From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 446-454

  Linders, Dennis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Coproduction; Crowdsourcing; E Government; Government 2.0; Government as a platform; Open government; Social media

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866279731     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ackerman J. Co-Governance for Accountability: Beyond "Exit" and "Voice". World Development 2004, 32(3):447-463.
2. Amichai-Hamburger Y. Potential and promise of online volunteering. Computers in Human Behavior 2008, 24(2):544-562.
3. Arnstein S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 1969, 35(4):216-224.
4. Benkler Y. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom 2006, [Benkler.org].
5. Bertot J.C., Jaeger P.T., Hansen D. The impact of policies on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Govenrment Information Quarterly 2012, (29):30-40.
6. Bertot J., Jaeger P., Munson S., Glaisyer T. Engaging the public in open government: Social media technology and policy for government transparency. Computer 2010, 43(11):53-59.
7. Bovaird T. Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review 2007, 67(5):846-860.
8. Bovaird T., Downe J. Innovation in public engagement and co-production of services (policy paper) 2008, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff.
9. Boyd O. Differences in eDemocracy parties' eParticipation systems. Information Polity 2008, 13(3):167-188.
10. Brandsen T., Pestoff V. Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public management review 2006, 8(4):493-501.
11. Brudney J., England R. Toward a definition of the Coproduction Concept. Public Administration Review 1983, 43(1).
12. Cameron D. The Big Society Speech 2010, July 19, The Office of the British Prime Minister, [Retrieved from The Office of the British Prime Minister: http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/speeches-and-transcripts/2010/07/big-society-speech-53572].
13. Cameron D. The Next Age of Government (Video). TED 2010 2010, [Retrieved from TED 2010 (Video).: http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/david_cameron.html].
14. Carlitz R., Gunn R. Online rulemaking: A step towards e-governance. Governance Information Quarterly 2002, 19(4):389-405.
15. Castells M. The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2008, 616(78).
16. Cooper T.L., Bryer T.A., Meek J.W. Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review 2006, 66:76-88.
17. CS Transform Citizen Service Transformation: A manifesto for change in the delivery of public services 2010, CS Transform, (White Papers).
18. Donahue J. On collaborative governance 2004, Harvard, Cambridge, MA.
19. Dunleavy P., Margetts H.Z. The second wave of digital era governance. APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Papers 2010.
20. Dunleavy P., Margetts H., Bastow S., Tickler J. New public administration is dead - Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2005, 16:467-494.
21. Dutil P.A., Howards C., Langford J., Roy J. Rethinking government-public relations in a digital world: Customers, clients, or citizens?. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 2007, 4(1):77-90.
22. Evans P. Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence of synergy. World Development 1996, 24(6):1119-1132.
23. Flanagin A.J., Stohl C., Bimber B. Modeling the structure of collective action. Communication Monographs 2006, 73(1):29-54.
24. Gazley B. Beyond the contract: The scope and nature of informal government-nonprofit partnerships. Public Administration Review 2008, 68(1):141-154.
25. Goldsmith S., Kettl D. Unlocking the power of networks: Keys to high performance government 2009, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
26. Horne M., Shirley T. Co-production in public services: A new partnership with citizens (Discussion Paper) 2009, Cabinet Office, U.K., [The Strategic Unit].
27. Huxham C., Vangen S., Huxham C., Eden C. The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management Review 2000, 2(3):337-358.
28. Jaeger P.T., Bertot J.C. Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27:371-376.
29. Jennings M.K., Zeitner V. Internet use and civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 2003, 67(3):311-334.
30. Johnston E., Hansen D. Design lessons for smart governance infrastructures. American Governance 3.0: Rebooting the Public Square? 2011, National Academy of Public Administration. D. Ink, A. Balutis, T. Buss (Eds.).
31. Lallana E. SMS in business and government in the Philippines. ICT4D Monograph Series 2004, [Retrieved from ICT4D Monograph Series: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/Other/UNPAN024834.pdf].
32. Lam W. Institutional design of public agencies and coproduction: A study of irrigation associations in Taiwan. World Development 1996, 24(6):1039-1054.
33. Levine C., Fisher G. Citizenship and service delivery: The promise of coproduction. Public Administration Review 1984, 44.
34. Linders D. We-government: An anatomy of citizen coproduction in the information age. Digital Government Society Conference 2011 2011, June 12-15.
35. Linders D., Wilson S. What is open government? One year after the directive. Digital Government Society Conference 2011 2011, June.
36. Long M. Beyond traditional boundaries: Government in the information age. Australian Journal of Public Administration 2002, 61(1):3-12.
37. Mattson G. The promise of citizen coproduction: some persistent issues. Public Productivity Review 1986, 10(2).
38. McGuire M. Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review 2006, 66:33-43.
39. Nam T. Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly 2011, (29):12-20.
40. Noveck B. Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful 2009, Brookings Institutions Press, Washington, DC.
41. O'Reilly T. Government as a Platform (Chap 2). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice 2010, O'Reilly Media. D. Lathrop, L. Ruma (Eds.).
42. Ostrom E. Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development 1996, 24(6):1073-1087.
43. Padget J. E-government and e-democracy in Latin America. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2005, 20(1):94-96.
44. Parikh T.S. Engineering Rural Development. Communications of the ACM 2009, January, 54-63.
45. Prince R. David Cameron launches his Big Society. The Telegraph (telegraph.co.uk) 2010, June 18, [Retrieved from The Telegraph (telegraph.co.uk): http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/david-cameron/7897445/David-Cameron-launches-his-Big-Society.html].
46. Prince R. David Cameron: Big society is not a 'cover for cuts'. The Telegraph (telegraph.co.uk) 2010, July 19, [Retrieved from The Telegraph (telegraph.co.uk): http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/david-cameron/7898881/David-Cameron-Big-Society-is-not-a-cover-for-cuts.html].
47. Rethemeyer R.K. The empires strike back: Is the internet corporatizing rather than democratizing policy processes?. Public Administration Review 2007, 67(2):199-215.
48. Rich S. Storm puts Chicago's new snowplow tracker to test. Government Technology 2012, January 18, [Retrieved from http://www.govtech.com/e-government/Storm-Puts-Chicagos-New-Snowplow-Tracker-to-Test.html].
49. Robinson D., Yu H., Zeller W.P., Felten E.W. Government data and the invisible hand. Yale Journal of Law and Technology 2009, 160-175.
50. Schlozman K., Verba S., Brady H. Weapon of the strong? Participatory inequality and the internet. Perspectives on Politics 2010, 8(02):487-509.
51. Shirky C. Cognitive Surplus 2010, Penguin Press, New York.
52. Shneiderman B. National initaitive for social participation. NISP White Paper 2009.
53. The Gov Monitor New Singapore e-Government Masterplan to Connect with the People 2010, June 14, [thegovmonitor.com. Retrieved from thegovmonitor.com: http://www.thegovmonitor.com/world_news/asia/new-singapore-e-government-masterplan].
54. Torres L. Citizen sourcing in the public interest. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 2007, 3(1):134-145.
55. van Dijck J., Nieborg D. Wikinomics and its discontents: A critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos. New Media & Society 2009, 11(4):855-874.
56. Vigoda E. From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review 2002, 62(5):527-540.
57. Wang X. Review: Mutual empowerment of state and society: Its nature, conditions, mechanisms, and limits. Comparative Politics 1999, 31(2):231-249.
58. Whitaker G.P. Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review 1980, 40(3):240-246.
59. Yongnian Z., Wu G. Information technology, public space, and collective action in China. Comparative Political Studies 2005, 38:507.