts, H.Z. The Internet and public policy. Policy Internet 2009, 1, 1.
62. Moriera, A.M.; Moller, M.; Gerhardt, G.; Ladner, A. E-Society and E-Democracy. Paper presented at the eGovernment-Symposium 2009, Berne, Switzerland, 2009.
63. U.S. Census Bureau. Section 24: Information and Communications; Table 1156; U.S. Census Bureau: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; p. 724. Available online: http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/11statab/infocomm.pdf (accessed on 14 February 2012).
64. Kuzma, J. Asian government usage of Web 2.0 social media. Eur. J. ePractice 2010, 9, 69–81.
65. Landsbergen, D. Government as part of the revolution: Using social media to achieve public goals. Electron. J. e-Government 2010, 8, 135–147.
66. Bertot, J.C.; Jaeger, P.T.; Munson, S.; Glaisyer, T. Social media technology and government transparency. IEEE Comput. 2010, 43, 53–59.
67. LaPaze, R.E. Friending the Government: Why US Government Social Media Websites do not Function as Public Spheres and What Can be Done to Promote Civic Participation. Master’s Thesis; George Mason University: Fairfax, VA, USA, 2011.