E-governance developments in European union cities: Reshaping government's relationship with citizens

Governance

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 277-302

  Torres, Lourdes ^a   Pina, Vicente ^a   Acerete, Basilio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645113623     PISSN: 09521895     EISSN: 14680491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2006.00315.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Commission of the European Communities. 2003a. Special Eurobarometer: Issues Relating to Business and Consumer E-Commerce. (http://europa.eu.int/comm/ public_opinion/archives_en.htm}. (February 15, 2006).
2. _. 2003b. European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets 2003: COM (2003) 715. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.
3. Dunleavy, Patrick, Hellen Margetts, Simon Bastow, and Jane Tinkler. 2003. "E-Government and Policy Innovation in Seven Liberal Democracies." Presented at the Political Studies Association's Annual Conference, Leicester, UK, April 15-17.
4. E-Munis. 2002. Standards for E-documents, E-procedures and E-services. Relevant Standards for Local E-government Applications. Deliverable 12. Sankt Augustin, Denmark.
5. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP). 2003. CEDEFOP Info January-February. Thessaloniki, Greece: CEDEFOP.
6. Eurostat. 2004. Structural Indicators, (http://europa.eu.int/comm/ eurostat). (February 15, 2006).
7. Hammerschmid, Gerhard, and Renate Meyer. 2003. "Current Initiatives and Central Actors in the Austrian Administrative Reform Process." Presented at the EGPA Annual Conference, Oeiras, Portugal, September 3-6.
8. Ho, Alfred Tat-Kei. 2002. "Reinventing Local Governments and the E-Government Initiative." Public Administration Review 62: 434-444.
9. Hood, Christopher. 1995. "Emerging Issues in Public Administration." Public Administration 73: 165-183.
10. International Telecommunication Union. 2003. Internet Indicators, (http:// www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/). (February 15, 2006).
11. John, Peter. 2001. Local Governance in Western Europe. London: Sage.
12. Kaylor, Charles, Randy Deshazo, and David Van Eck. 2001. "Gauging E-Government: A Report on Implementing Services among American Cities." Government Information Quarterly 18: 293-307.
13. Kickert, Walter. 1997. "Public Management in the United States and Europe." In Public Management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe, ed. Walter Kickert. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
14. Kinder, Tony. 2002. "Vote Early, Vote Often? Teledemocracy in European Cities." Public Administration 80: 557-582.
15. Kraemer, Kenneth, and Jason Dedrick. 1997. "Computing and Public Organizations." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 7: 89-112.
16. Layne, Karen, and Jungwoo Lee. 2001. "Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four Stage Model." Government Information Quarterly 18: 12-136.
17. Margolis, Michael, and David Resnick. 2000. Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace "Revolution." Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Melistki, James. 2002. "The Adoption and Implementation of E-government: The Case of E-government in New Jersey." Ph.D. diss., Rutgers University.
19. Mindforest. 2004. Tendances de l'Internet au Luxembourg en 2003 [Internet trend in Luxembourg in 2003]. Luxembourg: Mindforest.
20. Moon, M. Jae. 2002. "The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?" Public Administration Review 62: 4-12.
21. Norris, Pippa. 2004. Deepening Democracy via E-Governance. Draft chapter for the UN World Public Sector Report, Harvard University, 1-37.
22. Oakley, Kate. 2002. "What Is E-Governance?" E-Governance Workshop, Strasbourg, June 10-11.
23. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1997. Managing across Levels of Government, Part One: Overview. Paris: OECD.
24. _. 2003. The E-Government Imperative: Main Findings. Paris: OECD.
25. Pollitt, Christopher, and Geert Bouckaert. 2000. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Pratchett, Lawrence. 1999. "New Technologies and the Modernization of Local Government: An Analysis of Biases and Constraints." Public Administration 77: 731-750.
27. Rouban, Luc. 1997. "The Administrative Modernization Policy in France." In Public Management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe, ed. Walter Kickert. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
28. Santos, Rita, and Richard Heeks. 2003. ICTs and Intra-Govemmental Structures at Local, Regional and Central Levels: Updating Conventional Ideas. Manchester, UK: IDPM, University of Manchester.
29. Swedish Association of Local Authorities (SALA) and Swedish Federation of County Councils and Regions. 2003. E-democracy in Practice. Swedish Experiences of a New Political Tool. Stockholm: Author.
30. Torres, Lourdes. 2004. "Trajectories in the Modernization of Public Administration in European Continental Countries." Australian Journal of Public Administration 63: 99-112.
31. Torres, Lourdes, and Vicente Pina. 2001. "Public-Private Partnership and Private Finance Initiative in European Union Local Governments and Spain." The European Accounting Review 10: 601-619.
32. United Kingdom National Audit Office. 2002. Government on the Web 11. House of Commons 2001-2002 Session, HC 764. London: Stationery Office.
33. United Nations (UN). (2004). UN Global E-Government Survey 2003. New York: United Nations Online Network in Public Administration and Finance (UNPAN).
34. United Nations/American Society for Public Administration (UN/ASPA). 2002. Benchmarking E-Government: A Global Perspective. New York: UN/ASPA.
35. Welch, Eric, and Wilson Wong. 1998. "Public Administration in a Global Context: Bridging the Gaps of Theory and Practice between Western and Non-Western Nations." Public Administration Review 58: 40-49.
36. West, Darrel. 2004. "E-government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes." Public Administration Review 64: 15-27.
37. Wong, Wilson, and Eric Welch. 2004. "Does E-Government Promote Accountability? A Comparative Analysis of Website Openness and Government Accountability." Governance 17: 275-297.